menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
Message you're replying to

RE: Logical...and promising...
By StillKirok

But people aren't stupid. They KNOW the character comes from Shatner and Nimoy, and we already HAVE an older Spock. They don't NEED to introduce a 40 year old legendary character.

Telling the origin does not require ignorance, and Kirk and Spock have been a part of our culture in the same manor as Superman and Batman.

As for simplicity, yes, it can be done simply. Depends on how they want to use older Kirk. It depends on whether the character is going to be a significant part of the movie, or just a cameo.


As for not believing Abrams--I won't buy it until I see it.

What he did yesterday was blow smoke up our butts. He and Shatner have spoken since Shatner announced he wasn't in the film. Why would Shatner still take that stance if Abrams said that to him? And why wouldn't Abrams tell Shatner that he's still interested?

This comment is inconsistent with Abrams' ACTIONS.

So no, I don't believe him.

Compose your message
Status
You are not logged in. To post, you must enter your login information as well.
Email:
Password:
Topic:
Type your message below:



After my reply is posted:
Quoting

Links


Styles


Images
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.