menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
Feature Story

Features

Deus Unsatisfied With Recycled, Out of Place "E2"

Features

By O. Deus / 11:52, 7 May 2004 / ENTERPRISE Reviews

Reviews Ex Deus

Title: "E2"

Overall: 5
Performances: 6.5
Writing: 5
Direction: 7.5
FX & Prod Value: 5


Synopsis: ENTERPRISE does VOYAGER and encounters its future in the form of reruns of previous STAR TREK episodes hashed together.

Review: DS9's "Children of Time" was hardly all that great of an episode, so it's unclear as to why ENTERPRISE felt the need to remake it again. Or why after already doing one episode that showed Enterprise's dark future if the Xindi mission failed, they chose to do another one. Or why they chose to interrupt the concluding arc of the season that had just begun gathering steam with an episode that distracts by rehashing a bunch of old episodes. But such are the mysteries that earn one a position on the writing staff of a television series.

It's not that "E2" is a particularly bad episode. In fact, Mike Sussman has generally done good work and so has Roxann Dawson. But as the saying goes, there's only so many times you can go to the well. The STAR TREK franchise has managed to drain the life out of such strengths as the Klingons and the Borg, and ENTERPRISE is well on its way to doing to time travel VOYAGER to the Borg. "E2" is not a bad episode but we've seen better versions of it plenty of times before. Take "Children of Time," hash it together with some bits and pieces of "Yesterday's Enterprise," "Deadlock" and "Equinox" and you pretty much have this episode.

Worst of all, "E2" really doesn't manage to do anything significant with the material. None of the future descendants are particularly interesting and aside from the great mess hall scene with Hoshi, Mayweather and Reed, the encounter with a future version Enterprise seems redirected into yet another round of Trip -n- T'Pol. And that is what really manages to reduce "E2" to a pile of barely digestible mush. Much as ENTERPRISE Season 3 took the destruction of Earth and the death of Trip's sister and turned it into an excuse for erotic massages, "E2" takes the encounter with a future Enterprise and turns it into yet another round of gracelessly shoving Trip and T'Pol together. But of course even this silliness isn't original because "Children of Time," the DS9 episode this episode is cribbed from, featured a futuristic version of Odo revealing his love to Kira.

But it isn't the turpid scenes between T'Pol and Trip themselves that destroy the episode but the outcome of twisting the episode to accomodate them by the creation of Lorian. Despite being derivative, however, "E2" had some possibilities. Imagine an encounter with a more wolfish and desperate Archer a decade or two down the road. Or even the same aged T'Pol we see in this episode in command and becoming more unstable as she desperately tries to achieve her goal by any means necesarry. It wouldn't be the greatest STAR TREK episode of all time but it could have been compelling. It would have been about the crew and the choices they've made and what they can become if they continue down this path. It would have tied neatly into the previous episodes.

But instead as an articulation of Trip and T'Pol's Love That Dare Not Speak Its Ratings, we get Lorian the first Redneck Vulcan on STAR TREK. He might have been entertaining if played for laughs, maybe meditating under a Confederate flag to a piece from a Harley's motor. But instead David Andrews portrays him with all the intensity of a coma patient being pumped full of extra sediatives. Meanwhile, the child of Trip and T'Pol combines Trip's boneheaded stupidity with T'Pol's emotionlessness to produce a truly boring idiot. Aside from his emoting scene in the brig, Lorian isn't just boring, he taps into a whole dimension of tediousness we never thought previously possible. God knows when you're looking forward to Mayweather saying a line, something is seriously wrong.

Not only does "E2" waste enormous amounts of time on a character who does not seem to survive this episode but it wastes more time drawing out this round of the 'Will They Or Won't They Game' for T'Pol and Trip, a game best reserved for the viewership of teenage girls, and ultimately is not about the choices Archer makes so much as the moral struggle of a boring character who is not a member of the crew and whom we will never see again. While it was a nice touch of irony to see the Enterprise crew end up on the other side of the treatment they handed out in "Damage" and for the same reason, "E2" manages to flub even this scene by centering the confrontation on Trip rather than Archer (you know, Archer, the guy who struggled with that tough decision to steal a warp coil from innocent people to save Earth only to find himself in the same predicament from the other side.)

There are worthwhile moments in the episode, however. Reed's worries about remaining a bachelor, the two beaten ships docked together, the revelation of who Phlox married, Archer's disappointed expression when he realizes that it's Degra's ship and not the other Enterprise and Degra becoming even more desperate and determined as Randy Oglesby continues stealing every scene he's in. Jolene Blalock turns in another surprisingly good performance as the aged T'Pol, which perhaps might remind the producers that they might consider more possibilities involving her than getting her on drugs or taking her clothes off. But when all is said and done this episode simply does not work.

It is a poorly hashed together mix of older episodes that fits poorly into the arc, has the wrong focus and is a letdown in every way. Even the production values seem poor with the corridor effects looking cheap and terrible and T'Pol's caked makeup making her look more like a swamp monster than an old woman. Makeup this bad was understandable on TOS when Kirk, Spock and McCoy underwent dramatic aging. But it's completely unacceptable in 2004. But then T'Pol's makeup, like this episode, shows the age of a creaking franchise in its last throes. With two episodes this season showing a dead and doomed ancient Enterprise fighting a hopeless battle, one almost wonders if the writers are prophecying the eponymous show for which they work.



More Top StoriesComments
Nov 24Scott Bakula on Why He Played the Role of Captain Archer in Enterprise1
Nov 24Leonard Nimoy Talks About Star Trek XII and (Not) Watching New Movie with Shatner0
Nov 23J.J. Abrams and Chris Pine Talk How Gratifying That Star Trek was Well Received, Working with Leonard Nimoy and Star Trek XII2
Nov 23Chuck returns to NBC with a special two-hour show on Sunday, Jan 10, 2010, before returning to its regular time slot, Mondays at 8pm on the following night. It's return to prime time television can be attributed to a successful fan renewnal campaign last year. CHUCK is a one-hour, action-comedy series that follows Chuck Bartowski (Zachary Levi, "Less Than Perfect") -- a computer geek who is catapulted into a new career as the government's most vital secret agent. This upcoming season will include some special guest stars, including Brandon Routh of "Superman Returns" who will play CIA agent Daniel Shaw in an episode, and the addition of SUBWAY restaurant as a major advertiser to the show. Chuck averaged a 4.0/6 rating last season, about eight percent better than the recently cancelled "Trauma". Ratings-challenged Heroes moves back an hour when Chuck returns on Monday nights. STAR TREK VOYAGER's Robert Duncan McNeill serves Chuck as a supervising producer and director.0
Nov 235-Page Preview of Third Issue of Galactica 1980 Comic Book  0
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

89 comments Post New | Help
View:

RE: Racism | Report this post to moderator
By: Chris Pike (Odo's file, contact) @ 00:00:45 on May 11, 2004

Since when does "redneck" refer only to one race? Don't be a dumbass.



--------

"Worlds may change, galaxies may disintegrate, but a woman always remains a woman."
--James Kirk, "The Conscience of the King"

"Vulcan children are never late with their sehlats' dinner."
--T'Pol, "The Forge"



Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Parent
Parent
Talkback Top
Top
RE: Racism by takeitnomore @ 19:43:54 on May 11
    RE: by Chris Pike @ 22:32:10 on May 11
    RE: Racism by Cymro @ 20:54:59 on May 11
       RE: Racism by takeitnomore @ 23:09:59 on May 11
          RE: Racism by Cymro @ 02:20:48 on May 12
             RE: Racism by takeitnomore @ 19:00:07 on May 12
          RE: Racism by Chris Pike @ 00:29:55 on May 12
             RE: Racism by dewleaf @ 05:54:17 on May 16

RE: Racism | Report this post to moderator
By: kxmode (Odo's file, contact) @ 00:31:08 on May 19, 2004

I think the reason why “redneck” doesn’t anger white people (save one) as a term as other words for other races is simply because most whites have thicker skin and can take insults maturely. Case in point Tecate Beer had a billboard advertisement with the statement, “Finally a Cold Latina”. All these Latino folks were in an uproar over it claiming everything from racism, to sexual connotations. Personally I think they just don’t like the fact that there are a lot of “cold latinos” out there (watch the movie “Training Day”). Here’s the article http://phoenix.bizjournals.com/phoenix/stories/2004/05/17/daily14.html if you’d like to read more. Technically words like redneck, and nigger aren’t necessarily evil, it’s all in how the word is used. I could easily insult you using just the word, “sir”.

--------

http://music.download.com/kxmode
http://www.kxmode.com

Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Parent
Parent
Talkback Top
Top
RE: Racism by Cymro @ 22:26:14 on May 19

Sense of Humor | Report this post to moderator
By: O. Deus (Odo's file, contact) @ 23:27:40 on May 11, 2004

The term redneck does not refer to a race like some of the other racial slurs you felt the need to post here. So your complaint is baseless and foolish.

And in the future if you have a spasm of political correctness, feel free to tihnk your complaint through before making it.

Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Parent
Parent
Talkback Top
Top
RE: Sense of Humor by takeitnomore @ 23:53:48 on May 11
    RE: Sense of Humor by O. Deus @ 06:39:43 on May 12
       RE: Sense of Humor by takeitnomore @ 18:42:16 on May 12
          RE: Sense of Humor by O. Deus @ 07:19:43 on May 14

Amusing | Report this post to moderator
By: Klytus (Odo's file, contact) @ 20:27:45 on May 11, 2004

Not the racial epithet but the fact that O.Deus may have unintentionally revealed the critics opinion of the Chief Engineer of Enterprise. Is it the shoot from the hip mentality? It can't be the southern accent? Can it?


"It's OK to be a redneck."
Alan Jackson


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Parent
Parent
Talkback Top
Top
RE: Amusing by takeitnomore @ 21:26:17 on May 11

RE: Racism | Report this post to moderator
By: Gene's Ghost (Odo's file, contact) @ 18:02:32 on May 11, 2004

Pluleeze! Don't go makin' Rednecks victims!
They are a proud klan, so get over it.





--------

PAY ATTENTION! Listen to DemocracyNow! , AirAmericaRadio and CrooksandLiars - Where the REAL truth hurts everyone!

Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Parent
Parent
Talkback Top
Top
RE: Racism by takeitnomore @ 19:28:55 on May 11
    Didn't most of Air America's top executives resign? by O. Deus @ 23:29:37 on May 11
       RE: Didn't most of Air America's top executives resign? by takeitnomore @ 00:06:59 on May 12
          RE: Didn't most of Air America's top executives resign? by O. Deus @ 06:41:37 on May 12
    RE: Racism by Gene's Ghost @ 20:42:14 on May 11
       RE: Racism by katefan @ 21:13:53 on May 11
          Yep that about sums it up by O. Deus @ 23:31:10 on May 11
          RE: Racism by Gene's Ghost @ 22:09:53 on May 11
             RE: Racism by O. Deus @ 06:43:24 on May 12
             RE: Racism by takeitnomore @ 23:31:57 on May 11
                RE: Racism by Gene's Ghost @ 15:36:09 on May 12
                   RE: Racism by takeitnomore @ 18:59:19 on May 12
                      RE: Racism by Gene's Ghost @ 19:24:52 on May 12
          RE: Racism by takeitnomore @ 21:34:28 on May 11
             RE: Racism by Gene's Ghost @ 22:17:05 on May 11
                RE: Racism by DS9 Fan @ 23:53:25 on May 11
                   RE: Racism by takeitnomore @ 00:21:17 on May 12
                RE: Racism by O. Deus @ 23:33:46 on May 11

RE: Racism | Report this post to moderator
By: Stroker Ace (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:11:27 on May 11, 2004

"we get Lorian the first Redneck Vulcan on STAR TREK. He might have been entertaining if played for laughs, maybe meditating under a Confederate flag to a piece from a Harley's motor."

I guess what O. Deus means is that anyone with a
slightly southern accent is a redneck, and while that's stereotypical, it is by far racist. "Redneck"
is a CULTURAL term, NOT RACIAL. Do you even know where the term "redneck" comes from? Last time I
checked, millions of sunburnt farmers weren't sold
into slavery. "Redneck" is not a racial slur, period.

--------

Show me a man who lives alone and has a perpetually clean kitchen, and 8 times out of 9 I'll show you a man with detestable spiritual qualities. Charles Bukowski

Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Parent
Parent
Talkback Top
Top
RE: Racism by takeitnomore @ 19:35:26 on May 11
    RE: Racism by Stroker Ace @ 22:38:17 on May 11
       RE: Racism by takeitnomore @ 00:43:09 on May 12
       RE: Racism by Chris Pike @ 22:48:55 on May 11
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.