menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
Feature Story

Features

"Damage" Offers Compelling Choice, Suffers Weak Subplots Says Deus

Features

By O. Deus / 00:01, 23 April 2004 / ENTERPRISE Reviews

Reviews Ex Deus

Title: "Damage"

Overall: 7.5
Performances: 8
Writing: 6.5
Direction: 7
FX & Prod Value: 8.5


Synopsis: Enterprise tries to recover from its pounding by stealing a warp coil. The Xindi Council bickers and T'Pol has to learn to 'just say no'.

Review: The damage in the title of this episode refers to both the physical damage we can see in the tears and devastation on the Enterprise hull and the moral damage sustained by Archer and members of his crew over the term of the Xindi mission. It's an episode that lingers over the damage Archer, T'Pol and even the Xindi see in themselves as much as it does over the lightless and beaten interiors of Enterprise itself.

The scene of the Xindi council calling off the attack early on dampens far too much of the tension too quickly, as it might have been much more helpful to keep the audience wondering why the Xindi called off the attack and whether they might
return for a while. Still, "Damage" does a credible job of showing the beating Enterprise has taken and closes as it began with a devastated ship not healed by any quick fix or technobabble solution.

While STAR TREK, particularly on TV, will never top the sense of devastation Enterprise experienced after Khan's attack, crystalized in the awful image of Scotty standing helplessly in the turbolift with a bloody body cradled in his arms, "Damage" provides
some excellent... well, damage. The exploding EPS conduit over the heads of the senior officers followed by debris raining down during the briefing is a particularly nice touch; Archer looking over the covered bodies in sickbay is a more understated moment, but arguably a more effective one that hardens both his determination and pain.

The truly inspired touch, though, is the damaged alien vessel with the warp coil that Enterprise must raid in order to stop the Xindi weapon. Unlike DS9's much-hyped "In The Pale Moonlight," Archer faces a genuinely impossible moral dilemma because circumstances give him no choice but to carry out an immoral act against innocent victims. This puts it closer to the depth of great TOS episodes like "A Private Little War," that require an immoral act for a pragmatic outcome.

When Archer's team raids the alien vessel, it visually suggests the raids on
Enterprise in "Anomaly" and "Rajiin," and thus the victims become the victimizers, as happens all too often today. Archer's final confrontation with the alien captain is brief but effective. Throughout the course of an agonizing year Archer has gone from being naive and arrogantly optimistic to a hard-driven and wounded man who acts not out of hope but pragmatism. The scientist and explorer has become the unwilling soldier.

All in all "Damage" effectively shows the price Enterprise has paid and the way
in which Archer and the crew respond to it. However the other two stories circling
around the episode, namely T'Pol Gone Wild and the Xindi council debating Archer's
claims, are a good deal weaker. The Xindi Council scenes in general to tend to deflate too much of the tension and claustrophobic atmosphere that makes for the episode's strongest scenes. Brannon Braga and Rick Berman should have learned from George Lucas's THE PHANTOM MENACE, which demonstrated that political bickering in government offices doesn't make for the best drama. Worse yet, the Xindi Council scenes represent exactly what much of "Damage" avoids, easy and quick fixes.

The Xindi Council members moving from genocide to freeing Archer and letting Enterprise go is just too implausible. Degra argues that Archer had provided proof where the Sphere Builder has not, but that is even more absurd; Archer did not prove his claims about the sphere-builders or their ambitions. All he did was prove that he might
have access to time travel, which the Xindi already know the Sphere-Builders do.
Archer did nothing to demonstrate or prove humanity's good intentions and at the same
time it's also completely implausible that Degra and the others would be so committed
to wiping out humanity without a single shred of evidence that Earth presented a threat, but just on the word of the Sphere-Builder.

Randy Oglesby continues to deliver strong performances as Degra and Tucker Smallwood is quite good too. The Sphere-Builder from the future pacing through the Xindi Council is eerie, even if her performance is so transparently malevolent that
it's absurd that anyone would take her claims seriously. Compare that to the more
subtle female shapeshifter on DS9 who didn't have to act like she was about to bake Hansel and Gretel in a giant oven to convey the presence of evil.

T'Pol's story is something else entirely. Namely an excercise in contemptible
stupidity and unforiveable ignorance. We had good reason to believe that sooner or
later TPTB would tie in something involving the anomalies and Trellium-D to T'Pol's bizarre behavior in order to get them off the hook with the STAR TREK fans Braga derides as 'Continuity Pornographers.'

But it was difficult to imagine a storyline in which we are told that Vulcans need to take drugs in order to experience emotions when in fact Vulcans experience emotions far more intense than humans--the very reason that requires them to maintain such strict control. The idea that a Vulcan needs to take drugs to experience emotions is as insane as saying that a weightlifter needs to take drugs in order to be able to put down barbells rather than to lift them up. The difficulty is in suppressing emotions, the emotions Vulcans experience all the time and must continually struggle to control using their mental disciplines. Trellium-D degrades those disciplines but those disciplines are a voluntary
excercise to begin with. It simply makes absolutely no sense at all.

Of all the aspects of STAR TREK, Vulcans have taken the worst beating from ENTERPRISE, first being cast as villains plotting to obstruct our heroes, as militarists, as
prudes, metaphorical homophobes, mind rapists and just about any nasty thing imaginable. But T'Pol's portrayal this season has really hit a whole new low. It is, of course, difficult to top the repulsive depiction of T'Pol in "Bounty," running through the halls half-undressed in a mating frenzy and having to be hunted down by Enterprise security teams, but season three has certainly been working up to it.

The bonus sexism of a woman being left in command on a ship while becoming unfocused and then hysterical, only to be relieved by the male Captain is yet another of
ENTERPRISE's thoughtful additions to the STAR TREK legacy that we will undoubtedly
treasure for years to come. Somewhere Harlan Ellison, who has spent countless hours over the past few decades shrilly complaining because Gene Roddenberry wouldn't let him portray a crew members as drug users and dealers is undoubtedly quite happy right now. Perhaps next season we can look forwards to Trip tripping out on E or Archer on crack? After all, we've now opened the door and we might as well step all the way through.

"Damage" is strongest when it focuses on the moral and physical dilemmas
of the Enterprise crew, rather than the more soap operatic elements. Unfortunately, along with the physical and emotional damage to the Enterprise and its crew, the episode suffers from its own damage as well.

Next week: There are only 5 new episodes left. Count em, that's 5 new episodes.



More Top StoriesComments
Nov 24Scott Bakula on Why He Played the Role of Captain Archer in Enterprise4
Nov 24Leonard Nimoy Talks About Star Trek XII and (Not) Watching New Movie with Shatner0
Nov 23J.J. Abrams and Chris Pine Talk How Gratifying That Star Trek was Well Received, Working with Leonard Nimoy and Star Trek XII2
Nov 23Chuck returns to NBC with a special two-hour show on Sunday, Jan 10, 2010, before returning to its regular time slot, Mondays at 8pm on the following night. It's return to prime time television can be attributed to a successful fan renewnal campaign last year. CHUCK is a one-hour, action-comedy series that follows Chuck Bartowski (Zachary Levi, "Less Than Perfect") -- a computer geek who is catapulted into a new career as the government's most vital secret agent. This upcoming season will include some special guest stars, including Brandon Routh of "Superman Returns" who will play CIA agent Daniel Shaw in an episode, and the addition of SUBWAY restaurant as a major advertiser to the show. Chuck averaged a 4.0/6 rating last season, about eight percent better than the recently cancelled "Trauma". Ratings-challenged Heroes moves back an hour when Chuck returns on Monday nights. STAR TREK VOYAGER's Robert Duncan McNeill serves Chuck as a supervising producer and director.0
Nov 235-Page Preview of Third Issue of Galactica 1980 Comic Book  0
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

69 comments Post New | Help
View:

RE: Survival of Humanity vs. Stealing a Warp Drive | Report this post to moderator
By: TRexx (Odo's file, contact) @ 13:03:38 on Apr 24, 2004

Quote from O. Deus:
Anyone who would choose to wipe out the human race rather than steal a warp drive is not only a blinkered fool who values personal image over the lives of billions of people but a collaborator in genocide.

Anyone incapable of grasping that there are sometimes stakers bigger more important than personal ethics and that sometimes you have to do something wrong for the greater good does not belong in positions of responsibility. Starship Captains are not priests or saints. They are men and women charged with a task greater than themselves.



Yet that Starship Captain values his immediate friends more than the billions of lives on Earth. We've been shown how frequent and deadly the spacial anomalies are -- yet Archer has forgone the protection of Trellium-D armor in order to keep T'Pol aboard, jeopardizing the ship and mission, thus trivializing all life on Earth.

ENT's characters (plot-driven puppets) are as schizophrenic as the writing.


--------------
William Shatner @ The Wayne Brady Show
Image

Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Parent
Parent
Talkback Top
Top
RE: Survival of Humanity vs. Stealing a Warp Drive by O. Deus @ 21:44:20 on Apr 24
    RE: Survival of Humanity vs. Stealing a Warp Drive by TRexx @ 00:21:49 on Apr 25
       RE: Survival of Humanity vs. Stealing a Warp Drive by O. Deus @ 07:55:16 on Apr 25
          RE: Survival of Humanity vs. Stealing a Warp Drive by Jadzia-Dax @ 05:57:11 on Apr 26
             RE: Survival of Humanity vs. Stealing a Warp Drive by O. Deus @ 09:12:43 on Apr 26
                RE: Survival of Humanity vs. Stealing a Warp Drive by Jadzia-Dax @ 20:17:59 on Apr 27
                   RE: Survival of Humanity vs. Stealing a Warp Drive by O. Deus @ 06:37:24 on Apr 29
          RE: Survival of Humanity vs. Stealing a Warp Drive by TRexx @ 15:37:55 on Apr 25
             RE: Survival of Humanity vs. Stealing a Warp Drive by O. Deus @ 19:03:09 on Apr 25
                RE: Survival of Humanity vs. Stealing a Warp Drive by TRexx @ 20:53:46 on Apr 25
                   RE: Survival of Humanity vs. Stealing a Warp Drive by O. Deus @ 09:15:22 on Apr 26
                      RE: Survival of Humanity vs. Stealing a Warp Drive by TRexx @ 13:57:56 on Apr 26
                         RE: Survival of Humanity vs. Stealing a Warp Drive by O. Deus @ 06:39:58 on Apr 29
                   RE: Survival of Humanity vs. Stealing a Warp Drive by brad hall @ 01:30:26 on Apr 26
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.