Nov 23 | Chuckreturns to NBC with a special two-hour show on Sunday, Jan 10, 2010, before returning to its regular time slot, Mondays at 8pm on the following night. It's return to prime time television can be attributed to a successful fan renewnal campaign last year. CHUCK is a one-hour, action-comedy series that follows Chuck Bartowski (Zachary Levi, "Less Than Perfect") -- a computer geek who is catapulted into a new career as the government's most vital secret agent. This upcoming season will include some special guest stars, including Brandon Routh of "Superman Returns" who will play CIA agent Daniel Shaw in an episode, and the addition of SUBWAY restaurant as a major advertiser to the show. Chuck averaged a 4.0/6 rating last season, about eight percent better than the recently cancelled "Trauma". Ratings-challenged Heroes moves back an hour when Chuck returns on Monday nights. STAR TREK VOYAGER's Robert Duncan McNeill serves Chuckas a supervising producer and director.
Nov 17 | Originally hired as co-executive producer to help with the second half of the show's first season, Kevin Murphy has now taken the reins of Caprica, the Battlestar Galactica prequel on Syfy, according to The Hollywood Reporter. He now serves as an executive producer along with Ronald D. Moore, David Eick and Jane Espenson and oversees the day-to-day functions of the show.
Nov 12 | Star Trek star Zachary Quinto is loosely attached to star in the romantic dramedy Whirligig, reports Risky Business.Quinto would play the lead role in the independent Canadian film, which is aiming to shoot early next year. The movie centers on a man who, in a misguided attempt to woo an older woman, befriends the woman's adopted son.Chaz Thorne is directing the pic, based on a screenplay by Michael Amo, creator of the Canadian supernatural series "The Listener."
Nov 11 | The CNS Foundation, is hosting an on-line charity auction at www.charitybuzz.com. One of the items they are auctioning is a signed movie poster of the new Star Trek movie which has all the cast members and writers. The president of our organization is Carol Abrams, JJ's mother, and she arranged for the donation from Bad Robot Production Company. J.J. Abrams is also a major donor to their organization. The funds raised will go to help find a cure to neurological disorders in children. The auction link is here.
Nov 10 | Candice Bergen, Charles Lisanby, Don Pardo, Gene Roddenberry, Tom and Dick Smothers and Bob Stewart have been selected as the next inductees into the Television Academy's Hall of Fame. They will be honored at a Jan. 20 ceremony at the Beverly Hills Hotel. "This year's inductees have challenged and shaped popular culture, changed television for the better and entertained us royally while doing so," TV Academy Chairman-CEO John Shaffner said. More info at the Hollywood Reporter
Well, not quite. STAR TREK: GENERATIONS seems born of several destinies, beginning with two competing scripts, including two popular casts, and layering together a broad range of thematic elements. The seventh STAR TREK feature has long been at the center of the disdain many have for the hit and miss ST:TNG films, but of the four, GENERATIONS is surprisingly the most watchable.
The new Collector's Edition DVD, hitting U.S. shelves on the eve of STAR TREK's 38th Anniversary, provides plenty of opportunity to examine why. It's a film rife with problems, from incoherent plot devices to bad lines and recycled pryotechnics. There are more gimmicks thrown into the film's near-two hours than even a Ferengi can keep up with. Klingons and sailors and Christmas trees, oh my, the script is a mishmash of creative energies. There are also blatant plot problems, like the concept of the Nexus, which invites more plot holes than you can imagine, contrived as a way to avoid using time travel to bring Kirk and Picard together. How exactly does one "think" their way out of the Nexus, anyway? You're better off not to ask such questions, but despite this caveat, GENERATIONS is still a lot of fun to watch.
One reason is the late John Alonzo's spectacular photography. It may be strange that the vacuum of space bathes the interior of the Enterprise-D in golden light, but it's sure pretty to look at. It also helps hide the lack of detail in the surfaces of the television sets, all except engineering looking better than they ever have. The warp core's flat, featureless face definitely needed a facelift for the big screen, but overall the Enterprise we came to know and love for seven years received a beautiful treatment in this film. The look of the film is also helped by a lot of color, perhaps lacking in the rest of the TNG films, in part due to the black and gray uniforms that FIRST CONTACT ushered in. At first it strikes of laziness for the crew to be interchanging between the TNG and DS9 costumes rather than having unique and consistent new threads, but the bold colors really make the frames of this picture a feast for the eye, and the familiarity of the style contributes to the happy feeling you get while watching, even if the script starts to drown about midway through.
The other big factor for me has always been Dennis McCarthy's original score. Second to my personal favorite, STAR TREK VI, McCarthy's score makes GENERATIONS the only TNG movie that I'll regularly watch through to the very last credit. Completely original and lacking the rehash that plagues FIRST CONTACT through NEMESIS, McCarthy's sweeping cues elevate the picture in many instances and never make the mistake of becoming mere wallpaper to the striking visuals. Highlights include the eerie Soran/intro pieces, the space battle, and the grandiose main theme that'll ring in your head for days. The only real let down is the Nexus music, disappointing mostly because the sequence as a whole just drags the film to a halt.
Despite warp-speed traveling rockets, confusing plot developments (such as Picard's volunteering to become a prisoner but then being immediately beamed down to the planet's surface), and a heavily contrived method of uniting Picard and Kirk, GENERATIONS still succeeds with some key elements. Namely, the scenes with William Shatner and the other representatives of the original crew, and Shatner's interactions with Patrick Stewart. The fact is that GENERATIONS goes into the hearts of both our captains and while the sentimental approach may not have been the best strategy for huge success at the box office, it's a really enjoyable ride for STAR TREK fans. We see a whole new side of Kirk and the look at his life that could've been is entirely appropriate for what would become the character's ultimate swan song, and a movie that tries desperately to deal with the issue of mortality. Having the swashbuckling heroes reexamine their choices as mortality creeps in is a poignant subtext to the "passing of the baton" credo permeating of the pic.
Data's comic subplot delights with groans and all. From the bad jokes to the "oh, shit," Spiner imbues all his scenes with successful humor and his journey across the gamut of human emotions provides an interesting subplot. Data and Geordi's relationship from the television series gets the most screen time in this movie (nearly forgotten in the others) and his emotional scene with Picard in stellar cartography - another example of rich, bright, pleasing color - is in the finest tradition of what STAR TREK was always about: the continuing exploration of the human condition. Add to that a marquee action sequence in the saucer crash landing (aka the scene so nice they used it twice), and you've got plenty of set pieces to keep the piece afloat.
The Commentaries
Co-writers Brannon Braga and Ronald D. Moore provide the play-by-play this time around, in a satisfyingly candid audio commentary track. Their discussion ranges from the early stages of development to little things like costuming, to outright criticism of their own work. Moore states that their inexperience as writers at the time contributed, and they both agree that meeting the demands the studio had for the script and pleasing everyone else along the way just made for a difficult writing process.
Braga and Moore explain the difficulties in working each character into the picture, such as finding a good way to utilize Troi and the mistake of having Picard become too emotional in his big screen debut. As the film progresses, both writers point out several blatant errors in the script and things they wished they could've worked out better. Braga points out something I've never managed to notice, which is the fact that Picard tells Worf "that's a pretty big margin of error" after Worf explains the odds of shooting down Soran's probe; obviously this should be "a pretty small" margin, not a large one.
Once the film gets into the Nexus, the commentary becomes pretty candid, from admitting that the idea of the Nexus itself wasn't very well-defined and invited numerous plot holes, to displeasure with the having introduced Captain Kirk doing, of all things, chopping wood and scrambling eggs. They admit that the inclusion of horseback riding was intentionally to attract Shatner and offer funny anecdotes like the fact that Shatner let the production use his horses for the sequence, but charged the studio for it! We also learn that much of Shatner's dialogue while walking his horse around Stewart was rewritten and replaced after the shoot.
By the end of the commentary, both Moore and Braga conclude that the performances of Stewart, Shatner, Spiner, McDowell, and the rest of the cast elevated the material beyond the page and that several of the film's misfires were the result of directly trying to avoid cliché and do things different. It seems that the proximity of the writing and production process to the seven year TNG series - both made for all intents and purposes, concurrently - actually made it difficult identify the types of elements that might've played better in a feature film.
Mike and Denise Okuda's text commentary comes in big STAR TREK-styled pop-ups, bringing you a mix of mundane, obvious, and mildly informative for the non-initiated observations or trivia facts about the picture. The main difference from previous Collector's Edition products is that they pop up on top of the film image, making it less attractive to run the commentary at all because you can't see the picture half the time and what's in the pop-up box isn't particularly compelling. Paramount would be wise to put these pop-ups in the black space below the letterbox from now on.
I liked the development of the emotion chip in Gen and FC, but felt Piller screwed it up in Ins. And don't get me wrong, I love Piller as a writer but I remember reading he hadn't liked the development of the chip; so they left it on the Enterprise. But then, the whole "playing" with the kid scenes seemed out of place for the character - he learned how to laugh and have fun in Gen, that was his whole motivation for getting the chip in the first place, he didn't know how to enjoy himself.
Of course, the story did tie in with the movies theme of letting go from the everyday stress of life but with his character it seemed forced. I think it was poor writing to simply leave the chip on the ship, and more interesting stuff could have been done with the character by leaving it in. By the time of the movie, he'd have had the chip for a few years and you'd think he'd have gotten used to it by then.
Quote: Despite the dialog building up his backstory, his actions belied ANY sympathy on a viewer's part.
I personally wish that in Generations, they had made the audience feel sympathy towards Soran. I mean, one underlying idea in the film is coping with aging. Kirk wants action one last time, but at the same time wishes he hadn't gone back to Starfleet. Picard wants a family. What does Soran want? They could have tied the three characters together in how they wanted to stay young and have the perfect life, but then show us the evil that Soran would do to achieve that and contrast it with Kirk and Picard.....even with the Nexus plot holes, there was enough there that this film could have been a huge emotional experience....and it just fell flat on its face in my opinion.
--------
Scientists discover the world that exists;
engineers create the world that never was.
-Theodore von Kármán
Quote: Quote:
The movie has enough problems without making some up.
On the contrary, one can trace the introduction of the Borg (or knowledge about them) to Humanity, earlier and earlier and earlier as one progresses beyond GEN to FC, and then through VOY with 7 of 9's parents suddenly, out of nowhere, revealed as having been "studying" the Borg some 11 years before Picard and the 1701-D were hurled 7000 light years into the Delta Quadrant... through to ENT, where Borg appear in the 22nd century after having appeared in the 21st.
But going back to the original question: How is any of this the fault of Generations? What, because the El-Aurians were in contact with humans in the 23rd century? According to "Time's Arrow" [TNG], we've been in contact since the 19th century! (Admittedly, they weren't making their presence known quite that far back, but there's no reason to believe that we weren't in contact in the 23rd or even 22nd centuries. Yep, Enterprise can use El-Aurians if they want to!)
In any case, if we're already accepting that Guinan never bothered to mention the Borg to Picard before "Q Who?", despite the fact that they were obviously old friends (even excluding the events of "Time's Arrow"), maybe there's a reason why the El-Aurians were keeping quiet about it? Although I honestly have no idea what that reason might be... Maybe every time someone asked, they just said "I don't want to talk about it." They are better listeners than talkers... ;-)
Again, the point is that the conundrum of the El-Aurians and the Borg existed before Generations. It had been implied before Generations that the El-Aurians had been keeping quiet about the Borg for some reason, and the movie just silently continued with that inference.
Quote: It began a sad trend that effectively reduces the power and symbollism of a TNG "Q Who?".
The trend is very true and very much a shame, but please don't act like Generations is to blame for this. As you pointed out above First Contact and especially "Dark Frontier" [VOY] and "Regeneration" [ENT] hold the true culpability for this. (I would've swalloed "Dark Victory" a little easier if the father had mentioned "Rumours from the El-Aurians...")
Quote: The character isn't even consistent within the El-Aurian archetype.
With characters as different as Guinan and Martus already in the mix, I don't know how you can seriously make a claim like this... Do you think he wasn't a good enough listener?
--------
"You know what six movies average out to be really good? The first six Star Trek movies!" -- Fry, Futurama
RE: Hmmm....
by Jadzia-Dax @ 18:04:13 on Aug 27
RE: Hmmm....
by Cap'n Calhoun @ 03:59:41 on Aug 28
RE: Hmmm....
by Jadzia-Dax @ 11:32:58 on Aug 28
RE: Hmmm....
by Cap'n Calhoun @ 17:07:27 on Aug 28
RE: Hmmm....
by Jadzia-Dax @ 22:38:12 on Aug 28
RE: Hmmm....
by Cap'n Calhoun @ 02:31:18 on Aug 29
RE: Hmmm....
by Jadzia-Dax @ 08:50:23 on Aug 29
Quote: The character isn't even consistent within the El-Aurian archetype.
How can there be an archetype off two characters with minimal screen time?
Anyway, I agree with Soran as a villain but I think what he does successfully is mirror Picard and Kirk's personal dramas of facing mortality and bring the questions of existence and the fear of death to the forefront. So in that respect, Soran is a more successful thematic sounding board than a villain.
--------
It's a rip-off. / We're stepped on, and cheated! / We're flat, stone-cold lied to / But we're not defeated / No!
RE: Hmmm....
by Jadzia-Dax @ 18:15:21 on Aug 27
RE: Hmmm....
by Steve Krutzler @ 18:20:17 on Aug 27
RE: Hmmm....
by Jadzia-Dax @ 19:27:27 on Aug 27
RE: Hmmm....
by Steve Krutzler @ 19:37:56 on Aug 27
RE: Hmmm....
by Jadzia-Dax @ 20:13:32 on Aug 27