menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

'T'Pol' Faces New Challenge at "Home", Plus the Newest NX Ship - First Plot Details (SPOILERS)

Features

By Steve Krutzler / 19:48, 23 July 2004 / Enterprise

Jolene Blalock let the cat out of the bag during this week's fall press tour: 'T'Pol' may be getting married. In fact, TrekWeb has received the first information on the third episode of the season in which the big event might occur, entitled simply "Home."

In the episode, slated to begin production August 4th under the direction of Allan Kroeker (who is also directing the season premiere "Storm Front, Part 1", credits), T'Pol will face her mother 'T'Las', who along with another family has arranged a Vulcan marriage for the Enterprise science officer. Producers are reportedly looking for an actress in her 60s are are open to "stunt" casting for the role.

UPN president Dawn Ostroff said earlier this week that the network would like to land popular performers in ENTERPRISE guest roles this season; TNG's Brent Spiner is already onboard for a three-part stint, and Shatner talks is omnipresent.

T'Pol's husband-to-be goes by the name of 'Koss' and looks in his late 30s by human standards. Koss is reminiscient of 'Spock', tall and imposing. But T'Pol -- as you can probably imagine -- is unsure whether to go through with the betrothal. Both T'Las and Koss could appear in later episodes.

In addition, we'll also meet the newest NX-class member of the fleet in "Home." The commemoratively-named Starship Columbia is captained by 'Erika Hernandez', a sexy Latin former colleague of 'Archer's from Starfleet's command school.

Rick Berman stated this week that the third episode of the season would be a standalone before launching into the three-part storyline focusing on Spiner as 'Arik Soong', the great-great-grandfather of 'Noonien Soong' (Data's creator) who attempts to continue the work of geneticists with embryos left over from the Eugenics Wars (story).

Until this information if confirmed by Paramount (or blurted out by one of the producers), it should be treated as rumor. "Home" will air in October.



More Top StoriesComments
Nov 22Quinto, Urban, Saldana, Cho and Greenwood on Their Hopes for Star Trek XII0
Nov 22Exclusive Digital Content Now Available With New Star Trek Movie on iTunes
1
Nov 22No J.J. Abrams Version of the U.S.S. Enterprise in the Star Trek Online MMORPG 0
Nov 21Faran Tahir on His 10 Minutes as Captain Robau in J.J. Abrams Star Trek Movie2
Nov 21J.J. Abrams, Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman on Shatner and Nimoy7
Story Archives...Browse:   
ENTERPRISE Mission Schedule | Logs by Season: 1 2 3 4
Episode Number Title Airdate

Talkback

70 comments Post New | Help
View:

RE: Explaining the "No Female Captains" thing. | Report this post to moderator
By: Jadzia-Dax (Odo's file, contact) @ 23:18:56 on Jul 24, 2004

Quote:
Of course things aren't perfect now, I certainly am not saying they are. But having a female captain in ENT? I have no problem with that, because to me that is what Star Trek is all about.

Really? Seems like we had 7 years of one, her name being Captain Kathryn Janeway. Yet so many who post here have called her what? All SORTS of ugly names. "Psychotic", "barbaric", "incompetent", "ugly bitch", and worse.

No. Trek doesn't need any more "female" Captains. That one was enough to know that THIS group in Human society isn't ready for one.

We've come a long way baby but we STILL have a long way to go. Image

Quote:

If you want to tell a story about sexism then make it an alien race.


No. We need to START with Humanity. And better, we need to start with THIS website. Image

My god, when someone posted some screenshots of Geneive Bujold as "Nicole Janeway" this past year, it was an absolute disgrace what the comments were in that thread.

Quote:

"Turnabout intruder" seems to fly in the face of Gene's future vision.


It was WRITTEN by him MaxPower. Which is why in that spacebeluga thread that I posted a link to below, I argued that it was his "up you" to NBC.

Quote:

It's like they


Who is they? You mean "Gene Roddenberry" who WROTE TOS "Turnabout Intruder".

Quote:

wanted to use Star Trek to tell this kind of story even though it contradicts everything that Star Trek's utopia is supposed to be all about.


EXACTLY. And if you look at what was done there, you might find that just like what Solow said that Gene Coon did with TOS "Spock's Brain" as HIS ultimate "up you" to NBC, so too did Roddenberry do with this episode - ie., we all know that Roddenberry's original pilot was rejected, in part because of the female "Number One" character. And so what do you do as a finale? You slap that "woman" in there "as Captain", anyway. But you "cover it up" by doing a literal parody or exaggeration of everything that is considered "stereotypical" about women and the "censors" miss the message that he got his "Captain" in an episode just the same.

If you look at Janice Lester BEFORE she made the switch, she never did all that exaggerated "stereotypical female" crap that Shatner did to play her. And note the actress who played Kirk and HOW she did him.

And NOTE that ACTRESS WAS KIRK-IN-CHARGE. Shatner says this in commentary that this was the only ep where "someone other than himself had played Captain James Tiberius Kirk".

So you symbollically HAVE your "female" (for all intents and purposes, including appearance - female body, female voice, etc) AS A CAPTAIN, but with the plot device being that Kirk was "inside her". And EVERYTHING presented in this episode as a statement of "fact", whether "medical" or "psychological" - everything "scientific" and thus based on hardcore "provable" information, indicated that NO SUCH SWITCH OCCURED.

Yet the only thing that we can use AS "evidence" on the distaff side, is to note the change of "behavior" of the 2 and Spock's information based on a "mind meld" - both of these things being plot devices for the audience to show that something had changed. Yet the "real" science said that this "woman" (who supposedly had Kirk's soul in it) WAS the Captain.

And it's a shame because all the exaggerated Shatner acting going on here, that this whole message is missed and that people just chalk it up as "She was psychotic" and other nonsense that women are usually called.

No other ep was so over the top than that (although TOS "Spock's Brain" and TOS "Omega Glory" were close).

I mean it was well known that he and the others did this sort of thing. TOS "Bread and Circuses", with the whole "television" backdrop for gladiator fights, with dialog where a Centurion monitoring the fighting says:

"You bring this network's ratings down Flavius and we'll do a special on you!"

was a well known in the fandom double-entendre jab at NBC within an episode that had aired during a time when TOS was threatened with cancellation.

Quote:

Maybe since this was the last episode produced(I think) this ep was kind of rushed out, a story with a moral even though it rubbed against the ideals of Trek.


It wasn't "rushed". According to Shatner's commentary, it was known well in advance that the show was over and when they would conclude filming, to the point where they had a wrap party all planned.

You all have to think "politics" and the fact that certainly those who are professional writers, especially in THAT industry, truly learn that "The pen is mightier than the sword". ;-)

--------

"I think the show talked to people through the characters. They're stories that speak to the heart. They talk about love, they talk about friendship, they talk about loyalty, they talk about patriotism, exploration, curiosity, reaching out... And I think all those things still touch people. Even when you look at a 30-year old show, it still has something to say." - D.C. Fontana, Sci Fi Channel Special Edition TOS 1998
----
"If the season finale involves the re-built USS Reliant coming back in time to the 21st Century crewed by Moogie, Dr. Selar, Morn, Transporter Chief Kyle, and the Salt Vampire, then we'll know that Coto has gone too far." - tomba1701

Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Parent
Parent
Talkback Top
Top
RE: Explaining the "No Female Captains" thing. by MaxPower @ 03:02:41 on Jul 25
    RE: Explaining the "No Female Captains" thing. by Jadzia-Dax @ 09:29:52 on Jul 25
       RE: Explaining the "No Female Captains" thing. by MaxPower @ 13:26:28 on Jul 25
          RE: Explaining the "No Female Captains" thing. by Jadzia-Dax @ 17:24:00 on Jul 25
             RE: Explaining the "No Female Captains" thing. by MaxPower @ 18:15:51 on Jul 25
                RE: Explaining the "No Female Captains" thing. by Jadzia-Dax @ 19:19:56 on Jul 25
                   RE: Explaining the "No Female Captains" thing. by MaxPower @ 19:34:31 on Jul 25
                      RE: Explaining the "No Female Captains" thing. by Jadzia-Dax @ 19:39:20 on Jul 25
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.