menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

J.J. Abrams Talks X-Files, Galactica, Star Trek and Fringe

Features

By GustavoLeao / 06:36, 6 September 2008 / Feature Films

MovieWeb posted a new interview with Star Trek movie director J.J. Abrams, in which he talks about his new TV Show Fringe. Here are few excerpts.

When you talked a little bit earlier about the serialized nature of the show, how it won't be as much serialized as Lost and Alias, do you envision more like the The X-Files where maybe ten out of 20 episodes in a season have to do with one particular back story and the others have nothing to do with it, or more like Lost where there's a number of different mythologies, but they're introduced every episode and don't seem to go anywhere, but you plan to revisit it at some point? Which do you see it more as?

J.J. Abrams: I've never seen the The X-Files [laughs]. ....I'm such a fan of not just The X-Files, but The Twilight Zone is one of my favorite shows of all time. I love the original Nightstalker was great. What I love about shows, The X-Files did so well is they could do creepy stuff The Twilight Zone style, and like you said, it was actually even more than half the season, but they would do a number of shows that had nothing to do with the overall storytelling, the overall mythology and then they would jump in and do one. That is definitely closer to the model. I would even say closer to that-it's closer to ER almost where you have these ongoing relationships, these ongoing storylines and yet week to week when the door bursts open you're faced with the insane urgent situation of the week.

A show I loved when it was on was The Practice. That's another show that would do that well, which is they would deal with the interpersonal relationship stuff. The funny thing about, I am so interested in those relationships. When I look back at doing Felicity, and I'm sure Josh felt this way on Dawson's Creek as well, that the problem with those shows is that there's nothing to interrupt the relationship story. So while there are things here and there that you come up with, there was no franchise that would distract the main characters from their emotional storyline.

So I think a show like ER is a good example of a show where if these characters were not doctors and they were just hanging out, you go through their emotional stories in a few episodes. But because of what's happening everyday, every week on those shows, there's stuff they have to deal with, there're fires to put out. So anyway, The X-Files is definitely a good model. ER for some reason is one that feels more in line with the rhythm of what we're doing, but the X-Files is a great example.

J.J., when you look at the current television landscape and you think about what shows like Lost and Heroes and Battlestar Galactica have done and what Fringe could potentially do, do you consider this to be almost the golden age of sci-fi?

J.J. Abrams: I would like to think that we're-it's funny because Lost was always a sci-fi show that was kind of secretly a sci-fi show, and something like Battlestar Galactica is obviously much more overtly science fiction. The weird thing about Fringe is that although you can say it's science fiction, a lot of what we're talking about is stuff that is at least in the realm of possibility, even though we're definitely pushing it. So some of the stuff that we're talking about now is not as much sci-fi as much as it is just sci, like when Star Trek came out and they had their communicators, that was a cool dream and now we all in our pockets have communicators and it's just real. So when we're working on an episode and we read as we did a week ago, that invisibility is coming, they think we've cracked invisibility. And you're like, "Okay." Like the stuff that you just would never in a million years think is actually possible is happening every day.

So I think we may be living in the golden age of sci-fi for the TV, but I think it's partially because we're living in an incredibly advanced, and almost uncontrollably so, period of scientific achievement. It's pushing what we all thought was our ... it's that comfortable almost quaint version of what sci-fi is to a very different place, and that's where Fringe lives.

The full interview is here.



More Top StoriesComments
Nov 21New Posters of Eric Bana as Nero and Zoe Saldana as Uhura2
Nov 21Chris Pine Says New Star Trek Cast is Signed for a Three-Picture Deal13
Nov 21Jonathan Frakes Wants to Play Captain Riker Again18
Nov 21J.J. Abrams Says He Would Love to See the Enterprise Family Together in Star Trek XII9
Nov 20Comics Review : Star Trek The Last Generation Issue 10
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

3 comments Post New | Help
View:

More like ER? | Report this post to moderator
By: jimbtnp (Odo's file, contact) @ 03:23:50 on Sep 07, 2008

A soap opera?

We're in trouble....


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

This is the "Golden Age" of sci-fi shows? | Report this post to moderator
By: PatBorg (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:34:45 on Sep 06, 2008

Nope. Not yet.

I'd still have to give it to the 1990s. The shows that were science fiction also got the ratings. Outside of Lost (which is just starting to become a sci-fi show IMHO), I can't think of any sci-fi show that got the ratings this decade. True, there's still two years, but as of now, nada.

X-Files and Star Trek were ratings powerhouses, worldwide. They were what all others wanted. There were tons of sci-fi and fantasy [Xena ruled this roost (and if you go horror, Buffy wins)] shows in the 1990s. Networks also seemed more willing to have shows on for more than a season to see if they could find an audience.

I've got to give it to the 1990s for the golden age.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Please...no talking | Report this post to moderator
By: IamKirok!!! (Odo's file, contact) @ 08:07:53 on Sep 06, 2008

"So while there are things here and there that you come up with, there was no franchise that would distract the main characters from their emotional storyline."

Every time Abrams gets me to trust a little, he says something like this-calling plot arcs a "franchise"- that reminds me that he works for the meat grinder now. Maybe he makes good salami, but it's still for the meat grinder.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2007 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.