|
|
Rumor of a big Doctor Who find
Wil Wheaton loves Into Darkness
The 'Trek' film fans wanted 10 years ago.
Star Trek Reborn by Grunloh et al
STID falls to 8th place in it's 6th weekend for a total of 5.6 million
Kal-El must be Kryptonian for "Inert." (Spoilers)
AICN’s incredibly anal scientific analysis of STID

Is INTO DARKNESS better than STAR TREK (2009)?. Is INTO DARKNESS better than STAR TREK (2009)?




By GustavoLeao / 07:12, 13 January 2013 / Star Trek: Nemesis
MTV posted a video interview a month ago with Star Trek Into Darkness director J.J. Abrams and here are excerpts.
"Rather than answer anything that would give away the fun of the movie, I
would say that the character that Benedict plays, he brings such an
incredible power to it. His voice alone, I actually as a joke should
have had him read the lunch menu," Abrams said, deftly dodging the
Khan question with a laugh. "He makes anything sound great and brings such a
force to it that hopefully when you see the movie, this character, all
speculation aside, will be really compelling, not because of any
connection to anything past, but because of who he is and what he brings
to it."
"The whole thing, not just his backstory, but his agenda, his plan, his
secret, all that is what, for me at least, makes him such a frightening
and cool villain," Abrams said. "Also, the real villains — when
they're not just two-dimensional, angry vengeful types — don't see
themselves as the bad guy. They are the good guy and have complete
rationale and motivation. So true to form, the character that Benedict
plays has an absolute sense of right and wrong, and he's on the right
side."
"This movie was not made for 'Star Trek' fans; it was made for movie
fans. But if you're a 'Star Trek' fan, I think you'll be really happy,"
Abrams said, once again avoiding answering the question directly.
"There's a lot of stuff in here for you, but we couldn't just make the
movie only for fans of 'Star Trek.' The thing about the movie that I
love also is that we didn't even make it for fans of the first movie we
did.
"A lot of sequels I've seen tend to assume you love the characters and
know them really well and get things off to a fast start where you
don't have any sense of investing in the characters in the beginning, so
we tried to treat this as a movie that works on its own. Certainly
it's a sequel, certainly if you saw the first movie, great. You don't
have to have seen the first film. This movie is its own thing, and
there are definitely nods to prior 'Trek' lore in the film."
The full interview is here

![]() Reply |
![]() Quote |
![]() Reply |
![]() Quote |