menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

James Cawley on the Nebula Award Controversy, Says They Are not Professionals

Features

By GustavoLeao / 09:38, 7 March 2008 / General Star Trek

The controversy about the inclusion of the Star Trek New Voyages/Phase II episode World Enough and Time among the nominations for Best Script continues. World Enough and Time director Marc Scott Zicree made a statement (story), in which he made several claims to the project's professional status.

But now New Voyages producer and Kirk actor James Cawley, made public a letter that he sent to the Science Fiction Writers of America , in which he declines any claim to professional status and says Zicree is wrong in his statement.

Here is the transcript of the letter, posted at the TrekBBS :

This was my letter to SFWA, regarding Mr. Zicrees quest to get his Nebula.

Regretfully, SOME of his public statement, paints a wrong picture of My project and it's participants:

To the Board of Directors of the Science Fiction Writers of America,

I am the Executive Producer of Star Trek New Voyages. I apologize for any confusion created by Marc Scott Zicree's efforts on behalf of the "World Enough And Time" episode of Star Trek New Voyages. It does not come from my offices nor does it reflect my wishes.

Here is what you need to know about our situation:

Paramount Pictures owns the copyright to Star Trek. The relationship of Star Trek New Voyages with Paramount Pictures is very strictly defined.

We are not allowed to sell tickets to screenings of our episodes. We are not allowed to sell advertising for our episodes. We are not allowed to sell DVD copies of our episodes. We are not allowed in any way to produce or distribute our episodes for profit. These are the rules by which Paramount allows us to continue. We will not allow anyone connected with STNV to violate those guidelines or misrepresent our efforts.

Legally, we are a fan-based production. We exist solely because we maintain our amateur status, and good faith relationship with Paramount CBS.

Contrary to anything stated anywhere else, we have not sold tickets for any public exhibition of any of our episodes nor have we authorized anyone else to do so.

Yes, many of the people who have worked in our episodes are
professionals in their respective fields. We have been privileged to have Walter Koenig, George Takei, Denise Crosby, Bill Blair, Bobby Quinn Rice, Kim Stinger, Ben Tolpin and other professionals play key roles in our episodes. We have been privileged to have produced scripts by DC Fontana, J. Michael Reaves, and David Gerrold.

We have been privileged to have technical experts like Ron Moore, Doug Drexler, Ron Thornton, Brian Kelley, and others, working behind the scenes as well. Yes, we have paid some of our performers, those who are SAG members; but always with the understanding that we are a fan-based production.

Speaking for myself, it has been enormously gratifying to tap into such a wellspring of enthusiasm for classic Star Trek. All of us on STNV aspire to produce episodes that meet or surpass the standards of excellence established by the original Star Trek series and I believe the Nebula consideration of "World Enough And Time" is acknowledgment that we are starting to achieve that goal.

But I must stress this as strongly as I can. We are committed to maintaining our relationship with Paramount Pictures. We are a fan-based production. Legally, our episodes are AMATEUR. Marc Scott Zicree's claims otherwise are notwithstanding.

I certainly understand and respect Marc Scott Zicree's desire to have "World Enough And Time" on the Nebula ballot. The script that he and Michael Reaves wrote was one of the best we've ever seen and George Takei's performance was stunning. We are all very proud of the episode and we believe it does deserve consideration.

As I understand the situation, as it was explained to me by Rules Committee Chair, Jeff Carver, the award requirements specify that only PROFESSIONAL productions are eligible for consideration. Therefore, by the rules of the SFWA, the episode is not eligible. I understand this and I respect and agree with that position. The SFWA is a highly regarded professional organization and your awards are intended to
acknowledge professional excellence.

But it is also my understanding that the Board of Directors of the Science Fiction Writers of America has the authority to waive the professional production requirement in this case or reinterpret it to include Internet productions. This is new territory for everyone and I hope we can find a solution that serves us all. Our next episode, David Gerrold's "Blood and Fire" is nearing completion and I expect it to be even better than "World Enough And Time."

Speaking on behalf of everyone who worked on "World Enough And Time" we would be honored to see the episode on the Nebula awards ballot.

We are all grateful that you are taking time to consider the
eligibility of the episode. I look forward to your decision. Whatever you decide, I hope that the SFWA has a wonderful and exciting Awards Ceremony.

Sincerely yours,
James M. Cawley
Senior Executive Producer/Creator New Voyages


The original post of the letter can be found here.



More Top StoriesComments
Jul 04John Cho on How Big Star Trek is, Trek Philosophy and Meeting George Takei0
Jul 03Orci and Kurtzman on Dealing with Fanboys, Say They Listen to the Online Fans4
Jul 03The Evolution of Generations : Part II Don't Miss the Conclusion to this In-Depth Analysis of the Film's Controversial Multiple Endings and the Death of James T. Kirk!6
Jul 03Cover and Info for William Shatner Presents TekWar Chronicles Issue 50
Jul 03First Photo of Chris Pine in New Post-Apocalyptic Horror Movie Carriers0
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

18 comments Post New | Help
View:

Hmm... | Report this post to moderator
By: Cymro (Odo's file, contact) @ 04:31:39 on Mar 09, 2008

I think that in the context of an award for the script, it can be considered professional as the person who wrote the script was paid for it. It was a professional script for an amateur production.

--------

"All I know is back when I was in high school, I always thought it was bullshit how when we'd have to play against the girls,and they broke it down as SHIRTS VS SKINS, the girls team NEVER had to be skins." - DekaMaster on the horrific institutionalised sexism in public schools



"As I gangsta leaned down the hallway..."


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Hmm... by GustavoLeao @ 13:27:32 on Mar 09
    RE: Hmm... by Cymro @ 04:05:40 on Mar 10

Confession of a 'Fanfessional' | Report this post to moderator
By: TRexx (Odo's file, contact) @ 08:37:41 on Mar 08, 2008


Carlos Pedraza, Phase II co-producer, also posted a response at his blog...

"Consider that Marc [Zircee] has a vested interest in portraying the show as professionally produced -- he (not the production itself, mind you; the award is only for the script) can now win a Nebula. And I own the fact the we have a vested interest in remaining non-professional -- our agreement with Paramount is that we can't be professional (i.e., earn money) and continue producing our show."


--------

Star Trek: Retro Series 3 -- McCoy and Romulan

Image


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

JAMES CAWLEY'S TOUPEE | Report this post to moderator
By: pinto (Odo's file, contact) @ 15:30:07 on Mar 07, 2008

On a related note to the above misunderstanding, the Hair Club For Men is considering giving Jim Cawley's Toupee a lifetime acheivement award.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

JAMES CAWLEY'S TOUPEE | Report this post to moderator
By: pinto (Odo's file, contact) @ 15:30:04 on Mar 07, 2008

On a related note to the above misunderstanding, the Hair Club For Men is considering giving Jim Cawley's Toupee a lifetime acheivement award.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Let Sanity Prevail | Report this post to moderator
By: NX-47 (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 14:44:19 on Mar 07, 2008

I sincerely hope that this 'controversy' doesn't cause any issues between Cawley, Zicree, and Paramount. Legalities can hose just about anything in this litigious society we've found ourselves in. I'd hate to see this degenerate into a pissing match or, far worse, Paramount's intervention.

--------

THAT is the Exploration that awaits you: not mapping stars or studying nebulae, but charting the unknown possibilities of Existence.

______________________

http://www.startrekreborn.net


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

since when? | Report this post to moderator
By: IamNotBORG (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:26:25 on Mar 07, 2008

Guys, since when does what James Cawley said became "Top Stories" on trekweb? Anyone still care that he's an Elvis impostor and doing it as a living?


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: since when? by A Taste of Lemmiwinks @ 13:53:58 on Mar 07
RE: since when? by Plush Armadillo @ 13:10:00 on Mar 07
RE: since when? by GustavoLeao @ 11:23:15 on Mar 07
    RE: since when? by Bean @ 17:11:41 on Mar 07
       Really? by Jean-Luc @ 19:57:53 on Mar 07
       RE: since when? by GustavoLeao @ 18:30:18 on Mar 07
          RE: by rassmguy @ 19:15:40 on Mar 07
             RE: by GustavoLeao @ 20:03:23 on Mar 07
    RE: since when? by Scorpiuscat @ 11:45:22 on Mar 07
       RE: since when? by GustavoLeao @ 14:40:42 on Mar 07
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.