menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

'T'Pol' Faces New Challenge at "Home", Plus the Newest NX Ship - First Plot Details (SPOILERS)

Features

By Steve Krutzler / 19:48, 23 July 2004 / Enterprise

Jolene Blalock let the cat out of the bag during this week's fall press tour: 'T'Pol' may be getting married. In fact, TrekWeb has received the first information on the third episode of the season in which the big event might occur, entitled simply "Home."

In the episode, slated to begin production August 4th under the direction of Allan Kroeker (who is also directing the season premiere "Storm Front, Part 1", credits), T'Pol will face her mother 'T'Las', who along with another family has arranged a Vulcan marriage for the Enterprise science officer. Producers are reportedly looking for an actress in her 60s are are open to "stunt" casting for the role.

UPN president Dawn Ostroff said earlier this week that the network would like to land popular performers in ENTERPRISE guest roles this season; TNG's Brent Spiner is already onboard for a three-part stint, and Shatner talks is omnipresent.

T'Pol's husband-to-be goes by the name of 'Koss' and looks in his late 30s by human standards. Koss is reminiscient of 'Spock', tall and imposing. But T'Pol -- as you can probably imagine -- is unsure whether to go through with the betrothal. Both T'Las and Koss could appear in later episodes.

In addition, we'll also meet the newest NX-class member of the fleet in "Home." The commemoratively-named Starship Columbia is captained by 'Erika Hernandez', a sexy Latin former colleague of 'Archer's from Starfleet's command school.

Rick Berman stated this week that the third episode of the season would be a standalone before launching into the three-part storyline focusing on Spiner as 'Arik Soong', the great-great-grandfather of 'Noonien Soong' (Data's creator) who attempts to continue the work of geneticists with embryos left over from the Eugenics Wars (story).

Until this information if confirmed by Paramount (or blurted out by one of the producers), it should be treated as rumor. "Home" will air in October.



More Top StoriesComments
Nov 22Quinto, Urban, Saldana, Cho and Greenwood on Their Hopes for Star Trek XII2
Nov 22Exclusive Digital Content Now Available With New Star Trek Movie on iTunes
1
Nov 22No J.J. Abrams Version of the U.S.S. Enterprise in the Star Trek Online MMORPG 0
Nov 21Faran Tahir on His 10 Minutes as Captain Robau in J.J. Abrams Star Trek Movie2
Nov 21J.J. Abrams, Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman on Shatner and Nimoy7
Story Archives...Browse:   
ENTERPRISE Mission Schedule | Logs by Season: 1 2 3 4
Episode Number Title Airdate

Talkback

70 comments Post New | Help
View:

RE: Explaining the "No Female Captains" thing. | Report this post to moderator
By: MaxPower (Odo's file, contact) @ 18:15:51 on Jul 25, 2004

Quote:
HUH??? What is "sexism" but personal prejudice against a woman?

I mean, sure there could still be induvidual prejudice in Gene's future. But Starfleet not accepting female captains goes against Star Trek's future Earth. That's how I see it.

Quote:
You only "knew" because I just told you. And so if you "knew", then it would make no sense to say "Gene Roddenberry wrote a story against Gene Roddenberry's vision of the future".

That is not true. I was writing out my point quickly and that is what I tapped out. I worded it wrong, badly even LOL, gee I'm glad you never do that ;-)

Quote:
And people wonder why I have to be verbose here. ;-) And am I detecting a bit of "emotion" out of the normally "calm" MaxPower"? Did I shoot a bit too many volts down your wire?

Ohhh, well that isn't very nice at all is it? So that's the deal. Sorry that I have hit a nerve with you from time to time(all the time?).

Quote:
Wow. You ARE hitting a "spike" there. Better have that circuit breaker ready! Or do you use fuses instead?

Ok, now I see. It's all about getting back at me. And I thought I was in a real discussion. Oh well. Fool me once, yada yada yada.

Quote:
That's a DAMN shame. Howdy Doody redux. heh

Yes I know, I'm a terrible terrible person.

Quote:
Oh now don't be like O.Deus and hop on a pedestal so that you can go through some sort of self-imolation ritual. ;-)

Most of what I have said in this thread regarding this issue, has been in "exposition" fashion, not naming "names". So if you want to self-label, then be my guest. But it won't come from ME.


LOL! I was just curious.

Quote:
So I declare that ENT is NON CANON! Now there!

Go right ahead.

I was TRULY trying to have a decent conversation with you. Too bad it's just not possible.



Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Parent
Parent
Talkback Top
Top
RE: Explaining the "No Female Captains" thing. by Jadzia-Dax @ 19:19:56 on Jul 25
    RE: Explaining the "No Female Captains" thing. by MaxPower @ 19:34:31 on Jul 25
       RE: Explaining the "No Female Captains" thing. by Jadzia-Dax @ 19:39:20 on Jul 25
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.