Who is guessing that the Okuda's changed the James R Kirk in the Gary Mitchell pilot to James T Kirk? Anyone, anyone?
I can't believe the range of comments on this board regarding the remastered Star Trek. They run the gamut from, "I hate it, they shouldn't have messed with it," to, "Freakin' awesome! This is gonna rock!"
Reality, as someone once said, is probably somewhere in the middle. As a CGI artist, video editor, photographer and producer myself, I have often wondered why the money wasn't spent on upgrading the SFX for Trek. Now that I see the final product, I can honestly say that it makes the original look better.
I don't think the ship has to be ultra-detailed or do barrel rolls or look all greeble-fied...it looks just fine the way it is, with the *subtle* weathering (note to Ed Miarecki - this is the way it should be done). I'm building a CGI Enterprise myself in Cinema 4D, and I'm having to work hard to balance the "realism" with the "fantasy." Also, kudos to Mike and Denise Okuda for even going so far as to include the original film grain on the new efx.
Folks, if you're a fan of Trek (not just the visuals, but the stories and the characters), then you'll appreciate this new effort. It won't please everyone, but if it pleases most, it'll be a good indicator of how well JJ Abrams' movie will do...and whether there's a market out there for new Trek on TV. Don't trash the effort just because you think it's sacred, or that the French horns in the theme aren't exactly the same, or the ship doesn't have rivets or whatever. Enjoy it for what it is - Star Trek.
--------
A generation which ignores history has no past and no future. -- Robert Heinlein
PCLinuxOS
falcon
-
Mr. Falcon, I agree with everything you posted. I applaud the effort that CBS is taking with Trek. There is just one thing that I take issue with and it's really nobody's fault. In Boston where I live, the show is being syndicated at 2:05 AM Monday morning. This is, to be frank, bullshit, because how could a Trek market be measured with that kind of absurd time slot? Again, nobody's fault but the local buyer, but sheesh!
-
Quote:
In Boston where I live, the show is being syndicated at 2:05 AM Monday morning.
Well, in Dallas it comes on at 3am Sunday. But that's what VCRs are for. :-)
Actually, the original series replaces Enterprise in syndication. It's the same syndication package, but with a different show.
--------
A generation which ignores history has no past and no future. -- Robert Heinlein
PCLinuxOS
falcon
Is Here in Windows Media
--------
As excited as I am about TOS being remastered, I have to say I was disappointed by the Romulan Bird of Prey in the trailer. The view from astern revealed that the VFX artists have *not* added impulse engines or closed up those gaping warp nacelles. I mean, I wasn't expecting all-new storyboarded starship maneuvers, but sheesh, why not *detail* the CGI ship like it's supposed to be? Hope they don't make that same omission with the Klingon battle cruiser.
--------
LORD EDZO
Imperious Leader - Paramount Ruler - Master and Commander
-
I agree. Why not take the detailing to the next level. I think the folks re-doing the FX are so afraid they are going to tickoff the purist, they are not gonna to do too much. The guy in the trailer says something to the effect of our "mouths watering" or such, but if they are just going to clean up the effects and not put in the "wow" factor...why do them? I hate to say it, if CBS is goin' to be the same as Paramount has in the past, all they are goin' to do is put this together as fast as they can just so they can make another buck off Trek.
--------
"It's peanutbutter jelly time...peanutbutter jelly time..."
I admit I've never been able to watch the entire TOS -- in fact I've ever only watched a few complete episodes as a child, in the 1980s -- which goes a long way to explain why I've never called myself a "Trek fan". But now having seen this trailer I think I will be able to enjoy the story without being distracted by the odd special effects. I've no idea if this will end up on Taiwanese cable, but I'll get the DVDs if I have to.
-
Dude, it's never been about the FX. Trek has always been the story and the characters...which, ironically, why are they makin' these changes in the first place.
--------
"It's peanutbutter jelly time...peanutbutter jelly time..."
Dammit, Jim, I'm FIFTY. I remember watching the original Trek around our black and white TV in 1966, pre internet, pre computers, pre color TV, pre-just about everything. I was ten then (do the math) and my mother made me go to bed early and then got me up to watch the show because I *had* to get my sleep. Heck, who could sleep when STAR TREK was gonna be on?
I'm feeling that way again! It's wonderful. I have my DirecTivo set to record "Balance of Terror" next Monday morning at 12:05 am on KNBC4 in LA.
But I have no one to share my enthusiasm with! Everyone my age would think I'm a nut. :=(
At least I have you fine folks here. You know what it's like to hear that old theme in new stereo in your headphones and have chills go up and down your spine. You know what it's like to go "OH YEAH!" when you see the new Enterprise sailing majestically over a photorealistic Earth! You get it when Kirk kicks ass, gets the girl and saves the ship again.
This is gonna be good, all over again!
--------
-
"...and the good news is that they are not prosecuting!" Bones McCoy in ST6 "The Undiscovered Country" in his parting quip from his last Star Trek December 1992.
This newly enhanced Trek is going to be great! This is going to be incredible, and while an old hag myself, I look forward to it...most eagerly!
And hey Sailor?, if your ever feeling lonely, or ever feelin blue?..just come on up and see me sometime, I'm a "catch of the day".. some might say.
[
]
.. although some men say my best years are behind me, i'm not sure how to take that, please help with any beuity tips.
____________________
--------
"Then the memories flashed in her mind and heart of the woman she loved...a reminescent fantasy lingered, bringing a glimmer to her eye; and spark of happiness, a mad descant key filled the background with her soulful longing as she became aware of the stars and home."
Here are the links to wmv and qt source files on startrek.com.
Quicktime
Windows Media
Does anyone else think that this would be vastly improved with the Orchestra behind the scenes piece taken out (or at least a lot shorter). It seems to break the rest of the tempo, given the upbeat soundtrack to the rest of the clip.
Also- "The Ship Hits The Fans" -- Puh-leeze! Can we get like a group of 10 non-basemented fans to review these for Paramount to avoid a craptastic lines like that one?
--------
-
The side-by-side comparisons did nothing but convince me there was no need to redo the SFX. If the shots of Kirk and Spock looked that good cleaned up, so would the Miri planet, etc.
And I am utterly offended at the gall of rerecording the music! WHY? I've worked with people who do digital remastering and they could have easily upgraded the original tracks. Oh, and does no one remember that the first season didn't even have that bloody opera singer? Or is this another bit of history that is going to be forgotten by a generation of children (of all ages) who are just being attracted like lemmings to a nice shiny new today, throwing out the old.
As a novelty, fine. But as a replacement this is wholly unnecessary. If people think the original TOS sucked so badly then they should just burn the tapes once HDTV becomes the standard.
Al
That shot of the ship firing photon torpeados seems to actually be the one of it firing "phasers" from Balence of Terror, since we know that's the episode that's coming up.
Does this mean Trek Remastered will retain all of the original version's inconsistencies in regards to the appearence of the ship's weapons? I had figured with Mike Okuda on board they would have fixed that.
-
Quote from G'Kar:
That shot of the ship firing photon torpeados seems to actually be the one of it firing "phasers" from Balence of Terror, since we know that's the episode that's coming up.
Does this mean Trek Remastered will retain all of the original version's inconsistencies in regards to the appearence of the ship's weapons? I had figured with Mike Okuda on board they would have fixed that.
Michael Okuda spoke of changing that specific SFX...
"You know, this is the first thing that we wanted to do when we started working on this episode. But then we started studying the episode more closely and discovered a number of things. First, Kirk orders "proximity phasers" to be used. This is the only time in the entire series where he does so. Second, the phasers behave differently than normal. They fire into space, then explode like depth charges. This is clearly the intention of the writer and director [Paul Schneider and Vincent McEveety respectively], since the episode is based on submarine movie metaphors.
"Finally, the sound effects clearly dictate the timing of the weapon firing, and we very early decided that we did not want to mess with the soundtrack. As a result, we thought the best approach was to use a different phaser effect than is seen in the rest of the series. The new proximity phasers will have longer bolts than they did in the original 'Balance of Terror,' but they will still be tied to the original sound effects."
--------------
Chobits Talking Sumomo Action Figure
-
Interesting!
So I presume when they're faced with the same recycled shot in "Errend of Mercy" and other episodes, we'll get a slightly different effect for the photon torps.
The issue of not tampering with the soundtrack raises questions of its own: the fact that the original series stopped using sound for most of it's spaceship flybys during latter seasons. On the other hand, the fact that the weapons in "Balence of Terror" were originally silent, seems to suggest Okuda and co are willing to make changes to some degree.
Where was Okuda quoted saying that? Is there a site somewhere that has more in-depth info/comminication regarding the project? Trekmovie.com is the best source I've found so far...
-
Quote from G'Kar:
Is there a site somewhere that has more in-depth info/comminication regarding the project? Trekmovie.com is the best source I've found so far...
That site is today posturing as though an unnamed insider was tapped to confirm that Rick Berman isn't associated with J.J. Abrams' movie. Fact is, Paramount posted that information on its website back in April -- along with stating that Abrams' film is a confirmed project, something that has also been affirmed publicly via Leonard Nimoy.
For reading material on the remastered TOS: IESB has a formidable transcript of the conference Q&A with Mike Okuda, Dave Rossi, and John Nogawski.
Ultimately, the most solid source is CBS-Paramount's official site, StarTrek.com, which is where you'll find Okuda's phaser comment in a recent Q&A.
--------------
"My Other Car is a BATTLESTAR" (License Frame)
I've looked at the comparisons at VRRRM.com - is it just me, or do the old effects always look something in between better or the same? I miss the bright, NASA-like surface of the Enterprise and some surface definition, as well as some colored stars in the background. The model shots look more alive to me. However, it's clear the old ones wouldn't have looked too good in HD.
I'm reserving final judgment, of course.
Sweet god I had chills running down my back - god knows if or when this'll make it to Australia but i can't wait!!!
--------
Quit your day job
There are several screen-capture comparisons posted at VRRRM.com.
The remastered images are from the downloaded CBS trailer (and thus less than ideal for an example), and the original images are from the TOS DVD. Frames were chosen to show approximately the same scene.
Remastered...

Original (from "Miri")...

More examples at VRRRM.
--------------
EXCLUSIVE Star Trek "Mirror, Mirror" Action Figure Set
From 2:30 onward, that part really got me pumped about Star Trek like I haven't been in a long time. I think its the music they used, anyone know if thats original or from something?
16th cant come soon enough.
I just had a trekgasm.
I can't wait for Saturday night. This really is a fantastic gift back to the fans, and makes up for a lot of short shrift over the past several years.
Now I don't want to get off on a rant here, so I'll be very brief. But one thing hit me watching this trailer. It was DYNAMIC. Now, I'm sure that much of it had to do with the music bed and the editing and just my overall excitement of watching my childhood heroes charging across the screen again, young and at the peak of their game. But as the last montage flashed by (before the execrable 'ship hits the fans' line) I couldn't help but reflect on how much panache and joie de vivre TOS demonstrates in just these couple of minutes...more, even, than most of TNG and DS9, and a ridiculous amount more than VOY and ENT.
I've seen all these episodes countless times. But I am eager to watch them again, not just to see how spiffy they are now that they've been cleaned up, with sparkling new visuals and sound...but because they're FUN. Enterprise? Voyager? Not fun. Not at all. Like someone sucking the air out of a room. But Star Trek...no bloody subtitled version...I can't wait to see young Mark Lenard standing on the bridge of his warbird...for Sulu to go swashbuckling down the hall, the madman Decker facing down the Planetkiller, Scotty fighting with Klingons, Scotty DRINKING with Klingons...and my beloved Dr. McCoy sputtering next to Kirk's chair after another droll barb from Spock. It's a fabulous return to adventure, something that's been missing from the franchise for at least 15 years.
-
VERY nice work!!!! Can't wait to see it! Phillips DVD recorder at the ready...;-)
Looks like the naysayers were...WRONG!!! LOL!!!!
Way to go, CBS!!! If the entire episodes look as good as the trailers and still, then this is going to be excellent.
IM
-
I second your sentiments. To this day, I have to say, you can still watch TOS and have fun. That is the winning formula- human relationships and a sense of humor. Sure the characters were flawed- but what fun is there in their dull , lifeless, perfect successors?
All the glitz, the technology in the subsequent regurgitated crap really never matched that aspect. Although DS9 came close. Picard was so serious and boring that even an omnipotent being tells him to loosen up with his own crew. Janeway was an unpredictable factor- sometimes you could easily watch her and other times you just cringed.
I think DS9 came close to capturing some of the warmth and plain old fun of Trek. Unforunately, it was a bit too complex for the huge TNG following that wanted simple mind candy where the Federation and their Captains were always right. The Necrotic Generation truly lacked life- and it showed most clearly in their big time movie flops.
Looking forward to reliving the real Trek - warts and all it still blew the doors of all attempts at copying. Those who are not aware of the original will be shocked at how much material The Necrotic Generation just stole from the original.
--------
psp1
It's just a matter of time before they announce Shatner and Nimoy will be in ST XI.
Not bad. Not bad.
I notice that, in this trailer, Kirk says "Its mission" rather than "Its 5-year mission."
CBS Studios say they've fixed old technical problems in the opening montage.
"We didn't change anything, although we did update everything," David Rossi says. "All the star patterns that were in the original opening are exactly duplicated in the new opening. We smoothed out the motion of the Enterprise. It flies more dynamically now. It occupies real space. It doesn't look like a model anymore. So that's kind of the angle we took on it."
"The process that Dave just described is one particular shot where the Enterprise's flight path takes a couple of strange bumps to the left and to the right," adds Michael Okuda. "And there were artifacts of the visual-effects processes back then. And now CBS Digital is able to go in and essentially have an infinitely long track, so the perspective of the ship now is proper. It, as Dave says, occupies real space. It's a subtle change, but it just gives the ship more presence as it flies by you.
"Back in '64, when they shot the original opening elements, [or] '66, there was a physical limit to how far ... back you can get the camera [from the model]. So the perspective changes were limited by the physical length of the dolly track in the studio. What CBS Digital can do is, ... with the digital rendering, you can have your virtual camera infinitely far away and have the ship travel to inches from your nose. And by doing that, the perspective is ... proper. It's just as if the ship is really flying by you."
--------------
EXCLUSIVE Star Trek "Mirror, Mirror" Action Figure Set
There was something odd yet wonderful about the voiceover saying "Star Trek" without anything else following it...
Since they remastered these in High Def, is it up to the local affiliates that are broadcasting the show to show them in high def or will they be on a Hi Def cable channel as well?
WOW! That got me excited (with the exception of "the Ship hits the fan - overused and annoying).
--------
"Yes, madam, I am drunk. But in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly.
-- Winston Churchill
(Picture Main Street Salt Lake City UT, Circa 1900)
-
The true sign of a man is his ability to admit when he was wrong.
I was wrong.
Seeing these promotional materials and actual footage from the new HD episodes, I was sooo wrong.
This is an entirely faithful remastering of the classic.
Can't wait for next weekend now!
Telly
PS - That music that played over the barrage of newly remastered clips near the end, in case anyone is wondering, is called "The Final Battle" by Robert Duncan. It came from "Chosen", the series finale of "Buffy the Vampire Slayer" and is on the "Radio Sunnydale" CD.
--------
The Human Adventure Begins... Again
Holy frickin' crap! I'm salivating! This will be done well, it will be done right, and it will be awesome. I can't wait!
--------
"They are not the hell your whales!" - Spock