menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

J. Michael Straczynski Says Paramount is Driving the Franchise into the Ground

Features

By GustavoLeao / 09:47, 6 June 2005 / Enterprise

Beam This Story to a Friend
Complete the form below to e-mail a link to this story to a friend.

Your Name:
Your E-Mail:
Your Friend's Name:
Your Friend's E-Mail:
Subject:
Message (optional):

BABYLON 5 creator/producer J. Michael Straczynski was a guest of honor at Wizard World Philadelphia convention, and talked about his current TV and comics projects, his future plans and his opinion on the current state of the STAR TREK franchise.



Straczynski said he still loves the original STAR TREK and would like to see the franchise regain its luster. "They're driving that franchise into the ground because they don't understand what it is," he said.

Straczynski said he and Bryce Zabel (creater of THE CROW and DARK SKIES television series) prepared a STAR TREK pitch, a treatment for a reboot of the franchise, but Paramount has a bad taste in their mouths over what has happened to the franchise over the years, so the studio is giving the franchise a couple years rest after the cancellation of ENTERPRISE. "When the door is open again, I'll be there, (not in a contractual sense, but willing to work if called)" he said.

As for BABYLON 5, he said that he told the story that he wanted to tell, and plans for a feature film based on the property never really came together. Right now, there are no plans for B5 for film, television, or books, according to the creator.

The full reports from the Straczynski panel can be found at Comics Continuum and Newsarama.



More Top StoriesComments
Nov 22Quinto, Urban, Saldana, Cho and Greenwood on Their Hopes for Star Trek XII2
Nov 22Exclusive Digital Content Now Available With New Star Trek Movie on iTunes
1
Nov 22No J.J. Abrams Version of the U.S.S. Enterprise in the Star Trek Online MMORPG 0
Nov 21Faran Tahir on His 10 Minutes as Captain Robau in J.J. Abrams Star Trek Movie2
Nov 21J.J. Abrams, Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman on Shatner and Nimoy7
Story Archives...Browse:   
ENTERPRISE Mission Schedule | Logs by Season: 1 2 3 4
Episode Number Title Airdate

Talkback

36 comments Post New | Help
View:

RE: the kettle calling the pot | Report this post to moderator
By: Sennik (Odo's file, contact) @ 18:35:21 on Jun 08, 2005

In other words, some actors from Voyager and some from Babylon 5 have moved on and had careers after their respective shows. The question was "where's B5 people"? I was unaware of anyone from Voyager doing anything else since, other than Mulgrew. But it seems like both series are equal in that respect. Thanks for correcting me, but in the end all it means is that B5's actors seem to have had the same after-series success as Voyager's actors have.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

RE: the kettle calling the pot | Report this post to moderator
By: Sennik (Odo's file, contact) @ 18:33:02 on Jun 08, 2005 | Edit History (1)

Oops.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Let's look at the merits of his criticism not him personally | Report this post to moderator
By: Polly_Scy (Odo's file, contact) @ 18:00:50 on Jun 07, 2005

He puts his finger on the real problem: Paramount and the BeeBees NEVER UNDERSTOOD the source of Trek's appeal or what made it work. No matter what you think of him or his work, he's absolutely right about that. You can't duplicate the success of the previous series if you don't understand WHY they were successful. You can throw in all the CGI, catsuits, and hardbodies you like, but that's not what made us love Trek.

But then most of the old timers like me have been saying that for years.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

New Writers | Report this post to moderator
By: shart (Odo's file, contact) @ 23:18:39 on Jun 06, 2005

There is no doubt that Star Trek needs new writers. I'm not sure that JMS is the right person, but maybe he deserves a chance. But maybe someone new is what is really needed... someone without any connections to past shows and bagage that goes with it. What is needed is a writer with real passion for the original Trek vision and the creativity to bring it back to life. Passion and creativity are much more important than his/her resume. Star Trek needs to start looking for new talent, there are lots a young writers out there they just need to start looking.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

5 Minute Flame-Bake Recipe | Report this post to moderator
By: Archangel (Odo's file, contact) @ 19:17:45 on Jun 06, 2005

1) Take large Star Trek based community.

2) Lightly sprinkle with the name "JMS".

3) Season with disparaging comments about Trek and how JMS could do it better.

4) Voila!

--------

"If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land, it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy."

-James Madison


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

It'd be good | Report this post to moderator
By: Postdoc (Odo's file, contact) @ 19:05:29 on Jun 06, 2005

JMS deserves credit for creating a truly unigue show in B5. He basically created and SF novel for TV. All those enigmatic book covers you saw in the store but didn't read-- he brought that kind of stuff to life. I liked DS9, but B5's political plots and its relationships were heavy and entertaining stuff, much more mature and complex than most of DS9. Trek went for the glitz while B5 did some heavy stories. The PsiCorps alone was a great idea, as were the Shadows and Babylon 4. Who can forget the character Zathros?(sic) I don't know why he couldn't finish or why Sinclair disappeared. Anyhow, he'd be a good choice. Will they take somebody with a vision? Who knows.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: It'd be good, not. | Report this post to moderator
    By: Sabotman (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:52:13 on Jun 07, 2005

    more complex eh?
    How about the time the doctor went on a "walk about" the station?
    Certainly a high point of B-5.
    All I can say is this space station really needed to have more securtity or something because there were lot's of homeless just living around the station.
    How many homeless live in military bases w/o molesting?
    Whatever.


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
    • RE: It'd be good, not. | Report this post to moderator
      By: Sennik (Odo's file, contact) @ 12:01:32 on Jun 07, 2005

      It's very easy to look back on a 5 year series and pick out an episode here and there that wasn't exactly a great moment. It's too bad that those moments are few and far between when you look at Babylon 5 from an objective point of view. It's also unfortunate that I (and many others) can look back at 7 years of Voyager and 4 years of Enterprise and pick out at least 10 times more crap episodes than is possible with Babylon 5. Let's look at Voyager Season 1's crap: "Time and Again" and "Cathexis". Yes, only two episodes that I thought were pretty crappy. But I also consider Voyager's first season their best. Season 2: "Projections," "Parturition," "Tattoo," "Cold Fire," "Deadlock," "The Thaw," and "Resolutions." That's 7 episodes that I thought were pretty crappy. That doesn't include the ones that were just below average.

      Like I said, it's very easy to sit back and criticize a show's low points, but when you're trying to compare the garbage that Rick Berman has been shoveling us for the past 2 spin-offs to the excellent character driven, quality acted, and brilliantly written 5 year saga JMS created, there is no comparison whatsoever. JMS would produce a Star Trek series that would be light years ahead of anything Berman produced in terms of quality and staying true to the real ideals of Star Trek (which aren't aliens of the week and big space fights every episode by the way).

      And since you criticize the Lurkers in Downbelow on B5, I'll throw a criticism of Voyager to you: Why would a group of rebels who turned their back on the Federation just suddenly, after one episode, decide: "Hey, lets all put on Starfleet uniforms and be one happy family." Whatever.


      Reply
      Reply
      Quote
      Quote

What will it be? | Report this post to moderator
By: Ralphis (Odo's file, contact) @ 15:47:27 on Jun 06, 2005

Has JMS ever announced what "his" Star Trek show would be? When would it set? Prequel? Sequel? How much wood would a wood chuck chuck if a woodchuck could chuck wood? Just to many questions and not enough brain cells.

--------


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: What will it be? | Report this post to moderator
    By: GaryCLT (Odo's file, contact) @ 17:57:49 on Jun 06, 2005

    Fans will reject any atempt to "reboot" or "re-invent" Star Trek.

    Maybe he can find another show to ruin like RDM did :)


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
    • RE: What will it be? | Report this post to moderator
      By: Bella Oxmyx (Odo's file, contact) @ 18:33:16 on Jun 06, 2005

      Quote:
      Fans will reject any atempt to "reboot" or "re-invent" Star Trek.


      Yeah, that's what a few people said when The Next Generation came out (A Klingon on a Federation ship! It's unthinkable!).

      Star Trek needs a re-boot. It just has to be done in a way that respects the classic elements of the previous shows.


      Reply
      Reply
      Quote
      Quote
      • RE: What will it be? | Report this post to moderator
        By: darkedgex (Odo's file, contact) @ 02:34:07 on Jun 08, 2005

        Quote:
        Yeah, that's what a few people said when The Next Generation came out (A Klingon on a Federation ship! It's unthinkable!).

        As Gary said, TNG was not a "reboot". If you want an example of a reboot, look at what was done with Battlestar Galactica-- you'll note how everything was changed (rebooting Trek would be like making Kirk a girl, for example).

        No, instead TNG took place in TOS's future which allowed it to pay homage to TOS in places (Spock was in a few episodes, McCoy made an appearance in the first episode, and so on). A reboot wouldn't really make that possible.

        The problem with Trek, as a franchise, is they've boxed themselves in. According to various Voyager (and now Enterprise) episodes they've perfected time travel sometime in the future. There's not much wiggle room to do a "Next Next Generation" without running into the time travelling future (which I think would be boring, but who knows).


        Reply
        Reply
        Quote
        Quote
        • RE: What will it be? | Report this post to moderator
          By: Bella Oxmyx (Odo's file, contact) @ 08:29:29 on Jun 08, 2005

          Quote:
          As Gary said, TNG was not a "reboot".

          In his original post he used the words "reboot" and "reinvent." TNG was not a reboot in the sense it re-imagined Kirk and Spock (since TOS cast was still making movies at the time, that would've been especially pointless) but Roddenberry had ambitions for making the second series different in style and substance than the original one.

          You talk about TNG paying homage to TOS -- I remember when TNG first came out a lot of TOS cast griped about how they had nothing to do with the show, and how they didn't like the concept of it. That was because, McCoy's seconds-long appearance in the pilot aside, in its first couple seasons TNG's writers conscientiously tried to distance themselves from the original series (Riker seemed not to know who James T. Kirk was, for example, when Data looked up a reference on the original Enterprise). Only after TNG became a hit in its own right did the episodes that featured Spock and Scotty and Sarek get made.

          All these years later the changes made with TNG don't seem that big a deal, but back then even the minor alterations struck some Trek fans as blasphemy. A French Captain?!! And a BALD Frenchman at that, one who didn't go on away missions?!!! Everyone knew the Captain of the Enterprise had to be a red-blooded swashbuckler! And peace with the Klingons? Purely wishful thinking!

          But more important than these cosmetic shifts, though, were the kind of character and storytelling changes that happened with TNG. With the original series, everything gets wrapped up with a bow by the end of the episode, and won't ever be brought up again: Kirk never brings up Edith Keeler after "The City on the Edge of Forever," or deals with the heartbreak of losing her, even though she was the love of his life. Picard, on the other hand, is never the same person after becoming Locutus. And Data gradually progresses on his quest to become more human, to the point that in "All Good Things," we see his future self acting like a perfectly normal human being. Those kind of character arcs, played out over years, were still a relatively new thing in series television--especially genre television--back when TNG first aired.

          So I'd argue TNG was a reinvention of Star Trek, just one that respected the best elements of what came before it. Its success was due to the fact Roddenberry was ambitious enough to try to capture lightning in a bottle twice, and not bring out the same show with different actors and costumes.

          I wish Star Trek had that kind of ambitious champion today. All the talk on these boards and elsewhere about whether the next series should be a prequel, or set in the Academy, or take place in the Mirror Universe, is fun, but ultimately it's not going to be a change in setting that saves Trek, in my opinion. Trek, at its heart, is about groundbreaking storytelling, exploring subjects and themes other series hesitate to touch, in ways other shows just can't do. Both TOS and TNG broke new ground in their day, and it's time for Star Trek to be back in the forefront of daring storytelling, again.


          Reply
          Reply
          Quote
          Quote
      • RE: What will it be? | Report this post to moderator
        By: GaryCLT (Odo's file, contact) @ 19:52:03 on Jun 06, 2005

        TNG was NOT a reboot! TNG was just updated and set in the future. It wasn't so different from TOS if you really look at it.


        Reply
        Reply
        Quote
        Quote
        • RE: What will it be? | Report this post to moderator
          By: Bella Oxmyx (Odo's file, contact) @ 20:04:23 on Jun 06, 2005

          Quote:
          It wasn't so different from TOS if you really look at it.

          Sure it was. With the exception of some of the shows in season one and two, TNG struck out on its own path. Evolving characters. Vulnerable characters (you'd never see Kirk crying after being assimilated). A history to the series that played out over seven seasons. The result -- renewed popularity for the franchise, and an Emmy nod for best series.

          My real point is, anytime someone suggests trying to do anything new with Star Trek, there's always those elements of the Old Guard who bitch that if it isn't all kept exactly the same, it won't be any good. It's the same kind of mentality held dear by B&B.


          Reply
          Reply
          Quote
          Quote
  • RE: What will it be? | Report this post to moderator
    By: Meglo (Odo's file, contact) @ 17:02:11 on Jun 06, 2005

    Like I said in another thread, I don't think any details have come out. He may not have even told Paramount much, considering the whole DS9/B5 thing.

    --------

    The supervisor is Verizon!


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
    • RE: What will it be? | Report this post to moderator
      By: Sennik (Odo's file, contact) @ 17:12:52 on Jun 06, 2005

      Nothing official has come from either JMS or Paramount. But I do think Paramount has seen his idea, as it would be hard to pitch a new series without giving the production company some idea of what he wants to do. JMS and Zabel know what they'd do, and Paramount is also aware of what their idea would be.

      Right now it's just Berman's contract holding things up as far as I'm concerned. Early 2007 can't come soon enough if it means JMS taking over the Star Trek franchise.


      Reply
      Reply
      Quote
      Quote

Gets my vote | Report this post to moderator
By: Scorpius (Odo's file, contact) @ 15:44:04 on Jun 06, 2005

I'm all for JMS taking over the Star Trek reigns once it's dead enough to oust Rick Berman.

Not unusual to see a large scale Trek fan denomination bashing his achievements with B5. There is still a significant number of Trek fans that refuse to watch or even attempt to appreciate anything in the B5 universe because, well, because it isn't Star Trek.

Talented people from other franchises that love the original Star Trek will do no harm. Coto was one such man; but as much as I appreciate Coto, his resume is nothing on JMS.

All hale King JMS...

Now all we wait for is the beheading of the Trek franchise under Rick and Mini-Rick... Let the JMS takeover begin then!

--------

"Men don't use sex to get what they want. Sex IS what they want" - Frasier


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: Gets my vote | Report this post to moderator
    By: Cap'n Calhoun (Odo's file, contact) @ 00:59:39 on Jun 07, 2005

    Quote:
    I'm all for JMS taking over the Star Trek reigns once it's dead enough to oust Rick Berman.

    I'm a fan of Babylon 5. I have the entire series on DVD, plus Crusade and the TV movies. But to this I must say:

    No.

    No. No. No. No. No.

    I don't trust JMS to "play by the rules" of Star Trek any more than I would trust his buddy Harlan Ellison to run it. They're both great writers, but I tend to think they don't get Star Trek.

    I'd love for him to prove me wrong. But I want to see him do it in a novel first. Prove to me that he really understands Trek. (And, no, great as it was, "Worldsinger" doesn't count.)

    Quote:
    There is still a significant number of Trek fans that refuse to watch or even attempt to appreciate anything in the B5 universe because, well, because it isn't Star Trek.

    Probably true. But, last I checked, all of the B5 fans I know were Trek fans first. I know this isn't the case for everyone, but it certainly is for the people I've known.

    The people I've known who have moderately watched both series have trashed B5 for its immaturity and often absurdly awful dialogue. Despite my best attempts, I've rarely been able to successfully defend the show when these things have been pointed out, because they were usually true. Even some of the dialogue that comes off well is pretty awful, but in the hands of Andreas Katsulas and Peter Jurasik, some very corny lines actually come off sounding pretty good. (This is nothing new: Alec Guiness and Harrison Ford were doing the same thing nearly 30 years ago.)

    Also, look at the quality of JMS' onscreen work since B5: A Call to Arms, Crusade, Legend of the Rangers. Each had its moments, but I'd rank each of these below an average episode of Enterprise.

    What tears me apart is that JMS excels when it comes to epic plots. "The Coming of Shadows" is one of the single finest hours of TV ever produced. And for all of my problems with JMS' sometimes-awful dialogue, when he does get it right, he really gets it right.

    Quote:
    Talented people from other franchises that love the original Star Trek will do no harm.

    Then why does the use of the word "reboot" scare the tar out of me? I'm hoping this doesn't mean throwing 30 years of continuity out the window, but I'm not counting on it...

    Quote:
    Coto was one such man; but as much as I appreciate Coto, his resume is nothing on JMS.

    Well, give him a chance to build it up first. ;-)

    Quote:
    All hale King JMS...

    Appropriately enough, "hale" means "to compel to go". Freudian slip? Certainly, I would like to compel JMS to go far, far away from Star Trek unless he can earn a lot more confidence from me.


    Quote:
    Now all we wait for is the beheading of the Trek franchise under Rick and Mini-Rick... Let the JMS takeover begin then!

    The funny thing is, Trek was actually never to bad under Berman until Braga became a higher-up. I still would rather see someone else in charge, but something that few seem to appreciate is that Rick Berman gets a lot of things about Star Trek that others don't. He doesn't always understand what makes for good entertainment, but he knows what Roddenberry set out to do, and I get the sneaking suspicion that the messes he's prevented may be far greater than the ones he's made. I could be wrong.... but I could be right. All the same, if Berman goes, I won't be shedding any tears. But I will be watching his replacement very closely.

    You want a real replacement who gets Trek? I can think of a few. Most of them are busy working on The 4400 or Battlestar Galactica at the moment, but it sounds like we have a few years to wait anyway.

    --------

    "You know what six movies average out to be really good? The first six Star Trek movies!" -- Fry, Futurama


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote

JMS is an idiot | Report this post to moderator
By: Salter1701 (Odo's file, contact) @ 14:51:35 on Jun 06, 2005 | Edit History (2)

read it back, didnt make any sense


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

the kettle calling the pot | Report this post to moderator
By: Sabotman (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:46:34 on Jun 06, 2005

Why is it fans get all up when Joe sez something about Trek?
Where's B-5 people?
Where are any of the B-5 spin offs?
Is Paramount ruining Trek, yes & no.
Berman ran it down w/ Voyager & Enterprise & Paramount shelved it for a time. Be it to let Berman's contract run out or whatever.
Now let's look at Joe.
B-5 barly got a 5th yr [remember he wraped things up in season 4?].
How about the movie spin off, Exclaber-? Yup, w/ his X-Files rip-off ep, the complete take on DSN uniforms, please be glad the show died a quick end [maybe he should have given into the sex character].
Whatelse has Joe done? Jerimiah didn't even have a full 2nd yr [thanks to Joe].
Joe, before you start tring to clean up someone else's yard, make sure your trash is cleaned up too.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: the kettle calling the pot | Report this post to moderator
    By: Sennik (Odo's file, contact) @ 13:17:14 on Jun 06, 2005

    In SEASON ONE, actually even before Babylon 5 was airing, JMS came forward and said it was a 5-year story, beginning to end, and that's it. He took a shot at Paramount even then by saying he was not looking to create a franchise. So your question "where's B5 now?" is a question someone who has either never watched the show or didn't understand its uniqueness would ask.

    The B5 people? Well, I think one of them has a quest starring role on one of the biggest hits on TV right now, LOST. Claudia Christian has done occassional movie appearances. Bruce Boxleitner has also appeared in a movie or two I think. And even beyond that, where's the actors who played any character on Voyager or Enterprise? To compare an exceptional group of stage actors (such as Andreas Katsulas and Peter Jurasik) to actors the likes of the guy who played Chakotay or Mayweather is absurd.

    The ONE B5 spin-off that had the potential to be something excellent was cancelled because the network it was airing on was interfering with JMS's creative process. They wanted more sex, less character stuff, more action, and so on. JMS said there was no way he was going to work with a network that wouldn't let him do his show his way, so he pulled the plug on it. Meanwhile, we got Rick Berman who caved in to UPN's wishes for more sex, less character stuff, more action and so on. Enterprise was cancelled and is regarded as a large waste of time. Crusade is regarded (by most people who wanted a new B5 story) as a series that was about to hit its stride, much like Firefly.

    You obviously know NOTHING about the behind the scenes stuff. JMS and Chris Carter (creator of the X-Files) are friends, hence the X-Files "homage" episode on Crusade. Not a rip off. Get your facts straight. The uniforms were not rip offs of DS9. DS9 was TNG uniforms but with reversed colors. And I mean really, in a sci-fi show, when you're portraying military characters, there's going to be similarities between costumes. There's only so much you can do with the idea of a futuristic military uniform.

    Jeremiah didn't get a full 2nd year because again, the suits behind the scenes were stepping on his ideas and he left the show. The man has integrity for his work, and isn't content to slap something together, put the words Star Trek on it, and air it. Unlike the hack producers Star Trek has had for the past 18 years.

    And I cannot believe you asked what else has Joe done? Would you like the complete laundry list or just the ones off the top of my head? Currently working on a novel, writes Amazing Spider-Man monthly, writes Fantastic Four monthly, wrote Midnight Nation (12 issue series), wrote Rising Stars (24 issue series), wrote a screenplay (one of a planned trilogy) for a Rising Stars film, wrote a graphic novel Dream Police, writes Supreme Power monthly, pitched an idea to Paramount (with series bible and all) for a new Star Trek series, had a series ready to go with Chris Carter but it fell through, had a series with someone else ready to go but it got nixed because it very closely paralleled certain events that happened on Sept.11th, 2001 (his story was written before those events). He's been told by DC Comics that if he ever leaves Marvel he's got a Superman monthly series with his name on it whenever he wants it. And so on and so on and so on.

    The man's yard is quite clean, thanks. His only failing is he has a very large ego. I think he'd either need to get the reigns on that ego, or he'd have a lot of problems working under Paramount. But if left alone, he's capable of producing some very powerful TV and would do wonders with the Star Trek franchise.

    Anyway, before you start slagging someone's work, get your facts straight.


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
    • RE: the kettle calling the pot | Report this post to moderator
      By: Sam Cogley (Odo's file, contact) @ 17:31:45 on Jun 06, 2005 | Edit History (1)

      I seem to recall Jennifer Lien having a fairly important role in "American History X" - I noticed it because an actor from each of the then-current Trek series was in the movie (Avery Brooks was the other).

      Kate Mulgrew also seems to have had a rather successful stage show recently.

      --------

      Growing up leads to growing old and then to dying,
      And dying to me dont sound like all that much fun...
      -John Mellencamp

      Political tags-such as royalist, communist, democrat, populist, fascist, liberal, conservative, and so forth-are never basic criteria.
      The human race divides politically into those who want people to be controlled and those who have no such desire.
      -Robert A. Heinlein

      Samuel T. Cogley, Attorney at Law


      Reply
      Reply
      Quote
      Quote
    • RE: the kettle calling the pot | Report this post to moderator
      By: Brikar (Odo's file, contact) @ 13:52:05 on Jun 06, 2005

      And let's not forget that he's not a new talent, either. In addition to being supremely busy now, he's been around the block for a while. That includes positions on shows like "Murder, She Wrote", "The Twilight Zone" and "Jake and the Fat Man" as well as other fare like "He-Man," "She-Ra" and "Ghostbusters".

      We'll ignore his credits on "Walker, Texas Ranger" though...

      --------

      "Serenity" is the movie "Star Wars" prequels wish they could be.


      Reply
      Reply
      Quote
      Quote
      • RE: the kettle calling the pot | Report this post to moderator
        By: Sennik (Odo's file, contact) @ 17:03:39 on Jun 06, 2005

        Correct you are. And I know I was hugely surprised when I found out he was involved in "The Real Ghostbusters" cartoon back in the day. It was my favorite cartoon, and it just fit that he had some impact on it considering Babylon 5 is my all time favorite sci-fi series.

        He, nor anyone for that matter, will be doing anything with Star Trek until early 2007. Paramount isn't willing to buy out Rick Berman's contract, and he's not willing to walk away from it. It's a stand off until the contract expires. Once it does, Paramount will start looking at their options. Until then, enjoy Battlestar Galactica, Alias, 24, Lost, and all the other good shows out there. I know I'm not going to be missing Berman's Crap Trek. I'm looking forward to what someone with some real talent can do.


        Reply
        Reply
        Quote
        Quote
        • RE: the kettle calling the pot | Report this post to moderator
          By: Brikar (Odo's file, contact) @ 17:23:20 on Jun 06, 2005

          I was surprised too, though I think more surprised by "Murder, She Wrote" since I'm so used to seeing his name attached to sci-fi fare.

          --------

          "Serenity" is the movie "Star Wars" prequels wish they could be.


          Reply
          Reply
          Quote
          Quote
          • RE: the kettle calling the pot | Report this post to moderator
            By: SpiritOne (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 18:06:42 on Jun 06, 2005

            well everybody had to start somewhere right?

            I hope that in 07, Paramont decides to go with his ideas and let him run a series the way he wants to. I love Babylon 5, its one of my all time favorite scifi shows. Sure it had some cheasy episodes here and there, but damn what a kick ass show that turned out to be.

            I still get goose bumps watching Sherridans fugitive fleet come back to earth to dispose President Clarke. Hell, Im getting goosebumps just thinking about watching it.

            --------

            Today is a fabulous day to dye - The Metrosexual Klingon.


            Reply
            Reply
            Quote
            Quote
    • RE: the kettle calling the pot | Report this post to moderator
      By: Dmitri Andreyevich (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 13:43:24 on Jun 06, 2005

      He does indeed have great credentials.
      And I like the attitude he has regarding the Trek franchise.
      Geez, if I were the Paramount honchos, I'd give him the greenlight to produce his take on Trek, WITHOUT shutting the door in the faces of other producers with their own takes.
      After all, two different Trek shows running in the same year is not without precedent.


      Reply
      Reply
      Quote
      Quote

B5 Film... | Report this post to moderator
By: Meglo (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:38:38 on Jun 06, 2005

I think most people are glad the B5 film didn't come to fruition this time around. The idea was generally received with a "meh".

I get the feeling JMS doesn't want to tack on a story to the original B5 characters, but I think a movie about Sheridan's son is one of the few concepts that will fly.

--------

The supervisor is Verizon!


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: B5 Film... | Report this post to moderator
    By: BringBackKirk (Odo's file, contact) @ 16:37:02 on Jun 06, 2005

    I will disagree with one thing he said. Paramount isn't driving Trek into the ground. They already HAVE driven Trek into the ground. The only chance they have now is to resurrect it. I would think by a reboot, he would start fresh with Kirk and crew recast.


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
    • RE: B5 Film... | Report this post to moderator
      By: Sennik (Odo's file, contact) @ 17:10:16 on Jun 06, 2005

      I think maybe reboot is the wrong word. I don't think he'll go back and redo TOS with a new Kirk, Spock, and McCoy. From interviews and comments I've read, he's not another Rick Berman who wants to prove he can do it better than Roddenberry. He has too much respect for the ideals Roddenberry brought forward to do that. I think by reboot he means moving the franchise away from the "bumpy head alien of the week" stories, and the "action but little character development" and the "ensemble cast but really not" mentality that Rick Berman has plagued Star Trek with for the past 2 spin-offs.

      Being in the comics biz for as long as he has now, that's probably where he picked up the word. In comics, if a series has a high issue count, and they feel it's keeping people from jumping on board because they're scared of over 100 issues of continuity, sometimes the publisher will "reboot" the series at issue #1 just to draw in new people. Usually it involves a new creative team, new direction and so on. I think that's the type of reboot JMS is talking about.


      Reply
      Reply
      Quote
      Quote
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.