menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
STAR TREK BBS

Explanations for Alice Eve (SPOILERS)

Upon 2nd viewing...

Watching the birth of a new Star Trek fan ...

Star Trek prominent at Xbox One launch

Pine vs. Shatner

Website gets POed with Zoe Saldana...

TV Guide: Why Star Trek should return to TV.

The new Enterprise (spoilers)

2 Iron Man 3 questions

STID Underperforming?! Is it time to release info in commercials?

boxBottom
News Tribblets

|

comments

boxBottom
Advanced Search
boxBottom
Opinion Poll

Is INTO DARKNESS better than STAR TREK (2009)?. Is INTO DARKNESS better than STAR TREK (2009)?

Current Results

Top Stories

May 25 | Roberto Orci on Spock/Uhura Romance and Developing the New Villain of Star Trek Into Darkness -Part 1

0 comments

May 25 | 9-Page Preview for Star Trek After Darkness Issue 1 Comic Book

0 comments

May 24 | Star Trek Into Darkness Blu-Ray German and UK Box Art

0 comments

May 24 | Rumor Mill : Joe Cornish May Direct Star Trek XIII ?

12 comments

May 23 | William Shatner to Host Screenings of Wrath of Khan, Discuss His Opinion on Into Darkness and the Star Trek Franchise

0 comments
More Stories...
News Story

Features

MTV Movie Awards Reveals New Character from Star Trek XII - SPOILER

Features

By GustavoLeao / 08:58, 4 June 2012 / Star Trek: Nemesis

According to ComicBook.com, a Star Trek XII spoiler went unnoticed during the 2012 MTV Movie Awards.  During a parody video about archery coach Lester Boonshaft, Star Trek XII director J.J. Abrams appeared. On the computer screen behind him, there is an image of someone with a mask covering his face.

According to MTV, the image is actually a first look at a new character from the upcoming Star Trek XII movie. This character did not appear in the previous Star Trek film from J.J. Abrams.

You can watch the video at MTV



More Top StoriesComments
May 25Roberto Orci on Spock/Uhura Romance and Developing the New Villain of Star Trek Into Darkness -Part 10
May 259-Page Preview for Star Trek After Darkness Issue 1 Comic Book0
May 24Star Trek Into Darkness Blu-Ray German and UK Box Art0
May 24Rumor Mill : Joe Cornish May Direct Star Trek XIII ?
12
May 23William Shatner to Host Screenings of Wrath of Khan, Discuss His Opinion on Into Darkness and the Star Trek Franchise 0
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

33 comments Post New | Help
View:

the most important rule in ST- | Report this post to moderator
By: Italiantrek (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:41:44 on Jun 05, 2012

This timeline is a branch of the original timeline. A branch. You must not change everything because is funny o because you can.It must be a logical relationship cause effect. You can't say: Cause: Vulcan is detroyed by Nero. Effect: Klingons are now vegetarians and pacifists, or perverses masked men. Why? No sense. And you can't change previous canon: Eugenics wars, Khan's bio or Archer's era.
Or from Vulcan destruction does not logic already matter in this universe?
A minimum logic chain cause effect in ST is the most important thing.


Reply
Reply 		Quote
Quote
RE: the most important rule in ST- by Terry212 @ 15:34:54 on Jun 06
RE: the most important rule in ST- by cdydatzigs @ 15:32:17 on Jun 05
    RE: the most important rule in ST- by StillKirok @ 11:34:40 on Jun 06
    RE: the most important rule in ST- by ZOD @ 17:33:35 on Jun 05
       RE: Sorry, but no future for Abrams trek in TV. by Italiantrek @ 18:32:30 on Jun 05
          RE: Sorry, but no future for Abrams trek in TV. by cdydatzigs @ 23:33:51 on Jun 05
             RE: Sorry, but no future for Abrams trek in TV. by ZOD @ 02:37:27 on Jun 06
                RE: Sorry, but no future for Abrams trek in TV. by cdydatzigs @ 18:20:23 on Jun 06
          RE: Sorry, but no future for Abrams trek in TV. by Spaceball One @ 23:06:13 on Jun 05
RE: the most important rule in ST- by ZOD @ 13:45:38 on Jun 05
RE: the most important rule in ST- by Spaceball One @ 12:18:14 on Jun 05
    RE: the most important rule in ST- by kc @ 15:14:35 on Jun 05

new image? | Report this post to moderator
By: The One (Odo's file, contact) @ 19:40:41 on Jun 04, 2012

I saw it, just thought JJ was F'ing with us by having an image up from Trek `09. If that's a new character image, then that's just a douchey thing to do.


Reply
Reply 		Quote
Quote
RE: new image? by ZOD @ 20:07:45 on Jun 04
    RE: new image? by The One @ 02:18:26 on Jun 05
       RE: new image? by cdydatzigs @ 05:12:06 on Jun 05
          RE: new image? by The One @ 10:45:09 on Jun 05
             RE: new image? by cdydatzigs @ 15:27:44 on Jun 05
                RE: new image? by The One @ 22:20:41 on Jun 05
       RE: new image? by Spaceball One @ 03:04:58 on Jun 05
          RE: new image? by The One @ 10:38:33 on Jun 05
             RE: new image? by Spaceball One @ 12:21:32 on Jun 05
                RE: new image? by The One @ 12:27:20 on Jun 05
    RE: new image? by cdydatzigs @ 20:44:39 on Jun 04

Isn't that a ... | Report this post to moderator
By: timmer33 (Odo's file, contact) @ 12:56:06 on Jun 04, 2012

Klingon, only slightly blurry?


Reply
Reply 		Quote
Quote
RE: Isn't that a ... by StillKirok @ 13:36:20 on Jun 04
    RE: Isn't that a ... by GustavoLeao @ 13:45:10 on Jun 04
       RE: Isn't that a ... by rassmguy @ 14:05:08 on Jun 04
          RE: Isn't that a ... by Kuca @ 02:14:53 on Jun 05
          RE: Isn't that a ... by cdydatzigs @ 14:42:58 on Jun 04
             RE: Isn't that a ... by GustavoLeao @ 17:13:24 on Jun 04
                RE: Isn't that a ... by Rhiannon @ 17:21:16 on Jun 04

Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!

Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us |
This website is not endorsed, sponsored or affiliated with CBS Studios Inc. or the "Star Trek" franchise.
The STAR TREK trademarks and logos are owned by CBS Studios Inc.
© 1996-2012 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.