--Oh really! You think you are really in my head. Interesting. One, if you even know me, I have been adament about the fact that I do not like the idea of Kirk coming back.--
Doesn't that render your opinion as a little biased, then? It could have had a totally different storyline and you would've hated it no matter what.
--I put it in my signature because I thought it was humourous.--
So I'm sure "Vlad fans' opinions are useless" is a very funny sig line too, right?
--You want a good laugh, watch the whole damn thing.--
You sound like those people that say "I hate ENT! You know why? Just watch the episodes! There's your evidence!" There's no substance to that.
--Two, yes, those people think they are being serious. I've emailed them and they would have loved for this to come about. I think that is ridiculous.--
You're lying. I know those people, and they have never said that, ever.
Even in a public Q&A they said this:
Quote:
master_q : ....... Some people seem to think that the second official trailer suggests that the BBK
group wants to combine all five series into one project with the return of Kirk. Is that true?
BBKUS : No. The trailer is simply meant to show how exciting Kirk's return could be. It shows
that Kirk fits in to the modern era. It's meant to show possibilities.
On the trailer page itself, it even says:
Quote:
This short film is not so much an endorsement on a particular plot point, but an effort to show the exciting possibilities that Kirk’s return would bring.
That's it, that's the trailer's purpose. Period.
--You seriously believe I'm a troll, that is unbelievably LAUGHABLE. I've been hear on TREKWEB for over three years.--
Trollers have been on Trekweb for a hell of a lot longer than that.
--All my posts have been about my enjoyment of Trek.--
Except for your signature line that negates anything positive you have to say.
--I enjoy "ENTERPRISE" and that is no crime and definitely not a concern of yours.--
Did I say it was a crime? It wasn't a concern of mine until you started judging other people.
--Yes, I hated the "Bring Back Kirk" trailer.--
You just hate what it stands for.
--MISSED THE PURPOSE OF THE FILM! IT WAS A GODDAMN CHEESY FAN FILM!--
Again, it's a TRAILER. Not a FAN FILM.
--IT WAS NEVER MEANT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY! HENCE WHY MY SIGNATURE WAS NEVER MEANT TO BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY!--
Your postings have shown it was a serious statement that comes right from your heart.
--Yeesh, you really are a real winner. I could care less what you think of me troll or not. I think the fact that fans put this together to support the bring back kirk venture is a joke.--
But you don't go into specifics, you just keep saying it's a joke.
--Kirk is dead. DEAL WITH IT!--
Your characters on the shows you like may be disposable, but some people care a bit more than that.
--Bringing him back would be the ultimate cry for help for Trek. You are the one who missed the purpose. You think the fact that bringing back Kirk would do wonders for trek. My ass it would. It would bring ratings up JUST ONCE! Then once all is said and done Trek would be back on a spiral slump to the bottom all over again.--
Again, you can't back that up with ANYTHING. It's a proven fact that crossover Trek episodes in the past have RETAINED ratings after the episode itself. Nobody's asking for them to have a Trek series revolve around Shatner. They're saying the episode will bring people in, and it will retain in the following episodes, and if the episodes are GOOD, they'll STAY. Coto and Reeve-Stevens have shown they CAN make good episodes. All they have to do is follow the Shatner episode with strong episodes, and the ratings will retain. But if they don't bring in Shatner, even if the episodes remain good, people aren't going to return to ENT fast enough to keep the show on the air.
--Realize one thing Kirk's reign over Trek is done and over.--
Who said people want Kirk to keep on reigning over Trek? The people who made that trailer just want to correct a mistake, and in doing so it could also help that show you claim to be a fan of.
--Trek needs people who know what they are doing. People who can make descent and character driven shows.--
Did the people who made that trailer say that they want people in charge of Trek who don't know what they're doing?
--Kirk was an enjoyable character, but now that he's gone, it's time for someone else to step up.--
That hasn't happened yet, but that's irrelevent. If the people in charge can do that, more power to them. And nobody associated with that trailer has said anything opposing that.
--Bringing Back Kirk is the biggest mistake in the world, and I for one am comfortable to the fact that Paramount and Shatner can't come up with a financial compromise. As far as I'm concerned I hope it never gets resolved.--
But again, you don't say why. You just keep repeating rhetoric.
--So, since you are "Informed" now you are more "Informed" to the fact that I could careless whether Kirk comeback or not.--
If you didn't care one way or the other, it wouldn't be in your SIGNATURE for god's sake!
--Also you are informed to the fact that I put it in my signature to BE HUMOROUS JACK!--
How is it humorous? It's just lies! You're claiming they want that trailer's storyline to be a real storyline. And you're claiming they want to be "in charge" of Trek. There's not even a hint of irony in what you're saying. That's like someone putting a sig link that says "EntFan! is a crackhead!" and then being shocked if you say something about it.
--See the Ron White joke below? Got a problem with it?--
Not at all, it's clearly a humorous direct quote. You're not projecting your own agenda into it.
--Yeesh, it's a goddamn Trek site...lighten the fuck up... --
Exactly, it's a Trek site. Think about that. If this was a Star Wars site, the sig would make more sense, even though it would still be a falsehood.
Again, with that sig, you're getting attention. Why aren't you happy?
(2)
| 
