menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

Rick Berman Talks Brannon Braga's STAR TREK Departure and Internet Project

Features

By GustavoLeao / 22:58, 19 January 2006 / General Star Trek

Beam This Story to a Friend
Complete the form below to e-mail a link to this story to a friend.

Your Name:
Your E-Mail:
Your Friend's Name:
Your Friend's E-Mail:
Subject:
Message (optional):

The latest issue of STAR TREK Magazine features an exclusive interview with STAR TREK producer Rick Berman. Here are a few excerpts.



Regarding former TREK producer Brannon Braga recent comments that he is "done" with STAR TREK (story), Berman said "Brannon mentioned that to me, and I looked at the whole statement somewhere on the Internet. It was very overrated. All that Brannon said was that he's on another project and he's not doing STAR TREK right now, and he thinks if someone asked him tomorrow to do STAR TREK again he's probably say the time wasn't right, but that he wouldn't rule it out. A lot more was made of that than should have been."

"As for myself, I have no idea if I'm done with STAR TREK. Since there are no STAR TREK projects in television even being discussed right now and since the idea of the next STAR TREK movie is far away, or does not seem to be imminent, for me to say 'I'm done with STAR TREK' isn't something I'm going to say. I can't make any kind of definitive statement on that."

Asked about how much influence he feels THE ORIGINAL SERIES has had on him over the years, he said "I was a fan of THE ORIGINAL SERIES in that I had watched a number of episodes, maybe a third of them, and I'd enjoyed them. I didn't closely follow it. Gene [Roddenberry] created THE NEXT GENERATION. He created every character and he set the tone and the style for it. Even though he stepped back after the second season, it was totally his creation. I watched much more of the original show than people think, though. If we were doing VOYAGER or whatever show and a question of continuity came up, we very often would find ourselves in the cutting room, screening a video or DVD of one of the original episodes.

"A lot of fans like to berate me with the idea that I don't care about the continuity of the series, but it was something that I in fact cared greatly about, and it was something we always tried not to hurt."

About future projects, Berman revealed "There's something going on with the Internet, something STAR TREK-related, but it's something that's way too early to discuss."

More from Berman, including his comments on the late Michael Piller, can be found at Sci Fi Pulse.

To read the full article, get issue #125 of STAR TREK Magazine at your local newsstand.



More Top StoriesComments
Nov 22Quinto, Urban, Saldana, Cho and Greenwood on Their Hopes for Star Trek XII2
Nov 22Exclusive Digital Content Now Available With New Star Trek Movie on iTunes
1
Nov 22No J.J. Abrams Version of the U.S.S. Enterprise in the Star Trek Online MMORPG 0
Nov 21Faran Tahir on His 10 Minutes as Captain Robau in J.J. Abrams Star Trek Movie2
Nov 21J.J. Abrams, Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman on Shatner and Nimoy7
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

42 comments Post New | Help
View:

I needed a laugh today | Report this post to moderator
By: cooper2000 (Odo's file, contact) @ 17:09:15 on Jan 26, 2006

and reading the Berman interview did it.
This guy is just an idiot and if Paramount has any sense He is done with Trek.
I'm guessing offers arent piling in for him or Braga.
Go home Berman, clean out your offic and give us a break from your crap product.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Please get this guy out of here. | Report this post to moderator
By: BeyondtheTech (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 13:10:01 on Jan 24, 2006

His arrogance is so over-the-top, it's not even funny anymore. They should never put Berman and Trek in the same sentence ever, ever again.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: Please get this guy out of here. | Report this post to moderator
    By: OV-101 (Odo's file, contact) @ 13:34:11 on Jan 24, 2006

    Love the shirt! I certainly hope, and believe, you are correct about Berman's involvement in Trek (Sorry, I used Berman and Trek in the same sentence....but for a good cause).

    I don't know if he it really that arrogant or if it is just simple ignorance. Either way he is a complete flop and if Hollywood is smart he will be flipping burgers for a living.

    --------

    "Life's tough. It's tougher if you're stupid."
    -- John Wayne

    "Space is disease and danger wrapped in darkness and silence."
    --Dr. Leonard McCoy

    "I'm a politician, which means I am a cheat and a liar, and when I am not kissing babies I am stealing their lollipops."
    -- Jeffrey Pelt, The Hunt for Red October

    "Liberals, Intellectuals, Peacemongers, IDIOTS!!!!"
    - General Decker, Mars Attacks

    "It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires, both subtle and gross. But it's not for the timid."
    - Q from Q Who


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote

Berman done with Trek | Report this post to moderator
By: Alberon (Odo's file, contact) @ 15:45:45 on Jan 23, 2006

Trust me, Rick, you are done with Star Trek. Whether you want to be or not, you are done with it.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: Berman done with Trek | Report this post to moderator
    By: Capricorn Two (Odo's file, contact) @ 17:48:23 on Jan 23, 2006

    What's equally amusing is all the news about STXI is coming from Patrick Stewart - not Rick Berman, that the TPTB speaking directly with Stewart - not Berman. Stewart, not once, said he Berman approached him about his involvement in the next ST film.

    The fact is Rick Berman is not a creative man; more importantly, he's not Brad Gray's kind of producer - one who is creative and a producer who keeps the project on budget and delivered on time for release.

    Berman - despite the criticism - is clearly a good producer - delivers product on time and in budget but his creative side is found wanting and he manages to drive away creative individuals. For whatever speculation Berman allowed too many people not to participate in the ST endeavour and keep ST a viable commodity. Worst - he has shown himself to be involved in revisionist history and refuses to claim failure in the devaluation in ST as commodity. He has officially stated that the fault lies with the former Paramount management - the same management that gave him a sweet contract and protected him.

    Yes - he is done with STAR TREK but he will forever be part of STAR TREK. He is Gene Roddenberry's heir and we cannot change history.


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote

What a total door knob! | Report this post to moderator
By: OV-101 (Odo's file, contact) @ 20:14:11 on Jan 22, 2006

He says he only watched a third of trek and he calls himself a "fan". That pretty much puts the final nail in any respect I had for the man. What an idiot! Star Trek may not be totally dead but I think it needs an excellent doctor to get it out of coma

--------

"Life's tough. It's tougher if you're stupid."
-- John Wayne

"Space is disease and danger wrapped in darkness and silence."
--Dr. Leonard McCoy

"I'm a politician, which means I am a cheat and a liar, and when I am not kissing babies I am stealing their lollipops."
-- Jeffrey Pelt, The Hunt for Red October

"Liberals, Intellectuals, Peacemongers, IDIOTS!!!!"
- General Decker, Mars Attacks

"It's not safe out here. It's wondrous, with treasures to satiate desires, both subtle and gross. But it's not for the timid."
- Q from Q Who


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

He only watched 1/3 of TOS? | Report this post to moderator
By: NEXUS (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:07:40 on Jan 21, 2006

No wonder the franchise is dead.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

No Offense But . . . | Report this post to moderator
By: Snails (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:53:35 on Jan 21, 2006

Anyone who is in charge of Star Trek (on any level whatsoever) should take the time to watch all of:

TOS
TNG
DS9
VOY
ENT

and the movies.

If they are so busy they can't BOTHER to watch all of those, BEFORE deciding what type of "programming" to put on the air, then I have nothing but contempt for them and I personally, IN MY OPINION, think they are lazy . . .


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Anyone else smell that? | Report this post to moderator
By: Sabotman (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:48:48 on Jan 21, 2006

Quote:
Quote:
Asked about how much influence he feels THE ORIGINAL SERIES has had on him over the years, he said "I was a fan of THE ORIGINAL SERIES in that I had watched a number of episodes, maybe a third of them, and I'd enjoyed them. I didn't closely follow it.

Please, just put the shovel down.

Quote:
Quote:
I watched much more of the original show than people think, though. If we were doing VOYAGER or whatever show and a question of continuity came up, we very often would find ourselves in the cutting room, screening a video or DVD of one of the original episodes.

Really, I actually watched Voyager & you couldn't keep your own continuity right, forget TOS (he must be refering to that Sulu ep, but he missed more than he got!)

Quote:
Quote:
"A lot of fans like to berate me with the idea that I don't care about the continuity of the series, but it was something that I in fact cared greatly about, and it was something we always tried not to hurt."

Seriously where are the guys w/ the white jackets? Buddy you went out of your way to make sure continuity was a bad word! Another first Vulcan, female Pon Fars, wrong warp scale, races we never heard of or saw again, got the ship design right the first time (who remembers the phrase "pioneering"?)....


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

internet project? | Report this post to moderator
By: ludwig (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:34:57 on Jan 21, 2006

Why is everyone making an "internet project," out to be such a glorious idea? I hope that was some kind of misunderstanding.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

RE: Future projects | Report this post to moderator
By: StillKirok (Odo's file, contact) @ 12:44:58 on Jan 20, 2006

Quote:
Give me a break. Most people don't give a shit who is in charge. They just want Star Trek. This ain't a religion and this ain't a political party. As far as I am concerned they could have bloody Oprah Winfrey in charge of the francise. IT DOESN'T MATTER. It's attitudes like this that killed Star Trek in the first place.

WRONG. It's TERRIBLE WRITING that killed Trek. Rick Berman and Brannon Braga killed Trek. Not people like me. People like me have standards. We actually expect continuity to be followed, and good stories to be told. Berman and Braga liked boobs and bombs, and disrespected the franchise. They have NO ABILITY WHATSOEVER, and there is NO CHANCE that they can produce anything good. 12 years of garbage proved that.

Quote:
On the contrary... it's attitudes of people who will produce and/or swallow any 'Trek, regardless of quality, that killed (more like damaged) the Franchise.

And it's quotes like that which shows why this guy is the hero of Canton.


Quote:
You gotta admit Rick knows more about Star Trek than she does.

Rick knows NOTHING about Star Trek--unless you mean producing bad Star Trek.

Quote:
He has worked intensely with all the shows since TNG

And that intense work stunk. He killed a billion dollar franchise.


Quote:
and done his best to protect Roddenberrys vision.

How? By ignoring it completely? By bastardizing it?

Quote:
I say, Berman is more concerned with the product - Star Trek - than the money.

Did you even watch Star Trek in the last 10 years?

Quote:
Otherwise he could have easily turned it upside down. He didn't.

You never saw Enterprise, Voyager, Insurrection, or Generations.




Quote:
Shatners comments are heartwarming, but can they be carried out? With all due respect to the man, his age needs to be considered. And when he is gone, and Berman's contract expires, who is left to decide the fate of Star Trek? Leslie Moonves? Who will make his decision strictly business.

Even dead, Shatner could outproduce Berman.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: Future projects | Report this post to moderator
    By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact) @ 15:40:37 on Jan 20, 2006 | Edit History (1)

    Quote:
    We actually expect continuity to be followed, and good stories to be told. Berman and Braga liked boobs and bombs, and disrespected the franchise.

    Funny. You don't think ENT started out well? Do you think it started out with boobs and bombs, or with a strong message of hope, purpose, and a great respect for all life? From my perspective it conveyed Star Trek beautifully and it was B&B at their finest. The shows focus was on the dream coming true for Archer, and the kid in all of us that wants to "go out there". The noble exploration of space. It wasn't a conquest of territory or a desperate battle for survival. It was back to the roots of Star Trek. Ready to take on a new direction. I don't see the boobs and bombs you're talking about.

    The show did lose focus later on, picked up pace in season 3 and found a whole new identity. But all that mess happened because people tuned out of season 1-2. Apparently, Star Trek in its pure form wasn't welcome. Is that B&B's fault? Nope.

    It got cancelled anyway. Because it was simply time for Trek to rest.


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
    • RE: Future projects | Report this post to moderator
      By: StillKirok (Odo's file, contact) @ 04:37:41 on Jan 23, 2006

      Quote:
      Funny. You don't think ENT started out well? Do you think it started out with boobs and bombs, or with a strong message of hope, purpose, and a great respect for all life?

      It started off with boobs and bombs. Did you not notice the weekly T'Pol in the decon chamber scene? Did you not notice the continuity violations in the very pilot?

      Quote:
      From my perspective it conveyed Star Trek beautifully and it was B&B at their finest.

      Maybe, but from the reality perspective it did not convey Star Trek at all. And B&B at their finest, stinks. B&B=wooden/generic characters, unoriginal plots, and bad continuity.



      Quote:
      It got cancelled anyway. Because it was simply time for Trek to rest.

      It got canceled because it wasn't good enough to be on the air. Star Trek itself didn't need a rest. B&B did. Star Trek ended because it was run into the ground by incompetents.


      Reply
      Reply
      Quote
      Quote
    • RE: Future projects | Report this post to moderator
      By: katefan (Odo's file, contact) @ 05:59:23 on Jan 21, 2006

      First of all, the show did start out with boobs, namely T'Pol. It was obvious from the start that B & B were re-hashing the 7 of 9 phenomena, that by putting a robotic hot chick in a catsuit would garner viewers. It garnered scorn.

      Second, the Vulcans were portrayed as assholes, which upset a great many fans. Having the primary Vulcan walk around in an atypical catsuit did not help matters any.

      Third, the acting was wooden. I was disappointed with Scott Bakula's performance and I hated Jolene Blalock. the rest of the cast also failed to impress.

      Fourth, the writing sucked. Instead of focusing upon several key species, we got alien-of-the-week stories that did not make any sense. This was supposed to be a slower ship, yet they reached the Klingon homeworld in five days! It never really felt like a sequel, not with their phase pistols and phase cannons, transporter and polarizing the hull which essentially did the same thing deflector shields did.

      Enterprise was a suckfest from day one, which is why nine million people stopped watching.

      --------

      "Oh, I'll wake up
      To any sound of engines,
      Ev'ry gull a seeking craft..."

      Kate Bush, And Dream of Sheep


      Reply
      Reply
      Quote
      Quote
      • RE: Future projects | Report this post to moderator
        By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact) @ 07:24:28 on Jan 21, 2006

        Quote:
        It was obvious from the start that B & B were re-hashing the 7 of 9 phenomena, that by putting a robotic hot chick in a catsuit would garner viewers. It garnered scorn.

        I was pretty indifferent about the catsuit. It didn't help. It didn't hurt. In this case I think most people would agree with me.

        Quote:
        Second, the Vulcans were portrayed as assholes, which upset a great many fans.

        My interpretation of the Star Trek universe is that humans in general have always despised the Vulcans for their apparent lack of emotion. Remember how Pille used to yell at Spock. ENT added one more twist: That Vulcans came off as arrogant liers, a century and a half before TOS. I don't understand your problem with that? Is it necessary that the Vulcans come off as good guys for ENT to succeed?

        Quote:
        Third, the acting was wooden. I was disappointed with Scott Bakula's performance and I hated Jolene Blalock. the rest of the cast also failed to impress.

        I don't know how many people think as you do. Maybe a great deal. I just don't know. Its sort of difficult to say goodbye to known characters from other shows (DS9 and TNG in particular) and begin from scratch, with a new crew that you don't know, and don't care about yet. It takes time to build an emotional attachment to new characters.

        The crew on ENT was wet behind the ears at first, which I think was totally appropiate for their time period. Maybe the same can be said about the acting. But if you go back and watch DS9 season one, or TNG season one, you see the acting was terrible compared to subsequent seasons as well.

        Season one was focused on the characters, which helped the actors to get aquianted with their characters and the audience to care about them. I don't know why you think they weren't symphatic.

        Quote:
        Fourth, the writing sucked. Instead of focusing upon several key species, we got alien-of-the-week stories that did not make any sense.

        Wasn't that primarily in season 2 ? In season one, it was first and foremost about "going out there" to see what's going on. The Sulliban kept reappearing, and there was this mysterical TCW, luring in the background.

        Quote:
        It never really felt like a sequel, not with their phase pistols and phase cannons, transporter and polarizing the hull which essentially did the same thing deflector shields did.

        I agree.


        Reply
        Reply
        Quote
        Quote
        • RE: Future projects | Report this post to moderator
          By: katefan (Odo's file, contact) @ 13:27:49 on Jan 21, 2006

          Quote:
          I was pretty indifferent about the catsuit. It didn't help. It didn't hurt. In this case I think most people would agree with me.

          When you say "most people", do you mean the twelve million fans who started watching the show or the three million left watching it at the end? Just curious.

          Quote:
          My interpretation of the Star Trek universe is that humans in general have always despised the Vulcans for their apparent lack of emotion.

          That is your interpretation, not everyone else's. Unless we're back to the twelve million or three million viewers part. In that case I would think the nine million
          viewers who left have more weight than the three million who stayed.

          Quote:
          Remember how Pille used to yell at Spock.

          Who the fuck is Pille?

          Quote:
          ENT added one more twist: That Vulcans came off as arrogant liers, a century and a half before TOS. I don't understand your problem with that? Is it necessary
          that the Vulcans come off as good guys for ENT to succeed?


          What upsets so many of us is the fact that 1) Vulcan telepathy was discarded for three seasons, even though it was established in TOS repeatedly that telepathy was
          such an inherent aspect of Vulcan culture and biology that it could not possibly be ignored.

          And no, a lot of us don't buy the whole Vulcan change in attitude that was shown in the fourth season, especially when it was gawd-savior Jonathan Archer who was
          responsible.

          And what about Vulcan strength? Vulcans are much more stronger than humans yet T'Pol was repeatedly shown as weak. Archer is kicking all sorts of Vulcan ass
          yet in TOS Spock almost killed Kirk twice.

          You see, little things like this matter to many of us.

          Quote:
          I don't know how many people think as you do.

          About nine million.

          Quote:
          Maybe a great deal.

          Nine million is a great deal.

          Quote:
          I just don't know.

          That is denial talking.

          Quote:
          Its sort of difficult to say goodbye to known characters from other shows (DS9 and TNG in particular) and begin from scratch, with a new crew that you don't
          know, and don't care about yet.


          And yet many of us did it with TNG and DS9. Many of us fell in love with Firefly. Law and Order fans love the spin offs SVU and Criminal Intent.

          Growing to like a new cast of characters is not hard. What is hard is growing to like a cast so unlikable is.

          Quote:
          It takes time to build an emotional attachment to new characters.

          If you can't get people to like them by the end of the first season then you are doing something very, very wrong.

          Quote:
          The crew on ENT was wet behind the ears at first, which I think was totally appropiate for their time period.

          I had no problem with that. Fight or Flight was a decent ep and illustrated this.

          Quote:
          Maybe the same can be said about the acting.

          With a veteran like Scott Bakula at the helm? Please.

          Quote:
          But if you go back and watch DS9 season one, or TNG season one, you see the acting was terrible compared to subsequent seasons as well.

          DS9 was good from the get go, from an acting perspective. The writing was also good. Perhaps TNG was rough when it began, but many of us grew to love those
          characters.

          Quote:
          Season one was focused on the characters, which helped the actors to get aquianted with their characters and the audience to care about them. I don't know why
          you think they weren't symphatic.


          They were boring. Bakula and Blalock, the two key characters, were wooden.

          Quote:
          Wasn't that primarily in season 2 ? In season one, it was first and foremost about "going out there" to see what's going on. The Sulliban kept reappearing, and
          there was this mysterical TCW, luring in the background.


          Ah yes, the TCW, one of the worst aspects of Enterprise. Let's fall upon the old crutch of time travel, giving B & B a good excuse to whip out their dicks and piss
          all over continuity.

          But let's look at how many alien races were shown in season one:

          Broken Bow: Alien chicks eating butterflies, alien species that breath another gas other than oxygen and have to be weaned off of it. Suliban. Denobulans (Phlox).
          Four new alien species in the pilot.

          Fight or Flight: Aliens hung up like meat, aliens who hung previous aliens up like mean. Two new alien species.

          Unexpected: Aliens who made Tucker pregnant. One new alien species. Also bullshit use of holographic technology.

          Civilization: Primitive culture, species abusing said primitive culture. Two new alien species.

          Fortunate Son: Okay, just a note here. Nausicans were used. I highly approved of them using the Nausicans here. B & B were very sharp in this regard. But even
          the blind squirrel finds a nut, now and then.

          Cold Front: Bunch of monks. At least one new alien species.

          Silent Enemy: Silent new alien species.

          Dear Doctor: Two new alien species. Phlox advocates letting one species die due to some bizarre theory. Archer goes along with it, advocating genocide without
          further study.

          Shadows of Pjem: New alien species.

          Rogue Planet: Two new alien species.

          Oasis: New alien species. Also bullshit use of holographic technology.

          Detained: At least one new alien species.

          Vox Sola: New alien species.

          Fallen Hero: New alien species.

          Desert Crossing: New alien species.

          So let's count up, shall we? Season one showed no less than twenty one new alien species. Still want to claim season one did not suffer from alien of the week
          syndrome?

          For a guy who so passionately defends this series you sure don't know much about it.

          Season one should have concentrated on Andorians, Vulcans, Tellarites and humans. Orions could have been used as recurring villians. Instead we got AOTW
          syndrome, Tellarites did not appear until season two, Orions until season four. At the very least Nausicans could have been employed as good recurring bad guys.

          --------

          "Oh, I'll wake up
          To any sound of engines,
          Ev'ry gull a seeking craft..."

          Kate Bush, And Dream of Sheep


          Reply
          Reply
          Quote
          Quote
          • RE: Future projects | Report this post to moderator
            By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact) @ 14:29:13 on Jan 21, 2006

            Quote:
            When you say "most people", do you mean the twelve million fans who started watching the show or the three million left watching it at the end? Just curious.

            I mean people watching TV.

            Quote:
            Who the fuck is Pille?

            The doctor in TOS. Usually referred to as Pille. At least in german dubbing.

            Quote:
            Vulcan telepathy; Vulcan change in attitude; Vulcan strength

            I didn't buy the Vulcan change in attitude in season 4 either. But at least it was an attempt to bring their society closer to what people like you expected.

            Regarding Vulcan telepathy, it seems plausible that 150 years before Kirk it was taboo, since they tried to suppress this as well as their emotions.

            Vulcan strength? You got me there.

            Quote:
            little things like this matter to many of us

            Sure but you're an avid, long standing TOS Trekker, and therefore a minority. Like I only represent a minority too. We are a blip on the ratings screen. I suspect the 9 million people who tuned out, did so because ENT felt like "more of the same". Nothing so specific as Vulcan behaviour.

            Quote:
            DS9 was good from the get go, from an acting perspective.

            Not Avery Brooks and Cirroc Lofton. The writing was good though. But Avery didn't deliver a natural sounding dialogue until he got rid of his hair, and Cirroc wasn't good in the pilot.

            Quote:
            Aliens of the week syndrome

            As I see you've done some research. I must admit that I have forgotten many of those alien appearances. You can laugh now.

            But the recurring species in season one was Vulcans and Sulliban. A lot of character oriented stuff in there. I really liked Shadows of P'Jem.

            Quote:
            For a guy who so passionately defends this series you sure don't know much about it

            Alright its fading. I don't have ENT on video at the moment and my mind is currently filled with DS9 and VOY episodes.


            Reply
            Reply
            Quote
            Quote

Why is the Magazine even interviewing him anymore?! (duh) | Report this post to moderator
By: Yesterday's Lemmiwinks (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:57:11 on Jan 20, 2006

Quote:
All that Brannon said was that he's on another project and he's not doing STAR TREK right now, and he thinks if someone asked him tomorrow to do STAR TREK again he's probably say the time wasn't right, but that he wouldn't rule it out.

Don't you threaten us Berman...

Quote:
As for myself, I have no idea if I'm done with STAR TREK. Since there are no STAR TREK projects in television even being discussed right now and since the idea of the next STAR TREK movie is far away, or does not seem to be imminent, for me to say 'I'm done with STAR TREK' isn't something I'm going to say. I can't make any kind of definitive statement on that.

I honestly don't think it's your decision any longer.

Quote:
I was a fan of THE ORIGINAL SERIES in that I had watched a number of episodes, maybe a third of them, and I'd enjoyed them. I didn't closely follow it.

Thanks for the update Captain Obvious.

I'd like to think that I don't usually post little rants like this, but I've been watching VOY on DVD lately, and this bozo and Braga are all over the special features. (God, I miss Ira Behr) I give Braga credit for admitting on the Season 2 bonus feature segment that VOY: Threshold was a huge mistake, but mainly I just want to put an axe through the television each time one of their snide visages talks about the wonderful things they did for the Franchise.

--------

"A billion robot lives are about to be extinguished! Oh, the Jedis are going to feel this one..."
-Hubert Farnsworth (Futurama: Crimes of the Hot)
----
"The Andorian Mining Consortium runs from no one!"
-Shran (ENT: Proving Ground)


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Oh, the horror, the horror! | Report this post to moderator
By: Schpock (Odo's file, contact) @ 04:47:38 on Jan 20, 2006

I was just over at slashdot where there is an article about George Takei reprising his role of Sulu for Star Trek:New Voyages, and it dawned on me that the internet project that Braga is involving himself in could be somehow connected to the New Voyages fan series.

The only other apparently logical internet project that I can think of is TrekUnited...

Egad!

--------

To me, truth is not some vague, foggy notion. Truth is real. And, at the same time, unreal. Fiction and fact and everything in between, plus some things I can't remember, all rolled into one big 'thing.' This is truth, to me.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: Oh, the horror, the horror! | Report this post to moderator
    By: GustavoLeao (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 06:48:23 on Jan 20, 2006

    The STAR TREK NEW VOYAGES episode in which George Takei will appear, "World Enough And Time", will be co-written by DEEP SPACE NINE writer Marc Scott Zicree and Michael Reaves. Reaves pitched a Sulu story for the never-produced STAR TREK PHASE 2 TV Series.

    Gustavo

    --------

    TrekWeb.com Supervising Editor

    gl2000@uol.com.br


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
    • RE: Oh, the horror, the horror! | Report this post to moderator
      By: StillKirok (Odo's file, contact) @ 12:38:31 on Jan 20, 2006

      There is no way Braga would be involved with New Voyages. New Voyages has actually been RESPECTFUL to TOS.


      Reply
      Reply
      Quote
      Quote
      • RE: Oh, the horror, the horror! | Report this post to moderator
        By: Schpock (Odo's file, contact) @ 15:15:23 on Jan 20, 2006

        I bet Braga is working on his own self aggrandizing internet Star Trek project in an attempt to vindicate himself.

        He's going to have to put a mighty spin on it if he wants to come across as some kind of Trek hero, right now he's quite hated.

        --------

        To me, truth is not some vague, foggy notion. Truth is real. And, at the same time, unreal. Fiction and fact and everything in between, plus some things I can't remember, all rolled into one big 'thing.' This is truth, to me.


        Reply
        Reply
        Quote
        Quote

Future projects | Report this post to moderator
By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact) @ 03:27:59 on Jan 20, 2006

It seems that Star Trek won't be back tomorrow. But when it returns, we need men like Rick Berman to set the style and tone of the show, and give it a sense of familiarity. We also need new people for that creative sparkle and modern touch. Cooperation is beneficial and allows for mixing old and new.

Broadcasting a show worldwide over the internet is still many years away. Not due to technical obstacles but due to politics. But its only appropiate if Star Trek gets to be the first show to benefit from it. (Assuming this is what Rick Berman was talking about. It could be something else)


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: Future projects | Report this post to moderator
    By: Yesterday's Lemmiwinks (Odo's file, contact) @ 11:00:09 on Jan 20, 2006

    Quote:
    Assuming this is what Rick Berman was talking about. It could be something else

    I'm pretty sure that when he was referring to stuff "on the internet," he meant that rumors about the upcoming film were circulating.

    --------

    "A billion robot lives are about to be extinguished! Oh, the Jedis are going to feel this one..."
    -Hubert Farnsworth (Futurama: Crimes of the Hot)
    ----
    "The Andorian Mining Consortium runs from no one!"
    -Shran (ENT: Proving Ground)


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
  • RE: Future projects | Report this post to moderator
    By: StillKirok (Odo's file, contact) @ 04:15:13 on Jan 20, 2006

    One thing that bothers me about him is that he really seems to think the fans are idiots and will swallow what he says. He CARED about continuity? The man created ENTERPRISE. They watched TOS in the cutting room? Then how come there were STILL so many continuity errors on his watch. About the only thing true here is that GR created TNG.

    Rick Berman shouldn't be allowed in a Star Trek movie with a paid ticket.

    A guy who only watched 1/3 of TOS was put in charge. Shame on Paramount for this stupidity.

    Actions speak much louder than words. And the product Rick Berman and Brannon Braga produced was terrible. These two idiots ruined a billion dollar franchise. The LAST thing we ever need is them in Star Trek.

    There will NEVER be a successful Star Trek under their watch.


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
    • RE: Future projects | Report this post to moderator
      By: Yesterday's Lemmiwinks (Odo's file, contact) @ 11:01:45 on Jan 20, 2006

      Quote:
      A guy who only watched 1/3 of TOS was put in charge.

      ...by Gene Roddenberry.

      --------

      "A billion robot lives are about to be extinguished! Oh, the Jedis are going to feel this one..."
      -Hubert Farnsworth (Futurama: Crimes of the Hot)
      ----
      "The Andorian Mining Consortium runs from no one!"
      -Shran (ENT: Proving Ground)


      Reply
      Reply
      Quote
      Quote
    • RE: Future projects | Report this post to moderator
      By: sb2004 (Odo's file, contact) @ 04:42:04 on Jan 20, 2006

      Quote:
      There will NEVER be a successful Star Trek under their watch.

      Give me a break. Most people don't give a shit who is in charge. They just want Star Trek. This ain't a religion and this ain't a political party. As far as I am concerned they could have bloody Oprah Winfrey in charge of the francise. IT DOESN'T MATTER. It's attitudes like this that killed Star Trek in the first place.

      Al


      Reply
      Reply
      Quote
      Quote
      • RE: Future projects | Report this post to moderator
        By: Yesterday's Lemmiwinks (Odo's file, contact) @ 11:04:47 on Jan 20, 2006

        Quote:
        It's attitudes like this that killed Star Trek in the first place.

        On the contrary... it's attitudes of people who will produce and/or swallow any 'Trek, regardless of quality, that killed (more like damaged) the Franchise.

        --------

        "A billion robot lives are about to be extinguished! Oh, the Jedis are going to feel this one..."
        -Hubert Farnsworth (Futurama: Crimes of the Hot)
        ----
        "The Andorian Mining Consortium runs from no one!"
        -Shran (ENT: Proving Ground)


        Reply
        Reply
        Quote
        Quote
      • RE: Future projects | Report this post to moderator
        By: JediFonger (Odo's file, contact) @ 05:04:27 on Jan 20, 2006 | Edit History (1)

        hmmm... Oprah... in charge of Trek. book of the week, planet of the week... that could WORK! hell she's already recommending authors that fabricate sources, why not!? hehehehehe

        --------

        LET THEM DIE!!!


        Reply
        Reply
        Quote
        Quote
        • RE: Future projects | Report this post to moderator
          By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact) @ 06:29:40 on Jan 20, 2006 | Edit History (1)

          Doh! Comparing Oprah to Rick! Guys.... :)

          You gotta admit Rick knows more about Star Trek than she does. He has worked intensely with all the shows since TNG. And no doubt he has watched every TOS episode as the need arised. Continuity errors? okay. Flaws? Okay the man has flaws. Who doesn't. What I'm talking about is, he has also protected Star Trek in this lion cave - Hollywood, you know? - and done his best to protect Roddenberrys vision. Even when that meant the show was losing numbers, and people went on to darker shows. I say, Berman is more concerned with the product - Star Trek - than the money. Otherwise he could have easily turned it upside down. He didn't. People blame him for producing, you know a stale show. Cutting back on things. To keep them Star Trek. That's a man I would gladly have in the team for the next Star Trek show. He cares about the product, not getting mass recognition or people's blessing - as such. On the other hand its only natural in order to reach good balance, that he works in a team with other people who have other specific qualities. Other strengths. Its clear that Rick alone can't drive the franchise for another decade. It needs new blood. Granted. But I don't like when people bash him, just because they hate him. Principally I won't give into hate. Not to anyone. And he created Star Trek for you!

          I think, people expect too much when they want Star Trek to still get big numbers. After so many years of non-stop production (and mind you, this was a Paramount decision to milk the cow .. a normal business practice). Its a TV and movie franchise and as such, there will be high and low points. Its not an eternal thing. We've reached the end of the evening, but maybe tomorrow night the show will be back. With or without Rick. With more or less familiarity. I appriciate that familiarity in style and tone just as much as some people appriciate continuity.


          Reply
          Reply
          Quote
          Quote
          • RE: Future projects | Report this post to moderator
            By: GustavoLeao (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 06:56:37 on Jan 20, 2006

            I agree with William Shatner. When asked at the Las Vegan convention last year, to what he would say to the TREK producers about the future of the franchise, Shatner responded frankly, "I'd say, you gotta get outa there, guys. Bring a new team in and see ya later. I would say, take a broom, let's clean everything out and start absolutely [from scratch] with some wonderful writers who love STAR TREK. Wonderful producers who love STAR TREK who wish to put it back on. And have a singular person - that person we gotta find - to drive with honesty, and sincerity, and with veracity, and clarity, the whole STAR TREK concept." Upon shouts of "You do it!" he joked, "If I'm elected...!"

            "I mean, they've done a wonderful job and they've done all these STAR TREK things." Shatner said "But you know, people get tired of the job. I mean, you get burned out. Not that they are, not that they could be - but just start again."

            At the conclusion of his time on stage, Shatner said "Those of us who love STAR TREK know that there is a future. It's just taking a pause right now. We don't have anything to worry about. Paramount Studios has made ... in excess of $2 billion? From the franchise of STAR TREK? They aren't gonna let that die! There's too much money there! So, there will be another STAR TREK, I assure you."

            Gustavo

            --------

            TrekWeb.com Supervising Editor

            gl2000@uol.com.br


            Reply
            Reply
            Quote
            Quote
            • RE: Future projects | Report this post to moderator
              By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact) @ 07:10:32 on Jan 20, 2006

              Shatners comments are heartwarming, but can they be carried out? With all due respect to the man, his age needs to be considered. And when he is gone, and Berman's contract expires, who is left to decide the fate of Star Trek? Leslie Moonves? Who will make his decision strictly business.


              Reply
              Reply
              Quote
              Quote
              • RE: Future projects | Report this post to moderator
                By: katefan (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:38:00 on Jan 20, 2006

                Berman's last two films have been failures, and Generations was not very good. So he is 1 for 4 when it comes to films. Enterprise was a commercial failure, losing 75% of it's viewing audience by season three. It is the first 'Trek series since TOS not to survive seven seasons.

                And this is the guy you would trust to give us another motion picture? Another series?

                You may love this guy, but most 'Trek fans do not. Berman is burnt out, and without a group of good writers helping him any project he may be involved in will fail.

                A director or producer does bring along with him a reputation that can affect a film's success. Do you think any Batman fan would have seen the last movie if Joel Schumacher's name was attached to it? Not after Batman Forever and Batman and Robin. Brett Ratner's reputation has tainted the latest X-Men movie. At the same time, Bryan Singer's name has lent itself well to the latest Superman project.

                So sure, keep Berman's name attached to 'Trek. Just don't be surprised if it harms the franchise in the bargain.

                --------

                "Oh, I'll wake up
                To any sound of engines,
                Ev'ry gull a seeking craft..."

                Kate Bush, And Dream of Sheep


                Reply
                Reply
                Quote
                Quote
                • RE: Future projects | Report this post to moderator
                  By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact) @ 14:12:44 on Jan 20, 2006 | Edit History (1)

                  Its true I didn't like the TNG movies but then again, I don't like a whole lot of movies. They have to have this "broad appeal" you know, and therefore a lot of qualities that define Star Trek gets tossed out for an increased dosis of action, and rather bad humor. At least a humor not typically seen in Star Trek so it feels forced and out of place.

                  I think the sense of family, between fans and the cast, was hurt because the TNG characters fell out of character in the movies. But I know a lot of people laughed when Data began to curse in "Generations" and all that crazy stuff with his emotion chip. Well, I thought it was really, really stupid. And "First Contact" was an action flick more than anything else in my opinion, it didn't carry the Roddenberry ideals far enough for people to notice. So it ended up giving people - people who don't know Star Trek very well - a wrong impression of what Star Trek means to us; to me.

                  But enough rambling. I've just had it with the movies. But who am I to judge the quality of the TNG movies since I rarely watch movies altogether...

                  I wasn't saying Rick Berman's role in future Trek projects needs to be that of an executive producer. Maybe he would (and should) settle for something else. At least because, as you said, he is not a popular figure anymore. But in terms of keeping the series on familiar ground I think he has been determined, and for that, I give him a lot of credit.

                  Whether or not he personally believes in a better future, like Roddenberry so strongly advocated, I'm not sure. In recent interviews he even addressed the question of whether or not Star Trek should remain as bright and hopeful as it has - in order to survive. But unfortunately a lot of people is asking the same question. The world is bleak so its easy for people to lose hope. Especially when people are under a lot of pressure, as I think Berman has been under a lot of pressure from fans and also the bosses at CBS/Paramount, for a number of years. Who can blame him for being a bit pessimistic.

                  I do admire his persistance and also that he never disrespect fans, in the same way, fans disrespect him. Its obvious that many Trekkers like to drive him through the mud. Yet he takes kindly on them, and sticks to his job. That makes me respect him more than those who wish death upon him.


                  Reply
                  Reply
                  Quote
                  Quote
                  • RE: Future projects | Report this post to moderator
                    By: katefan (Odo's file, contact) @ 13:35:01 on Jan 21, 2006

                    Quote:
                    I wasn't saying Rick Berman's role in future Trek projects needs to be that of an executive producer. Maybe he would (and should) settle for something else.

                    Like what, as a writer? The man only knows three tricks; time travel, transporter accidents and holodecks.

                    As a director? Please.

                    As a producer? You think he would be willing to take orders from an executive producer? And having any part of the production process would be a disaster.

                    Quote:
                    I do admire his persistance and also that he never disrespect fans, in the same way, fans disrespect him.

                    First of all, he is persistent because he wants a paycheck. Second, he deserves every bit of disrespect I can dish out at him.

                    --------

                    "Oh, I'll wake up
                    To any sound of engines,
                    Ev'ry gull a seeking craft..."

                    Kate Bush, And Dream of Sheep


                    Reply
                    Reply
                    Quote
                    Quote
                    • RE: Future projects | Report this post to moderator
                      By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact) @ 14:43:07 on Jan 21, 2006

                      Quote:
                      The man only knows three tricks; time travel, transporter accidents and holodecks.

                      Transporter accidents? You mean shuttle crashes? There ain't no transporter accidents. Okay, Barclay in TNG. Hoshi in ENT. Tuvix in VOY (and possibly a few more). DS9 wasn't his creation, by and large.

                      Quote:
                      You think he would be willing to take orders from an executive producer?

                      I don't know. A lot of bosses find it difficult to adjust in such situations.

                      I think Berman should be co-executive producer or superviser in the next Star Trek series.


                      Reply
                      Reply
                      Quote
                      Quote
                      • RE: Future projects | Report this post to moderator
                        By: katefan (Odo's file, contact) @ 20:58:18 on Jan 21, 2006

                        Ah, yes, the famous shuttle crashes. Thanks, I forgot all about that.

                        --------

                        "Oh, I'll wake up
                        To any sound of engines,
                        Ev'ry gull a seeking craft..."

                        Kate Bush, And Dream of Sheep


                        Reply
                        Reply
                        Quote
                        Quote

Puh-leeze! | Report this post to moderator
By: Schpock (Odo's file, contact) @ 00:33:37 on Jan 20, 2006

If either Berman or Braga return to Star Trek, I think a huge portion of the people who have been hanging on and waiting for a "new" Star Trek will simply give up on the franchise completely. And if they create another lame attempt at interpreting Star Trek and it sucks, then Star Trek will be hurt as a franchise for a very long time. It's a lose-lose situation.

They've had their chance and they blew it...royally.

--------

To me, truth is not some vague, foggy notion. Truth is real. And, at the same time, unreal. Fiction and fact and everything in between, plus some things I can't remember, all rolled into one big 'thing.' This is truth, to me.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: Puh-leeze! | Report this post to moderator
    By: GhostPoet (Odo's file, contact) @ 12:02:49 on Jan 24, 2006

    If either of these guys step into the Trek Franchise again..even on the internet...they will bury Trek the rest of the way.

    Trek never slowed down because not enough people were watching....not enough people were watching simply because of the talent-less HACKS who are in charge of the show couldn't make a single good episode.

    After DS9 (some may say it sucked..I thought it was a different spin on things and very enjoyable) everything went down the crapper.
    As someone said...B&B only care about boobs and bombs...not content.


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
  • RE: Puh-leeze! | Report this post to moderator
    By: Yesterday's Lemmiwinks (Odo's file, contact) @ 11:08:48 on Jan 20, 2006

    You can only hold the door open for an un-invited guest so long before you gotta kick them out!

    --------

    "A billion robot lives are about to be extinguished! Oh, the Jedis are going to feel this one..."
    -Hubert Farnsworth (Futurama: Crimes of the Hot)
    ----
    "The Andorian Mining Consortium runs from no one!"
    -Shran (ENT: Proving Ground)


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.