Alex, In also consider the Shatnerverse books, Peter David's New Frontier, Star Trek Titan, the post-Nemesis novels such as Before Dishonor and David Mack's upcoming Star Trek Destiny trilogy of novels and so forth part of the official canon, or my personal canon, like I used to say. What I said is that Paramount dont consider the novels and comic books part of the canon, but this dont stop fans like you and me from enjoying those books, right ?
Gustavo
--------
TrekWeb.com Supervising Editor
gl2000@uol.com.br
Yesterday morning, August 26, HardCoreNerdity.com posted an exclusive audio interview with Simon Pegg, recorded at Toronto's Fan Expo. Pegg mentions that he approached the Scotty character "from scratch."
None of the Trek sites have scoped this interview yet, so here's a transcribed excerpt from the 30-minute MP3 podcast (which also has segments with BSG's Edward James Olmos and Aaron Douglas)...
HardCoreNerdity.com: Star Trek's always been about hope for the future, and there's been some talk that the reasons Star Trek had been on the slide for the last few years is that maybe it's a little too quaint. Maybe, in the post-9/11 world, we're a little too cynical that this kind of world could possibly exist in the future. What do you think about that?
Pegg: I dunno -- I think it's a shame if that's the case, because I think that's what marked it out when it first started. Gene Roddenberry created this vision of an integrated universe, it was way ahead of its time; it had the first interracial kiss, on television, was on Star Trek. The very notion of -- I love the fact that the engineer was Scottish, because Scotland has a history of incredibly innovative engineers. And he [Roddenberry] did paint this really clever future-verse. I think that to suggest that we can't still get there is just kind of giving up. So, I hope that's not the case.
Obviously, JJ's Star Trek is going to be, you know, it's going to have JJ's stamp on it. It'll be like -- it'll be contemporary, and gritty, but it'll be -- it's very much Star Trek. The bridge was the bridge, it was incredible, but somehow it didn't look like it was built in the '60s. The production design was so cleverly pitched, in that it was completely credible, but still very much like you'd expect. It's very clever. I don't know if I should have said that!
HardCoreNerdity.com: Franchises have been benefiting a lot from reboots lately -- Batman Begins, Casino Royale -- do you think Star Trek will have that kind of feel, and do you think it's gonna reinvigorate it?
Pegg: I hope so. I think it's very much in that vein. It's very much about getting back to what made it good in the first place. That's what both those films have done -- in Casino Royale and Batman Begins -- they stripped it back down to the beginning and what appealed at the very conception. What happens with things that exist for a long time is they become augmented, and gimmicky, and things change, and they kind of -- they're added to and added to -- to try and make them better -- and it ends up just toppling over, under the weight of its own sort of self-parody -- whereas this is really getting back to it.
I know there's some consternation within the fanbase, but they're gonna see new Star Trek with the original cast. I don't know what's not to be fucking excited about! I am, and I'm in it. And it's in the hands of a person who really cares about it. We had advisors on-set the whole time. If we needed to know what happened on a -- if there was an away mission, and only a certain amount of people went, then who carried the tricorder -- we got it all from the people that really know. And JJ was absolutely at pains to make sure that it's totally and utterly -- and there's a lot in it for the fan. There's a lot of little ironies in there that you'll pick up on if you know the series, and you know the mythology. It's going to be crackin'!
HcN #16: Simon Pegg Talks New Star Trek!

--------
Spaced: Complete Series - Uncut Cult Classic starring Simon Pegg
Quote:
The weird thing is that neither of them are remakes. I often see Star Trek being referred to as a remake, and it really isn't. It's another Star Trek film; it's another movie in the series. It's the continuing mission.
I can already sense some people choking on their Smarties as they read that -- but he's right. As I have said before, I do feel that this film can blend right into the canon of the existing TV shows and films. The history, characters, events, relationships will all be 100% canon. I believe the new film is only a VISUAL remake, reboot, etc. So I think Pegg is correct here.
--------
-- Steve
"If a sixth Star Trek television series is ever realized, it will be set in the new universe." -- cdydatzigs, June 15, 2009.
-
Quote:
Quote:"The weird thing is that neither of them are remakes. I often see Star Trek being referred to as a remake, and it really isn't. It's another Star Trek film; it's another movie in the series. It's the continuing mission."
I can already sense some people choking on their Smarties as they read that -- but he's right. As I have said before, I do feel that this film can blend right into the canon of the existing TV shows and films. The history, characters, events, relationships will all be 100% canon. I believe the new film is only a VISUAL remake, reboot, etc. So I think Pegg is correct here.
That's my thought, as well. The writers, cast, etc. keep talking about the degree to which they've made this work in terms of the history and overall structure of Trek, and also about how this isn't a remake, but instead the "origin story" that TOS never had. I have trouble reconciling that with spinning Trek into a whole separate Abrams-verse.
Obviously there are going to be some visual changes, but I agree in the thinking that it's more about how the Trek Universe is being portrayed than about changing what it is.
'Course, there's a whole lot we don't know, so new info may yet compel any of us to revise our theories. ;)
-
I disagree. I think it will be difficult to blend this movie with the original canon. I think this movie will create a "new universe", a new canon (which is perfectly okay with me - I love the Trek novels and they are not canon). Maybe we will get some sort of "alternate universe" explanation, I dunno. But I am very optimistic about this movie, original timeline or not.
Gustavo
--------
TrekWeb.com Supervising Editor
gl2000@uol.com.br
-
Quote:
I think it will be difficult to blend this movie with the original canon. I think this movie will create a "new universe", a new canon...
Do we know that? So far, the only things "off-canon" that we know of are all visual things.. the updated uniforms, the look of the ship and its interiors. As far as character backgrounds, storylines, relationships and history? All of it can still fit right in with existing canon because the early-TOS-era stories are untold, and the 24th century stuff in the new film all take place after Nemesis. No toes to step on.
I have said before.. I truly believe that the only thing this new film is replacing is the look of TOS. Once this run of films comes to an end, you can follow them with the existing Motion Picture seemlessly, taking place 18 months later and more realisticly in my mind.
--------
-- Steve
"If a sixth Star Trek television series is ever realized, it will be set in the new universe." -- cdydatzigs, June 15, 2009.
-
I love the Trek novels, too. :) 'Course, I also think that 99% of them are intended to take place in the same Trek Universe as the 5 series and 10 (hopefully 11!) films, and honestly, if that weren't the case, I'd probably be a lot less interested in them.
That the authors are working pretty hard these days to maintain continuity among the books, too, is icing on the cake. They may not be canon, but I consider print Trek as "valid" a part of the Trekverse as filmed Trek, even though I realize that many people don't.
Best,
Alex