|
|
|
Free HD iTunes version of Star Trek 2009
Here, let Riker show you how to command a chair.
ALL HANDS REPORT TO THE NEWS PAGE
Star Trek Into Darkness Mini-Review
Question for prometheus 59650 (Into Darkness SPOILER thread)
Is INTO DARKNESS better than STAR TREK (2009)?. Is INTO DARKNESS better than STAR TREK (2009)?
By GustavoLeao / 03:02, 28 December 2012 / Star Trek: Nemesis
TrekMovie.com posted new interviews with Star Trek Into Darkness director J.J. Abrams, and stars Benedict Cumberbatch, Chris Pine and Zachary Quinto to the Korean site Naver Movies, and here are few excerpts.
Cumberbatch: He [John Harrison] is an extraordinary terrorist of sorts. He uses
himself as a warrior with weapons and close hand combat to just reap
devastation and havoc wherever he goes and a trail of destruction
follows him. What is interesting from an acting point of view — beyond
doing the stunts and choreographed fight sequences….was also the
psychological warfare that he acts out. He has an incredible ability to
control people’s minds to his bidding and make them – well confuse the
radar of their loyalties and prerogatives, so that was great fun. So it
was a great mixture of intense acting scenes and action scenes.
Abrams: First of all the studio required us to shoot in 3D. They
said we have to do that for the economics of it. So I was really bummed
because I am not a huge fan of 3D at all. So approaching this thing I
went in very cynically. I knew I wanted to shoot the movie on film. I
knew I wanted to shoot it anamorphically, which means we couldn’t shoot
it in native 3D. But I wanted to make the version of the movie that was
that was the version I wanted to make in 2D. And I thought that if we
can augment it and make it even cooler in 3D, then great. Well luckily
we are working with an amazing stereographer and 3D crew and we have
been doing work converting the movie. There is this myth that if you do a
movie that is not shot natively in 3D then it will not look as good,
which is absolutely not true. The look of the movie – there are some
tricks and techniques that have never been used before. And the look of
this 3D is beyond what we have seen before, especially with what you can
do with IMAX. The frame of the IMAX is so much bigger than the 35MM
frame. The resolution is so high. In this movie all the exterior shots
are done in IMAX, whether filmed or rendered if it is a CG shot. So the
cool thing there you have this massive scale plus the 3D. It is really
going to be a cool experience for the audience.
More excerpts at TrekMovie
You can watch the full video interview at Naver Movies.
 Reply |
 Quote |
