menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

TOS Remastered Producer Dave Rossi on Recasting Kirk for Star Trek XI

Features

By GustavoLeao / 13:38, 30 April 2007 / Star Trek: Nemesis

Here are excerpts from TOS Remastered producer Dave Rossi column from the latest issue of Star Trek Magazine, in which he gave some thoughts on some the hassles that producer/director J.J. Abrams will no doubt have when it comes to recasting the role of Captain Kirk in the upcoming Star Trek XI movie.

"Star Trek fans want to like Star Trek." wrote Rossi "If the stories are good, if the characters are compelling, if there's balanced doses of action, humour, and drama, people will watch. Not surprising then that Paramount chose to go with Star Trek The Original Series and moreover Mr. Abrams. It's not quite that simple though. While there are a lot of factors to consider in an undertaking like this, one of the biggest is casting."


"The Shat Factor ranks pretty high. You're recasting a role that has become synonymous with William Shatner. His mannerisms, his inflections, tone; all these things make up what we know as Captain Kirk. I think it's deadly to cast someone with the instructions to ‘play Shatner playing Kirk'. Can't be done. No sir. That begs the question: Can the millions of ST: TOS fans wrap their heads around, not just a new Kirk, but a new everybody? I'll admit that if I like this movie, I'll feel a little dirty for doing so knowing that someone else is playing Kirk. But I want to like this movie."

"Having worked on this Remastered project, I know that the die-hard fans will ultimately pick this new movie apart regardless. It 's the nature of the beast. And while the nit-pickers do what they do best, I hope the rest of us will look at this with fresh eyes and a nod towards what Roddenberry was going for: not that Shatner was Kirk and Nimoy was Spock, but a story about heroes thrust into extraordinary adventures, armed only with their humanity (okay, and phasers too) as a guide."


More from Rossi can be found at Sci Fi Pulse.

To read the full article, get the new issue of Star Trek Magazine at your local newsstand.



More Top StoriesComments
Nov 24Cover and Info for Star Trek Movie Adaptation Comic Book2
Nov 24Scott Bakula on Why He Played the Role of Captain Archer in Enterprise6
Nov 24Leonard Nimoy Talks About Star Trek XII and (Not) Watching New Movie with Shatner0
Nov 23J.J. Abrams and Chris Pine Talk How Gratifying That Star Trek was Well Received, Working with Leonard Nimoy and Star Trek XII4
Nov 23Chuck returns to NBC with a special two-hour show on Sunday, Jan 10, 2010, before returning to its regular time slot, Mondays at 8pm on the following night. It's return to prime time television can be attributed to a successful fan renewnal campaign last year. CHUCK is a one-hour, action-comedy series that follows Chuck Bartowski (Zachary Levi, "Less Than Perfect") -- a computer geek who is catapulted into a new career as the government's most vital secret agent. This upcoming season will include some special guest stars, including Brandon Routh of "Superman Returns" who will play CIA agent Daniel Shaw in an episode, and the addition of SUBWAY restaurant as a major advertiser to the show. Chuck averaged a 4.0/6 rating last season, about eight percent better than the recently cancelled "Trauma". Ratings-challenged Heroes moves back an hour when Chuck returns on Monday nights. STAR TREK VOYAGER's Robert Duncan McNeill serves Chuck as a supervising producer and director.0
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

32 comments Post New | Help
View:

RE: Recasting will never work | Report this post to moderator
By: Writer4GoodTrek (Odo's file, contact) @ 14:53:52 on May 02, 2007

"So by that line of reasoning, James Bond, Dracula, King Kong, Danny Ocean, The Seven Samurai, Superman, Batman, and Willy Wonka should have never been recast?"

Well, the difference is that these franchises were not Star Trek. They were not and are not a single fabric and continuity that has been built and crafted over 40+ years. These recasts were all reboots. "Casino Royal" with Daniel Craig was a reboot of James Bond that threw out the previous Bond films from continuity with it (just had been done in Bond with every new actor taking on the role of James Bond). Peter Jackson's "King Kong" was not a sequel to the 1933 version or the 1976 version; it was a remake. "Batman" (1989) was not picking up within the continuity established by the 1960's TV show with Adam West and Burt Ward (nor did "Batman Begins" for that matter); it was a reimagining as the 60's show was not bound by the comic book.

Star Trek is different. It is large canvas that crosses many mediums: TV, movies, books, comics, etc. all united within a single continuity. Granted, with the super-saturation of Trek in the last 15 years or so, that continuity has often not always been completely consistent - but it is all one thing. Comparing Trek to Bond or superhero franchises is like comparing apples and door knobs. It is so different it is absurd.

You might say, well Abrams is talking about rebooting or reimagining Trek anyway. This is true. And it is wrong. To reboot Trek would only illustrate further how this project has no artistic integrity.

If they want to do a "Star Trek" film then there are perimeters that are imposed by 43 years of productions within this continuity and what is practical to produce. As much as I'd love to see a movie with for example Scotty, McCoy, or Sarek again, nothing short of an act of God is going to make that possible (James Doohan, De Kelley, and Mark Lenard are all dead).

If they want Kirk and Spock, then they will have to get Shatner and Nimoy - and since both men are in the late 70's that pretty well confines the story to exist in a time period were Kirk is in his late 70's and Spock is in his late 150's. And since Kirk was last seen on scene dying in his early 60's, that would mean a bit of exposition would have to be done that would explain briefly how Kirk was resurrected and subsequently built a new life over the course of the years since (as outlined in eight "Trek" books that Shatner has written since 1994). Now, that in mind, unless Paramount is willing to start there and do a Trek movie that has a story that is bigger in scope to the Preservers and the Totality , the idea of having Kirk and Spock in a new movie seems completely impractical.

As I said, recasting within the continuity would be ridiculous. And rebooting would totally undermine the last 40+ years to the point of insult.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Parent
Parent
Talkback Top
Top
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.