menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
Feature Story

Features

2003 Ends With Trip to 2004, But "Carpenter Street" Goes Out With a Whimper

Features

By O. Deus / 08:46, 28 November 2003 / ENTERPRISE Reviews

Beam This Story to a Friend
Complete the form below to e-mail a link to this story to a friend.

Your Name:
Your E-Mail:
Your Friend's Name:
Your Friend's E-Mail:
Subject:
Message (optional):

Reviews Ex Deus

Title: "Carpenter Street"

Overall: 6.5
Performances: 7
Writing: 4
Direction: 7.5
FX & Prod Value: 7.5


Synopsis: Archer and T'Pol do Starsky and Hutch going back in time to the 21st century to stop an attempt by the Insectoid Xindi on earth's past.

Review: It's odd for ENTERPRISE producers to schedule two retro episodes like "North Star" and "Carpenter Street" so close together, and indeed the two episodes do have a lot of similarities. Both borrow the visual style of an action genre, the western and the 70's cop show. Both are fun to look at with strong direction but aside from the occasional comic moment, take themselves far too seriously in stories that don't add up to very much. But "Carpenter Street" isn't nearly as visually adventurous as "North Star" and it takes itself even more seriously. Where "North Star" committed itself completely to the material it was paying homage too, "Carpenter Street" picks and chooses a few elements with no real enthusiasm or vigor.

Time travel episodes on STAR TREK and elsewhere in Sci-Fi usually provide plenty of comic material. From Kirk claiming that Spock's ears were crushed in a cotton picker, to Picard doing Shakespeare to dodge paying the rent, to militia goons capturing Torres and Chakotay. "Carpenter Street" has some comic moments, but not nearly enough, and its only real high points are T'Pol recovering her strength this season in her tough, no-nonesense treatment of Loomis; and Archer offering to untie Loomis so he can hit him again. Most of the remaining comic moments come from Loomis but instead of being played broadly for laughs, Loomis is played by an actor who tends to play disturbed characters and his performance isn't really broad comedy but nervous and fidgety; a lot like his guest role on NYPD Blue.

For whatever reason, "Carpenter Street" is set in the present day even though if the car Archer drives had been removed, the episode could just as easily have been set in the 70's or the 80's which would have been more adventurous and in keeping with the visual theme. A theme into which Loomis' apartment, haircut and fashion choices would have fit in perfectly. Also it would be more credible than having the Xindi pick our time out of all the other points in Earth's history they could have gone to. After all, what are the odds of that anyway? Presumably Braga and Berman thought that a present day setting would be simpler to do and make the threat more relevant to the audience; but it's not like the audience was sitting on pins and needles anyway worried about the Xindi virus being released. "Carpenter Street" could at least have had some fun with the 70's.

In some ways, the idea of integrating "Carpenter Street" into the Xindi arc rather than having the characters take a vacation from dealing with the superweapon due to obliterate the human race as in "North Star" was smart. But on the other hand, if the Xindi could travel back to Earth's past, then why bother with the entire process of designing a weapon and flying it to Earth. All they really had to do was go back a few thousand years and wipe out a handful of nomadic proto-humans. The Borg in FIRST CONTACT behaved logically since they didn't want to wipe out humanity, just assimilate it. The Xindi though want to wipe out humanity and instead they tinker around with a bio-weapon in recent human history when there are much easier ways to accomplish their goals if they can travel through time. "Rajiin" too starts to make very little sense if the Xindi had all of Earth's past at their disposal. So does sending the weapon prototype to attack Earth in the 22nd century instead of the 19th when Earth would have had no defense against it. And so the integration with the Xindi arc rather than being a strong point begins to raise questions the episode can't answer but that just cast doubt about the credibility of the Xindi arc.

The actual use of the Reptilian Xindi in the realistic 20th century set designs also pointed up how fake and shiny and plastic the Xindi Reptilian costumes look. On ENTERPRISE or another spaceship, Sci-Fi designs don't stand out nearly as much, but put up against textured natural materials like wood and brick, the costumes look like something off the discount post-Halloween sale rack. Having the Xindi alter their appearance, or using humanoid Xindi, might have expanded our knowledge of them, saved money on makeup and been creepier than the latex. ENTERPRISE often uses humanoid-looking aliens with just a dab of latex here or there when it shouldn't, but this was one case where the producers should have gone for a humanoid look. There might have been a scene where one of the Xindi would peel off the human mask to reveal the Reptilian inside that would again have been more disturbing than having Reptilian Xindi running around the city.

The oddest part of "Carpenter Street" might be the episode's decision to hang most of it around the character of Loomis, a low grade sleazeball without much in the way of interesting or redeeming qualities. The episode begins with him and ends with him, even though aside from occasional bits of comic relief, he contributes nothing to the episode. At one point the rumor regarding "Carpenter Street" was that the producers were looking for a 'name star' to play the part of Loomis and that may explain why Loomis 'looms' so large in this episode. But since at the end of the day the producers ended up a casting a capable but generally unknown actor who's played a number of roles on STAR TREK over the years, it's unclear why the Loomis character continued to play such a large role in the episode.

In order to accommodate the Loomis character, the episode had to have Archer do some pretty stupid things. First his plan to sneak in alone using Loomis and then take on the Reptilian Xindi is nothing short of foolish. Loomis is not trustworthy, as we find out later, and when your team only has two people on it and the enemy outnumbers it, splitting up is just senseless. In "Rajiin" and "Twilight," we've seen that the Reptilian Xindi are very tough and very formidable and easily defeated the MACO's even when the numbers were even. Archer taking them on alone is nothing short of insane and his being able to do it so easily discredits the Xindi as a capable enemy.

And why keep Loomis around anyway once Archer was inside? There is no real reason except that the plot calls for a bit of suspense that has Loomis attacking T'Pol. Like most of what happens in the episode, Archer's decisions make no sense except as setups for action scenes borrowed from TV shows with even worse writing. All in all Loomis is the single biggest weakness because the plot warps around him. If an actual big name had been cast in the part, centering the episode around him might have made some sense. But lacking any depth, complexity or redeeming qualities, Loomis is nothing more than 30 seconds of comic relief stretched out to 15 minutes. T'Pol at one point suggests that Loomis encapsulates the worst qualities of the 21th century, which we might take as the writer's view of Loomis. Except of course the worst qualities of the 21st century would involve mass murder, brutal dictatorships and theocracies and the eugenics war, which STAR TREK once again forgets about. Loomis is just a petty slimeball. He doesn't represent the moral failings of the 21st century, just the failings of this episode.



More Top StoriesComments
Nov 23J.J. Abrams and Chris Pine Talk How Gratifying That Star Trek was Well Received, Working with Leonard Nimoy and Star Trek XII0
Nov 23Chuck returns to NBC with a special two-hour show on Sunday, Jan 10, 2010, before returning to its regular time slot, Mondays at 8pm on the following night. It's return to prime time television can be attributed to a successful fan renewnal campaign last year. CHUCK is a one-hour, action-comedy series that follows Chuck Bartowski (Zachary Levi, "Less Than Perfect") -- a computer geek who is catapulted into a new career as the government's most vital secret agent. This upcoming season will include some special guest stars, including Brandon Routh of "Superman Returns" who will play CIA agent Daniel Shaw in an episode, and the addition of SUBWAY restaurant as a major advertiser to the show. Chuck averaged a 4.0/6 rating last season, about eight percent better than the recently cancelled "Trauma". Ratings-challenged Heroes moves back an hour when Chuck returns on Monday nights. STAR TREK VOYAGER's Robert Duncan McNeill serves Chuck as a supervising producer and director.0
Nov 235-Page Preview of Third Issue of Galactica 1980 Comic Book  0
Nov 22Quinto, Urban, Saldana, Cho and Greenwood on Their Hopes for Star Trek XII3
Nov 22Exclusive Digital Content Now Available With New Star Trek Movie on iTunes
1
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

27 comments Post New | Help
View:

Well... | Report this post to moderator
By: CaptainBeckett (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 12:10:16 on Dec 03, 2003

Well, I liked the episode myself. I thought it was good for what it did.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

What a Thaksgiving Turkey it was | Report this post to moderator
By: cooper2000 (Odo's file, contact) @ 22:26:56 on Dec 01, 2003

Nothing happens. That's the point of most shows that Braga and Berman write (and yes, I use that term loosely). I know there are fans out there -that damn Star Trek Communication Magazine and on here too, filled with letters from fans who love this show. Granted, it's a little bias, but most of the letters they choose to publish are ones that praise these two tools. The key factor here is that Star Trek: Enterprise -like Voyager before it -is not made for Trek fans anymore. It's made for the absentee viewer -mainly males - who don't expect much substance from their shows. Thusly, we have Berman and Braga, obvious poster children for misogynistic-no-brains-needed TV, who "write" obnoxious, empty of any material that could actually be called interesting television. Star Trek: Enterprise hangs it's entire concept on visual effects and few nearly naked shots of T'Pol.
Alas, though, Paramount does not care. As long as Trek continues to generate money through it's various merchandise, we'll see Berman and Braga further drag down one of the best franchises TV has ever produced.
Trek god rest it's soul!


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: What a Thaksgiving Turkey it was | Report this post to moderator
    By: Steve Krutzler (Odo's file, contact) @ 08:39:22 on Dec 02, 2003

    I missed Carpenter Street but "Similitude" was certainly not vacuous. If they can produce more like "Similitude" and "Twilight" and "Anomaly" then I think the show will be headed in the right direction.

    --------

    It's a rip-off. / We're stepped on, and cheated! / We're flat, stone-cold lied to / But we're not defeated / No!

    Halen. "The Dream is Over."


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
  • RE: May I say something? | Report this post to moderator
    By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact) @ 04:00:14 on Dec 02, 2003 | Edit History (2)

    I realize that I have responded to your posts before but it's not that I'm "after you" so please take no offense! I just don't think it's fair to generalize the crowd who like B&B. Some of us are just nice people who look for something else in Star Trek than the crowd who dislikes B&B.

    Have you noticed that the B&B stories have certain unique qualities to them? Let me give you an example or two: "Carbon Creek" and "Carpenter Street". Both of them compare our time to the Roddenberry-future. By doing this, B&B point out the many small flaws of our society. The flaws that, altogether, make a lousy world. Thankfully the story is subtle enough so people don't take offense, usually, and perhaps some of you don't even notice because they mix it with an entertaining kind of story. But it describes how many of us actually contributes to the problems mentioned in the two episodes.

    I think that's relevant. You don't have to write a story about fanatics massmurders or cloning to be relevant.

    I probably need to go into detail here. Well, lets talk "Carpenter Street" only:

    Loomies' house is a mess. The phone has an annoying sound when it rings. Drugs are widespread. The cars are all locked up with alarm-systems, dogs and the van that Archer and T'Pol finally gets into, instantly turns on a loud radio with an annoying speaker. Crazy world huh? They need fuel and T'Pol notes the misuse of oil supplies. Loomies will do everything for money and T'Pol points him out as an example of a little mite that, along with thousands of other mites eats our society from within and takes the world from bad to worse. There was an anti-smoking ad (a clear one, what's why some people got upset). There was also the "Burgerland" scene that illustrates how everybody is a little greedy and nearly everybody falls victim of their own greediness, because it's part of our society.

    These details are a contrast to the Roddeberry future that we usually see in Star Trek. It was covered with an entertaining story but you see it's relevant because it makes some people think: We are reminded of all the things we have to work on, to improve our world!

    This is something unique to Star Trek and a vital part of it: It shows us a better future. Some fans have come to know it so well, they don't notice the contrast anymore. Other people don't look for it, and see only a mildly entertaining show. B&B are not trying to teach us HOW to solve the problems, but they point out WHAT needs to be solved and that it CAN be solved. That's an encouraging fantasy, that is worth striving for.

    I realize, the Star Trek future has it's own problems with the Xindi and such. But at least it shows us there is progress, and there has to be, for our society to bloom. Season 1-2 was probably the best example of this so far, since it focused more on peaceful exploration, fitting the intro-sequence that describes the dreams of mankind.


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote

The Battle | Report this post to moderator
By: trekker2001 (Odo's file, contact) @ 22:23:14 on Nov 30, 2003

Well, in the choice between Enterprise and Survivor, Survivor still wins for me, especially when they happen to be on the same night at the same time :P

Trek01

--------

"I am En'riov M'Tabek, Commander of the Seventh Fleet of the Romulan Imperial Navy. You've had your fun Captain. Its my turn now. See what this Varuul has up his sleeve and fear the new might of the Romulan Empire!" --From my story "Cry of Echoes"


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

I disagree | Report this post to moderator
By: AntonyF (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 06:09:00 on Nov 30, 2003

Most of the time i agree with O. Deus's reviews... but not this week. I really enjoyed this episode.

I've always thought it was a shame that they lost the excellent tone and style of "Broken Bow". This was the first episode that I felt recaptured it some what. I liked the more "down to Earth" nature as it were, and it just felt more like trepidation rather than space battles. T'Pol was so much better this week, more like a Vulcan, and I liked the T'Pol/Archer team.

Yeah, there are some plot holes, isn't there always plot holes in every Trek or show ever? The main thing was that it didn't ruin my enjoyment.

Just one final point... are there any Odyssey 5 fans around, and do any agree with me that Manny Coto's influence is really working its way into the show? A few weeks ago Earth was blown up in the show. Now this, an episode that could have been taken from Odyssey 5 quite easily.

--------

Lydia: "I've never lost at mortal combat yet." Diana: "Idiot. If you had, you'd be dead." -- V, "The Champion"


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: In touch with season 1-2. | Report this post to moderator
    By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:34:54 on Nov 30, 2003

    I've already watched "Carpenter Street" 3 times on video now! It's still very exciting. There has been some interesting and emotional episodes recently, but the "action" usually consists of gunshooting that we've seen a million times. However, Loomies tricked his victims in strange ways (not common in Star Trek) and this created a lot of suspense.

    I've also noted some nice details that draws a line to earlier seasons:

    1) T'Pol is vegetarian.

    2) She is still sceptical about time-travel.

    3) She is bothered by the smell of Porthos (oh she must have taken a great dose of medicine to reduce her smelling sensitivity before going to a large city on Earth 2004)

    4) She seems to understand human culture fairly well. The same ability was demonstrated in "Carbon Creek" when another Vulcan understood how to play billiard; how T'Pols grandmother took on her clothes "backwards"; and what was radio entertainment. In "Carpenter Street", T'Pol advices Arhcer to start driving the van in gear number 2, and she correctly interprets the flashes from another driver as a reminder to turn on the external lights... Something I doubt I would've guessed if I was thrown into an alien world. But maybe T'Pol has read a thing or two about cars (actually Tucker says he once had a car, so they still exsists in the 22. Century.)

    The episode briefly mentions what seems to be correct: Earth's oil reserves will be gone in circa 60 years according to current measures, assuming the industry does not change habits. Archer indicates that humans had to be forced to change it.

    One of my theories gets confirmed: It takes a while for temporal disturbances to ripple through the time-line! That was my argument for believing Phlox in "Twilight".

    I wonder though: How many tricks can this PRE-era Tricorder do? Trace the alarm system in cars, open the locks, and trick a machine to deliver some dollars?


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote

If memory serves... | Report this post to moderator
By: Meglo (Odo's file, contact) @ 13:02:12 on Nov 28, 2003

I believe Kirk actually said Spock's ears were hurt in a rice picker. Anyone know for sure?

--------

The supervisor is Verizon!


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: If memory serves... | Report this post to moderator
    By: Jadzia-Dax (Odo's file, contact) @ 13:52:05 on Nov 28, 2003

    I think it was rice. And in VOY "Future's End I & II", Tuvok tells Rain his ears were "a family trait". LOL

    --------

    "I think the show talked to people through the characters. They're stories that speak to the heart. They talk about love, they talk about friendship, they talk about loyalty, they talk about patriotism, exploration, curiosity, reaching out... And I think all those things still touch people. Even when you look at a 30-year old show, it still has something to say." - D.C. Fontana, Sci Fi Channel Special Edition TOS 1998
    ----
    "If the season finale involves the re-built USS Reliant coming back in time to the 21st Century crewed by Moogie, Dr. Selar, Morn, Transporter Chief Kyle, and the Salt Vampire, then we'll know that Coto has gone too far." - tomba1701


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote

Another stinker from B&B | Report this post to moderator
By: Grand Admiral Thrawn (Odo's file, contact) @ 11:16:46 on Nov 28, 2003

Whimper is a nice word used by Deus for this episode.

--------

"The mighty Star Trek would fall before us"-B&B


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Loved Carpenter Street! | Report this post to moderator
By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:55:30 on Nov 28, 2003 | Edit History (2)

Well... My mood after watching this episode is very good. So I vote 10/10 for this episode because I liked the style and everything about it.

Yeah, I've read Deus's review. Yeah, there are some questions about why Xindi could travel back in time, but not destroy Earth in a more immediate way. However, there could be a logical explanation for that (wether or not we will ever get the entire explanation) I don't have a problem with that. You just can't solve all mysteries in real life either. I've noticed from the very beginning of the Xindi arc, that they are NOT very powerful beings, so it makes sense that their abilities to travel in time was very limited in this case.

It's possible that the Xindi as a whole are weak, simply because they can't agree with each other. They can't decide anything really because they never agree. They are still an enemy with potential destructive power, but they can't figure out how to release that power. The episode "Rajiin" reveals this in particular, but in my opinion, it's been luring through all of season 3. Sometimes I think the audience is blinded by preconceptions about how the big enemies in Star Trek should behave. The Xindi seems like the exact opposite of the Borg. The Borg, who agree so well with each other.

Regarding how T'Pol kept Loomies around after Archer went into the building, it makes sense. She can't drive the car. Even Archer can't possibly drive as well as Loomies. So, they need him.

Regarding T'Pol referring to Loomies as portraying the worst of the 21. Century, lets remember how little she knows about humanity's past.

I do agree that it was insane for Archer to move into the factory the way he did. But perhaps he had little choice... In real life, yeah, he probably would have been killed. I also wonder why the Xindi don't pick up the audio transmissions between him and T'Pol outside the building. But they didn't pick up any biosigns in the episode "Shipment" either. Again, it demonstrates they are relative weak.

Anyway, it's rare and refreshing for Star Trek to show our time, with cars and everything. I loved that. It's actually been a wish of mine, for some time. And the first half of the episode was very exciting! The last half was just fine, keeping me glued to the TV. The story was believeable.

The music was great and there was enough humour - well placed humour - to keep me smiling. It wasn't "mediocre" Trek in my opinion. It was excellent. The episode did, what it was supposed to do. Thanks B&B. I look forward to the next episodes!


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: Loved Carpenter Street! | Report this post to moderator
    By: Jadzia-Dax (Odo's file, contact) @ 11:29:48 on Nov 28, 2003

    Quote:

    Anyway, it's rare and refreshing for Star Trek to show our time, with cars and everything. I loved that. It's actually been a wish of mine, for some time.


    Hey buddy - whenever they repeat it again, then you must watch VOY "Future's End I & II". Very much Earth in "our time" for a full 2 hours (and not just 1 like this). ;-) Tom Paris and Tuvok in a similar pickup truck (they must love those) and later in an old VW bus... With tacos and buritos and such for breakfast. ;-)

    --------

    "I think the show talked to people through the characters. They're stories that speak to the heart. They talk about love, they talk about friendship, they talk about loyalty, they talk about patriotism, exploration, curiosity, reaching out... And I think all those things still touch people. Even when you look at a 30-year old show, it still has something to say." - D.C. Fontana, Sci Fi Channel Special Edition TOS 1998
    ----
    "If the season finale involves the re-built USS Reliant coming back in time to the 21st Century crewed by Moogie, Dr. Selar, Morn, Transporter Chief Kyle, and the Salt Vampire, then we'll know that Coto has gone too far." - tomba1701


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
    • RE: Loved Carpenter Street! | Report this post to moderator
      By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact) @ 12:02:19 on Nov 28, 2003

      Yes I've seen "Future's End" and think it's one of Voyagers best two-parters! Captain Braxton is very funny as he walks around in the ghetto (wasn't it Brooklyn area?) and talks about time anomalies. Also the beginning where this hippie drums on some pans out in the woods. Hilarous! I've seen it more than once actually, as I have it on VHS. :-)

      There was also DS9's two-parter in mid-season 3, where Jadzia, Benjamin and Julian ends up in 2000-something.. I don't remember the title of the episode. Do you remember when Kira beamed onto the street next to a van with some hippie music? ;o)


      Reply
      Reply
      Quote
      Quote
      • RE: Loved Carpenter Street! | Report this post to moderator
        By: Jadzia-Dax (Odo's file, contact) @ 12:43:00 on Nov 28, 2003 | Edit History (1)

        Quote:
        Yes I've seen "Future's End" and think it's one of Voyagers best two-parters! Captain Braxton is very funny as he walks around in the ghetto (wasn't it Brooklyn area?)

        It was some 3000 miles away from NYC - in Los Angeles. :-)

        Quote:

        and talks about time anomalies.


        Well what's interesting is that he draws on a wall, what a "causality loop" is supposed to be like, ie., "A -> B -> C -> A". heh Actually I thought that was an interesting way to explain it since the term was used several times in Trek, particularly in TNG "Cause and Effect" (one of Braga's stories).

        Quote:

        Also the beginning where this hippie drums on some pans out in the woods. Hilarous! I've seen it more than once actually, as I have it on VHS. :-)


        The "hippy" was the younger Henry Starling himself in 1969 (the main antagonist in the ep who causes all this mess stealing the time ship and making alot of money by introducing that 29th century technology into the 20th century). That part was when he witnesses Braxton's ship crash landing near his little campsite.

        Quote:

        There was also DS9's two-parter in mid-season 3, where Jadzia, Benjamin and Julian ends up in 2000-something.. I don't remember the title of the episode. Do you remember when Kira beamed onto the street next to a van with some hippie music? ;o)


        That was "Past Tense I & II" and I believe they went back to 2024.


        --------

        "I think the show talked to people through the characters. They're stories that speak to the heart. They talk about love, they talk about friendship, they talk about loyalty, they talk about patriotism, exploration, curiosity, reaching out... And I think all those things still touch people. Even when you look at a 30-year old show, it still has something to say." - D.C. Fontana, Sci Fi Channel Special Edition TOS 1998
        ----
        "If the season finale involves the re-built USS Reliant coming back in time to the 21st Century crewed by Moogie, Dr. Selar, Morn, Transporter Chief Kyle, and the Salt Vampire, then we'll know that Coto has gone too far." - tomba1701


        Reply
        Reply
        Quote
        Quote
        • RE: Loved Carpenter Street! | Report this post to moderator
          By: O. Deus (Odo's file, contact) @ 23:09:04 on Nov 29, 2003

          "It was some 3000 miles away from NYC - in Los Angeles. :-)"


          Yes, Brooklyn these days has fewer ghettos than it used to and in any case Voyager was shot in California, so they wouldn't be very likely to fly to New York just for the ambiance. Ditto for Carpenter Street.


          Reply
          Reply
          Quote
          Quote
        • Good memory! | Report this post to moderator
          By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact) @ 18:18:26 on Nov 28, 2003

          It's nice to see someone with such a good memory! Now that you mention it, it's all coming back to me. All except the year 1969 & 2024 as I can never remember such things...


          Reply
          Reply
          Quote
          Quote
          • RE: Good memory! | Report this post to moderator
            By: Jadzia-Dax (Odo's file, contact) @ 08:22:11 on Nov 29, 2003

            Quote:
            It's nice to see someone with such a good memory! Now that you mention it, it's all coming back to me. All except the year 1969 & 2024 as I can never remember such things...

            I have all of the Trek episodes (all 6 series, which includes the Animated series) here on tape which I can rewatch whenever I want (we're talking 670+ hours worth on 100+ VHS tapes...lol). Also, don't forget that the internet is a wonderful thing. There are alot of Trek fan sites out there (as well as the official site at startrek.com) that recap the episodes too. :-)

            --------

            "I think the show talked to people through the characters. They're stories that speak to the heart. They talk about love, they talk about friendship, they talk about loyalty, they talk about patriotism, exploration, curiosity, reaching out... And I think all those things still touch people. Even when you look at a 30-year old show, it still has something to say." - D.C. Fontana, Sci Fi Channel Special Edition TOS 1998
            ----
            "If the season finale involves the re-built USS Reliant coming back in time to the 21st Century crewed by Moogie, Dr. Selar, Morn, Transporter Chief Kyle, and the Salt Vampire, then we'll know that Coto has gone too far." - tomba1701


            Reply
            Reply
            Quote
            Quote
            • RE: Good memory! | Report this post to moderator
              By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact) @ 11:07:17 on Nov 29, 2003

              Ohh, and I only have one shelve full of tapes and discs! I call it "Fort Knox" because I have all TNG, DS9, VOY and ENT recorded from TV (sometimes by getting up late at night, when picture quality was bad during the day) and some are original VHS's. I'm also collecting the DS9 DVD's and I plan to do the same with the ENT DVD's. I hope someday to finally watch all of TOS.


              Reply
              Reply
              Quote
              Quote

Not the only Turkey in my house this week | Report this post to moderator
By: NAFF (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:29:56 on Nov 28, 2003

At Thanksgiving I have a lot to be thankful for...

... I am not in Iraq...

... or Afghanistan...

... that I live in a State where I can wear short pants in November...

... and that we have Deep Space Nine being released on DVD to ease the pain of watching Enterprise.

Last week's episode was at least good television while straying from the values of Trek.

This week really makes a total mockery of them adding 'Star Trek' in front of the title for this season.

Sleazy Hookers. Archer steals a car. Archer steals from an ATM. T'Pol promises to pay back what stolen money they don't use (!). Archer unties someone to immediately hit them because it makes him feel better than if their hands were tied.

This is not Trek!

We have here a recycled Season 1 X-Files plot that was a putrid as yesterday's diaper in the trash can.

And stupid stuff like why steal a car in the first place when there are taxis? Archer learning to drive incredibly quickly. Xindi hiding in shadows. T'Pol getting over her time travel disbelief. What the heck happened to the kidnapped people? Who called the Cops (not Mr and Mrs Morality, I hope). Sending only a handful of Xindi to wipe out Earth's population. I could go on... and on!

The Hamburger scene may have worked in a heart-warming story like ST4, but not in a show about blood-bank hookers on chloroform. Vejar does his best to direct this, but even he cannot rescue this time-traveling turd of a plot.

Why the Xindi have abandoned the weapon used at the end of Season 2 (which was supposed to be a test) for a biological attack still makes no sense to me.

Why did Drakula choose T'Pol as a partner? After last week's bs about Trip being so critical, why risk the 2 most senior people? Why not take a Maco?

This wasn't even fun to watch it was so bad.

This crapola makes me so angry. It is just lazy film-making. After the love and dedication that so obviously went into DS9, it is hard to believe this garbage is being produced by some of the same folks.

Again the producers have got involved in writing the script. Are they that short of talent? Are the producers that short of money for the show (or more likely themselves)?

I almost thought I heard Iggy Pop as the Xindi at the beginning of the show. It's sad when 'The Magnificent Ferengi' looks like a classic when compared to this mess.

Conclusion: TERRIBLE. The Pits. And this was supposed to be a Sweeps show? Jesus H. Christ.

I did have hope that this show would avoid cancellation after some promising episodes this season, but I am afraid this week is the final nail in the coffin. Most of the regular cast did not appear last night... I think it's really imporant to start job-hunting as soon as possible, don't you?


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: Not the only Turkey in my house this week | Report this post to moderator
    By: degra (Odo's file, contact) @ 17:49:46 on Nov 28, 2003 | Edit History (1)

    Quote:
    Xindi hiding in shadows.

    The Xindi stood in shadows so not to reveal themselves to Loomis. Loomis thought he was working for humans.

    Quote:
    Why the Xindi have abandoned the weapon used at the end of Season 2 (which was supposed to be a test) for a biological attack still makes no sense to me.

    The Xindi did NOT abandon the energy probe weapon. In "Rajiin" Degra the scientist overseeing the energy weapon project informed the council that during one of the tests on the weapon it destroyed the lab taking most of his research with it.

    Concerned that it would be months before they had a weapon and NX getting closer to them and finding weapon, the reptilian mentioned the bioweapon. The council decided to allow both degra and the reptilians to separately work on both weapons and whoever finished theirs first would be used to destroy humnaity.

    Degra as we have seen over last few episodes seems to have made up for the setback and is almost ready to deploy the energy weapon while the reptilian sent a team of doctors back to the 21st century to perform tests on their virus. The Reptilians clearly have been shown as the experts on biotech based on their weaponry so they probably were more qualified to create the bioweapon

    I imagine they went back in time to work on humans who in this period know nothing of xindi conflict. it isn't like they would feel safe going to 22nd century earth surrounded by their enemies who are aware of them after probe attack.


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote

The '70s... LOL | Report this post to moderator
By: Jadzia-Dax (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:24:53 on Nov 28, 2003

As a former major fan of "Starsky and Hutch", I protest! !! ;-)

Actually, you're right. Only difference is that setting "Carpenter Street" when they did allowed:

1.) Showing of an ATM machine to get money, technology only speculated about in Alvin Toffler's mid-70s book "Future Shock" and for sure not around in the '70s.

2.) Showing of a "booted" car (LOL)

3.) The nod to Conan O'Brien in one scene... ;-)

And O. Deus dear - and someone correct me if I'm wrong - I thought those things were Xindi-reptillians. If I'm not mistaken, way back per a chat (maybe one of Bakula's), I thought they pretty much ruled out showing live-action interaction between the CGI characters - the Xindi-aquatics and the Xindi-insectoids and the principle actors... Which would be a shame because at least with respect to the aquatics, it would be cool to show a Water polo-trained Archer interacting with the aquatics under water. What a wonderful nod to character consistency that could have been, tapping in on biographical elements originally assigned to the character (being a swimmer). But whatever. :\

The 3 Xindi who could be easily played by actors - the reptillians, the sloth, and the primates (humaniods) were obviously the ones who could interact the most.

Also as you note, the actor playing Loomis has been on previous Treks, the last of which I recall being VOY in "Revulsion" as the maniacal, highly obsessed (yes unstable) hologram "Dejaren". And so throughout "Carpenter Street", I was left with imagining this guy in terms of that hologram... ;-)

You're right about this thing with time travelling Xindi. Who the heck got them back there? FutureGuy apparently hasn't shown an ability to move himself, let alone any of his pawns through time like that. Why bother experimenting and perfecting (and hiding) a weapon in the 21st century? They could do like those aliens in TNG "Time's Arrow I & II" and just use a "plague" as a cover to wipe out humanity back then (well in their case, humans = food via neural energy or something like that). If you want to hide something, why not in the future?

But... although alot of the comments I've seen claim nothing happened at the end, there was something that happened at the end... Archer got 3 Xindi, and a pile of Xindi technology (along with one particular bioweapon's cannister) to play with... So I guess we'll have to wait until January to find out what happens

NEXT TIME ON STAR TREK: ENTERPRISE

;-)

--------

"I think the show talked to people through the characters. They're stories that speak to the heart. They talk about love, they talk about friendship, they talk about loyalty, they talk about patriotism, exploration, curiosity, reaching out... And I think all those things still touch people. Even when you look at a 30-year old show, it still has something to say." - D.C. Fontana, Sci Fi Channel Special Edition TOS 1998
----
"If the season finale involves the re-built USS Reliant coming back in time to the 21st Century crewed by Moogie, Dr. Selar, Morn, Transporter Chief Kyle, and the Salt Vampire, then we'll know that Coto has gone too far." - tomba1701


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: The '70s... LOL | Report this post to moderator
    By: O. Deus (Odo's file, contact) @ 23:06:42 on Nov 29, 2003

    Yes I was on a long and difficult flight after a long and difficult family get together and my brain must have lost track of the information on all the varioux Xindi species. You're right, it was the Reptilian.

    And now that you've mentioned it I'm sure Braga is already producing a script in which Archer convinces the acquatic Xindi of humanity's peaceful intentions through a game of water polo (-:

    And yes you're right in that there are arc implications of Archer getting the Xindi back to Enterprise. We'll see if that ends up being followed up on but it doesn't really redeem the episode. And while the Loomis actor was great in Revulsion, here he's mostly wasted playing a sleazy two bit pawn.


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
  • RE: The '70s... LOL | Report this post to moderator
    By: degra (Odo's file, contact) @ 17:39:49 on Nov 28, 2003

    Quote:

    You're right about this thing with time travelling Xindi. Who the heck got them back there? FutureGuy apparently hasn't shown an ability to move himself, let alone any of his pawns through time like that.


    The Xindi Future Guy has been shown to be able to transport objects like the various components used in the probe that attacked Earth. He transported the RX back to Earth
    In Rajiin the RX councilmember made it clear the faction working with them suggested a bioweapon over the energy one


    Quote:
    Why bother experimenting and perfecting (and hiding) a weapon in the 21st century?


    They needed test subjects to perfect the virus to make sure it affected all humans. They certainly couldn't have traveled to 22nd century earth to kidnap humnas it would be too dangerous for them but in 21st century humnas are unaware of Xindi threat and less likely to be detected


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
  • RE: The '70s... LOL | Report this post to moderator
    By: MaxPower (Odo's file, contact) @ 16:41:53 on Nov 28, 2003

    You know, the more I think about it, this episode makes no sense whatsoever :)

    It was a kind of fun episode in and of itself, but it makes no sense in relation to the Xindi arc or in relation to anything really. I keep trying to think of some way that any of it makes sense because I sure would like it to :)

    Quote:
    Archer got 3 Xindi, and a pile of Xindi technology (along with one particular bioweapon's cannister) to play with

    Yeah, well I guess that's something. If only it was wrapped in an episode that made sense.

    BTW Deus you need to edit your review, your use of 'Insectoid' throughout looks pretty silly.


    --------


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote

Insectoids? | Report this post to moderator
By: Mr. J (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:00:59 on Nov 28, 2003 | Edit History (1)

Good review, I pretty much agree with you on this ep.

However, I think you're confusing insectoids with reptilians; insectoids are the CGI ones..


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
  • RE: Insectoids? | Report this post to moderator
    By: Cylykon (Odo's file, contact) @ 18:08:40 on Nov 28, 2003

    The Xindi insectoids would have been a better choice.

    I would believe that they might try to go behind the Xindi council's back and attempt something really paranoid because Rajiin failed.


    Reply
    Reply
    Quote
    Quote
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.