menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
STAR TREK BBS
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

J.J. Abrams Says Star Trek XII Must be the Most Meaningful Adventure for the Crew of the Enterprise, Says Movies and TV Series Can Definitely Co-Exist

Features

By GustavoLeao / 14:50, 23 October 2009 / Star Trek: Nemesis

MTV posted a new interview with Star Trek director J.J. Abrams and here are few excerpts from the article.

"The second one has an obligation to go deeper and maintain the fun and adventure in the sense of optimism and scale that ['Trek' originator Gene] Roddenberry created," Abrams said. "But I do think it has to evolve and not become some polemic over-the-top, on-the-nose allegory. It needs to be something that is not just about the characters meeting each other and having their first adventure; it needs to be about having their most meaningful one."


These are the wide-ranging concepts that Abrams and writers Alex Kurtzman, Roberto Orci and Damon Lindelof are starting to explore. "We're literally just beginning discussions about the story and where we want to go," Abrams said. "We have some very broad stroke ideas that are very exciting. We're obviously going to do the best we can in terms of rewarding an audience."


One thing they likely won't do, according to Abrams, is call the sequel "Star Trek 2."


"I think we can't really do that, right?" Abrams laughed. "I don't know what you'd call it. It's a good question. I'm not sure."

"There's been talk about it but none of it has been mine," Abrams revealed about rumnors of new Star Trek TV Series. "Obviously I'm open to anything. The key to doing another TV show is what would the approach be that would be worthy of the audience. If there's a good idea that's fantastic."

"Obviously what you do in a film you couldn't do week to week in a series. The advantage of a series-- when you look at something as good as 'Battlestar Galactica' you see that, despite its great visual effects, there was a level of character and interpersonal drama that never would have taken place had that been a film. [A movie series and a TV series] can definitely co-exist," he said.

"The question is, who runs that show. Whats the vision of it? How does it work?" To MYV's suggestion that the studio would likely approach Abrams before anyone else, he responded in his usual humble manner. "I don't know. It would be nice certainly."

More from Abrams on Star Trek can be found at MTV and MTV Movie Blog

MTV also posted a video interview with J.J. Abrams in which he talks about Star Trek XII here



More Top StoriesComments
Sep 02Star Trek Toys News : New TOS Action Figures from Diamond Select Toys Themed on Episodes0
Sep 02Ronald D. Moore to Produce Fantasy TV Series for NBC0
Sep 01Mondo Star Trek First Contact Borg Queen Poster on Sale September 21
Sep 015-Page Preview of Star Trek Movie Adaptation Issue 6 Comic Book 0
Sep 01New Synopsis for Star Trek Typhon Pact Seize the Fire Novel - Spoilers2
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

23 comments Post New | Help
View:

A series? | Report this post to moderator
By: StillKirok (Odo's file, contact) @ 22:40:55 on Oct 24, 2009

With Lost on the way out, I think that a series would be ok--if Abrams does it.

I also would like to see a series with THIS CAST. None of them are so big that they can't be on TV, and I would much rather see a series with this crew. You could do so much more with a Kirk and crew series than you can with movies. It'll never happen--at least the part about this cast doing a Kirk and crew series, but in a perfect world, that's what I'd be happy with.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
I dont think so by GustavoLeao @ 08:48:03 on Oct 25
    RE: I dont think so by cdydatzigs @ 09:26:57 on Oct 25
RE: A series? by cdydatzigs @ 08:40:24 on Oct 25

So many things... | Report this post to moderator
By: Ralphis (Odo's file, contact) @ 19:10:28 on Oct 24, 2009

There's so many things I'd love to see in a new Trek TV show. And I'll list them... because I'm lame like that.

1) A post-Nemesis series based in the Primeline or Prime Universe or whatever we're callin' it. To tie-in with the movie (Star Trek '09) the pilot would deal directly with the destruction of Romulus. Wherever the show goes from there, I don't know.

2) A show set in the Alternate Timeline, but with a different ship. Maybe deal with the relocation of the Vulcan survivors.

3) I still like my Thrid Universe idea I posted awhile back. Set it post 2387 and incorporate the events of the new movie, but also pick-and-choose events from the Prime Timeline (with minor tweaks). It would be a hybrid timeline, but establish that it's separate from the movie.

4) *My favorite* Set the movie in a timeline where I'm getting laid on a frequent basis. Granted, it has nothing to do with Star Trek, but it's SUCH a good idea.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: So many things... by cdydatzigs @ 08:38:56 on Oct 25

"I don't know what you'd call it." | Report this post to moderator
By: Cylykon (Odo's file, contact) @ 17:22:41 on Oct 23, 2009

How about "Star Trek (2012)"?


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: "I don't know what you'd call it." by VoR @ 14:42:42 on Oct 24
RE: "I don't know what you'd call it." by GustavoLeao @ 13:44:32 on Oct 24
    RE: "I don't know what you'd call it." by Tupperfan @ 14:06:18 on Oct 24
RE: "I don't know what you'd call it." by cdydatzigs @ 18:18:11 on Oct 23
    RE: "I don't know what you'd call it." by Tupperfan @ 23:37:25 on Oct 23

TV Series yes... eventually. | Report this post to moderator
By: cdydatzigs (Odo's file, contact) @ 15:20:18 on Oct 23, 2009

As I discussed with someone over on the Shore Leave forum, I feel the powers that be will wait for the franchise to have two to three solid blockbusters under its belt to ensure audience and fan interest warrant the move. If Star Trek XII ends up being our Dark Knight in 2012, look for a series to be develped as early as the Fall of 2013. If not then, then perhaps Fall 2015 or later. This would give them a chance to introduce a minor yet memorable character in one of the films (XII or XIII), that the series could then be based on.

--------

-- Steve

"If a sixth Star Trek television series is ever realized, it will be set in the new universe." -- cdydatzigs, June 15, 2009.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: TV Series yes... eventually. by The Magrathean @ 15:57:47 on Oct 23
    RE: TV Series yes... eventually. by cdydatzigs @ 16:07:24 on Oct 23
       RE: TV Series yes... eventually. by The Magrathean @ 16:13:24 on Oct 23
          RE: TV Series yes... eventually. by cdydatzigs @ 16:43:11 on Oct 23
             RE: TV Series yes... eventually. by The Magrathean @ 16:54:53 on Oct 23
                RE: TV Series yes... eventually. by GustavoLeao @ 17:07:58 on Oct 23
                   RE: TV Series yes... eventually. by cdydatzigs @ 18:14:14 on Oct 23
                      RE: TV Series yes... eventually. by GustavoLeao @ 22:52:05 on Oct 23
                         RE: TV Series yes... eventually. by The Magrathean @ 23:21:07 on Oct 23
                RE: TV Series yes... eventually. by cdydatzigs @ 17:01:32 on Oct 23
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
This website is not endorsed, sponsored or affiliated with CBS Studios Inc. or the "Star Trek" franchise.
The STAR TREK trademarks and logos are owned by CBS Studios Inc.
© 1996-2010 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.