menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

Orci and  Kurtzman on Next Generation Timeline and Future of Star Trek Franchise

Features

By GustavoLeao / 10:44, 28 June 2009 / Star Trek: Nemesis

WizardUniverse posted a new interview with Star Trek writers Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman and here are few excerpts.

This movie had a strong sense of excitement throughout the film that's been missing from "Star Trek" for a long time. How did you infuse that into the storyline?

ORCI: The tricky part regarding an origin story with characters you know and love is how are you going to have that kind of excitement if you already know what happens to them? When we came up with the idea of having Leonard Nimoy come back and have this story be something that changes history to such a degree that now the future is not written. That was the biggest thing we came up with that would allow us to have not only the freedom but also up the dramatic stakes to take the audience on a ride where you wouldn't know what was going to happen to them.

KURTZMAN: I think this movie was also inspired by the first half of the Richard Donner "Superman" movie. All of the adventure movies that we grew up with had such an enormous sense of epic adventure against the backdrop of very personal storytelling. All of them, "Star Wars," "Superman," "Star Trek"... any of those movies were always so big and anamorphic, and yet the stories were so relatable. It felt to us that it had been a very, very long time since we had seen a space epic that really did that. I think for us it was also a weird chance to reclaim our childhood.

ORCI: You actually care about the characters and that's why it's exciting.

Why did you choose to use the Romulans as the villains when they didn't work the last time out?

ORCI: [Laughs] When we came upon the idea of Leonard Nimoy, we wanted to pick up where he left off in "Star Trek," which was in the "Next Generation." In those stories, he was the ambassador to Romulus, so we wanted to keep continuity with what that was, that's why we brought them in.

KURTZMAN: And it's funny because some people have said, "Wow, you've broken continuity by having this encounter." That's not exactly true. Yes, we meet Romulans early, but we meet Romulans early because one of them comes back in time. It just changed everything right there.

What part did you play in the IDW comic prequel, Star Trek Countdown?

KURTZMAN: We produced it and generated the story. We came up with the idea of it being a countdown to the movie. And we got [Tim Jones and Mike Johnson] to work with us to write it and we all came up with the story together.

I really liked the idea that the Romulan ship was enhanced with Borg tech and I was hoping for some kind of reference to that in the movie.

ORCI: We did the "Countdown" comic after we finished the movie. So it was very difficult to do that.

When you originally came up with the story, what was your explanation for why the ship was so advanced?

ORCI: That it was from the future.

KURTZMAN: They had advanced their technology. And it's not only from the future but it's a very industrial ship designed for massive mining.

How does Kirk differ as a result of this new timeline?

KURTZMAN: Because of the events of the opening of the movie, there's a very fundamental difference. Kirk ends up growing up without a father and so he doesn't have that grounding. He's much more of a reckless wildcard and yet he has all of the same instincts of the Kirk that we know and love. We say that he is the same Kirk in soul it's just that the experiences in his life have shaped him...

ORCI: And the route to get him there. You know, one of the differences is that he gets to the academy later because he defers college. Yet ironically, he becomes Captain sooner.

Do you think this altered timeline precludes any other visits to the "Next Generation" era, given how the timeline has changed?

ORCI: I don't think so. If you saw the end of "Countdown," you know the Next Generation era is continuing on. Their universe is fully intact.

What direction would you like to see the franchise go in the future?

ORCI: We've said it before and we mean it, we want to see how fans react first. Because we are fans and fans have sort of been our consultants on our shoulders just by reading their reactions as we've been developing the movie. I'd love to see it become even more sci-fi than you can do when you're introducing something, because sci-fi can be distancing. I'd love to continue doing what we're doing.

KURTZMAN: I'd like to keep it emotional, if we're lucky enough to make more movies. One of the things that we were proud of is that everything came from an emotional big bang from the characters; which buys you the sci-fi.

ORCI: And we want to give that to all the characters. It's tricky. It's not just a single lead kind of thing; it's a family that you have to portray.

The full interview is here.



More Top StoriesComments
Nov 23J.J. Abrams and Chris Pine on Making Star Trek Cool Again, Nimoy and Trek XII0
Nov 23Chuck returns to NBC with a special two-hour show on Sunday, Jan 10, 2010, before returning to its regular time slot, Mondays at 8pm on the following night. It's return to prime time television can be attributed to a successful fan renewnal campaign last year. CHUCK is a one-hour, action-comedy series that follows Chuck Bartowski (Zachary Levi, "Less Than Perfect") -- a computer geek who is catapulted into a new career as the government's most vital secret agent. This upcoming season will include some special guest stars, including Brandon Routh of "Superman Returns" who will play CIA agent Daniel Shaw in an episode, and the addition of SUBWAY restaurant as a major advertiser to the show. Chuck averaged a 4.0/6 rating last season, about eight percent better than the recently cancelled "Trauma". Ratings-challenged Heroes moves back an hour when Chuck returns on Monday nights. STAR TREK VOYAGER's Robert Duncan McNeill serves Chuck as a supervising producer and director.0
Nov 235-Page Preview of Third Issue of Galactica 1980 Comic Book  0
Nov 22Quinto, Urban, Saldana, Cho and Greenwood on Their Hopes for Star Trek XII3
Nov 22Exclusive Digital Content Now Available With New Star Trek Movie on iTunes
1
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

50 comments Post New | Help
View:

RE: Ohhh, that ole' can of worms... | Report this post to moderator
By: c.p. (Odo's file, contact) @ 18:47:17 on Jun 28, 2009

Unless we're all now having this conversation in a "fake" existence which serves the ulterior motives of an alien race that zapped us with some beam.

"Put your shoes away."

Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Parent
Parent
Talkback Top
Top

RE: Ohhh, that ole' can of worms... | Report this post to moderator
By: Kamen Rider Blade (Odo's file, contact) @ 16:34:16 on Jun 28, 2009

That's the thing, though. It isn't necessarily that everyone (or possibly even anyone) is truly expecting them to deal with the original Star Trek timeline again. Hell, after the success of this latest film, I, for one, think they would be stupid to even try going back to the original timeline on tv or in the movies.


That said... Obviously, you don't agree, but when all of the people involved in the making of the film say that their intention was to create a seperate timeline from the one we've come to know over the last 40+ years, but which does not in any way destroy the original timeline, I am far more inclined to believe that over some fanboy on the internet, such as StillKirok, who insists that they "know" what the intention of the film was more so than those who made it.

--------

"Oh relax, Cupcake. It was a joke."- James T. Kirk

Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Parent
Parent
Talkback Top
Top
RE: Ohhh, that ole' can of worms... by cdydatzigs @ 17:56:56 on Jun 28
    RE: Ohhh, that ole' can of worms... by c.p. @ 19:33:03 on Jun 28
    RE: Ohhh, that ole' can of worms... by StillKirok @ 19:06:34 on Jun 28
       RE: Ohhh, that ole' can of worms... by Kamen Rider Blade @ 20:46:15 on Jun 28
          RE: Ohhh, that ole' can of worms... by Stilgar @ 05:33:40 on Jun 29
             RE: Ohhh, that ole' can of worms... by cdydatzigs @ 10:49:34 on Jun 29
                The argument all falls over in a heap with your assumption... by Stilgar @ 11:47:05 on Jun 29
                   RE: The argument all falls over in a heap with your assumption... by cdydatzigs @ 13:34:19 on Jun 29
          RE: Ohhh, that ole' can of worms... by cdydatzigs @ 00:36:03 on Jun 29
             RE: Ohhh, that ole' can of worms... by Kamen Rider Blade @ 08:46:45 on Jun 29

RE: Ohhh, that ole' can of worms... | Report this post to moderator
By: DixonHill (Odo's file, contact) @ 15:42:29 on Jun 28, 2009

This is STAR TREK! It's almost a given there will be direct exploration of this topic at some point. You know, it would be a great idea to have a "Trials and Tribble-ation" kinda episode or special for Trek's 50th anniversray in which the new crew explores the original timeline, wandering around that strangely different (original) NCC-1701 designed by George Kirk and Admiral Robeau...

You people are giving me a hard time. Why are so many of you unable to accept that there are two timelines now? Quoting old timetravel episodes (in which the original timeline was seemingly eradicated) just doesn't make sense because we've always seen these changes through the eye of the beholder (Picard, Guinan, Kirk) who REALIZED these changes. There is absolutely no proof whatsoever that there wasn't the original timeline left in "City on the Edge of Forever" even though McCoy had supposedly altered history. The quantum option never ceased to exist. That's why there will always be the our timeline and the mirror universe and infinite other versions of the universe! That's the very core of Star Trek and Vulcan belief! IDIC...

Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Parent
Parent
Talkback Top
Top
RE: Ohhh, that ole' can of worms... by cdydatzigs @ 16:14:11 on Jun 28
    RE: Ohhh, that ole' can of worms... by DixonHill @ 16:57:06 on Jun 28
       RE: Ohhh, that ole' can of worms... by cdydatzigs @ 17:49:40 on Jun 28
          RE: Ohhh, that ole' can of worms... by Ichthus @ 18:35:15 on Jun 28
             RE: Ohhh, that ole' can of worms... by c.p. @ 19:09:14 on Jun 28
                RE: Ohhh, that ole' can of worms... by cdydatzigs @ 19:22:13 on Jun 28
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.