menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

Star Trek Movie Release Delay Part of Reshuffling at Paramount Pictures, No Problems with the Movie Script

Features

By GustavoLeao / 01:07, 14 February 2008 / Feature Films

After yesterday story about the delay on the release date of J.J. Abrams Star Trek prequel movie, here is more info on the move of the movie from December 2008 to May 2009 from Variety's Blog (thanks to TrekMovie.com for the links and quotes)

John Lesher is starting to make his imprint felt at Paramount. (And make no mistake, he's still overseeing Vantage too.) Paramount is changing a number of release dates on their 2008 and 2009 skeds, moving J.J. Abrams' Star Trek from Christmas, 2008 to May 8, 2009. David Fincher's Brad Pitt-starrer The Curious Case of Benjamin Button will move from November 26 to December 19, 2008.


DreamWorks Pictures' comedy Tropic Thunder, originally scheduled for July 11, will now be released on August 15 by DreamWorks-Paramount. And Sam Mendes' Revolutionary Road, starring Leonardo DiCaprio and Kate Winslet, originally announced as a DreamWorks-Paramount release, will now be distributed by Paramount Vantage. Which makes perfect sense; who better to handle it as an Oscar contender?

The Hollywood Reporter reports that Paramount Pictures reshuffling was due to a rethink after the strike and regarding the Star Trek movie, it was not related to any problems with the movie's script.

Dramatically underscoring the need for movie-side execs to review slates following the long writers strike, Paramount on Wednesday bounced six films to new dates and moved two unslotted films to next year's calendar.


Other distributors were scrambling to complete similar reviews of their upcoming productions to determine what can or can't be delivered on scheduled dates. In some cases, films will move because of talent issues, but many film projects have been frozen in time when script rewrites weren't completed before the 100-day scribe walkout.


"Star Trek" arguably was the biggest film moved, with the intended Christmas Day release now set for the first prime date in the following summer boxoffice season: May 8, 2009. But "Trek" appears something of an exception in the mix of itinerant pics, with its shift unrelated to script or cast considerations.


" ‘Star Trek' is moving to summer because its has so much boxoffice potential," Par spokesman Michael Vollman said. "It does not need any script tweaks. They're two-thirds of the way through shooting, and we would have delivered a great movie at Christmas."



More Top StoriesComments
Nov 04Christian Slater on His Star Trek VI Cameo, Praises J.J. Abrams and the New Movie0
Nov 04New Star Trek DVD Special Feature Online : Casting Zachary Quinto as Spock0
Nov 03New Issue of Star Trek Magazine Announces Winner of Best Star Trek Villain8
Nov 03Blu-Ray Review : Galaxy Quest Deluxe Edition5
Nov 03New Star Trek Deleted Scene Online : Diora Baird as Another Orion Officer8
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

64 comments Post New | Help
View:

Star Trek movie delayed | Report this post to moderator
By: jedi (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:45:57 on Feb 15, 2008

I think its a shame we have to wait until May now.

I would have dearly loved to have "Star Trek" as my big Christmas special and I for one bitterly disagree with Paramount.

This film is so hotly anticipated it would be a blockbuster whenever it was released!

Boo. Hoo.

btw what the FRAK are you people talking about below?

Shatner's testicles and all the filth below is just stupid, childish flaming & you should all be ashamed of yourselves!

You give Star Trek fans a bad name!!

Now get ON TOPIC or f**k OFF, you closets!!!


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Star Trek movie delayed by Sam Cogley @ 13:12:52 on Feb 15
    RE: Star Trek movie delayed by Bean @ 14:22:36 on Feb 15

Arbitrary Bigotry | Report this post to moderator
By: TRexx (Odo's file, contact) @ 04:47:05 on Feb 15, 2008

Quote from Cymro:
Well, I think there's something more insulting than the mere homo-eroticism of liking an overweight 76-year-old's gentitals on your face.


What's implied by the use of irrelevant homo-eroticism as insult?

You add advanced age to the equation. The visual mockery posted in this thread is of a person who's chubby and balding. All of these attributes have been western culture's choice of social pariahs. Old. Fat. Gay. Trekkie. In some near time and place, the photo might also be of a non-Caucasian. None of these characteristics are intrinsically "bad", they're posed as disgrace by the local moral majority.

Unless these wide demographic attributes have empirical relevance to individual cries of "He's a liar!", their scorn here is no different than any other arbitrary bigotry.

The "something more insulting" that you mention is what, exactly?


--------

The Full Body Project

Leonard Nimoy: "A book of pictures of beautiful women who just don't happen to be living in the same kinds of bodies as fashion models."

Image


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Arbitrary Bigotry by Cymro @ 07:11:54 on Feb 15
    RE: Arbitrary Bigotry by TRexx @ 09:13:11 on Feb 15
       RE: Arbitrary Bigotry by Cymro @ 09:53:08 on Feb 15
          RE: Arbitrary Bigotry by TRexx @ 12:26:22 on Feb 15
             RE: Arbitrary Bigotry by Cymro @ 14:09:37 on Feb 15
                RE: Arbitrary Bigotry by TRexx @ 16:10:28 on Feb 15
                   RE: Arbitrary Bigotry by Cymro @ 00:34:41 on Feb 16
                      RE: Arbitrary Bigotry by TRexx @ 01:35:00 on Feb 16
                         RE: Arbitrary Bigotry by Cymro @ 03:48:28 on Feb 16
                            RE: Arbitrary Bigotry by TRexx @ 05:48:04 on Feb 16
                               RE: Arbitrary Bigotry by Cymro @ 07:55:43 on Feb 16
                                  RE: Arbitrary Bigotry by TRexx @ 09:14:44 on Feb 16
                                     RE: Arbitrary Bigotry by Cymro @ 11:03:38 on Feb 16

RE: Still Hopeful | Report this post to moderator
By: StillKirok (Odo's file, contact) @ 13:27:49 on Feb 14, 2008

You have people who are actually photoshopping requests for homosexuality and William Shatner. That's the counterargument. THOSE are the people that need therapy.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Still Hopeful by Chronic Harlot @ 18:07:30 on Feb 14
    RE: Still Hopeful by Kamen Rider Blade @ 18:21:08 on Feb 14
       RE: Still Hopeful by TRexx @ 20:58:30 on Feb 14
RE: Still Hopeful by TRexx @ 18:01:10 on Feb 14
    RE: Still Hopeful by Cymro @ 23:31:10 on Feb 14

Nervous | Report this post to moderator
By: Lt Santiago (Odo's file, contact) @ 12:16:13 on Feb 14, 2008

Does anyone else get nervous when they think about Star Trek moving to the summer? Maybe I don't have enough faith in our favorite show here but if it doesn't compete it could mean the end of Trek for a longer time...

--------

"In every revolution, there's one man with a vision"
-- James T. Kirk


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

May | Report this post to moderator
By: Steve Krutzler (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:05:57 on Feb 14, 2008

Wow, Paramount thinks a Trek movie can actually stand up to the competition in May for the first time since -- well I can't remember. No TNG movie ever came out in the summer, that's for sure. Especially not the high-profile summer opening weekend.

--------

"Fellow citizens, we cannot escape history. We of this Congress and

this administration, will be remembered in spite of ourselves. No personal significance, or insignificance, can spare one or another of us. The fiery trial through which we pass, will light us down, in honor or dishonor, to the latest generation." -- Abraham Lincoln.



"History. We won't know. We'll all be dead." -- GWB



It's a rip-off. / We're stepped on, and cheated! / We're flat, stone-cold lied to / But we're not defeated / No!



Halen. "The Dream is Over."


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: May by The artist formerly known as Gary @ 09:23:48 on Feb 15
RE: May by OV-101 @ 11:51:37 on Feb 14
    RE: May by GustavoLeao @ 15:13:05 on Feb 14

Talk about a strong vote of confidence | Report this post to moderator
By: NX-47 (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 06:08:40 on Feb 14, 2008

Quote:
" ‘Star Trek' is moving to summer because its has so much boxoffice potential," Par spokesman Michael Vollman said. "It does not need any script tweaks. They're two-thirds of the way through shooting, and we would have delivered a great movie at Christmas."

Looks like the studio is firmly behind the project, which, while not a guarantee of success, is a guarantee that all involved are striving for success. When compared to the studio's overall environment and attitude during the ENT years (with Berman at the helm), the current studio's attitude is a 180-degree shift in favor of Trek.

Say what you will, but it's amazing what fresh blood can do for a franchise.

--------

THAT is the Exploration that awaits you: not mapping stars or studying nebulae, but charting the unknown possibilities of Existence.

______________________

http://www.startrekreborn.net


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Talk about a strong vote of confidence by GustavoLeao @ 06:33:14 on Feb 14

nnnerves... | Report this post to moderator
By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact) @ 06:06:33 on Feb 14, 2008

This is a high stakes gamble. What else to say. It is possible that we will get a better movie (?) but the situation becomes increasingly unpredictable in 2009. Maybe they will decide on the final release date later on, early next year.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

RE: Still Hopeful | Report this post to moderator
By: StillKirok (Odo's file, contact) @ 05:39:47 on Feb 14, 2008

First of all, this is something that shouldn't be "let go." It's a major disappointment and dark cloud over this movie.

And Bean is probably right. Putting Shatner in the movie is a no brainer, guaranteed to make the movie more money, but Abrams made the ridiculous choice to not put him in--and of course, lie about it.

Given the mental midgets that are on the anti-Shatner side, I expect a full diatribe attacking me personally. It's funny that I didn't even post in the other thread and that happened.

However, I can understand that. There is no logical argument to keep Shatner out. So attack the defender.

There is still time to do something about the Shatner debacle. Hopefully the extra time will help Abrams do the right thing. Given the history of Paramount and Trek, I doubt it.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Still Hopeful by Kamen Rider Blade @ 17:59:42 on Feb 14
RE: Still Hopeful by Bean @ 17:30:35 on Feb 14
RE: Still Hopeful by Chronic Harlot @ 11:48:17 on Feb 14
RE: Still Hopeful by A Taste of Lemmiwinks @ 09:06:17 on Feb 14
    RE: Still Hopeful by Kamen Rider Blade @ 17:49:25 on Feb 14
It Was Hardly An Attack by Jean-Luc @ 07:42:22 on Feb 14
    RE: It Was Hardly An Attack by StillKirok @ 08:06:17 on Feb 14
       RE: It Was Hardly An Attack by Kamen Rider Blade @ 15:46:05 on Feb 14
       RE: It Was Hardly An Attack by Chronic Harlot @ 11:51:57 on Feb 14
RE: Still Hopeful by Hbasm @ 06:19:46 on Feb 14
    RE: Still Hopeful by StillKirok @ 07:03:30 on Feb 14
       RE: Still Hopeful by Chronic Harlot @ 11:54:11 on Feb 14
       RE: Still Hopeful by Hbasm @ 09:39:47 on Feb 14
          RE: Still Hopeful by StillKirok @ 10:07:31 on Feb 14
             RE: Still Hopeful by Chronic Harlot @ 11:55:17 on Feb 14
             RE: Still Hopeful by rico @ 10:36:45 on Feb 14
       RE: Still Hopeful by critch @ 09:19:49 on Feb 14

Still Hopeful | Report this post to moderator
By: StillKirok (Odo's file, contact) @ 04:19:44 on Feb 14, 2008

I just hope this extra time helps Abrams do the right thing and actually get Shatner in this movie.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Still Hopeful by sb2004 @ 15:27:07 on Feb 14
RE: Still Hopeful by pepe @ 14:47:08 on Feb 14
    RE: Still Hopeful by SuperDave @ 16:13:17 on Feb 15
RE: Still Hopeful by Chronic Harlot @ 11:56:22 on Feb 14
RE: Still Hopeful by critch @ 09:20:44 on Feb 14
RE: Still Hopeful by Kamen Rider Blade @ 05:27:58 on Feb 14
    RE: Still Hopeful by GustavoLeao @ 07:11:56 on Feb 14
       RE: by rassmguy @ 07:28:14 on Feb 14
    RE: Still Hopeful by Gothampunk @ 05:37:49 on Feb 14
       RE: Still Hopeful by StillKirok @ 06:14:27 on Feb 14
          RE: Still Hopeful by Chronic Harlot @ 11:57:43 on Feb 14
          RE: Still Hopeful by Gothampunk @ 06:51:00 on Feb 14
RE: Still Hopeful by Bean @ 04:43:34 on Feb 14
    RE: Still Hopeful by Rorschach @ 07:42:18 on Feb 14
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.