menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

New Star Trek Movie Opening Scenes Timeframe - Spoilers

Features

By GustavoLeao / 12:46, 9 May 2008 / Star Trek: Nemesis

TrekMovie.com revealed a new plot detail for J.J. Abrams upcoming Star Trek movie. Beware of spoilers.

According to TrekMovie, the new Star Trek movie opens in the post-Nemesis timeframe. This is where we initially find the elder Ambassador Spock (played by Leonard Nimoy). Then the film takes us from the end of the The Next Generation 24th Century era and brings us back to before the TOS era, showing the origins of Kirk and Spock and the crew of the NCC-1701.

The original report can be found at TrekMovie.com



More Top StoriesComments
Nov 21Faran Tahir on His 10 Minutes as Captain Robau in J.J. Abrams Star Trek Movie1
Nov 21J.J. Abrams, Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman on Shatner and Nimoy6
Nov 21Roberto Orci on the Status of the Star Trek XII Script and the Possibility of Producing a New Star Trek TV Series14
Nov 205-Page Preview of Final Issue of Nero Comic Book Mini Series 4
Nov 20J.J. Abrams Says the Success of the DVD May Bring More People to Star Trek XII1
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

56 comments Post New | Help
View:

RE: What Shatner Wanted | Report this post to moderator
By: The Real Dr McCoy (Odo's file, contact) @ 13:42:21 on May 11, 2008 | Edit History (2)

While I'm flattered that you felt that a response to my reply deserved its own top-level thread, you might want to consider what the usage policies here say about that sort of thing.

"Yet that's exactly what ST:XI was to be, since Team Abrams desperately wanted to put Shatner in their script. Abrams deemed this an appropriate goal, despite GEN."

No, wanting to include Shatner in the script if possible without making significant sacrifices to the storyline isn't the same thing. I've no problem with an attempt to find a way to include Shatner, nor do I think that doing so inherently would make the movie "a vehicle for catering to the whims of a relative handful of actor obsessed fanatics". I just don't think that effort should supersede the other overall goals of the movie. I don't think that anything that Orci or Abrams' crew have said evidenced nefarious motives, deceit, or putting their vision of the movie aside for the sake of casting for a single role. Most of those accusations stem from anger over a decision made movies ago, not from reasonable or well-supported arguments. They almost always boil down to the "Well, this is sci-fi and time travel. They said they wanted to, and if they didn't do it then they must have been lying" non-sequitur.

Abrams' and Co's comments have evidenced a desire not to sacrifice their larger goals for the sake of a single casting decision, something that efforts to try to accommodate the latter do not contradict. The kind of binary thinking that doesn't recognize the distinction is exactly the same type of nonsense that's behind the "Well, they said they wanted to do include Shatner, and now that they're not, so THEY MUST HAVE LIED!!!" bullshit. Frankly, that kind of infantile illogic is the kind of thing that negatively stigmatizes Trek fans, and I would hope that most are capable of better.

-The Doctor


--------




"That green-blooded Son of a Bitch... It's his revenge for all those arguments he lost to me!"
- Bones

Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Parent
Parent
Talkback Top
Top
RE: What Shatner Wanted by TRexx @ 15:05:18 on May 11
    RE: What Shatner Wanted by The Real Dr McCoy @ 15:25:15 on May 11
       RE: What Shatner Wanted by TRexx @ 15:54:45 on May 11
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.