menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
Message you're replying to

Prequelize it and they're riffing on Star Trek: New Voyages
By Michael X. Maelstrom


Unless you want to inject the possibility that he was lying or answering through his hat, it looks like he just let slip a confirmation that they're re-casting the seminal Trek roles.

If anyone wants to see for themselves whether re-casting Spock, Kirk and McCoy can be done effectively (or if you prefer, what your personal reaction is to _an_ re-casting) visit www.newvoyages.com and download an ep.

As an Trekkie, I would 'ave to say, that ST:NV displays (to me) that it can be done, in that it was able to surmount my apprehension _against_ an re-casting.

Introspectively, it works primarily because it meets 3 criteria.

1. it's very respectful of the original TOS

2. the (re)cast members are unknowns.

3. It captures the look'n'feel of TOS down to recreations of original sets.

While 3 is not necessary for a new Trek movie, in that an TOS early-years movie need only 'look'n'feel' contextually like TOS (we've seen some excellent art posted here on Trekweb where uniforms look consistent with pre-TOS/post-Naval)

Myself, I would submit that criteria 1 is absolutely essential, and criteria 2 is preferable.

Abrams has vocalized his respect for the original series (and fans) so assuming he's not engaging in a feat of linguistic legerdemain and a degree of intrepidity, that's one down.

I'm now 'opeful.

Michael X.

Compose your message
Status
You are not logged in. To post, you must enter your login information as well.
Email:
Password:
Topic:
Type your message below:



After my reply is posted:
Quoting

Links


Styles


Images
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.