menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
Feature Story

Features

Deus Finds "The Forge" More Suggestive Than Substantive

Features

By O. Deus / 18:36, 22 November 2004 / ENTERPRISE Reviews

Beam This Story to a Friend
Complete the form below to e-mail a link to this story to a friend.

Your Name:
Your E-Mail:
Your Friend's Name:
Your Friend's E-Mail:
Subject:
Message (optional):

Reviews Ex Deus

Title: "The Forge"

Overall: 6.5
Performances: 5.5
Writing: 7
Direction: 5
FX & Prod Value: 5.5


Synopsis: Archer and co. investigate the bombing of the Earth embassy on Vulcan.

Review: The premise of the three-part Vulcan arc is an interesting one, especially considering the need to bridge the gap in continuity between ENTERPRISE's mangled portrayal of the Vulcans and the STAR TREK portrayal of the Vulcans, two often quite outrightly incompatible. "The Forge" itself also tosses out a variety of interesting ideas into the mix, which may or may not be delivered on properly in future episodes. However, "The Forge" itself is nearly impossible to review on its own because it's simply more a fragment of an episode than an episode.

As with the Augments arc, "The Forge" appears to be part of an attempt to return to the prequel concept as a bridge to the Original Series and has a nice selection of continuity references to TOS. While it still continues to be filled with negative Vulcan stereotypes, the arc appears to be moving towards the argument that these Vulcans are bad primarily because they are the Vulcans in authority and prefiguring a social upheaval on Vulcan that will bring it more in line with the Vulcan we know. Of course the entire
premise that such events had occurred in recent memory fly in the face of all of STAR TREK, as we know continuity and ENTERPRISE even in the best of situations go together about as well as oil and water. And for those troubled by that, ENTERPRISE's own premise renders it as being outside of STAR TREK history via time-tampering from the future, rather than a continuing part of STAR TREK history as a whole.

The actual Vulcan drama is hit and miss with Ambassador Soval returning as a strong character but the Vulcan high command crudely portrayed and poorly acted. Soval's speech to Archer, though, sounds like recycled deep throat cliches. Admiral Forrest is somewhat unnecessarily killed for shock value where having him severely injured in sickbay would actually have been more far more effective. Trip's reaction of callously not caring about the embassy guard's body but his mind is out of character for him. Trip has many failings but inhumanity hasn't been one of them until now.

STAR TREK has more traditionally done three-part episodes and ENTERPRISE's new attempt to carry out these arcs has its flaws. Like "Borderland," "The Forge" feels like less of an episode and more of a preview to an episode. But where "Borderland" had more content and a solid ending, "The Forge" strings together exposition scenes and some action with the end result being more of a snack than a full dinner. Considering that the episode begins with a bang, the succeeding action mostly drags in scenes in which various people discuss or argue with Vulcans. There is no real sense of loss or catastrophe aside from Archer's scene with the coffins.

Once in the desert the pace does not actually pick up any but the interest level increases mainly because we are finally exploring Vulcan. Some elements such as the sandfire are well done, though the special effects for it and the Sehlat are quite inferior. The Sehlat in particular looks like CGI from the early 90's. The editing attempts to compensate for this by showing it only in quick shots is effective to a degree but still would have been better done with the Sehlat entirely out of sight. Just as the electrical sandstorm worked much better as flashes from behind rocks, so too the Sehlat worked better as a growl than a cgi creation. Special effects problems also plague the embassy bombing with the pillar collapsing blast scene looking just downright silly. I don't know if ENTERPRISE's budget has been cut or just stretched (in light of the lower UPN licensing fee) but in such a situation, suggestion is better than showing poor effects.

All in all "The Forge" raises some interesting ideas and possibilities but lacks real meaning until future episodes pick up the ball or don't.

Next week: I've got Surak in my head and I can't get him out.



More Top StoriesComments
Nov 22Exclusive Digital Content Now Available With New Star Trek Movie on iTunes
0
Nov 22Star Trek Online MMORPG Producer Talks Space Combat and Away Missions0
Nov 21Faran Tahir on His 10 Minutes as Captain Robau in J.J. Abrams Star Trek Movie2
Nov 21J.J. Abrams, Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman on Shatner and Nimoy7
Nov 21Roberto Orci on the Status of the Star Trek XII Script and the Possibility of Producing a New Star Trek TV Series16
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

44 comments Post New | Help
View:

DaVinci Code-esq | Report this post to moderator
By: Ang (Odo's file, contact) @ 22:30:38 on Nov 24, 2004

Love the new story arc! It's a nice little "DaVinci Code" take off (a secret society guarding repressed secrets about a revered spiritual leader from 2000 years ago!)

It's been a long time since I read "Spock's World," so I'm a little fuzzy on Vulcan history, but I'm enjoying this story very much.

Ok, so Tripp's outburst about not caring about the security guard's body was unnecessary, but otherwise great work. The DNA-aging thing was interesting too. And Mayweather actually got a couple of lines in the episode.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Lil' harsh on an arc episode, aren't we? | Report this post to moderator
By: Bucky (Odo's file, contact) @ 18:34:58 on Nov 23, 2004

This episode was all setup and it set it up the next two episodes nicely, you shouldn't dock it just cuz its not a full episode. Besides, it used the katra, something I hadn't even heard mentioned since Star Trek 3. That's good enough in my book

--------

An elephant never forgets . . .TO KILL!


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Talk About Depressing... | Report this post to moderator
By: Vashta (Odo's file, contact) @ 17:32:33 on Nov 23, 2004

Wow. I watch what I think to me possibly the best Enterprise ever, and I come to this website...supposedly a pro trek one, and see this review. The Forge had everything you could want. It had repeated TOS references and an interesting story. You could not ask for more Trek minded writers. You could not ask for more TOS like music and style.
I 'm really not trying to be pissy, but I don't see what Coto could do to make Dues and the other Enterprise haters happy. They fix the TCW and...you hate it. They come home to earth and...you hate it. They bring Spiner back and...you dont like the character. They bring back eugenic supermen, and you don't like how they are played. They go to a real TOS alien homeworld and explore it...and again you hate it.
Please give Coto a chance to fix things. He can't do it in one or two episodes. When/if Enterprise dies, Star Trek is going with it for many years. Is this what we really want?
Next week..Dues tells us how much Awakening sucked..


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: Talk About Depressing... | Report this post to moderator
    By: IceHunter (Odo's file, contact) @ 02:45:42 on Nov 27, 2004

    Don't over generalize. I think much of what has gone before has been crap (or close to it) Berman and Brag haven't an inch of writing talent - but this was muuuuch better. In many ways i consider this the first real Enterprise episode.
    This has ramifications all over (even though a lot of younger fans probably missed a lot of it)

    For instance, the questions the Vulcan asked Archer in the desert: We've heard them before, in the motion picture "the voyage home" - Spock having lost his memory is being retrained by a Vulcan computer, and it is asking him the same questions. Ie, Spock was a Syranite. Ie, the Vulcan government by Kirks time will be Syranites. How is that for a spin.


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
  • RE: Talk About Depressing... | Report this post to moderator
    By: Sisko2375 (Odo's file, contact) @ 00:35:40 on Nov 24, 2004

    He has always been that way, years ago when Deep Space nine was still in production all he could say about it was practically negative. I quit coming to this site because of people like him. Your right, you would think that this would be a great site for fans to get together. But all too often all you hear is somebody complaing and bitching about something. And O doosh is there Queen so to say. I honestly think he is never happy unless he can point out something negative, guess it will be another 6-7 years before I come back lol..we will see


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
  • RE: Talk About Depressing... | Report this post to moderator
    By: NAFF (Odo's file, contact) @ 18:40:41 on Nov 23, 2004

    So what you are saying is we 'enterprise haters' can't have a different view to you?

    Because we aren't easily impressed by a few nods (wow, I bet that took 'em a whole 5 minutes) to past shows and movies, you don't like it.

    Because we aren't in rapture because the Temporal Cold War was wrapped-up too quickly for the investment viewers had made in it, you don't like it.

    Because we aren't impressed by drab and obvious storylines (you didn't know the those Vulcans were behind the bomb?), you don't like it.

    Because we found Spiner to be an old ham, you don't like it.

    You, sir or madam, are a facist.

    I bet you belong to the group of folks who vote 'Excellent' to every episode in the Trek Web poll.

    You probably have all the action figures in your bedroom too.

    What you and your ilk cannot stomach is that Enterprise is a childish, badly-made television show.

    There is a reason it can't make the top 100 in the ratings....

    ...because it is *** CRAP ***.

    You have some potentially good characters in Hoshi and Phlox, yet week-in and week-out they are ignored. The rest shouldn't have even been cast, because they are *** BORING *** and *** CANNOT ACT ***

    Week-after-week we have to suffer STAR TREK: T&A.

    (that's Star Trek: T'Pol and Archer for you younger readers)

    When I see a good episode, I'll acknowlege it. But there aren't too many of them.

    The only reason this show hasn't been cancelled is to sell it to syndication and make *** MONEY *** out of the fans who buy the DVD sets.

    Don't dare tell us 'enterprise haters' what we will think of episodes we haven't even seen yet. You probably have made your mind up they are 'excellent', but unlike you, WE CAN THINK FOR OURSELVES.


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
    • RE: Talk About Depressing... | Report this post to moderator
      By: Sisko2375 (Odo's file, contact) @ 21:30:42 on Nov 25, 2004

      First of all..you do not know me. Second, I'm not talking about just Enterprise, I'm talking about Deep space nine when it was first run. Third ..no I do not have any of the enterprise action figures, I have a shit load of DS9 figures, but they are not in my bedroom. 4th...I rated the last episode a 8...as in very good. You sound like a very angry little man ..or woman...and I bet if you were face to face to me you would be as tough as you feel as you are protected behind that keyboard. Why are you so angry that there are a lot of fans who want to go to a place to talk OBJECTIVELY about something that we enjoy? Does that scare you? Look at Steve K..... He objectively talks about things in a civil understanding way. You sound full of hate and anger. Why are you even a fan if you feel that way. What I was saying that is for 7 years, everytime I visit this site there are people like your self who RIP EVERYTHING!!!!!! If there is sooooooooo much you dislike about it why in the hell are you even watching it??? You could watch american Idol or top model instead, now theres a choice that will make you think


      Reply
      Reply
      Quote
      Quote
    • RE: Talk About Depressing... | Report this post to moderator
      By: Vashta (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:20:44 on Nov 24, 2004

      Geeze Naff simma down now! I disagree with you and you call me a facist for disagreeing with you? Talk about pot calling the kettle black! If you don't like the show, fine, more power to you. I am more than happy for you that you have an opinion and a website such as this to express it. Please don't belittle me for expressing mine.
      So don't worry Naff, Enterprise will probably get cancelled at the end of the season. Then you can spend the next 10 years watching something other than Star Trek because it won't be around.


      Reply
      Reply
      Quote
      Quote

Forge was improved | Report this post to moderator
By: Postdoc (Odo's file, contact) @ 14:51:27 on Nov 23, 2004

The show had some interesting bits in it; the beamout from the embassy and the storm were interesting. I can't figure out where T'Pol's character is, her deference to Archer on her own planet suggests she hasn't recovered from the drugs yet.

Unfortunately this show came off as somewhat leaden in the modern trek way, just a bunch of people talking in the dark. Home was better. In light of Blalock's note that her attempt to be in character by not eating with her hands was rebuffed, how can this thing improve?

Who decided that Star Trek had to have characters that barely cry, yell, or laugh? Has Archer even cracked a smile in four years? I don't think so.
I still think this show is like Law and Order in space minus seventy percent of the cynicism. Whether that is good or bad depends on the viewer.

Using TOS to back up Enteprise is risky. It's like contradicting yourself every week. There were some good parts, but I have no idea what Enterprise is about anymore.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

If you want a 'Cliff's Notes' on Trek history--go read Okuda's encyclo | Report this post to moderator
By: Chronic Harlot (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 14:04:14 on Nov 23, 2004

Alright, I'm starting to suspect that this backlash against Deus suggests something about the continuity-pornographers of our little community.

For the record, this 'XXX Continuity Porn' (which is what Cotto is seeking to give us) is STILL not an improvement on the cardboard characterizations, larthargic plotting and unremarkable dialouge that has plauged ENT for years.

Excusing the glaring flaws still present in this show (from the acting on up to the writing) just because Cotto is now doing all this "prequel stuff" doesn't make the show any better from a dramatic standpoint.

If you want a 'Cliff's Notes' on Trek history--go read Okuda's encyclopedia; I thought ENT was supposed to be a 'dramatic one hour presentation'...a series, not only about the early days of human exploration, but also a show about seven characters living and working together in space.

--------

Image
The autumn days swung soft around me, like cotton on
my skin. But as the embers of the summer lost their
breath and disappeared, my heart went cold, and
only hollow rhythms resounded from within.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Oh, Deus! | Report this post to moderator
By: Captain Chris (Odo's file, contact) @ 12:10:34 on Nov 23, 2004

I usually agree with your reviews. And when I don't, I at least understand your points. But here, you've missed it.

This episode was exactly the kind of episode I expected when the series started. It laid the foundation of the Human-Vulcan aliance, while explaining the current distrust between the two species. We learn a little more about the planet Vulcan and some of their geo-political issues. It made a heroic attempt at connecting the dots to answer the continuity questions that the show raised over the last three seasons.

Were there flaws? Yes, and if I'm going to pick nits here they are: The earth embasy looked like a model. After noting the irony of some vulcan laws, the Vulcan stranger in the desert laughed. But overall, this is the prequel I wanted to see. After this arc, bring on the Andorians!


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

hmm | Report this post to moderator
By: Daniel (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:31:29 on Nov 23, 2004

Well...I hated the first 2 seasons of Enterprise. HATED. Last season was much more entertaining...but not really what I wanted Star Trek to be. This season has been perfect, they are telling the kind of stories that I could have told them from the begining that they needed to tell.

This was a perfect episode that kept me interested and excited from the first frame. Loved it. Loved it. Loved it.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

simply a good show | Report this post to moderator
By: neshama (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:48:50 on Nov 23, 2004

O. deus (too aptly named) is again being too hard on Enterprise. He (or she) reminds me too much of the parents of a kid who are angry and disappointed when he brings home only an A minus on an exam or makes second violin in the school orchestra or JV in soccer - unless it it exactly what he is looking for, he is angry and ready to turn his back on the whole enterprise, so to speak. This show is good, and The Forge was really good. There was mystery, adventure, surprise, interesting characters and yes continuity too. Was it Hamlet? No. But it was quite simply better and more intriguing than anything else you could have seen on TV that night. For the younger generation, who aren't as focused on 40 years of continuity and simply want to be excited and introduced to the wonders of good SF, this show is the best thing out there. Apparently, for reasons that elude me, the actors, writers and producers of Enterprise seem to read these notes, and because O.Deus is your lead reviewer, his negative and depressing reviews get the most attnetion. He is killing something wonderful. Look at the audience votes and you will see a truer picture of what people think - Enterprise is (most of the time, and especially under Manny Coto) excellent TV. Because of the nature of SF, requiring invention and surprise and novelty, it isn't as easy to create a top-notch show week after week - you can't rely on stock jokes and stock situations. Enterprise does a good job of exciting and entertaining. Please let it thrive by letting it be what it is - good SF - and condemning it for what it is not, some impossible ideal combination of theatre/literature. Be a little forgiving and appreciate what you have.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

The Forge review | Report this post to moderator
By: Timmer (Odo's file, contact) @ 07:27:23 on Nov 23, 2004


Sorry but I happen to think Deus is right in his reviews. That's not to say the shows aren't watchable. But when Jolene Blalock & John Billingsley openly disagree with the direction of the show & it's characters, it reveals there's trouble in paradise. Both actors have problems with the way the Vulcan's are portrayed, including the failure of the Trip/T'Pol love angle & the overall recycling of storylines among other things.
We're all Trek fans here after all but some of us understand that in an industry where ratings=money & money=survival, that Star Trek is fighting for it's very life. Changes must be brought in before it's too late. Remember that Gene Roddenberry was around to push for Star Trek's revival in the 80's but if the plug were pulled now we may lose it for good. No one will be there to revive it in 10 yrs time & 3 million fans cannot keep a franchise afloat forever. Ratings must rise, the whole franchise depends on it.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: The Forge review | Report this post to moderator
    By: IceHunter (Odo's file, contact) @ 02:49:13 on Nov 27, 2004

    Do pay attention will you, they had problems with the way the vulcans were portraied BEFORE Coto started, all things in print were before he started to explain why they haven't been anything like what they should be.


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
  • RE: The Forge review | Report this post to moderator
    By: Ghost of Sam Kirk (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:21:56 on Nov 23, 2004

    I've come to the conclusion that O Deus rights his reviews with one question in mind, what will get the biggest reaction from my readers? What other purpose could he have for writing the same reviews every week? He clearly enjoys watching everyone react to what he writes. If he truly hates the show, than what is the point in him continuing to watch it every week? Personally if I hated something as much as Deus does, I certainly wouldn't spend an hour a week watching it.

    --------

    "You did what you had to do. What you've always done. Turned death into a fighting chance"
    Leonard McCoy ST:III


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
  • RE: The Forge review | Report this post to moderator
    By: Ghost of Sam Kirk (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:21:34 on Nov 23, 2004

    I've come to the conclusion that O Deus rights his reviews with one question in mind, what will get the biggest reaction from my readers? What other purpose could he have for writing the same reviews every week? He clearly enjoys watching everyone react to what he writes. If he truly hates the show, than what is the point in him continuing to watch it every week? Personally if I hated something as much as Deus does, I certainly wouldn't spend an hour a week watching it.

    --------

    "You did what you had to do. What you've always done. Turned death into a fighting chance"
    Leonard McCoy ST:III


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote

Continuity error? | Report this post to moderator
By: Cap'n Calhoun (Odo's file, contact) @ 03:03:42 on Nov 23, 2004

Quote:
Of course the entire premise that such events had occurred in recent memory fly in the face of all of STAR TREK, as we know continuity and ENTERPRISE even in the best of situations go together about as well as oil and water

This comment is completely uncalled for. While Enterprise has certainly had some continuity problems before, I don't see how the events of this episode breach continuity. Actually, it appeared to me that one of the primary reasons for this trilogy was to set continuity back on track after all of the questionable decisions with the Vulcans over the past three years.

Just because we haven't heard of an event doesn't mean it didn't happen. If we assume otherwise, then Enterprise has little choice but to be irrelevant and deadly dull.

--------

"You know what six movies average out to be really good? The first six Star Trek movies!" -- Fry, Futurama


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Can't take much more | Report this post to moderator
By: alexkidd (Odo's file, contact) @ 01:45:50 on Nov 23, 2004

I seriously cant take many more episodes of Enterprise. This episode was so friggin boring. I think the only reason I keep watching is that I have seen every episode thus far. I keep hoping it will somehow get better. This show is barely science fiction. Its more like a cheesy action show in space. If T'pol wasnt so goddamn hot I dont know if I would still be watching...


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: Can't take much more | Report this post to moderator
    By: IceHunter (Odo's file, contact) @ 02:51:02 on Nov 27, 2004

    Quote:
    I seriously cant take many more episodes of Enterprise. This episode was so friggin boring.
    If T'pol wasnt so goddamn hot I dont know if I would still be watching...


    And there is your problem right there: You are a kid watching for "hot babes" - the Forge was a show for adults. Isn't there some nice reality show you can drool over ? ;)


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote

The difference between Star Trek fans and real Star Trek fans ... | Report this post to moderator
By: Locutus (Odo's file, contact) @ 00:11:28 on Nov 23, 2004 | Edit History (2)

I am convinced that the same people who love this episode are the people who love TOS.

I love what Enterprise is becoming because it is looking more and more like TOS. It has been truer to the spirit of The Original Series this season than all seven seasons of Voyager ever were. Enterprise is loved by the real Star Trek fans, the original fans, the fans of The Original Series.

I certainly wouldn't waste my time griping about special effects. Since when has Star Trek really been about special effects. Have we fogotten The Original Series completely. I don't know why people spend so much time complaining about it. I look forward to the continuing improvement of storylines this year. "The Forge" was wonderful, and I look forward to the rest of the series.

--------

"What we leave behind is not as important as how we've lived."
~Picard


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

better than o.deus | Report this post to moderator
By: johniccp (Odo's file, contact) @ 21:48:20 on Nov 22, 2004

Watching the episode twice was more entertaining than the o.deus review. I liked this episode because:
a. the character actors didn't steal the show. They acted their parts and told the story.
b. the special effects told the story. I agree they were not the same quality as a feature length movie budget allows, but hey, it's a TV episode, not a feature movie. And finally,
c. I wanted more when the episode was over. I'll be there, tape recorder ready, next Friday.

My only complaint... the entire episode was only 40:30 long. Ugh. Far too many commercials that distract viewer interest. In my daydreams, I'd argue with UPN the idea of expanding each episode to 48 minutes and increasing the cost per 20 or 30 second commercial spot to more than compensate and then, (this is critical) market ENTERPRISE as a "low commercial zone", much like American Express did for the Bourne Identity.

The truth is, I like ENTERPRISE enough to sit with the family and we watch it together. Between the 3-4 episode story arc, the positive image for humanity, and the reduced commercials, I believe ENTERPRISE would stand a fighting chance in any time slot. I'll check back latter to see what the cynics have to say....

Long days and pleasant nights.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Hit & miss saga continues..but can they afford it now? | Report this post to moderator
By: Peacekeeper (Odo's file, contact) @ 21:01:06 on Nov 22, 2004 | Edit History (1)

Right on review by Dues.
After two terrific episodes; we were subjected to a boring, dragging and lack-lustered enterprise episode as usual. Except seeing them kill off(uselessly) Admiral Forrester, I found nothing in the episode to talk home about. Just one more hour of enterprise gone by. No wonder the ratings dipped. Hopefully, next week Awakening would be much, much more intresting.
We(fans) can only pray for a Season 5....


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

no substance? | Report this post to moderator
By: daddy oh (Odo's file, contact) @ 19:20:12 on Nov 22, 2004 | Edit History (1)

I would have to say this episode of trek is at least going somewhere. True , Enterprise poses some continuity problems, but it is only a story and any problems can be easily dealt with. However, this story dealing with political and social change on Vulcan is not out of continuity with TOS or any other Trek that has been written. It must be looked at as part of a whole story that we simply haven't been told. Vulcans have emotions, surpressed, but there. Even Mark Leonard plays an emotional vulcan, his logic was "uncertain" where his son was concerned. So Enterprises so called emotional Vulcans or misguided Vulcan charecteristics doesn't really surprise me. Any questions?

--------

"One must have faith that the universe will unfold as it should" Spock ST:TUC


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

WTF!!! | Report this post to moderator
By: zhuneycutt (Odo's file, contact) @ 19:12:30 on Nov 22, 2004

Is there nothing out there (besides DS9) that can please this guy? C'mon dude WTF? The Forge is for the most part universally (except Deus) tauted as the best Enterprise episode ever. Other than this review have not seen a real bad attack on this episode even at StarTrek.com. I have to point out one thing, Deus says that this feels like the set up for an episode, of course it is, it is a three parter you are not supposed to tell the entire story in one episode WTF would be the point of a three parter then. C'mon this is 9.5/10 episode i don't give it a ten simply because nothing is absolutly perfect. So c'mon Deus lighten up a little bit and let yourself enjoy the episode alittle more.

--------

Forcast for today: a few sprinkles of genius with A CHANCE OF DOOM!!!!

Stewie Griffin


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

AGAIN SPOT ON | Report this post to moderator
By: NAFF (Odo's file, contact) @ 19:08:53 on Nov 22, 2004

Well reviewed.

With rubber rocks and a equally rubber lead actor, things are not looking good.

Again, Archer is center-stage - and the character is just not up to it.

This week we exchange Star Trek 2 nuances for Trek 3 and 4. Its going to take more than that.

This show has no sense of excitement or humor - oh, how well DS9 was done, my friends.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: AGAIN SPOT ON | Report this post to moderator
    By: The Burninator (Odo's file, contact) @ 19:18:30 on Nov 22, 2004

    Did you even watch the episode or are you just assuming it was bad because Deus didn't really like it that much?

    --------

    Burninating across the land. Burninating the peasants.


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
    • RE: AGAIN SPOT ON | Report this post to moderator
      By: NAFF (Odo's file, contact) @ 19:32:52 on Nov 22, 2004

      I watched it. And I was not impressed. This was no classic. Having seen almost every episode/movie of Trek this was no classic. Not even close.


      Reply
      Reply
      Quote
      Quote
      • RE: AGAIN SPOT ON | Report this post to moderator
        By: zhuneycutt (Odo's file, contact) @ 19:35:17 on Nov 22, 2004

        that Bullshmit dude you just hating just for the sake of hating it, i think you are afraid to like ENT. Yo just can't handle the fact that ENT might be getting awsome instead of just good. All do respect.

        --------

        Forcast for today: a few sprinkles of genius with A CHANCE OF DOOM!!!!

        Stewie Griffin


        Reply
        Reply
        Quote
        Quote
        • RE: AGAIN SPOT ON | Report this post to moderator
          By: NAFF (Odo's file, contact) @ 19:53:30 on Nov 22, 2004

          If this show entertains you, then I am very happy for you, but I refuse to rave over sub-standard material.

          Just what was awesome?

          And I never mentioned the Beneath the Planet of the Apes rip-off. Sorry, Mr zhuneycutt, I meant "homage".


          Reply
          Reply
          Quote
          Quote
          • RE: AGAIN SPOT ON | Report this post to moderator
            By: zhuneycutt (Odo's file, contact) @ 22:02:35 on Nov 22, 2004

            just what would it take to make you people happy? Face it folks DS9 is over and is not coming back. All you supposed star trek fans are like movie reviewers who compare every movie to to oscar winning movies. Take Van Helsing for instance, was it the best movie ever made equal to Schindler's List? No of course not but that doe not mean it was not entertaining or at least good. I really enjoyed Van Helsing. That is the way i am with Enterprise are all the episodes the best TV ever made, no but i am not comparing them to the best shows ever made. You have to take them for what they are, just good entertainment, you can't expect every episode to win an Emmy. To me if i am to label anything as being crappy i mean it really has to be crappy.

            AS for the episode itself. I though it was freakin' sweet. Acting was great, the story was well thought out and made perfect sense. The ties to TOS and later seriers were masterfully written esp. the Romulan reference. We finally get to see the planet Vulcan in some detail. It made a logical link between the Vulcans of later series and the Vulcans of ENT time (which i think were written diffrent by design. ex-the lieing, keniving, eating with hands etc..) To tell the honest truth i don't have the proper vocab to explain why the episode was so good, all i know is that it was.(i know you people are gonna destroy me for that sentence)

            My overall point is that i think the "FANS" judge the show too harshly and on the wrong crtiteria comparing it to things that it can't be compared to.

            --------

            Forcast for today: a few sprinkles of genius with A CHANCE OF DOOM!!!!

            Stewie Griffin


            Reply
            Reply
            Quote
            Quote
            • RE: AGAIN SPOT ON | Report this post to moderator
              By: NAFF (Odo's file, contact) @ 07:50:17 on Nov 23, 2004

              Again, I am happy you were entertained. I never said I expected Oscar standards, but I do expect adult, envelope-pushing, science fiction and we are not getting it.

              Sad to say I have seen the future and it is called Battlestar Galatica and Stargate: Altantis.


              Reply
              Reply
              Quote
              Quote
              • RE: AGAIN SPOT ON | Report this post to moderator
                By: Jadzia-Dax (Odo's file, contact) @ 08:40:02 on Nov 23, 2004 | Edit History (1)

                Atlantis is nothing but DS9 + VOY and derivative as hell. I watched the episodes over the summer every week and every week found myself screaming at the TV. And don't get me started on Moore's wacko sicko people of BSG.

                The "future" is neither of those shows. Their style is on its way out. They've had their run. The "future" might be "The 4400".

                --------

                "I think the show talked to people through the characters. They're stories that speak to the heart. They talk about love, they talk about friendship, they talk about loyalty, they talk about patriotism, exploration, curiosity, reaching out... And I think all those things still touch people. Even when you look at a 30-year old show, it still has something to say." - D.C. Fontana, Sci Fi Channel Special Edition TOS 1998
                ----
                "If the season finale involves the re-built USS Reliant coming back in time to the 21st Century crewed by Moogie, Dr. Selar, Morn, Transporter Chief Kyle, and the Salt Vampire, then we'll know that Coto has gone too far." - tomba1701


                Reply
                Reply
                Quote
                Quote
                • RE: AGAIN SPOT ON | Report this post to moderator
                  By: NAFF (Odo's file, contact) @ 08:57:44 on Nov 23, 2004

                  Sure, the 4400 was good. But was it less derivative? You could argue it was nothing more than a couple of cobbled together X-Files episodes (complete with Mulder and Scully dress-a-likes).

                  Derivative is one thing. But lousy and lacklustre television (like Enterprise) is quite another.

                  At least Stargate: Atlantis is putting characters at the forefront of its stories, rather than the CGI effect of the week. Plus it has a sense of fun and adventure.

                  There are only 5 or 6 Sci-Fi story patterns - its how you do 'em that counts. And my dearies, I'm afraid Enterprise is stuck in 1994.


                  Reply
                  Reply
                  Quote
                  Quote
                  • RE: AGAIN SPOT ON | Report this post to moderator
                    By: Jadzia-Dax (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:26:29 on Nov 23, 2004

                    Well now you're preaching to the choir but I sure as hell wouldn't put any of the current Stargates OR BSG up as any enlightened form of sci fi to emulate because they aren't. Atlantis, with its Defiant-like cloakable ships, aliens-of-the-weeks on planet-of-the-weeks, with Pah-wraith act-alike Wraiths, is enough to make one gag.

                    The genre is in dire need of revamp and the tired dark and gritty heavy-metal look is way past cliche. "Alien" did that style 25 years ago and everyone is still pulling that shit out and copying it and calling it "new". Image

                    --------

                    "I think the show talked to people through the characters. They're stories that speak to the heart. They talk about love, they talk about friendship, they talk about loyalty, they talk about patriotism, exploration, curiosity, reaching out... And I think all those things still touch people. Even when you look at a 30-year old show, it still has something to say." - D.C. Fontana, Sci Fi Channel Special Edition TOS 1998
                    ----
                    "If the season finale involves the re-built USS Reliant coming back in time to the 21st Century crewed by Moogie, Dr. Selar, Morn, Transporter Chief Kyle, and the Salt Vampire, then we'll know that Coto has gone too far." - tomba1701


                    Reply
                    Reply
                    Quote
                    Quote
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.