menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
Message you're replying to

That was important news, thanks.
By Hbasm

Assuming this means a cut on the budget as well ( probably not by half) I don't think that is necessarely a bad thing. Less effects and more story - would you mind? Effects are cool but the story is far more important. Obviously, only a fraction of the cost for a complete episode goes into story writing. But if they can nolonger compete on effects due to a lowered budget, they will have no choice but to compete on the stories.

In the long run, however, I don't think Star Trek can survive on good stories. The franchine needs to grow, and not maintain a status quo. If we say, the stories on ENTERPRISE are all going to be great and deep, well, it could be as good as DS9 ... but even DS9 kept loosing audience.

Star Trek needs to be slightly more "aggressive" rather than defensive, in order to grow. With "agressive" I mean, finding new ways to get a foot inside peoples door. That is difficult, of course. It needs to "capture" people and it probably means some technological investments... What about a 3D movie? Panorama? These could be shown at planetaries and get some publicity beyond the ususal movie reviews.

I don't have other ideas for the moment, but if you have, share them with us! Star Trek needs a kick forwards, that it never had before.

Compose your message
Status
You are not logged in. To post, you must enter your login information as well.
Email:
Password:
Topic:
Type your message below:



After my reply is posted:
Quoting

Links


Styles


Images
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.