Syndicate news

By GustavoLeao / 08:52, 17 December 2005 / Enterprise

Share on Facebook
Beam story to friend
Syndicate news
The 602 Club forum

The latest issue of TV Zone Special magazine, out in the UK, features an exclusive interview with STAR TREK ENTERPRISE actor Anthony Montgomery (Ensign Travis Mayweather), in which he talks about the show, his favorite episodes and his future projects. Here are a few excerpts.

“I can understand what the concern was in our first two years about the show not being, perhaps, as action-packed as some of our viewers might have liked,” notes Montgomery. “The writers and producers then introduced the Xindi arc at the end of year two and we went that whole route for the entire third season which, I feel, raised the bar as far as storytelling. And that continued on from there.”

“Season four turned out to be so much fun for me and, I think, the rest of the cast as well. We got to take the series in so many different directions, and as far as Travis was concerned, I was able to explore some new facets of my character. With the various story arcs, be they two or three-parters, or even just an intense single story, we got back to telling true TREK adventures. So year four was definitely a winner for us, and that’s what most people told me would happen when I first began this job. They said the majority of TV shows start to hit their stride in season three and by year four they’re on solid ground and know where they’re going. That’s what happened with ENTERPRISE.”

About the show’s cancellation, he said “It was sad, but you know what, if we had to go out, at least we did so after one hell of a year. I feel bad for all those people who had and will continue to have such respect and admiration for the STAR TREK franchise. It’s something that has influenced and inspired not just one nation, but an entire planet. I don’t know of any other TV show that can boast such an accomplishment. We’ve become one big extended family, and there’s no reason why we have to let that go.”

“I feel truly blessed that Rick Berman and Brannon Braga, took a chance on me and allowed me to take part in the incredible journey that is STAR TREK,” says the actor.

Regarding now-infamous series finale, “These Are The Voyages”, Montgomery said “First off, I don’t want anyone to think I’m speaking negatively about our franchise or Rick Berman and Brannon Braga, who wrote the finale. However, I feel there could have been a more effective way to wrap things up for our show as well as the franchise as a whole. It just seemed to take a little bit away from what the ENTERPRISE cast and crew worked so diligently to achieve over the past four years, do you know what I mean?

“As for Travis, his presence in the finale was minimal, which was OK by me. I wasn’t at all concerned about my character’s lack of involvement because I’d had some really wonderful scenes written for me in other episodes throughout the season. Funnily enough, I was used more in the last season than in the three years prior.”

The full interview can be found at Montgomery official website.

More Top Stories Comments
Jul 22 Final Design of the New U.S.S Enterprise-F from Star Trek Online 1
Jul 21 IDW Announces Star Trek Legion of Super Heroes Crossover Comic Book Series 4
Jul 21 William Shatner Talks The Captains, Says He Still Interested to Appear in Star Trek XII
10
Jul 20 “Gene’s Journal” the ongoing webcomic which humorously chronicles the “untold stories” of the adolescent years of Star Trek creator Gene Roddenberry, is being turned into a new animated kid’s cartoon for television. 0
Jul 20 Manny Coto is still Touched by Fans’ Reaction to his Work on Enterprise 12
Story Archives…Browse:
ENTERPRISE Mission Schedule | Logs by Season: 1 2 3 4
Episode Number Title Airdate

Talkback
7 comments Post New | Help
View:
Oh really? | Report this post to moderator
By: dopefish (Odo’s file, contact) @ 10:58:04 on Dec 22, 2005

Anthony Montgomery Says “These Are The Voyages…” Not an Effective Finale

Should be..

Fans Say “Travis Mayweather” not an effective character…

Reply
Reply Quote
Quote
Action?!! | Report this post to moderator
By: nombrecomun (Odo’s file, contact) @ 09:43:30 on Dec 18, 2005

Quote:
“I can understand what the concern was in our first two years about the show not being, perhaps, as action-packed as some of our viewers might have liked,” notes Montgomery.

If that’s what they thought was wrong with the show then they really have no clue.

Reply
Reply Quote
Quote
…but it could have been a tiny little bit more effective…. | Report this post to moderator
By: PoisonBorz (Odo’s file, contact) @ 02:36:40 on Dec 18, 2005 | Edit History (1)

Sometimes it’s a bit creepy how ‘givemework’ actors can’t say what they want (or just lame shadowy references like “oooh, don’t want to hurt anyone, please, really-really, but it could have been a tiny little bit more effective”), while bigger names can freely slap Trek to the ground with their opinions… (rightly so, most of the time, btw)

Reply
Reply Quote
Quote
a? | Report this post to moderator
By: Defiant (Odo’s file, contact, web site) @ 14:41:52 on Dec 17, 2005

He probably said that it was not “AN” effective finale.

-Defiant

Reply
Reply Quote
Quote

Fixed. Thanks ! [NIM] | Report this post to moderator
By: GustavoLeao (Odo’s file, contact, web site) @ 15:42:19 on Dec 17, 2005

NIM

——–

TrekWeb.com Supervising Editor

[email protected]

Join me on Facebook

Reply
Reply Quote
Quote

Season 1-4 | Report this post to moderator
By: Hbasm (Odo’s file, contact) @ 10:52:42 on Dec 17, 2005 | Edit History (1)

Season one wasn’t bad and if memory serves me right, MOST PEOPLE thought of season one as good, or at least fair enough. Some objections were made to the Temporal Cold War, and I can think of a few other aspects. But action? Sounds like Montgomery is making assumptions here. Its too easy to think “there’s not enough action” when the ratings drop. That is the typical mindset of Hollywood. “It must be the action quotient” But don’t underestimate your audience’s intelligence. I admit that I sometimes have great trouble understanding my fellow Trekkers, but I refuse to believe we’re all a bunch of aggressive, mindless teenagers.

In season two, people began to see the problems with ENT more clearly. They pinpointed several things, such as the lack of an overal direction for the show. Other sci-fi shows had moved to serialised storytelling and Star Trek kept its bottle-show format.

Season three was a desperate attempt to stir life in the show, and worked to some success. But was it a good move? Only in part. Because the Xindi threat was, in my opinion, a childish plot and in the end, the show degraded to “action for the sake of action”.

With season fore, new and respected writers were hired. They tried to infuse the show with meaty dialogue. That worked on many levels. But the show had already locked itself to an action-oriented approch. Unfortunately the focus was still not the characters. And the feeling that “this is a prequel show” had taken quite a beating in season three. (The crew fighting off such powerful enemies with a primitive ship? come on!). Besides there was still little connection to earth although one could expect our planet to remain pretty much the center of attention. Well the audience was pretty much lost by then – the show just didn’t feel like a prequel.

That’s not to say, I didn’t like most of the episodes. I liked the occasional optimism and character oriented stuff. But I think the real reasons for ENT failure has nothing to do with the lack of explosions in season 1-2… Sorry, Montgomory.

TATV has been debated (and trashed) more than enough, I won’t even begin on that.

Reply
Reply Quote
Quote

RE: Season 1-4 | Report this post to moderator
By: PyBolar (Odo’s file, contact) @ 13:06:53 on Dec 19, 2005

Aruably, Season three was more “action packed” that the preceeding two, but it still was just more bad storytelling for the most part.

Reply
Reply Quote
Quote