menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

J.J. Abrams Talks the Possibility of Time Travel and Cameos from Star Trek Actors from Other Trek Series in Star Trek XII

Features

By GustavoLeao / 09:49, 16 January 2010 / Star Trek: Nemesis

The December 2009 issue of Wizard Magazine features an exclusive interview with Star Trek director J.J Abrams and here are few excerpts.

It seems like time travel is mandatory for the most sucessful Trek films. But will you veer away from that in the sequel ?

We're just now talking about what the story is going to be and there is some very cool ideas that are out there. My instinct would be not necessarily go back to any of the same well again unless it pertains to character. But if there was some brilliant piece that involved time travel of course I wouldn't rule it out.

Would you consider any more cameos from any of the other Star Trek actorsfrom any of the other series ?

You know, I'm open to anything. But I am not going into it thinking, "Oh, okay, how do I figure out a way to create more cameo options ?"

But you are not averse to it.

No, I'm not averse to it, but the great news is that the cast of the new Star Trek has this massive burden of having to try to live up to the incredible job that the original actors did, and I think they were so good that they did it. And while the first movie would have been nearly impossible to do  without Leonard Nimoy - we would have ghad to change the story completely - I feel like while being open to it and, like you said, not averse, I am also thrilled that we are now in a place where we dont necessarily need to shoehorn cameos in just to appease original fans. The great thing about Nimoy, beyond his just being who he is, is that the role was not a cameo, it was a critically important character in the movie. Trying to find cameos was never an interesting thing for us. Trying to tell a decent story was the thing that we were working hard to do.

The full interview can be found in issue 217 of Wizard Magazine.



More Top StoriesComments
May 21Complete Info on Next Generation The First Season on Blu Ray4
May 21Five Star Trek Captains to Attend Wizard World Philadelphia Comic Con
0
May 21Cover and Info for Star Trek Ongoing 11 and Star Trek The Next Generation Doctor Who Assimilation2 4 Comic Books
0
May 20TrekMovie Confirms Star Trek XII 2nd Unit to Shoot in Iceland0
May 18Chase Masterson Joins Doctor Who Audio Adventures
0
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

11 comments Post New | Help
View:

"lying" = being deceptive about the plot on purpose | Report this post to moderator
By: cdydatzigs (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:53:51 on Jan 18, 2010

Quote:
The reason any hopes were up was because Abrams kept them up by lying about his interest in using Shatner in the movie.

Ok, so what if he lied? A producer or director is not entitled to give you ANY accurate information about a film's plot before the movie is released. If they went to such an effort to hide the costumes the actors were wearing during production, what made you think they were going to be 100% honest with who was in the film or not?

Honestly, if J.J. had done what I would have he would have had no serious intention on clouding up his movie with Shatner's involvement. Then, in order to not alienate anyone too early, he would have implied that "he tried" in interviews. So what? That is his right as a director. If YOU get your hopes up anyway, that's your problem -- not J.J.'s

If you remember, I spent 2006-2007 trying to tell all of you not to get your hopes up about Shatner's involvement, and the powers that be here banned me without explanation for 6 months... probably because "I banged that drum too hard". Well apparently I didn't bang it hard enough because some of you are still giving us this "J.J. lied! We were misled!" garbage almost a year after the film came out. Get over it already!

The odds are, J.J. and company probably never did make a serious effort to shoehorn Shatner into the film. It's their movie, not yours. I think most of us are perefectly fine with the outcome.

--------

-- Steve

"If a sixth Star Trek television series is ever realized, it will be set in the new universe." -- cdydatzigs, June 15, 2009.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Refreshing | Report this post to moderator
By: cdydatzigs (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:59:29 on Jan 16, 2010

Quote:
But I am not going into it thinking, "Oh, okay, how do I figure out a way to create more cameo options?"

THANK YOU.

You hear that Shatner fans?

--------

-- Steve

"If a sixth Star Trek television series is ever realized, it will be set in the new universe." -- cdydatzigs, June 15, 2009.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Refreshing by GustavoLeao @ 16:29:01 on Jan 17
RE: Refreshing by Fritz @ 13:26:01 on Jan 16
RE: Refreshing by Kamen Rider Blade @ 13:24:01 on Jan 16
    RE: Refreshing by Fritz @ 13:27:30 on Jan 16
RE: Refreshing by Fritz @ 13:23:41 on Jan 16
RE: Refreshing by StillKirok @ 11:41:43 on Jan 16
    RE: Refreshing by Kamen Rider Blade @ 13:30:40 on Jan 16
       RE: Refreshing by StillKirok @ 15:18:33 on Jan 16
          RE: Refreshing by Kamen Rider Blade @ 15:40:48 on Jan 16
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us |
This website is not endorsed, sponsored or affiliated with CBS Studios Inc. or the "Star Trek" franchise.
The STAR TREK trademarks and logos are owned by CBS Studios Inc.
© 1996-2012 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.