Nov 23 | Chuckreturns to NBC with a special two-hour show on Sunday, Jan 10, 2010, before returning to its regular time slot, Mondays at 8pm on the following night. It's return to prime time television can be attributed to a successful fan renewnal campaign last year. CHUCK is a one-hour, action-comedy series that follows Chuck Bartowski (Zachary Levi, "Less Than Perfect") -- a computer geek who is catapulted into a new career as the government's most vital secret agent. This upcoming season will include some special guest stars, including Brandon Routh of "Superman Returns" who will play CIA agent Daniel Shaw in an episode, and the addition of SUBWAY restaurant as a major advertiser to the show. Chuck averaged a 4.0/6 rating last season, about eight percent better than the recently cancelled "Trauma". Ratings-challenged Heroes moves back an hour when Chuck returns on Monday nights. STAR TREK VOYAGER's Robert Duncan McNeill serves Chuckas a supervising producer and director.
Nov 17 | Originally hired as co-executive producer to help with the second half of the show's first season, Kevin Murphy has now taken the reins of Caprica, the Battlestar Galactica prequel on Syfy, according to The Hollywood Reporter. He now serves as an executive producer along with Ronald D. Moore, David Eick and Jane Espenson and oversees the day-to-day functions of the show.
Nov 12 | Star Trek star Zachary Quinto is loosely attached to star in the romantic dramedy Whirligig, reports Risky Business.Quinto would play the lead role in the independent Canadian film, which is aiming to shoot early next year. The movie centers on a man who, in a misguided attempt to woo an older woman, befriends the woman's adopted son.Chaz Thorne is directing the pic, based on a screenplay by Michael Amo, creator of the Canadian supernatural series "The Listener."
Nov 11 | The CNS Foundation, is hosting an on-line charity auction at www.charitybuzz.com. One of the items they are auctioning is a signed movie poster of the new Star Trek movie which has all the cast members and writers. The president of our organization is Carol Abrams, JJ's mother, and she arranged for the donation from Bad Robot Production Company. J.J. Abrams is also a major donor to their organization. The funds raised will go to help find a cure to neurological disorders in children. The auction link is here.
Nov 10 | Candice Bergen, Charles Lisanby, Don Pardo, Gene Roddenberry, Tom and Dick Smothers and Bob Stewart have been selected as the next inductees into the Television Academy's Hall of Fame. They will be honored at a Jan. 20 ceremony at the Beverly Hills Hotel. "This year's inductees have challenged and shaped popular culture, changed television for the better and entertained us royally while doing so," TV Academy Chairman-CEO John Shaffner said. More info at the Hollywood Reporter
Synopsis: Archer and T'Pol do Starsky and Hutch going back in time to the
21st century to stop an attempt by the Insectoid Xindi on earth's past.
Review: It's odd for ENTERPRISE producers to schedule two retro episodes like "North
Star" and "Carpenter Street" so close together, and indeed the two episodes do
have a lot of similarities. Both borrow the visual style of an action genre,
the western and the 70's cop show. Both
are fun to look at with strong direction but aside from the occasional comic
moment, take themselves far too seriously in stories that don't add up to
very much. But "Carpenter Street" isn't nearly as visually adventurous as
"North Star" and it takes itself even more seriously. Where "North Star" committed itself completely to the
material it was paying homage too, "Carpenter Street" picks and chooses a few
elements with no real enthusiasm or vigor.
Time travel episodes on STAR TREK and elsewhere in Sci-Fi usually provide
plenty of comic material. From Kirk claiming that Spock's ears were crushed
in a cotton picker, to Picard doing Shakespeare to dodge paying the rent, to militia goons capturing Torres and Chakotay. "Carpenter Street" has some
comic moments, but not nearly enough, and its only real high
points are T'Pol recovering her strength this season in her tough,
no-nonesense treatment of Loomis; and Archer offering to untie Loomis so he
can hit him again. Most of the remaining comic moments come from Loomis but
instead of being played broadly for laughs, Loomis is played by an actor who
tends to play disturbed characters and his performance isn't really broad
comedy but nervous and fidgety; a lot like his guest role on NYPD Blue.
For whatever reason, "Carpenter Street" is set in the present day even though
if the car Archer drives had been removed, the episode could just as easily
have been set in the 70's or the 80's which would have been more adventurous
and in keeping with the visual theme. A theme into which Loomis' apartment,
haircut and fashion choices would have fit in perfectly. Also it would be
more credible than having the Xindi pick our time out of all the other
points in Earth's history they could have gone to. After all, what are the
odds of that anyway? Presumably Braga and Berman thought that a present day
setting would be simpler to do and make the threat more relevant to the
audience; but it's not like the audience was sitting on pins and needles
anyway worried about the Xindi virus being released. "Carpenter Street" could
at least have had some fun with the 70's.
In some ways, the idea of integrating "Carpenter Street" into the Xindi arc
rather than having the characters take a vacation from dealing with the
superweapon due to obliterate the human race as in "North Star" was smart. But on the other hand, if the Xindi could travel back to Earth's past,
then why bother with the entire process of designing a weapon and flying it
to Earth. All they really had to do was go back a few thousand years and
wipe out a handful of nomadic proto-humans. The Borg in FIRST CONTACT
behaved logically since they didn't want to wipe out humanity, just
assimilate it. The Xindi though want to wipe out humanity and instead they
tinker around with a bio-weapon in recent human history when there are much
easier ways to accomplish their goals if they can travel through time.
"Rajiin" too starts to make very little sense if the Xindi had all of Earth's
past at their disposal. So does sending the weapon prototype to attack Earth
in the 22nd century instead of the 19th when Earth would have had no
defense against it. And so the integration with the Xindi arc rather than
being a strong point begins to raise questions the episode can't answer but
that just cast doubt about the credibility of the Xindi arc.
The actual use of the Reptilian Xindi in the realistic 20th century set
designs also pointed up how fake and shiny and plastic the Xindi Reptilian
costumes look. On ENTERPRISE or another spaceship, Sci-Fi designs don't stand
out nearly as much, but put up against textured natural materials like wood
and brick, the costumes look like something off the discount post-Halloween
sale rack. Having the Xindi alter their appearance, or using humanoid Xindi,
might have expanded our knowledge of them, saved money on makeup and
been creepier than the latex. ENTERPRISE often uses humanoid-looking
aliens with just a dab of latex here or there when it shouldn't, but this
was one case where the producers should have gone for a humanoid look. There
might have been a scene where one of the Xindi would peel off the human mask
to reveal the Reptilian inside that would again have been more disturbing
than having Reptilian Xindi running around the city.
The oddest part of "Carpenter Street" might be the episode's decision
to hang most of it around the character of Loomis, a low grade sleazeball
without much in the way of interesting or redeeming qualities. The episode
begins with him and ends with him, even though aside from occasional bits of
comic relief, he contributes nothing to the episode. At one point the rumor
regarding "Carpenter Street" was that the producers were looking for a 'name
star' to play the part of Loomis and that may explain why Loomis 'looms' so
large in this episode. But since at the end of the day the producers ended
up a casting a capable but generally unknown actor who's played a number of
roles on STAR TREK over the years, it's unclear why the Loomis character
continued to play such a large role in the episode.
In order to accommodate the Loomis character, the episode had to have
Archer do some pretty stupid things. First his plan to sneak in alone using
Loomis and then take on the Reptilian Xindi is nothing short of
foolish. Loomis is not trustworthy, as we find out later, and when your team
only has two people on it and the enemy outnumbers it, splitting up
is just senseless. In "Rajiin" and "Twilight," we've seen that the Reptilian
Xindi are very tough and very formidable and easily defeated the MACO's even
when the numbers were even. Archer taking them on alone is nothing short of
insane and his being able to do it so easily discredits the Xindi as a
capable enemy.
And why keep Loomis around anyway once Archer was inside? There is no real
reason except that the plot calls for a bit of suspense that has Loomis
attacking T'Pol. Like most of what happens in the episode, Archer's
decisions make no sense except as setups for action scenes borrowed from TV
shows with even worse writing. All in all Loomis is the single biggest
weakness because the plot warps around him. If an actual big name had been
cast in the part, centering the episode around him might have made some
sense. But lacking any depth, complexity or redeeming qualities, Loomis is
nothing more than 30 seconds of comic relief stretched out to 15 minutes.
T'Pol at one point suggests that Loomis encapsulates the worst qualities of
the 21th century, which we might take as the writer's view of Loomis. Except
of course the worst qualities of the 21st century would involve mass murder,
brutal dictatorships and theocracies and the eugenics war, which STAR TREK
once again forgets about. Loomis is just a petty slimeball. He doesn't represent the moral failings of
the 21st century, just the failings of this episode.
I missed Carpenter Street but "Similitude" was certainly not vacuous. If they can produce more like "Similitude" and "Twilight" and "Anomaly" then I think the show will be headed in the right direction.
--------
It's a rip-off. / We're stepped on, and cheated! / We're flat, stone-cold lied to / But we're not defeated / No!
I realize that I have responded to your posts before but it's not that I'm "after you" so please take no offense! I just don't think it's fair to generalize the crowd who like B&B. Some of us are just nice people who look for something else in Star Trek than the crowd who dislikes B&B.
Have you noticed that the B&B stories have certain unique qualities to them? Let me give you an example or two: "Carbon Creek" and "Carpenter Street". Both of them compare our time to the Roddenberry-future. By doing this, B&B point out the many small flaws of our society. The flaws that, altogether, make a lousy world. Thankfully the story is subtle enough so people don't take offense, usually, and perhaps some of you don't even notice because they mix it with an entertaining kind of story. But it describes how many of us actually contributes to the problems mentioned in the two episodes.
I think that's relevant. You don't have to write a story about fanatics massmurders or cloning to be relevant.
I probably need to go into detail here. Well, lets talk "Carpenter Street" only:
Loomies' house is a mess. The phone has an annoying sound when it rings. Drugs are widespread. The cars are all locked up with alarm-systems, dogs and the van that Archer and T'Pol finally gets into, instantly turns on a loud radio with an annoying speaker. Crazy world huh? They need fuel and T'Pol notes the misuse of oil supplies. Loomies will do everything for money and T'Pol points him out as an example of a little mite that, along with thousands of other mites eats our society from within and takes the world from bad to worse. There was an anti-smoking ad (a clear one, what's why some people got upset). There was also the "Burgerland" scene that illustrates how everybody is a little greedy and nearly everybody falls victim of their own greediness, because it's part of our society.
These details are a contrast to the Roddeberry future that we usually see in Star Trek. It was covered with an entertaining story but you see it's relevant because it makes some people think: We are reminded of all the things we have to work on, to improve our world!
This is something unique to Star Trek and a vital part of it: It shows us a better future. Some fans have come to know it so well, they don't notice the contrast anymore. Other people don't look for it, and see only a mildly entertaining show. B&B are not trying to teach us HOW to solve the problems, but they point out WHAT needs to be solved and that it CAN be solved. That's an encouraging fantasy, that is worth striving for.
I realize, the Star Trek future has it's own problems with the Xindi and such. But at least it shows us there is progress, and there has to be, for our society to bloom. Season 1-2 was probably the best example of this so far, since it focused more on peaceful exploration, fitting the intro-sequence that describes the dreams of mankind.