menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar

Features

Edit History for RE: A Logical Gamble?

Features

by c.p.
<< Back

This post has been edited 1 time(s). Prior versions are displayed from the original.

Original message modified Oct 31, 2007 @ 19:41:
Topic: RE: A Logical Gamble?
Quote:
I'm not interested in prequels, retelling a story that has already been told.

A prequel is not a retelling of a story. It is a brand new story about familiar characters as they once were.

Quote:
I'll say it again, Star Trek should move forward, not backward.

Then I'll say my part again: moving "forward" means moving forward creatively and establishing fertile soil in which future franchise endeavors may bloom. Sticking to an already rambling linear timeline post-Nemesis would be "franchis-icide." At this terribly low point for Trek, it would try the patience of an already cynical general public and it would be begging fans to once again fall in love blindly when all they want is their first love.
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.