menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

J.J. Abrams Defends His Secrecy Regarding the New Star Trek Movie

Features

By GustavoLeao / 16:24, 3 June 2008 / Feature Films

According to a brief article at Jossip.com, Star Trek movie director J.J. Abrams finds himself at odds with rabid Trek fans who want to know "every gory detail about a movie that's still a year away."

He respects their hunger, but is convinced they are better off waiting until May 8, 2009. "Learning raw detail and experiencing that detail as it was intended are two totally different things," he says. "I would argue that not knowing those details in advance is a more refreshing way to live when it comes to entertainment."

The full article is here.



More Top StoriesComments
Nov 06Rumor Mill : Bryan Singer Battlestar Galactica Movie is Underway ?18
Nov 06Star Trek Online MMORPG Game Gameplay Trailer Released Online 2
Nov 06First Images from the Upcoming Star Trek The Art of the Film Book4
Nov 05Brent Spiner Criticizes Insurrection and Defends Nemesis, Stuart Baird and Rick Berman25
Nov 05J.J. Abrams in Talks to Produce Micronauts Movie7
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

26 comments Post New | Help
View:

Thank YOU | Report this post to moderator
By: IamKirok!!! (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:24:18 on Jun 06, 2008

Finally, a producer with the balls to stand up to the "gimme, gimme, gimme" internet fanboy culture. You're supposed to know about the movie when you experience the movie.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

It's the movie... | Report this post to moderator
By: cdydatzigs (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:14:55 on Jun 05, 2008

Quote:
I bet the theatrical trailer is basically a two minute version of the movie and gives too much away... Trailers should now just feature specially shot footage or maybe cut scenes (or both).

That's actually less the trailer's fault and more the movie's fault. If all the good scenes of a film can be crammed into a 2-minute trailer? (see: Indiana Jones 4) -- then that means your movie is basically the one that should be faulted there...

-- Steve


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Itchy & Scratchy | Report this post to moderator
By: TRexx (Odo's file, contact) @ 19:37:28 on Jun 04, 2008 | Edit History (2)

Quote from JJ Abrams:
"I would argue that not knowing those details in advance is a more refreshing way to live when it comes to entertainment."


Ironically, Team Abrams ignore the Official Star Trek message boards to endorse the very spoiler-peddlers who'll print idle hearsay as fact.

You can't expect to lay with dogs but not get fleas, JJ. ;-)


--------

Windows XP Gets Additional Resuscitation

Faced with either bumping the XP expiration date or letting Linux eat the entire low-cost PC market, Microsoft has chosen to let Vista play the fall guy again.

Image Get PCLinuxOS


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Itchy & Scratchy by Captain Aikens @ 10:38:04 on Jun 06

JJ is absolutely right | Report this post to moderator
By: JamesT (Odo's file, contact) @ 11:28:04 on Jun 04, 2008 | Edit History (1)

Nemesis, for example, was a bad film, but was made worse by the absolute and relentless dissection of the script prior to release.

Balls to a few impatient fanboys - they can wait and so they should. The film will be so much stronger for it.

JJ is spot on with his handling of this project and I have faith in his judgement.

--------

JamesT


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: JJ is absolutely right by Grupp @ 17:22:40 on Jun 04

Trail this | Report this post to moderator
By: Captain's Blog (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:31:57 on Jun 04, 2008

I bet the theatrical trailer is basically a two minute version of the movie and gives too much away... Trailers should now just feature specially shot footage or maybe cut scenes (or both).

--------

"I would be happy for Star Trek to come along decades later with a new group of minds. I'd love someone to say, 'Besides this one, Gene Roddenberry's was nothing!" - Gene Roddenberry, Starburst magazine


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

What if you knew about the ring falling through his hand? | Report this post to moderator
By: cdydatzigs (Odo's file, contact) @ 08:38:45 on Jun 04, 2008

Quote:
Frankly, I ruined First Contact for myself by knowing too much about it.

BINGO. That is exactly why I find it so refreshing that J.J. is keeping the jist of Star Trek in a secrecy vault -- a privelage only Star Wars films previously enjoyed. Let's put it this way... waiting for the film in May of 2009 might be a good thing in that you don't want to be the guy who had the ending for Sixth Sense ruined for him. If this is eating at you gentlemen, take up a hobby or something to distract you. :)

-- Steve


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: What if you knew about the ring falling through his hand? by Captain's Blog @ 10:21:20 on Jun 04

I fully agree. | Report this post to moderator
By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact) @ 04:08:30 on Jun 04, 2008

Nomore spoilers, thank you. And no need for spoiler warnings when there are no spoilers at all.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: I fully agree. by TRexx @ 19:49:52 on Jun 04

Mystery Meals | Report this post to moderator
By: TRexx (Odo's file, contact) @ 23:26:46 on Jun 03, 2008 | Edit History (1)


Using the food analogy: There are spoilers, and there are appetizers. The former is generally haphazard filler, while the latter is designed to stimulate desire and complement the main meal to come.

Hearsay spoilers are whatever scraps that may be gleaned from a pan or dumpster -- random ingredients which might not be fully baked or properly garnished. They do not represent the completed entree or presentation.

The chef's (Abrams) appetizers can quell the feeling of starvation, whetting the appetite without ruining his feast's pièce de résistance.

Wishful thinking? Movie trailers are one appetizer dish.

Abrams has demonstrated he's a legitimate creative, something of a connoisseur at his craft. He's now also gatekeeper to the Star Trek franchise, with super-sizer access to the goodies vault. There's no practical limit to what he could cook up as fun finger snacks. There has never been more immediate and widespread (Web) multimedia access to popcorn-loving moviegoers.

Come on, JJ, think outside the "mystery box" which fascinates you so. ;-)


--------

Cloverfield (2008) "Scary... Delivers the Thrills."

Image


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Mystery Meals by Terry212 @ 07:56:31 on Jun 04
    RE: Mystery Meals by TRexx @ 15:28:08 on Jun 04

Keep defending JJ | Report this post to moderator
By: cdydatzigs (Odo's file, contact) @ 20:54:55 on Jun 03, 2008 | Edit History (1)

He is absolutely right... movies are created to have their plots and stories delivered in a certain dramatic context. When you have little tidbits leaked and spoiled here and there, the rabid unknowledgeable fans misinterpret things and jump to conclusions. People can post on here saying certain producers and actors said this and that, to try and stregthen their argument.. "selling it" with hibrow vocabulary.. but what it comes down to is this. 'Star Trek' is JJ Abrams' project to make, not ours, and he has every right to want it delivered to us when it is actually FINISHED.. no matter how rabid a fan some may be. That's not deception, that's good art.

-- Steve


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Hook, Line, and Sinker | Report this post to moderator
By: TRexx (Odo's file, contact) @ 19:43:02 on Jun 03, 2008

Quote from Jossip.com:
He respects their hunger, but is convinced they are better off waiting...


Abrams doesn't respect that "hunger" when he uses it to bait fans for marketing schemes that advance his agenda.

Without an official go-to source, the thirsty fan will drink whatever koolaid is served by bloggers who seek a sense of power by their own celebrity as a seeming "insider". Walter Koenig recently panned the parasitic "blog personality". Aggressive gossipmongers can make their gullible readers believe there's no other credible source of news.

Get with the program, JJ. Create an informative (and fun) blog under Bad Robot auspices, otherwise just accept that you've already played a role in driving fans to gossip sites which spout hearsay with authority.


--------

Star Trek: Conquest (PS2 | Wii)

Image


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Good for him | Report this post to moderator
By: sb2004 (Odo's file, contact) @ 18:16:35 on Jun 03, 2008

Good for Abrams, and for what it's worth, I agree with him. It is certainly a refreshing throwback to the pre-Internet age when spoilers were few and far between. We heard about a movie, read magazine articles a few months before, saw the film, and was pleasantly surprised. Occasionally a spoiler would leak out (pre-released reports of Spock's death in Wrath of Khan was actually the first example of a major "spoiler" I ever encountered), but most of the time you never knew what was coming.

Unfortunately we live in a different time now, one which has developed an entire culture in which spoilers are not just as much a part of the anticipation process as those magazine articles used to be back in 1980-81.

I've already heard some grumblings of the "what are they trying to hide?" variety, plus some have already confused the "code of silence" with the same sort of shorthand "we know this film sucks" that studios use by refusing to allow critics to see the film before release. And you know there are hackers out there who won't sleep until they managed to obtain a leaked script to post to their blogs and forums.

I'm not saying Abrams should cave and allow spoilers. In fact I hope he sticks to his guns till next May. I just hope he's ready for a pretty tough battle over the next 12 months.

Al


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Bad for him by GustavoLeao @ 19:24:18 on Jun 03
    RE: Bad for him by steveleenow @ 00:03:35 on Jun 04
       Agreed by Jean-Luc @ 03:50:10 on Jun 04
          RE: Agreed by Dan1701A @ 08:42:41 on Jun 04
             RE: Agreed by steveleenow @ 11:24:12 on Jun 04
                RE: Agreed by Dan1701A @ 11:43:57 on Jun 04
RE: Good for him by DirtPile @ 18:27:06 on Jun 03

trailer? | Report this post to moderator
By: VoR (Odo's file, contact) @ 18:10:04 on Jun 03, 2008

A new trailer would be nice though..... =)

--------

"You're going straight in the Army, where you'll be sent straight to America's latest military quagmire. Where will it be? North Korea? Iran? Anything's possible with Commander Koo-Koo Bananas in charge!" --Homer Simpson


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: trailer? by captainkoloth @ 06:09:12 on Jun 04
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.