menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

Scott Bakula Says ENTERPRISE Was on the Wrong Network

Features

By GustavoLeao / 14:16, 28 July 2005 / Enterprise

The latest issue of STAR TREK Magazine, just out in the UK, features an exclusive interview with STAR TREK ENTERPRISE star Scott Bakula. Here are a few excerpts :



Regarding the show's cancellation, Bakula said "I would say simply that we've been on the wrong network for four years. That hardly ever happens, honestly. If you're on the wrong network you don't make it out of the first year. But because of a lot of history and positioning and, if you will, corporate synergy, we managed to stay alive for four years. That's good news, ultimately. We did manage to squeeze four years out of being at the wrong place. no one could have ever predicted the amount of upset within Viacom in the last four years, in terms of personnel changing and philosophies changing. There's just no way you could have predicted that all the people at Paramount who supported the show, who supported the franchise, would be gone, that all the people at UPN would have turned over a couple of times. We were trying to ride through all of that stuff. Timing is everything especially in television. We're a victim of that and at the same time, we got 98 hours of television out of it."

"There were elements in the pilot of a guy who was basically inexperienced and raw and a little bit of a loose cannon that I liked a lot," Bakula said about the 'Captain Archer' character "Then we got into an area for a while where he was awestruck. That worked and it had value, and I felt that near the end of Season Three and during this season we got into a maturing and a hardening and a toughening up of this guy."

"He was kind of unpredictable. I just would have liked to have had a little bit more of that. I'd like to have seen him more relaxed sometimes, maybe a little happier that he was out there in space exploring the universe, with no attachments to anything that was going on on Earth, going from one planet to the next. That didn't quite happen. We were very attached to the events of our world."

To read the full article, get the latest issue of STAR TREK Magazine at your local newstand



More Top StoriesComments
Nov 22Quinto, Urban, Saldana, Cho and Greenwood on Their Hopes for Star Trek XII2
Nov 22Exclusive Digital Content Now Available With New Star Trek Movie on iTunes
1
Nov 22No J.J. Abrams Version of the U.S.S. Enterprise in the Star Trek Online MMORPG 0
Nov 21Faran Tahir on His 10 Minutes as Captain Robau in J.J. Abrams Star Trek Movie2
Nov 21J.J. Abrams, Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman on Shatner and Nimoy7
Story Archives...Browse:   
ENTERPRISE Mission Schedule | Logs by Season: 1 2 3 4
Episode Number Title Airdate

Talkback

45 comments Post New | Help
View:

RE: Battlestar Galactica would have flourished on the golf channel | Report this post to moderator
By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact) @ 04:22:12 on Aug 01, 2005 | Edit History (1)

I agree with some of what you're saying. But its funny how there has ALWAYS been people who didn't like the utopic overtones in Star Trek. That criticism has always been levelled against Star Trek, and you know what? I think that's exactly what makes Star Trek special! Star Trek does the unthinkable. While some people can't seem to appriciate it, other people find it extremely attracting.

When the A-bombs were thrown during the second world war, some people just couldn't grasp it. How horrible it was. Other people, I'm sure knew exactly what this meant. There has been plenty of wars since then and today, we are afraid terrorism. When I think about all this, I feel really bad.

But while terrorists are doing the unthinkable, and the bombs over Hiroshima and Nakasaki was an unheard way of mass-murdering, something our fantasy can hardly grasp, Star Trek went in the opposite direction. Showed us, the things doesn't have to be like that. TOS said its almost ridiculous that we can't keep peace. TNG tried to be living proof that humans can live peacefully. When I think about this, I feel really good. Its far from a boring vision.

I don't think the circumstances has changed one bit. Our world is dark, but should our fantasies about the future be just as dark? Why should entertainment try to make us understand (and sometimes even accept) the worst things in our world? No, we need to understand that things can be better. If we can't imagine something better, how can we improve our lifes?

I know that conflict has always been an important part of storytelling. But it doesn't have to involve death! All conflicts are not about life and death. The more interesting challanges are not so unpleasant.

Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Parent
Parent
Talkback Top
Top
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.