menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

Leonard Nimoy and Zachary Quinto on the Resurrection of Star Trek, William Shatner, New Bridge Set and Tom Cruise

Features

By GustavoLeao / 11:07, 16 April 2008 / Star Trek: Nemesis

The Bosh posted the transcript of an exclusive interview with Star Trek movie stars Leonard Nimoy and Zachary Quinto (originally posted on E! Online). Here are few excerpts from the interview.

Is Tom Cruise in the movie?

(Nimoy/Quinto turn and exchange very guilty looks)

Quinto: "Not that I know of."

Nimoy: "What's your next question?"

Interesting, have you had a chance to meet him?

Nimoy: "Yeah, he came and visited one day... he made "Mission Impossible 3" with JJ Abrams was this director of this movie and directed him in Mission 3, and he visited one day, and we chatted about that movie and about that fact that we met before, Tom Cruise and I. We talked about his interest in "Star Trek." I worked on "Mission" for two seasons back in the late ‘60's and so we talked about that a little bit. It was a very fun kind of conversation light hearted, easy about careers about movies. We had a good time."

Isn't it weird having Tom Cruise on the set just hanging out?

Quinto: "I didn't know he was there for our day. He came a few times actually to see JJ. He was there one day when we were shooting a fight scene sequence so we were all gathered around the monitor to see if the punches were landing, and I was looking at the monitor and I looked up and to where JJ was standing and I was like, (whispered) ‘It's Tom Cruise.' (laughter) It was totally out of blue. He was so cool and really supportive. It was nice to have him around."

Will the old school fans love this movie?

Nimoy: "I was thinking about this question about where "Star Trek" is now on the way over here, and I remembered that 10 years ago in 1998 their was a "Star Trek" movie called ","Insurrection and it occurred to me that this movie is the resurrection of "Star Trek." I mean that very sincerely. I think that "Star Trek" has kind of drifted along and maybe meandered and lost its way some what over the last few years, and I think this picture is going to put it back on track. I think it's going to revive interest in the entire franchise, the "Star Trek" story, the "Star Trek" idea, and I think above all its going to be a very exciting movie. There is a great pull of talent coming together to make this film. JJ Abrams is a very, very talented and creative director, great writers, exciting script and on a gigantic scale. I've been in the business 58 years, and I have never worked on a film of this size. And the great talent I see in Abrams is he's able to see that very, very large vision and shoot it very, very well, but at the same time is able to deal very intimately with the moments between the people in the film.

Quinto: "The first thing JJ ever said when I sat down with him to talk about playing the role was, ‘We're making a movie for people who have loved "Star Trek" for forty years, and we're making a movie for people who have never seen it before in their lives."

Well, that's my question because I think the old school people will go because they're going to give it a chance regardless, but how do you bring new people who aren't necessarily Sci-Fi fans?

Quinto: "Well I think you utilize the many talents of the people who are working on the film to infuse it with a different energy and rhythm so it's going to be unexpected, so I think that young people who might have only preconceived notions of what "Star Trek" was or what "Star Trek" is are going to be sort of, blastingly surprised."

Tough question, Should William Shatner be in this film?

Nimoy: "I don't understand the question. What do you mean by should? I'm really curious, what do you meant by that?"

Well, I've had the chance to interview him a couple times, and I know he would like to be... And I think he would be at the end of the day but...

Nimoy: "Ok. I'd like to talk about that. Bill Shatner's character, Captain Kirk, as we all know died several movies back. And it was a great loss, a great character and a wonderful actor were lost to "Star Trek." I have not been privy to the discussions with the writers and producers and JJ about what efforts they made to try to introduce him into this movie. The fact is they couldn't and didn't. It's a loss. There's no question about it. I think it would've been wonderful if he could've been in the movie, but at the same time I understand why he's not. And I think Bill has come to an understanding about that, I was with him a couple weeks ago. And my sense is he now understands that his time has passed. I think after this film my film has passed. I was very lucky. When Spock died at the end of "Star Trek II," there was a hint even in that film that Spock wasn't really gone. In fact, the next film was about the resurrection of Spock. But that didn't happen with the Kirk character. I think it was a waste, frankly. I thought the character should not have died, should certainly not have died that way in that movie. I said to Bill, if I had been there you wouldn't have died. But I wasn't in that film. And that's where we are today. We have a film without Bill Shatner, and it's a loss. But we have to move on, and I think its going to be a great film. There's a great new Captain Kirk. Christopher Pine is going to be a great Captain Kirk, along with Zach and the rest of the cast. I think there's going to be a very exciting new kind of "Star Trek" for the audience to see."

Can you give me a little insight? I was watching some old "Trek" today and one of the questions that popped into my mind was the bridge of the Enterprise. Obviously it looks really old school in the original episodes. Is it going to have that old school feel to it?

Quinto: "You're going to recognize it, but it's on a whole new level. Scott Chambliss is our production designer and every time we walked onto the set, we had to stand there for five minutes before we could even speak. I mean, really, they are so incredible and dynamic."

So is it futuristic looking?

Quinto: "It's got a look all of its own. Like this movie, it's an infusion of what came before."

But the bridge, I'm trying to get a sense of it, flat screens and LCD's or like buttons that still fall off the chair like they did back in the day?

Quinto: "Things fell off every now and again when we were in there for three weeks every day for 18 hours, but you know, they were glued on appropriately."

The full interview is here.



More Top StoriesComments
Nov 24Cover and Info for Star Trek Movie Adaptation Comic Book1
Nov 24Scott Bakula on Why He Played the Role of Captain Archer in Enterprise4
Nov 24Leonard Nimoy Talks About Star Trek XII and (Not) Watching New Movie with Shatner0
Nov 23J.J. Abrams and Chris Pine Talk How Gratifying That Star Trek was Well Received, Working with Leonard Nimoy and Star Trek XII2
Nov 23Chuck returns to NBC with a special two-hour show on Sunday, Jan 10, 2010, before returning to its regular time slot, Mondays at 8pm on the following night. It's return to prime time television can be attributed to a successful fan renewnal campaign last year. CHUCK is a one-hour, action-comedy series that follows Chuck Bartowski (Zachary Levi, "Less Than Perfect") -- a computer geek who is catapulted into a new career as the government's most vital secret agent. This upcoming season will include some special guest stars, including Brandon Routh of "Superman Returns" who will play CIA agent Daniel Shaw in an episode, and the addition of SUBWAY restaurant as a major advertiser to the show. Chuck averaged a 4.0/6 rating last season, about eight percent better than the recently cancelled "Trauma". Ratings-challenged Heroes moves back an hour when Chuck returns on Monday nights. STAR TREK VOYAGER's Robert Duncan McNeill serves Chuck as a supervising producer and director.0
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

19 comments Post New | Help
View:

RE: I agree. | Report this post to moderator
By: c.p. (Odo's file, contact) @ 13:27:16 on Apr 16, 2008

I agree but would put a slightly different spin on it. As I and others have said before, there actually are many logical loopholes in sci-fi, esp. one with holograms, alternate timelines and flashbacks, to include Shatner in any Star Trek film as long as he's alive (and maybe even if he's not!) BUT...I've always been skeptical that it could be done in any way that wouldn't be completely distracting. Unless your film is about getting Kirk brought back, as ST:III was for Spock, there's no credible, non-distracting way to include him that I can think of. Imagine if he were alive in some alternate timeline. We see him and talk to him and then...move on with the rest of the movie? Everyone would be like, "Wait! What was that? That's it?" Too distracting. It would be distracting as bookends as well. Even if the story line logically and non-absurdly permitted it, seeing Shatner resurrected wouldn't end the movie on the proper note. It would seem like we were going back again instead of going forward, i.e. with the new crew, new adventures, etc.

I just think it doesn't really work to say he died and that's why he can't be in it. Star Trek has a bit of a reputation for bringing beloved characters back from the dead after all! :)

Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Parent
Parent
Talkback Top
Top
RE: I agree. by TRexx @ 23:21:34 on Apr 16

RE: I agree. | Report this post to moderator
By: rassmguy (Odo's file, contact) @ 15:03:50 on Apr 16, 2008

Prepare for a dozen posts by trolling Shatner fans who are more concerned with slamming Abrams and the new film at any opportunity they can than with actually having a discussion based on the reality of the situation, which is that Kirk is dead and shoehorning him into the film just for the sake of a making a vocal minority happy would damage the film.


--------

Rich Handley
Author, Timeline of the Planet of the Apes: The Definitive Chronology
Available now from Hasslein Books
www.hassleinbooks.com


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Parent
Parent
Talkback Top
Top

Y ou know you hate Shatner don't pretend. | Report this post to moderator
By: Xena and Gabrielle are lovers forever! (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 15:00:07 on Apr 16, 2008

We have all seen your posts and rants against the return of Shatner in any form to Trek and the repeated use of the "Kirk Death photo" by you over AND over again.

Much to your sickening glee.

:¬(

--------

"Then the memories flashed in her mind and heart of the woman she loved...a reminescent fantasy lingered, bringing a glimmer to her eye; and spark of happiness, a mad descant key filled the background with her soulful longing as she became aware of the stars and home."

Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Parent
Parent
Talkback Top
Top

RE: I agree. | Report this post to moderator
By: StillKirok (Odo's file, contact) @ 13:34:05 on Apr 16, 2008

And no one but a Shatner basher would buy into that stupid argument.

This is the FIRST movie with Kirk since Generations.

There ARE elements in the Generations plot that can give hope for Kirk.

This whole movie is about Spock saving Kirk's life.

Shatner wanted to be in the movie, Abrams gave a false hope (a lie for those who don't get it) that Shatner would be in the film, and Abrams dropped the ball.

And Nimoy is on record as saying the movie would have been better with Shatner in it.

No amount of party line toting by Nimoy will change that.

There is absolutely no excuse for Shatner to be sitting this one out. Abrams blew it, and the only people "moving on" are those that didn't want Shatner in the movie in the first place.

To hell with this movie.

Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Parent
Parent
Talkback Top
Top
RE: by rassmguy @ 15:41:45 on Apr 16
    RE: by Xena and Gabrielle are lovers forever! @ 16:15:58 on Apr 16
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.