|
|
Watching the birth of a new Star Trek fan ...
Website gets POed with Zoe Saldana...
TV Guide: Why Star Trek should return to TV.
STID Underperforming?! Is it time to release info in commercials?
J.J. IS THE MAN, GOTTA LOVE HIM !!!
It is important that we be humble and grateful (no spoilers)

Is INTO DARKNESS better than STAR TREK (2009)?. Is INTO DARKNESS better than STAR TREK (2009)?




By GustavoLeao / 07:32, 23 September 2012 / Star Trek: Nemesis
A new video interview with Star Trek star Karl Urban, by Todd Gilchrist, concerning Star
Trek Into Darkness, has just been posted on Celebuzz.com.
Urban
states that J J Abrams "is a brilliant director to work with", who has a
"real sharp storytelling sensibility". He states that the upcoming
film will "do something to the audience that will be epic, emotional and
will move them".
Urban was asked if he had a "greater sense of
ownership now of Bones in the second film, that he is more your
character and you are not just standing on the shoulders of giants?"
Urban
readily replied, "No. I have a huge admiration and respect for the TOS
cast". He went on to explain that the original series was special to
him, "as he grew up watching them" and enjoyed them as a kid. Urban
finished by saying that "to have the opportunity to do this film is an
amazing privlidge".
The video interview is here
TG Daily has also just posted a new interview with Urban from the Huffington Post, written be Mike Ryan.
When
asked about his interpretation of Bones, Urban said, "It's a slippery
slope. As a longtime fan of Star Trek, I would have felt short changed
if I had gone into the cinema and not seen a character that was
identically McCoy."
He went on to state, "I also have to make the
character my own. And it is, ultimately, my interpretation of what
Bones is. But, having such huge admiration and respect for what he did
before, it was important that the character be recognizably Bones."
The full interview is here
Special Thanks to TrekWeb Reporter John Morton

![]() Reply |
![]() Quote |