menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
Feature Story

Features

STAR TREK: GENERATIONS a Nexus of Shock and Awe on Collector's Edition DVD

Features

By Steve Krutzler / 03:48, 27 August 2004 / Reviews - Products

Two captains, one destiny.

Well, not quite. STAR TREK: GENERATIONS seems born of several destinies, beginning with two competing scripts, including two popular casts, and layering together a broad range of thematic elements. The seventh STAR TREK feature has long been at the center of the disdain many have for the hit and miss ST:TNG films, but of the four, GENERATIONS is surprisingly the most watchable.

The new Collector's Edition DVD, hitting U.S. shelves on the eve of STAR TREK's 38th Anniversary, provides plenty of opportunity to examine why. It's a film rife with problems, from incoherent plot devices to bad lines and recycled pryotechnics. There are more gimmicks thrown into the film's near-two hours than even a Ferengi can keep up with. Klingons and sailors and Christmas trees, oh my, the script is a mishmash of creative energies. There are also blatant plot problems, like the concept of the Nexus, which invites more plot holes than you can imagine, contrived as a way to avoid using time travel to bring Kirk and Picard together. How exactly does one "think" their way out of the Nexus, anyway? You're better off not to ask such questions, but despite this caveat, GENERATIONS is still a lot of fun to watch.

One reason is the late John Alonzo's spectacular photography. It may be strange that the vacuum of space bathes the interior of the Enterprise-D in golden light, but it's sure pretty to look at. It also helps hide the lack of detail in the surfaces of the television sets, all except engineering looking better than they ever have. The warp core's flat, featureless face definitely needed a facelift for the big screen, but overall the Enterprise we came to know and love for seven years received a beautiful treatment in this film. The look of the film is also helped by a lot of color, perhaps lacking in the rest of the TNG films, in part due to the black and gray uniforms that FIRST CONTACT ushered in. At first it strikes of laziness for the crew to be interchanging between the TNG and DS9 costumes rather than having unique and consistent new threads, but the bold colors really make the frames of this picture a feast for the eye, and the familiarity of the style contributes to the happy feeling you get while watching, even if the script starts to drown about midway through.

The other big factor for me has always been Dennis McCarthy's original score. Second to my personal favorite, STAR TREK VI, McCarthy's score makes GENERATIONS the only TNG movie that I'll regularly watch through to the very last credit. Completely original and lacking the rehash that plagues FIRST CONTACT through NEMESIS, McCarthy's sweeping cues elevate the picture in many instances and never make the mistake of becoming mere wallpaper to the striking visuals. Highlights include the eerie Soran/intro pieces, the space battle, and the grandiose main theme that'll ring in your head for days. The only real let down is the Nexus music, disappointing mostly because the sequence as a whole just drags the film to a halt.

Despite warp-speed traveling rockets, confusing plot developments (such as Picard's volunteering to become a prisoner but then being immediately beamed down to the planet's surface), and a heavily contrived method of uniting Picard and Kirk, GENERATIONS still succeeds with some key elements. Namely, the scenes with William Shatner and the other representatives of the original crew, and Shatner's interactions with Patrick Stewart. The fact is that GENERATIONS goes into the hearts of both our captains and while the sentimental approach may not have been the best strategy for huge success at the box office, it's a really enjoyable ride for STAR TREK fans. We see a whole new side of Kirk and the look at his life that could've been is entirely appropriate for what would become the character's ultimate swan song, and a movie that tries desperately to deal with the issue of mortality. Having the swashbuckling heroes reexamine their choices as mortality creeps in is a poignant subtext to the "passing of the baton" credo permeating of the pic.

Data's comic subplot delights with groans and all. From the bad jokes to the "oh, shit," Spiner imbues all his scenes with successful humor and his journey across the gamut of human emotions provides an interesting subplot. Data and Geordi's relationship from the television series gets the most screen time in this movie (nearly forgotten in the others) and his emotional scene with Picard in stellar cartography - another example of rich, bright, pleasing color - is in the finest tradition of what STAR TREK was always about: the continuing exploration of the human condition. Add to that a marquee action sequence in the saucer crash landing (aka the scene so nice they used it twice), and you've got plenty of set pieces to keep the piece afloat.

The Commentaries

Co-writers Brannon Braga and Ronald D. Moore provide the play-by-play this time around, in a satisfyingly candid audio commentary track. Their discussion ranges from the early stages of development to little things like costuming, to outright criticism of their own work. Moore states that their inexperience as writers at the time contributed, and they both agree that meeting the demands the studio had for the script and pleasing everyone else along the way just made for a difficult writing process.

Braga and Moore explain the difficulties in working each character into the picture, such as finding a good way to utilize Troi and the mistake of having Picard become too emotional in his big screen debut. As the film progresses, both writers point out several blatant errors in the script and things they wished they could've worked out better. Braga points out something I've never managed to notice, which is the fact that Picard tells Worf "that's a pretty big margin of error" after Worf explains the odds of shooting down Soran's probe; obviously this should be "a pretty small" margin, not a large one.

Once the film gets into the Nexus, the commentary becomes pretty candid, from admitting that the idea of the Nexus itself wasn't very well-defined and invited numerous plot holes, to displeasure with the having introduced Captain Kirk doing, of all things, chopping wood and scrambling eggs. They admit that the inclusion of horseback riding was intentionally to attract Shatner and offer funny anecdotes like the fact that Shatner let the production use his horses for the sequence, but charged the studio for it! We also learn that much of Shatner's dialogue while walking his horse around Stewart was rewritten and replaced after the shoot.

By the end of the commentary, both Moore and Braga conclude that the performances of Stewart, Shatner, Spiner, McDowell, and the rest of the cast elevated the material beyond the page and that several of the film's misfires were the result of directly trying to avoid cliché and do things different. It seems that the proximity of the writing and production process to the seven year TNG series - both made for all intents and purposes, concurrently - actually made it difficult identify the types of elements that might've played better in a feature film.

Mike and Denise Okuda's text commentary comes in big STAR TREK-styled pop-ups, bringing you a mix of mundane, obvious, and mildly informative for the non-initiated observations or trivia facts about the picture. The main difference from previous Collector's Edition products is that they pop up on top of the film image, making it less attractive to run the commentary at all because you can't see the picture half the time and what's in the pop-up box isn't particularly compelling. Paramount would be wise to put these pop-ups in the black space below the letterbox from now on.


Continued...
 of 3.    Next >


More Top StoriesComments
Nov 22Quinto, Urban, Saldana, Cho and Greenwood on Their Hopes for Star Trek XII2
Nov 22Exclusive Digital Content Now Available With New Star Trek Movie on iTunes
1
Nov 22No J.J. Abrams Version of the U.S.S. Enterprise in the Star Trek Online MMORPG 0
Nov 21Faran Tahir on His 10 Minutes as Captain Robau in J.J. Abrams Star Trek Movie2
Nov 21J.J. Abrams, Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman on Shatner and Nimoy7
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

42 comments Post New | Help
View:

RE: Hmmm.... | Report this post to moderator
By: Jadzia-Dax (Odo's file, contact) @ 18:04:13 on Aug 27, 2004

Quote:
Quote:Quote:
The movie has enough problems without making some up.

On the contrary, one can trace the introduction of the Borg (or knowledge about them) to Humanity, earlier and earlier and earlier as one progresses beyond GEN to FC, and then through VOY with 7 of 9's parents suddenly, out of nowhere, revealed as having been "studying" the Borg some 11 years before Picard and the 1701-D were hurled 7000 light years into the Delta Quadrant... through to ENT, where Borg appear in the 22nd century after having appeared in the 21st.

But going back to the original question: How is any of this the fault of Generations?


It was the opening shot in what would be a clear trend to create a totally revisionist Trek history. The attempt to re-make the Star Trek universe into something that was NOT "Roddenberry's". The death of TOS (Kirk) and the beginning of the systematic destruction of TNG (the 1701-D). Among other things.

Quote:

What, because the El-Aurians were in contact with humans in the 23rd century? According to "Time's Arrow" [TNG], we've been in contact since the 19th century!


But guess what? Except for dear Sam Clemmens, NO ONE in that era knew that Guinan was anything BUT "Human".

Quote:

(Admittedly, they weren't making their presence known quite that far back,


Exactly.

Quote:

but there's no reason to believe that we weren't in contact in the 23rd or even 22nd centuries. Yep, Enterprise can use El-Aurians if they want to!)


My problem is NOT with Humans being in contact with El-Aurians. It is the fact that the El-Aurians were there in GEN, why? Because they were refugees. And WHO made them "refugees"? Right, the Borg. If they had NOT been called "El-Aurian refugees", then maybe this could have slid by. But the fact that Soran's WHOLE existence and obsession was due to the Borg and thus even if the Nexus never existed, his state of mind regarding the loss of his family, was ALL "Borg" related. And the Nexus only made matters worse, enhancing his grief and determination to be with his family, thus prompting him to try to get back into it so that he could be at peace.

And the fact that they were on a Federation Transport ship - do you actually believe that diplomats and psychologists and others from the Federation didn't bother asking them questions about WHY they were "refugees"? And you don't think that they mentioned the fact that the "Borg" MADE them that way? Why would someone "hide" that fact, considering how horrible the Borg were to anyone who they came in contact with?

Thus by the time of the 24th century, there should have been some info on the "Borg" and Picard, et al wouldn't have had to stare blindly at a Cube not knowing what it was and then going through the 20 questions with Guinan regarding who the Borg were in TNG "Q Who?".

Quote:

In any case, if we're already accepting that Guinan never bothered to mention the Borg to Picard before "Q Who?",


NOT just Guinan. What about the REST of them? According to Scotty, when all was said and done, they managed to get something like 47 "out of 150" during that transport.

What about the 47 of them, which included Guinan AND Soran???? Are we THAT stupid as Humanity?

Quote:

despite the fact that they were obviously old friends (even excluding the events of "Time's Arrow"), maybe there's a reason why the El-Aurians were keeping quiet about it?


Why SHOULD they? The fact is that they were such a VISCIOUS group of beings who Guinan describes thusly in TNG "Q Who?":

"I was not personally involved... But from what I have been told they came through our system like a storm of Jaradan Aser beatles. And by the time they left, there wasn't much left of our society."

So why would they want to hide this so that others might suffer?

Quote:

Although I honestly have no idea what that reason might be... Maybe every time someone asked, they just said "I don't want to talk about it." They are better listeners than talkers... ;-)


That's bull.

And let me tell you... Personally, when GEN released, I didn't care. And that's because TNG "Q Who?" actually had dialog where Guinan mentioned that this had happened to her planet about a "century" before... Which would have been about 20 years before the time of GEN IF the "century" bit was literally meant to be "100 years". It seemed clear to me that calling them "refugees" seemed to suggest that whatever happened to them had happened more recently within the timeframe of the 23rd century, if not, then around the time of the end of Kirk's 5-year mission.

However, when you take that, and then look at the Borg suddenly going back in time in FC, and then you find that 7 of 9's parents - the Hansens had actually been "studying" the Borg... And now you have an ENT "Regeneration" with Borg reanimating out of nowhere on 22nd century Earth.... I mean come on.

Quote:

Again, the point is that the conundrum of the El-Aurians and the Borg existed before Generations. It had been implied before Generations that the El-Aurians had been keeping quiet about the Borg for some reason, and the movie just silently continued with that inference.


THAT is the same type of crap as ENT "Acquisition" where no one asks the name of the Ferengi. Image

The problems in GEN with the usage of this ended up introducing MORE problems... If it had just been maybe Soran and Guinan as the only survivors, then perhaps both might have kept "quiet". However even then, Soran's WHOLE EXISTENCE was based on the MISERY he had because of the Borg, and the Nexus would supposedly soothe this... So of ALL people... He should have been the blabbiest of them all regarding that which destroyed what he supposedly loved, thus leading to his obsession to get back with them in the Nexus.

Quote:

Quote:It began a sad trend that effectively reduces the power and symbollism of a TNG "Q Who?".

The trend is very true and very much a shame, but please don't act like Generations is to blame for this.


It started that trend and it was continued because it was like the pioneer out there saying:

"Canon is irrevelent. Consistency is irrelevent. We will use contrived time travel to incorporate nonsense elements to make this universe our own."

Quote:

As you pointed out above First Contact and especially "Dark Frontier" [VOY] and "Regeneration" [ENT] hold the true culpability for this. (I would've swalloed "Dark Victory" a little easier if the father had mentioned "Rumours from the El-Aurians...")


GEN started it. And it's funny how people want to skip over the transgressions related to TNG and point fingers at VOY. ;-) Those transgressions started at TNG and VOY picked them up and ran with them.

Quote:

Quote:The character isn't even consistent within the El-Aurian archetype.

With characters as different as Guinan and Martus already in the mix, I don't know how you can seriously make a claim like this... Do you think he wasn't a good enough listener?


Did you notice the idiotic dialog crafted for him that sounds like a literal recitation OF the species archetype where he says to Geordi:

"As you may or may not be aware, I am an El-Aurian. Some people call us a race of "listeners". We listen."

I mean THIS IS LAME.

Guinan wasn't reciting that she was from a "race of listeners". She carefully tended bar and observed the conversations of those all around her. And if need be, she would step up and make a comment or suggestion to people or give someone some sage advice as a good little 3rd party commentator can do. But not Soran. He does the complete opposite. Aggressive, in your face. Until such time when the scene is ratcheted back in to at least suggest that he WAS supposed to be an "El-Aurian". In essence, he's just your run-of-the-mill "bad guy" and could have been of any species because there was little or nothing about him save for one little scene where he senses Guinan there in Ten Forward and slips away... Otherwise, he's generic.

And all the existence of Soran does is completely deflates everything that had been built up about Guinan and makes it all meaningless. Ie., the character is made to totally discredit himself and the species. NOT because he may have been an odd-ball, but because of the dialog given to him and his actions.

--------

"I think the show talked to people through the characters. They're stories that speak to the heart. They talk about love, they talk about friendship, they talk about loyalty, they talk about patriotism, exploration, curiosity, reaching out... And I think all those things still touch people. Even when you look at a 30-year old show, it still has something to say." - D.C. Fontana, Sci Fi Channel Special Edition TOS 1998
----
"If the season finale involves the re-built USS Reliant coming back in time to the 21st Century crewed by Moogie, Dr. Selar, Morn, Transporter Chief Kyle, and the Salt Vampire, then we'll know that Coto has gone too far." - tomba1701

Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Parent
Parent
Talkback Top
Top
RE: Hmmm.... by Cap'n Calhoun @ 03:59:41 on Aug 28
    RE: Hmmm.... by Jadzia-Dax @ 11:32:58 on Aug 28
       RE: Hmmm.... by Cap'n Calhoun @ 17:07:27 on Aug 28
          RE: Hmmm.... by Jadzia-Dax @ 22:38:12 on Aug 28
             RE: Hmmm.... by Cap'n Calhoun @ 02:31:18 on Aug 29
                RE: Hmmm.... by Jadzia-Dax @ 08:50:23 on Aug 29
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.