menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
Opinion Poll
News Story

Features

Benedict Cumberbatch Denies Khan Rumors in Star Trek Into Darkness, Pine and Quinto Says the Movie is Much Bigger than the First One

Features

By GustavoLeao / 08:20, 13 December 2012 / Star Trek: Nemesis

Access Hollywood has just posted four separate interview snippets with Zachary Quinto, Chris Pine and Benedict Cumberbatch discussing various aspects of "Star Trek Into Darkness".

 
Cumberbatch, who plays the villain, John Harrison, in the film, was in his own separate interview and was asked about his character, and Cumberbatch responded, "I play a character called John and not that other name (meaning Khan).  It's interesting.  Speculation is speculation and that's all fun".  He went on to state that his character was a "terrorist", mirroring his sentiments in our MTV interview article today.
 
Pine, who plays Capt. Kirk, and Quinto, who plays Spock, were interviewed together, and Access Hollywood has posted three segments of their interview.  In the first segment, the pair discuss how epic "Star Trek Into Darkness" feels.  Quinto says, "It is much bigger than the first one ... can tell that in the first nine minutes ... does not get any more subdued"..Quinto went on to mention that the film is "submersive and absorbing".
 
The second Pine/Quinto segment speaks about how "Star Trek Into Darkness" is a commentary on our times, much like the orginal series allegorically spoke to the turbulent times of the 1960's.   Pine mentioned the fact that Cumberbatch's character was a "terrorist", and how that relates to all Americans' lives within the last twelve years.
 
The third segment with Pine and Quinto dealt with the villain, Cumberbatch's character.  Pine stated, "Benedict is a much colder, cleaner bad guy.  His primary weapon is the ability to manipulate and his ability to use psychological warfare on the crew.  (Kirk is) brought to his knees and has to face his own vulnerability ad his own feelings of self-doubt about whether or not his is capable of leading his crew in the battle".
 
All of the video interviews and segments can be found here.  This report has only touched the surface of the interviews' content, so please hit the link for more details.  Thanks go to Access Hollywood's Scott Mantz, for the interviews and his awesome Trek enthusiasm!
 
SPECIAL THANKS TO TREKWEB REPORTER JOHN MORTON



More Top StoriesComments
May 24Rumor Mill : Joe Cornish May Direct Star Trek XIII ?
1
May 23William Shatner to Host Screenings of Wrath of Khan, Discuss His Opinion on Into Darkness and the Star Trek Franchise 0
May 23Into Darkness Star Zoe Saldana on Upcoming 1883 Magazine Cover0
May 23Damon Lindelof Opens Up on His Work on Into Darkness, Talks About the Future of Star Trek Franchise Post-J.J. Abrams19
May 23Cover for Upcoming Novel Star Trek The Fall Revelation and Dust0
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

13 comments Post New | Help
View:

I don't get it | Report this post to moderator
By: StillKirok (Odo's file, contact) @ 12:35:23 on Dec 13, 2012

Why would Abrams and crew keep this so secret for so long?

I read a great "letter to Abrams" online yesterday, and the points about not revealing the villain at this point were very well made.

We know who the heroes are, and there really is nothing out there to be gained by not revealing who the villain is.

You're only going to piss the hardcore fans off, and you are not going to attract the non-hardcore fans by not answering this question.

It's starting to look like, and I hope this IS true, that Cumberbatch is a new, original character.

So why hide that for months and months?

Orci said it was a canon character, but he recently admitted he lied about something. His words.

From what I felt, and what I read from others, while some people would support anything, in general, the hardcore fans didn't like the idea of Khan. I'm one of those fans.

I was very cool and open to the idea of Gary Mitchell, but it was not like I had my heart set on it. I do think however, that after this movie, the window for Gary Mitchell has passed.

I hadn't thought of Garth of Izar until it was brought up recently, but that seemed like a fun idea too.

Ultimately, I found myself open to anyone OTHER than Khan.

But where is the harm in saying, "Cumberbatch is an original character?" How is that spoiling anything?

It doesn't make sense to hide that. There is nothing gained.

If they would have said this months ago, all it does is save frustration. It doesn't give more buzz now than it would have months ago. We're only talking about it like this now because we are annoyed. Not one ticket will be sold or not sold based on the irrational decision to not name the villain--especially now that it's looking like an original character.

In some ways, this is reminding me of the Shatner debacle, though to a much lesser degree. Abrams wouldn't completely confirm Shatner was not in the movie until the last minute, and people just didn't believe him even then, even after Shatner repeatedly denied being in the movie.

This time around, we're seeing something a little similar with the name of the villain. Now the villain is named and we still have trouble taking it at face value.

Until otherwise noted, I'm simply going to assume this is an original villain.

I'm fine with that and if you believe the hype, Cumberbatch is going to knock it out of the park. But geez--this was hardly worth the wait and annoyance of withholding the name this long.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: I don't get it by Captain Jeff @ 08:56:33 on Dec 14
RE: I don't get it by Captain Jeff @ 08:56:10 on Dec 14
RE: I don't get it by sb2004 @ 23:01:24 on Dec 13
    RE: I don't get it by StillKirok @ 23:26:31 on Dec 13
RE: I don't get it by ZOD @ 21:42:23 on Dec 13
RE: I don't get it by cdydatzigs @ 15:43:50 on Dec 13
    RE: I don't get it by StillKirok @ 17:56:50 on Dec 13
       RE: I don't get it by ZOD @ 21:57:55 on Dec 13
          RE: I don't get it by StillKirok @ 23:03:37 on Dec 13
             RE: I don't get it by ZOD @ 01:49:35 on Dec 14
       RE: I don't get it by Bean @ 20:48:24 on Dec 13
          RE: I don't get it by cdydatzigs @ 21:24:34 on Dec 13
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us |
This website is not endorsed, sponsored or affiliated with CBS Studios Inc. or the "Star Trek" franchise.
The STAR TREK trademarks and logos are owned by CBS Studios Inc.
© 1996-2012 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.