menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
Message you're replying to

Isn't it ironic?
By cdydatzigs

Quote:
I am sad that Bill Shatner is not in the movie, but like I said before, I have no interest in this movie. -- Gustavo

It is funny to me that people who "have no interest" in this film or "will not see it" or say that "this movie WILL fail if Shatner is not in it" -- seem to be the ones who are posting on these threads the most!

J.J. Abrams is smart. He knows that it's in his best interest to cater to the fans -- TO A POINT. Catering to every die-hard Trekkie's demand can lead to disaster, especially when their wants and needs are often times selfish and not in the best intrest of the LONG-TERM health of the franchise.

Star Trek needed two things by 2005.. time off and a return to something truly fresh. The days of repackaging the same tired storylines, characters and sets with new titles and special effects (See: Insurrection, Nemesis, and Enterprise) are over.

You need young, fresh-faced actors and a sense of honor to the original series (plural) that came before it. I am begging you J.J., PLEASE don't cave in to all these retarded "valentines" that a few diehard fans want so bad. (See: Throwing Shatner in this film as a ressurected elderly 153 year-old Kirk). Make this film, make it your own, and let's hope this is the adrenalene shot the franchise has desperately needed for the last decade.

Compose your message
Status
You are not logged in. To post, you must enter your login information as well.
Email:
Password:
Topic:
Type your message below:



After my reply is posted:
Quoting

Links


Styles


Images
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.