menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
Feature Story

Features

2003 Ends With Trip to 2004, But "Carpenter Street" Goes Out With a Whimper

Features

By O. Deus / 08:46, 28 November 2003 / ENTERPRISE Reviews

Reviews Ex Deus

Title: "Carpenter Street"

Overall: 6.5
Performances: 7
Writing: 4
Direction: 7.5
FX & Prod Value: 7.5


Synopsis: Archer and T'Pol do Starsky and Hutch going back in time to the 21st century to stop an attempt by the Insectoid Xindi on earth's past.

Review: It's odd for ENTERPRISE producers to schedule two retro episodes like "North Star" and "Carpenter Street" so close together, and indeed the two episodes do have a lot of similarities. Both borrow the visual style of an action genre, the western and the 70's cop show. Both are fun to look at with strong direction but aside from the occasional comic moment, take themselves far too seriously in stories that don't add up to very much. But "Carpenter Street" isn't nearly as visually adventurous as "North Star" and it takes itself even more seriously. Where "North Star" committed itself completely to the material it was paying homage too, "Carpenter Street" picks and chooses a few elements with no real enthusiasm or vigor.

Time travel episodes on STAR TREK and elsewhere in Sci-Fi usually provide plenty of comic material. From Kirk claiming that Spock's ears were crushed in a cotton picker, to Picard doing Shakespeare to dodge paying the rent, to militia goons capturing Torres and Chakotay. "Carpenter Street" has some comic moments, but not nearly enough, and its only real high points are T'Pol recovering her strength this season in her tough, no-nonesense treatment of Loomis; and Archer offering to untie Loomis so he can hit him again. Most of the remaining comic moments come from Loomis but instead of being played broadly for laughs, Loomis is played by an actor who tends to play disturbed characters and his performance isn't really broad comedy but nervous and fidgety; a lot like his guest role on NYPD Blue.

For whatever reason, "Carpenter Street" is set in the present day even though if the car Archer drives had been removed, the episode could just as easily have been set in the 70's or the 80's which would have been more adventurous and in keeping with the visual theme. A theme into which Loomis' apartment, haircut and fashion choices would have fit in perfectly. Also it would be more credible than having the Xindi pick our time out of all the other points in Earth's history they could have gone to. After all, what are the odds of that anyway? Presumably Braga and Berman thought that a present day setting would be simpler to do and make the threat more relevant to the audience; but it's not like the audience was sitting on pins and needles anyway worried about the Xindi virus being released. "Carpenter Street" could at least have had some fun with the 70's.

In some ways, the idea of integrating "Carpenter Street" into the Xindi arc rather than having the characters take a vacation from dealing with the superweapon due to obliterate the human race as in "North Star" was smart. But on the other hand, if the Xindi could travel back to Earth's past, then why bother with the entire process of designing a weapon and flying it to Earth. All they really had to do was go back a few thousand years and wipe out a handful of nomadic proto-humans. The Borg in FIRST CONTACT behaved logically since they didn't want to wipe out humanity, just assimilate it. The Xindi though want to wipe out humanity and instead they tinker around with a bio-weapon in recent human history when there are much easier ways to accomplish their goals if they can travel through time. "Rajiin" too starts to make very little sense if the Xindi had all of Earth's past at their disposal. So does sending the weapon prototype to attack Earth in the 22nd century instead of the 19th when Earth would have had no defense against it. And so the integration with the Xindi arc rather than being a strong point begins to raise questions the episode can't answer but that just cast doubt about the credibility of the Xindi arc.

The actual use of the Reptilian Xindi in the realistic 20th century set designs also pointed up how fake and shiny and plastic the Xindi Reptilian costumes look. On ENTERPRISE or another spaceship, Sci-Fi designs don't stand out nearly as much, but put up against textured natural materials like wood and brick, the costumes look like something off the discount post-Halloween sale rack. Having the Xindi alter their appearance, or using humanoid Xindi, might have expanded our knowledge of them, saved money on makeup and been creepier than the latex. ENTERPRISE often uses humanoid-looking aliens with just a dab of latex here or there when it shouldn't, but this was one case where the producers should have gone for a humanoid look. There might have been a scene where one of the Xindi would peel off the human mask to reveal the Reptilian inside that would again have been more disturbing than having Reptilian Xindi running around the city.

The oddest part of "Carpenter Street" might be the episode's decision to hang most of it around the character of Loomis, a low grade sleazeball without much in the way of interesting or redeeming qualities. The episode begins with him and ends with him, even though aside from occasional bits of comic relief, he contributes nothing to the episode. At one point the rumor regarding "Carpenter Street" was that the producers were looking for a 'name star' to play the part of Loomis and that may explain why Loomis 'looms' so large in this episode. But since at the end of the day the producers ended up a casting a capable but generally unknown actor who's played a number of roles on STAR TREK over the years, it's unclear why the Loomis character continued to play such a large role in the episode.

In order to accommodate the Loomis character, the episode had to have Archer do some pretty stupid things. First his plan to sneak in alone using Loomis and then take on the Reptilian Xindi is nothing short of foolish. Loomis is not trustworthy, as we find out later, and when your team only has two people on it and the enemy outnumbers it, splitting up is just senseless. In "Rajiin" and "Twilight," we've seen that the Reptilian Xindi are very tough and very formidable and easily defeated the MACO's even when the numbers were even. Archer taking them on alone is nothing short of insane and his being able to do it so easily discredits the Xindi as a capable enemy.

And why keep Loomis around anyway once Archer was inside? There is no real reason except that the plot calls for a bit of suspense that has Loomis attacking T'Pol. Like most of what happens in the episode, Archer's decisions make no sense except as setups for action scenes borrowed from TV shows with even worse writing. All in all Loomis is the single biggest weakness because the plot warps around him. If an actual big name had been cast in the part, centering the episode around him might have made some sense. But lacking any depth, complexity or redeeming qualities, Loomis is nothing more than 30 seconds of comic relief stretched out to 15 minutes. T'Pol at one point suggests that Loomis encapsulates the worst qualities of the 21th century, which we might take as the writer's view of Loomis. Except of course the worst qualities of the 21st century would involve mass murder, brutal dictatorships and theocracies and the eugenics war, which STAR TREK once again forgets about. Loomis is just a petty slimeball. He doesn't represent the moral failings of the 21st century, just the failings of this episode.



More Top StoriesComments
Nov 23J.J. Abrams and Chris Pine Talk How Gratifying That Star Trek was Well Received, Working with Leonard Nimoy and Star Trek XII0
Nov 23Chuck returns to NBC with a special two-hour show on Sunday, Jan 10, 2010, before returning to its regular time slot, Mondays at 8pm on the following night. It's return to prime time television can be attributed to a successful fan renewnal campaign last year. CHUCK is a one-hour, action-comedy series that follows Chuck Bartowski (Zachary Levi, "Less Than Perfect") -- a computer geek who is catapulted into a new career as the government's most vital secret agent. This upcoming season will include some special guest stars, including Brandon Routh of "Superman Returns" who will play CIA agent Daniel Shaw in an episode, and the addition of SUBWAY restaurant as a major advertiser to the show. Chuck averaged a 4.0/6 rating last season, about eight percent better than the recently cancelled "Trauma". Ratings-challenged Heroes moves back an hour when Chuck returns on Monday nights. STAR TREK VOYAGER's Robert Duncan McNeill serves Chuck as a supervising producer and director.0
Nov 235-Page Preview of Third Issue of Galactica 1980 Comic Book  0
Nov 22Quinto, Urban, Saldana, Cho and Greenwood on Their Hopes for Star Trek XII3
Nov 22Exclusive Digital Content Now Available With New Star Trek Movie on iTunes
1
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

27 comments Post New | Help
View:

RE: May I say something? | Report this post to moderator
By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact) @ 04:00:14 on Dec 02, 2003 | Edit History (2)

I realize that I have responded to your posts before but it's not that I'm "after you" so please take no offense! I just don't think it's fair to generalize the crowd who like B&B. Some of us are just nice people who look for something else in Star Trek than the crowd who dislikes B&B.

Have you noticed that the B&B stories have certain unique qualities to them? Let me give you an example or two: "Carbon Creek" and "Carpenter Street". Both of them compare our time to the Roddenberry-future. By doing this, B&B point out the many small flaws of our society. The flaws that, altogether, make a lousy world. Thankfully the story is subtle enough so people don't take offense, usually, and perhaps some of you don't even notice because they mix it with an entertaining kind of story. But it describes how many of us actually contributes to the problems mentioned in the two episodes.

I think that's relevant. You don't have to write a story about fanatics massmurders or cloning to be relevant.

I probably need to go into detail here. Well, lets talk "Carpenter Street" only:

Loomies' house is a mess. The phone has an annoying sound when it rings. Drugs are widespread. The cars are all locked up with alarm-systems, dogs and the van that Archer and T'Pol finally gets into, instantly turns on a loud radio with an annoying speaker. Crazy world huh? They need fuel and T'Pol notes the misuse of oil supplies. Loomies will do everything for money and T'Pol points him out as an example of a little mite that, along with thousands of other mites eats our society from within and takes the world from bad to worse. There was an anti-smoking ad (a clear one, what's why some people got upset). There was also the "Burgerland" scene that illustrates how everybody is a little greedy and nearly everybody falls victim of their own greediness, because it's part of our society.

These details are a contrast to the Roddeberry future that we usually see in Star Trek. It was covered with an entertaining story but you see it's relevant because it makes some people think: We are reminded of all the things we have to work on, to improve our world!

This is something unique to Star Trek and a vital part of it: It shows us a better future. Some fans have come to know it so well, they don't notice the contrast anymore. Other people don't look for it, and see only a mildly entertaining show. B&B are not trying to teach us HOW to solve the problems, but they point out WHAT needs to be solved and that it CAN be solved. That's an encouraging fantasy, that is worth striving for.

I realize, the Star Trek future has it's own problems with the Xindi and such. But at least it shows us there is progress, and there has to be, for our society to bloom. Season 1-2 was probably the best example of this so far, since it focused more on peaceful exploration, fitting the intro-sequence that describes the dreams of mankind.

Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Parent
Parent
Talkback Top
Top

RE: What a Thaksgiving Turkey it was | Report this post to moderator
By: Steve Krutzler (Odo's file, contact) @ 08:39:22 on Dec 02, 2003

I missed Carpenter Street but "Similitude" was certainly not vacuous. If they can produce more like "Similitude" and "Twilight" and "Anomaly" then I think the show will be headed in the right direction.

--------

It's a rip-off. / We're stepped on, and cheated! / We're flat, stone-cold lied to / But we're not defeated / No!

Halen. "The Dream is Over."

Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Parent
Parent
Talkback Top
Top
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.