menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
Feature Story

Features

Send in the Spores! Mind-Controlling "Hatchery" Time-Worn But Manages a Few Punches, Says Deus

Features

By O. Deus / 06:29, 26 February 2004 / ENTERPRISE Reviews

Beam This Story to a Friend
Complete the form below to e-mail a link to this story to a friend.

Your Name:
Your E-Mail:
Your Friend's Name:
Your Friend's E-Mail:
Subject:
Message (optional):

Reviews Ex Deus

Title: "Hatchery"

Overall: 7.5
Performances: 8
Writing: 7
Direction: 7.5
FX & Prod Value: 7


Synopsis: When Archer is infected by a Xindi hatchery he becomes the proud and overprotective godfather of a whole bunch of Xindi spawn.

Review: Viruses, mind-control devices, hallucinogenic plants, remote hypnotic suggestions and various radiations on STAR TREK have often been the vehicle for exploring behavior and playing out conflicts that the producers and writers do not dare have the characters act out in reality. Such plot devices are convenient because they allow conflict and dramatic events to take place without consequences that would redefine the characters and their relationships to each other. But such episodes are also often lifeless and dreary because ultimately we know that the Reset Button will be pressed by the end, eliminating whatever development has occurred in it.

"Hatchery" partially dodges this trap by limiting the effects of the Xindi chemical to Archer alone. The actions of his crew and the MACO's were not undertaken due to any outside influence and so continue to be a factor even though the episode hastily wraps up the conclusion with Major Hayes accepting everything without too much fuss -- although as far as he knows the people giving him the information may well now be the enemy. The bigger questions about Enterprise's command structure remain unanswered, however. A single scene of Archer telling Hayes not to accept any illegal orders from him in the future or orders that violate Starfleet's chain of command would have gone far in that regard. As would T'Pol and Trip or Phlox questioning whether the presence of the MACO's gives the Captain too much power and subverts the Starfleet approved hierarchy on the starship.

Still, "Hatchery" does well given the timeworn and derivative material. Despite the fact that just about any viewer with any STAR TREK experience under his belt realized that Archer had been infected and his behavior was due to the infection very quickly, "Hatchery" manages to draw out the suspense by framing Archer's behavior with appealing liberal rhetoric from the him. The more obviously bizarre and dangerous Archer's behavior becomes, the more appealing his rhetoric becomes, like a drug addict finding increasingly persuasive ways to defend his addiction. A literal metaphor since Archer had, in fact, been drugged. Unlike previous Captains in similar episodes whose behavior was clearly aberrant, Archer remains deeply persuasive almost until the end.

"Hatchery" also manages to throw in a good deal of background and character development for the Xindi Insectoids, moreso than anything that we've gotten in the past. We've seen the Xindi Insectoids at their worst but now we also see them possessed of a compelling instinct to preserve their offspring, even if that instinct appears to be a chemically-generated fact of their biology. "Hatchery" also throws in a variety of other continuity references, including a long-awaited one to the Eugenics Wars, even if Archer does make it sound more like a UN peacekeeping mission than the hell and horror of WWIII. The revelation that the MACO's were trained at West Point points to continuing questions about the status of individual nation states in this time period.

The key conflict in the episode simmers occasionally but never really boils. Trip's takedown of Archer is anti-climactic where a more extended scene in which Archer tries to use his newfound persuasive abilities and call on their friendship before Trip is forced to shoot him would have worked better. Major Hayes has also not been all that developed throughout the season and his tension with Reed should have been far better defined by this point. Nevertheless, the crew's willingness to defy the Captain for the mission even without any solid proof of a foreign agent acting on his mental state shifts the balance of power a bit as Archer recognizes jokingly in his final scene with Trip.



More Top StoriesComments
Nov 22Exclusive Digital Content Now Available With New Star Trek Movie on iTunes
0
Nov 22Star Trek Online MMORPG Producer Talks Space Combat and Away Missions0
Nov 21Faran Tahir on His 10 Minutes as Captain Robau in J.J. Abrams Star Trek Movie2
Nov 21J.J. Abrams, Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman on Shatner and Nimoy7
Nov 21Roberto Orci on the Status of the Star Trek XII Script and the Possibility of Producing a New Star Trek TV Series16
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

30 comments Post New | Help
View:

Very Cool | Report this post to moderator
By: Search (Odo's file, contact) @ 22:12:38 on Jun 05, 2004

Call me simple, but I always like the mutiny episode. True, the main focus was on the bug babies, but any time a captain is "under the influence" (whatever that influence may be...) and the crew has to mutiny, you know I'm on the edge of my seat.
I really enjoyed hatchery. Dont know why the critics are so harsh on this show ... I love it!


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

The Hatchery - Yawn. | Report this post to moderator
By: Batavia Station (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:23:36 on Mar 02, 2004

The eggs wern't the only thing sleeping in "The Hatchery" .

Normally i have no problem watching Enterprise, even though it's evening viewing time falls when I'm normally fast alseep and resting for my third shift work schedule.

This time however, I couldn't help but find myself drifting off now & again.

While it wasn't a bad episode, It surely wasn't very riveting in my opinion either.

I was impressed with the performance of Captain Archer however. So many times, during these episodes with "mind control" or some other outside controlling influence, characters who have been taken over seem to be "over the top" and exagerated with their actions. While this may be the actual case were something like this to actually happen, I feel that much of the time, any sort of controlling influence would attempt to be more subtle. A greatly written and performed episode in this respect.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Some "Aliens" On The Side | Report this post to moderator
By: Klytus (Odo's file, contact) @ 21:46:35 on Feb 29, 2004

The setup to the crew entering the Zindi Insectoid hatchery had a Aliens feel to it. The away team calmly walking into the hatchery. Positioning themselves far too closely to the eggs sacks. The inevitable contamination occuring.

I thought that the pacing of Archer's transformation to surrogate parent to the hatchlings was quite effective. And since Archer was unaware of the change, he suffered no tortured, emotional conflict. It was interesting watching the crew slowly realize that their personal safety was becoming secondary to the Captain. The senior officers having to deal with the situation without Archer's support was a new experience for them. And it was discovered why T'Pol is the executive officer. Because, it was her quiet strength, her leadership that made the retaking of the ship possible.

In the end, the Maco Major did finally become more of a member of the crew only after the incident was resolved because of the understanding reached by Reed and himself. I believe that the Major will become more involved with staff decisions as he should be. If the Major had been informed and saw Archer's transformation, the incident could have been resolved sooner.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

No Comment | Report this post to moderator
By: NAFF (Odo's file, contact) @ 07:48:39 on Feb 28, 2004

This episode had the worst pre-credits teaser in the history of the show.

Now, not only do the teasers last a few seconds, but they fail to do what they are supposed to do - grab the attention of the viewer.

I can't comment on the rest of the episode, as Enterprise doesn't deserve an uninterrupted hour of my time any more.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Not a bad episode | Report this post to moderator
By: Grand Admiral Thrawn (Odo's file, contact) @ 03:40:26 on Feb 27, 2004

I think it was a decent episode. I enjoyed watching it but the episode was not extraordinary which is what enterprise really needs to spike the ratings up

--------

"The mighty Star Trek would fall before us"-B&B


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

did anyone else notice | Report this post to moderator
By: tauremorna (Odo's file, contact) @ 21:30:45 on Feb 26, 2004

Decent, solid, predictable episode. But did anyone else notice that the tension between Reed and Hayes seemed a little sexual. Reed eyed him up and down while they were coversing in a way that totally made me feel like he wanted him. Maybe thats just Dominic Keating and his showtime/soft-core porn/chromiumblue.com style of acting.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: did anyone else notice | Report this post to moderator
    By: Kujo (Odo's file, contact) @ 13:56:20 on Feb 28, 2004

    Quote:
    Decent, solid, predictable episode. But did anyone else notice that the tension between Reed and Hayes seemed a little sexual. Reed eyed him up and down while they were coversing in a way that totally made me feel like he wanted him. Maybe thats just Dominic Keating and his showtime/soft-core porn/chromiumblue.com style of acting.

    Yeah, I noticed the same thing, and was disturbed by it. Overall, a decent episode. I do agree with the comments about the crew looking dumb in this ep. I can't believe it took them that long to figure out that Archer had been infected.


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote

Pretty good | Report this post to moderator
By: Steve Krutzler (Odo's file, contact) @ 17:09:49 on Feb 26, 2004

When I first learned that this episode actually involved Archer under undue alien influence, rather than my original assumption that he would try to use the hatchery to gain a tactical advantage, I was disappointed. I had thought a desperate Archer might try to do something to the Insectoid hatchlings to gain an advantage in the war against the Xindi, and that the crew's mutiny was in response to the captain finally taking his unethical behavior over the edge. In fact, the episode was just the opposite, and I think it worked very well.

"Hatchery" took advantage of the divided loyalties of the MACOs and the Starfleet crew, something I'd been hoping for since word of their arrival on the show last summer. Since Hayes has received a good bit of development lately, this plot worked very well in depicting the loyalty of Hayes to Archer and the tension with Reed. Hayes and Reed's final scene in sickbay was very effective to this end.

As someone else pointed out, at every point along the way, Archer's pleas for saving the hatchlings seemed to make sense. Despite the delay, it was plausible that saving them could prove a future tactical advantage. Of course once the issue of transferring Enterprise's anti-matter reserves comes into the picture, it's clear that Archer is out of bounds. The final scene with the insectoids running all over him is what really hammers it home and the mutinty etc. was handled well.

I have a couple quibbles: Eugenics Wars seem to be getting coalesced into World War III mythology. This indicates a lack of clearly defined backstory. Maybe they should have (when developing ENT) gone back and actually written a lot of backstory for all this so that they could keep everything straight, rather than make it more convoluted with every reference.

I have no problem with the away team removing their helmets, but if that was the only pressurized room, shouldn't it have been depressurized when Archer and Hayes arrived the first time and opened the door while the rest of the crew inside still have their helmets off?

How do they tow things in this era? Tow cables? OK, but they just hang right off the back of the shuttlepod through the impulse exhaust?

In any case, definitely one of the better episodes of the season. A good bottle show that used the unique Xindi situation to explore important questions about the MACOs and the ethics of the mission in general.

--------

It's a rip-off. / We're stepped on, and cheated! / We're flat, stone-cold lied to / But we're not defeated / No!

Halen. "The Dream is Over."


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: Pretty good | Report this post to moderator
    By: tazym (Odo's file, contact) @ 13:01:53 on Feb 27, 2004

    This wasn't one of the greatest episodes by any stretch, but I agree with you Steve that this type of episode stands up during the year. And to be honest this series hasn't had a lot of those. This was STAR TREK pure and simple. And instead of trying to shock the world every week -- more stuff like this with the occasional spectacular all out "event" episode-- and they'd be getting back on the right track.


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
  • RE: Pretty good | Report this post to moderator
    By: Cyrus (Odo's file, contact) @ 18:06:44 on Feb 26, 2004

    Quote:
    I have a couple quibbles: Eugenics Wars seem to be getting coalesced into World War III mythology. This indicates a lack of clearly defined backstory. Maybe they should have (when developing ENT) gone back and actually written a lot of backstory for all this so that they could keep everything straight, rather than make it more convoluted with every reference.

    I think they intentionally left it vague. The writers sort of have a no win situation with the Eugenics Wars. Many hardcore fans (myself included) want them to follow the TOS continuity and put the wars in the 1990s, while others want the Trek timeline to be as close to our own as possible (not to mention the casual fans who will be confused about a war in the 1990s). The reference in this episode can work both ways. It's theoratically possible for Archer's great grandfather to have been around in the 1990s, so there is no direct violation of TOS continuity. But as you said, it could also be interpreted that the war happend later and it may have been the same as WW-III.

    Of course the Eugenics Wars was already a mess with DS9 putting it in the 22nd century (thanks to a script goof by Ron Moore).

    --------

    Could you please continue the petty bickering? I find it most intriguing.


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
    • RE: Pretty good | Report this post to moderator
      By: spacebeluga (Odo's file, contact) @ 20:20:31 on Feb 26, 2004

      Quote:
      Of course the Eugenics Wars was already a mess with DS9 putting it in the 22nd century (thanks to a script goof by Ron Moore).

      Moore admitted that he wasn't thinking too much about it when he wrote that and that it was a simple error.


      Reply
      Reply
      Quote
      Quote

IQs have dropped... AGAIN! | Report this post to moderator
By: Sunspot (Odo's file, contact) @ 12:18:54 on Feb 26, 2004

Although the episode had some decent moments, "Hatchery" lost me in the beginning because I think, once again, it makes the crew look stupid. This is especially disappointing considering the string of recent episodes where they were written much better ("Proving Ground," "Stratagem," "Harbinger"). I began to get annoyed the moment they started taking off their helmets in this alien environment before determining if there were any bio-hazards. Why would they do this? To conserve oxygen? (No, to get infected, of course.) But what really pissed me off is when Archer starts acting whacky and risking the mission to find the Xindi weapon, no one says, "Hmmm, maybe it has something to do with him getting sprayed by that alien whatever. Maybe we should check a little closer." It isn't until very late in the episode (and long after he relieves T'Pol of her duties) that they begin to do this. As Star Trek fans we know exactly what's happening and how it's going to turn out. We have to watch while the crew run around in circles and finally start to figure out something we knew from the beginning. I think it makes the crew look dumb and bores the audience. And I really, really want the crew to look and act intelligent--it's much more entertaining.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: IQs have dropped... AGAIN! | Report this post to moderator
    By: seventhstar (Odo's file, contact) @ 17:01:24 on Feb 26, 2004

    I liked the episode, but I don't think it was as strong as it could have been.

    At first, Archer's orders seemed typical of a *Federation* starship captain. Saving alien lives in the hatchery, even enemy alien lives, is something we'd expect from a Federation starship captain.

    But, as the episode went along, you knew the venom was affecting his judgment.

    I wonder if it would have been more interesting if the crew had gone along with his orders, but Major Hayes and the MACOs, maybe eventually along with Doctor Phlox, were the ones to realize something was wrong.

    The crew, being explorers initially, would seem to be more apt to follow the Captain's orders to save the hatchery than would the MACOs have been as apt to follow the Captain's orders to basically put their primary mission in jeopardy.

    I think that would have made for a more believable plot.


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
  • RE: IQs have dropped... AGAIN! | Report this post to moderator
    By: Michael (Odo's file, contact) @ 13:04:20 on Feb 26, 2004

    I agree. I found it predictable and boring. I know I'm losing interest when I'm in no hurry to rush back to the show after the commercials are over. Except for Proving Ground, which I thought was a fantastic episode, the recent shows have been a disappointment. The show has to be consistently good for viewers to keep coming back.

    As for the survival of the show, I'm sure UPN is asking itself, "Can we get a better return on our investment with another show?" Enterprise isn't cheap to produce and if UPN can come up with a cheap exploitive "reality" show that will get better ratings, then Enterprise is doomed.

    It's all about money.


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote

Give Complete reign.... | Report this post to moderator
By: tazym (Odo's file, contact) @ 11:21:55 on Feb 26, 2004

...to Mike Sussman. This is the guy that bring TREK back....


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Eugenics Wars | Report this post to moderator
By: The TREKMAN!!!!! (Odo's file, contact) @ 11:11:07 on Feb 26, 2004

"including a long-awaited one to the Eugenics Wars, even if Archer does make it sound more like a UN peacekeeping mission than the hell and horror of WWIII."

Well, the Eugenics Wars did happened in the early-mid 90's and if all those little conflicts that happen during that time were actually the secret Eugenics War, Archer's quote is correct.

--------

"Take a Romulan chill pill and have some faith!"
-Erik Jendresen, writer of Star Trek: The Beginning

"No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country."
-General George S. Patton Jr.

"I am NOT Scorned."
-Scorned as Gage/Gage_2


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

ENT "Hatchery" = TOS "Turnabout Intruder" rework | Report this post to moderator
By: Jadzia-Dax (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:02:48 on Feb 26, 2004

Remember our little discussion about TOS "Turnabout Intruder"? Same sort of story setup here in ENT "Hatchery", where you have:

1.) Captain is impacted by [insert plot device here].

2.) Captain's initial behavior is somewhat unusual but not too far out initially to generate too much concern.

3.) Over time, Captain's behavior becomes increasingly erratic causing concern by some of the crew and illicits requests for a medical examination.

4.) Captain is reluctant but Doctor manages to run multiple tests (by consent in TOS "Turnabout Intruder" and by stealth methods in ENT "Hatchery") and the results indicate "nothing wrong" with Captain.

5.) Captain's behavior gets worse and crew begin to openly object.

6.) Crew begins to act insubordinate when given orders that would negatively impact the ship and crew, First Officer is the one to inform the Captain of the Captain's egregious violations and dereliction of duty, and Captain relieves First Officer from duty (and in TOS's case, Captain calls for a followup trial where execution is eventually ordered and in ENT's case, the First Officer is confined to quarters under MACO guard).

7.) Crew bands together to mutiny, the mutiny is discovered by the Captain, and more crew are "relieved" of duty.

8.) Crew manages to disrupt the Captain's actions and disable the Captain.

9.) Captain is "cured" of the [insert plot device] that caused the abberant behavior.

10.) Captain is no worse for the wear, but the crew is somewhat disillusioned anyway, but glad the ordeal is over.

Now this WAS the very setup for what I believe you said you considered as the WORST ep of TOS (albeit alongside what alot of folks hated - TOS "Spock's Brain"). Yet the execution of ENT "Hatchery", effectively took the EXACT SAME PLOT FORMULA used in TOS "Turnabout Intruder", and executed it differently to make it a better episode.

And so Sussman, just like he did with TOS "Spock's Brain", supposedly the fan favorite as the WORST episode of TOS - creates ENT "Dead Stop", a much better rendering and execution of the TOS version. And so he does the SAME with TOS "Turnabout Intruder", again, one of fandom's WORST TOS eps, to create ENT "Hatchery", a much better reworking.

And as a side note and twist on the storyline of TOS "Turnabout Intruder", Archer is "turned about" to become the "woman"/"mother" of the Insectoid hatchlings, like Kirk was "turned about" to become the woman Janice Lester.

(ha ha Sussman)

Interesting. ;-)

--------

"I think the show talked to people through the characters. They're stories that speak to the heart. They talk about love, they talk about friendship, they talk about loyalty, they talk about patriotism, exploration, curiosity, reaching out... And I think all those things still touch people. Even when you look at a 30-year old show, it still has something to say." - D.C. Fontana, Sci Fi Channel Special Edition TOS 1998
----
"If the season finale involves the re-built USS Reliant coming back in time to the 21st Century crewed by Moogie, Dr. Selar, Morn, Transporter Chief Kyle, and the Salt Vampire, then we'll know that Coto has gone too far." - tomba1701


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: ENT "Hatchery" = TOS "Turnabout Intruder" rewo | Report this post to moderator
    By: O. Deus (Odo's file, contact) @ 15:40:43 on Feb 26, 2004

    It's a commonplace plot line and certainly no refference to Turnabout Intruder. And while the plot outlines may be similar, the content differs dramatically.


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
    • RE: ENT "Hatchery" = TOS "Turnabout Intruder" rewo | Report this post to moderator
      By: Jadzia-Dax (Odo's file, contact) @ 16:58:12 on Feb 26, 2004

      Quote:
      It's a commonplace plot line and certainly no refference to Turnabout Intruder. And while the plot outlines may be similar, the content differs dramatically.

      Well let's not start with the flippant responses. Of course the content "differs dramatically"... unlike ENT "Doctor's Orders". ;-)

      But show me someplace else in Trek where that "commonplace plot line" appears in that fashion. About the closest might be TNG "Lonely Among Us". DS9 "Rapture" and VOY "Vis a Vis" weren't quite there.

      --------

      "I think the show talked to people through the characters. They're stories that speak to the heart. They talk about love, they talk about friendship, they talk about loyalty, they talk about patriotism, exploration, curiosity, reaching out... And I think all those things still touch people. Even when you look at a 30-year old show, it still has something to say." - D.C. Fontana, Sci Fi Channel Special Edition TOS 1998
      ----
      "If the season finale involves the re-built USS Reliant coming back in time to the 21st Century crewed by Moogie, Dr. Selar, Morn, Transporter Chief Kyle, and the Salt Vampire, then we'll know that Coto has gone too far." - tomba1701


      Reply
      Reply
      Quote
      Quote
  • RE: ENT "Hatchery" = TOS "Turnabout Intruder" rewo | Report this post to moderator
    By: Cylykon (Odo's file, contact) @ 12:49:18 on Feb 26, 2004

    'Brain' and 'brain'! What is 'brain'?


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
    • RE: ENT "Hatchery" = TOS "Turnabout Intruder" rewo | Report this post to moderator
      By: Jadzia-Dax (Odo's file, contact) @ 13:42:26 on Feb 26, 2004

      Quote:
      'Brain' and 'brain'! What is 'brain'?

      ;-)

      And did we not see Travis' "brain" hoooked up with other "brains" running the Repair facility in ENT "Dead Stop"?

      (IMHO, I didn't think TOS "Spock's Brain" was that bad...;-))

      --------

      "I think the show talked to people through the characters. They're stories that speak to the heart. They talk about love, they talk about friendship, they talk about loyalty, they talk about patriotism, exploration, curiosity, reaching out... And I think all those things still touch people. Even when you look at a 30-year old show, it still has something to say." - D.C. Fontana, Sci Fi Channel Special Edition TOS 1998
      ----
      "If the season finale involves the re-built USS Reliant coming back in time to the 21st Century crewed by Moogie, Dr. Selar, Morn, Transporter Chief Kyle, and the Salt Vampire, then we'll know that Coto has gone too far." - tomba1701


      Reply
      Reply
      Quote
      Quote

MACO, Culp, T'Pol | Report this post to moderator
By: Comm Mendez (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:41:26 on Feb 26, 2004

"Hatchery" brought up an issues about the MACOs that has been bothering me all season. These are supposed to be commando space marines, trained just for combat. How is it that Malcolm and his security team can best them so easily? Also, I gotten say, Steven Culp has a lot more presence than the other actors on the show - no wonder he's getting more acting gigs. And another thing: I love T'Pol in uniform. I know she can't be the first Vulcan in Starfleet (that would be Spock, as far as I remember), but she looks much better when she's not dressed like Catwoman from Space.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Liked the Eugenics Wars reference ... | Report this post to moderator
By: ety3 (Odo's file, contact) @ 08:43:58 on Feb 26, 2004

... but their math was a bit off. Maybe Archer left out a couple of "great"s in saying his "great-grandfather" fought in the war.

Other than that, a predictable and solidly average episode.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: Liked the Eugenics Wars reference ... | Report this post to moderator
    By: The TREKMAN!!!!! (Odo's file, contact) @ 11:04:52 on Feb 26, 2004

    "but their math was a bit off. Maybe Archer left out a couple of "great"s in saying his "great-grandfather" fought in the war."

    No, it's possible for his great-grandfather to have fought in the Eugenics Wars. But if it was actually his Great-Great Grandfather, it's okay if he did leave out a 'great', we've all done that from time to time.

    --------

    "Take a Romulan chill pill and have some faith!"
    -Erik Jendresen, writer of Star Trek: The Beginning

    "No bastard ever won a war by dying for his country. He won it by making the other poor dumb bastard die for his country."
    -General George S. Patton Jr.

    "I am NOT Scorned."
    -Scorned as Gage/Gage_2


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
    • RE: Liked the Eugenics Wars reference ... | Report this post to moderator
      By: SlugBug (Odo's file, contact) @ 21:38:50 on Feb 26, 2004

      Turnabout Intruder Vs Hatchery

      Enterprise matches original Trek with number of episodes, seems only natural the #69 of both series would have the same plot, call it an 'homage'.;~}

      I have enjpoyed the last few episodes moreso than the beginning of this season. Even Mayweather seems to have Woken up a bit.


      Reply
      Reply
      Quote
      Quote
      • RE: Liked the Eugenics Wars reference ... | Report this post to moderator
        By: Jadzia-Dax (Odo's file, contact) @ 05:55:37 on Feb 27, 2004

        Quote:
        Turnabout Intruder Vs Hatchery

        Enterprise matches original Trek with number of episodes, seems only natural the #69 of both series would have the same plot, call it an 'homage'.;~}


        Not quite. TOS Prod. #69 (at least according to what I use also confirmed here) was TOS "That Which Survives". TOS "Turnabout Intruder" was literally the last episode (#79) that was filmed and that was confirmed by Shatner on the commentary from my SE tape. He said they had a wrap party that last day (January 9, 1969). It wasn't shown until May.

        Quote:

        I have enjpoyed the last few episodes moreso than the beginning of this season. Even Mayweather seems to have Woken up a bit.


        Well.. because some efforts have been made to develop some more Xindi. And yes, it's good to see Travis. Considering his background of being born and raised in space on a freighter should mean that he has alot of practical experience, even if the tech is higher than what he grew up with, the principles should be the same (plus he has been trained).

        --------

        "I think the show talked to people through the characters. They're stories that speak to the heart. They talk about love, they talk about friendship, they talk about loyalty, they talk about patriotism, exploration, curiosity, reaching out... And I think all those things still touch people. Even when you look at a 30-year old show, it still has something to say." - D.C. Fontana, Sci Fi Channel Special Edition TOS 1998
        ----
        "If the season finale involves the re-built USS Reliant coming back in time to the 21st Century crewed by Moogie, Dr. Selar, Morn, Transporter Chief Kyle, and the Salt Vampire, then we'll know that Coto has gone too far." - tomba1701


        Reply
        Reply
        Quote
        Quote
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.