menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

Tom Cruise as Captain Christopher Pike ? Casting Rumor Mill Spinning Fast

Features

By GustavoLeao / 07:38, 7 August 2007 / Feature Films

IGN has posted an article claiming that a trusted source confirmed that producer/director J.J. Abrams would like to have an A-list star cameo in his upcoming Star Trek movie. According to the IGN source -- whose scoops have always panned out in the past, according to the site -- Abrams is wooing his MI3 star Tom Cruise to cameo in the new Star Trek in the role of Captain Christopher Pike.

According to IGN, Abrams is said to only be talking to Cruise at this point; that doesn't mean Cruise will actually agree to do it. There was still bad blood between Cruise and Trek studio Paramount some time ago, but in recent months the door was open for a reconciliation. IGN says that a Cruise cameo would be a favor to Abrams and not to Paramount.

Cruise is not opposed to doing cameos in big-name movies, last doing such work in Austin Powers in Goldmember.

Christopher Pike was captain of the starship Enterprise for many years, as the immediate predecessor to later Captain James T. Kirk, and succeeding Captain Robert April. He was played by the late Jeffrey Hunter in the 1964 pilot The Cage.

IGN also reported that Paramount are looking at another A-lister for the role of the villain.

This information is preliminary, of course, and entirely rumor.

The original report can be found here.

UPDATE: Rumor Denied

Arnold Robinson, a publicist for Mr. Cruise, told Trek Movie Report that this story is "not true." The site has also not been able to get any confirmation of the story from any sources.



More Top StoriesComments
Jul 04John Cho on How Big Star Trek is, Trek Philosophy and Meeting George Takei0
Jul 03Orci and Kurtzman on Dealing with Fanboys, Say They Listen to the Online Fans4
Jul 03The Evolution of Generations : Part II Don't Miss the Conclusion to this In-Depth Analysis of the Film's Controversial Multiple Endings and the Death of James T. Kirk!6
Jul 03Cover and Info for William Shatner Presents TekWar Chronicles Issue 50
Jul 03First Photo of Chris Pine in New Post-Apocalyptic Horror Movie Carriers0
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

47 comments Post New | Help
View:

More than a Cameo | Report this post to moderator
By: dwd201969 (Odo's file, contact) @ 18:13:54 on Aug 09, 2007

I hope that if Pike makes it into the movie that he's more than a cameo. The thing about going the prequel route is that there are some cool characters to explore like Pike and Mitchell. I could see Cruise in the role of Pike, but I agree with the other posters that believe this news to be fake. It was a pretty substantial falling out with Paramount.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: More than a Cameo by Riga @ 01:21:21 on Sep 13

Doubt it?!! | Report this post to moderator
By: Beckett (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 10:40:07 on Aug 09, 2007

Paramount and Cruise have very much parted company - sounds like a fake to me.

--------

jonathan-davies.net - pure boredom


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Trek Anithesis | Report this post to moderator
By: TRexx (Odo's file, contact) @ 17:02:18 on Aug 08, 2007 | Edit History (2)

Quote from timmer33:
Who cares what Cruise is like in the real world?


L. Ron Hubbard, creator of Scientology, is referred to as "Source" by Scientologists, and all of Hubbard's writings are revered as immutable, sacred scriptures -- thus his Church sanctifies lying and racism. A hate-based doctrine is the antithesis of Gene Roddenberry's Star Trek.

Why would we knowingly subsidize a viral hate-based agenda? Scientology requires its members to donate hefty portions of their income to the Church. When Cruise makes money from box-office or DVD sales, a nontrivial amount of cash goes to Scientology.

Cruise's next film, Valkyrie, has him in the lead role as the anti-Hitler German army officer Claus Schenk Graf von Stauffenberg. The German government sees this as effectively whitewashing the vocal Scientology belief that psychiatry is a "Nazi pseudoscience" responsible for the WWII holocaust. Von Stauffenberg's eldest son has stated, "[Cruise] should leave my father alone."


Panorama: "Scientology & Me" @ YouTube Part One, Two, Three, and Four.

60 Minutes: The Cult Awareness Network. (YouTube)


----------------

Image


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Trek Anithesis by timmer33 @ 10:48:56 on Aug 09
    RE: Trek Anithesis by TRexx @ 19:47:42 on Aug 09

George Clooney | Report this post to moderator
By: sb2004 (Odo's file, contact) @ 06:57:49 on Aug 08, 2007

The only A-list actor who comes close to being a Pike-like character would be George Clooney.

However if Trek XI ends up being a true reimagining, reboot, then there is no reason that they need to stick with a caucasian actor, in which case more possibilities open up, like Morgan Freeman who would add a Picard-like air of authority to Pike.

Al


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Doubt it?!! by Beckett @ 10:21:07 on Aug 08
    RE: Doubt it?!! by Beckett @ 10:38:24 on Aug 08

Cruise as Pike? | Report this post to moderator
By: dark_mr_fripperton (Odo's file, contact) @ 05:45:18 on Aug 08, 2007

As old, wheelchair bound Pike maybe, but that's it...


Two actors who would be good as Pike:
Joaquin Phoenix
Timothy Olyphant


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

CGI Pike | Report this post to moderator
By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact) @ 01:44:27 on Aug 08, 2007

If Pike's appearance is the film is brief, why not make him exactly the way he should look with computer graphics? Its the way to go.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Cruise CANNOT Act. | Report this post to moderator
By: msspurlock (Odo's file, contact) @ 19:47:09 on Aug 07, 2007

His sole drawing power is the ability to make flabby women over 40 damp and effeminate males get all ginchy.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Capt Pike | Report this post to moderator
By: Rejick (Odo's file, contact) @ 19:34:21 on Aug 07, 2007

Ray Liota would make a good Capt Pike. Pretty good actor, looks a little like Pike(Hunter), too.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Capt Pike by Red Barchetta @ 07:07:40 on Aug 08

Cruise Missiles | Report this post to moderator
By: TRexx (Odo's file, contact) @ 17:01:05 on Aug 07, 2007 | Edit History (2)

Quote from kc:
The only difference between [Christianity and Scientology] is truth and deception: One divine revelation, the other a belief/philosophy developed by a man.


If only there were just a conflict of theology.

Scientology is so crooked that even the peace-loving Canadians twice hauled the Church into a court of law, for breach of public trust and libel. One of the convictions resulted in the largest libel award in Canadian history.

In the US, Scientology auditor and chief supervisor Gabriel Williams repeatedly raped a 16 year-old Scientologist who had been ordered to live with Williams while she worked at Scientology's Mountain View organization. Williams allegedly told the girl that his actions were her fault, because she'd been evil in a past life. Williams' subsequent felony convictions for statutory rape and sexual battery required him to register as a sex offender with the State of California. After Williams' conviction, the young girl's family said they had endured death threats, stalking, and other harassment. (NY Post)

American free-speech activist Keith Henson sought political asylum in Canada (which was temporarily granted), because he feared for his safety in US prison after his conviction for public criticism of the Church. Henson was convicted under an obscure clause of California law that forbids "interfering with a religion", a misdemeanor.

The EFF reports, "Henson was not permitted by the judge to offer an explanation of why he was picketing, for example, and one part of the evidence used against him appears to be based on an online joke made on Usenet about actor Tom Cruise and 'cruise missiles.'"

BBC: Inside the Church of Scientology (YouTube)


----------------

Dell PCs Featuring Ubuntu

Image
:: Ubuntu Linux ::


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Cruise... | Report this post to moderator
By: SkyGuy (Odo's file, contact) @ 15:51:51 on Aug 07, 2007

Then you have guys like me who have hated the little sissy boy Cruise ever since "Risky Business," and his equally annoying roles in "Top Gun" and "The Firm." I'll also never forgive Cruise for the manner in which he dragged down Dustin Hoffman's Oscar-winning performance in "Rain Man."

Yeah, he did good for a change in Mission Impossible, but he also had a hand in that stupid MI-2 -- biggest waste of a movie ticket since "Mr. Mike's Mondo Video." He was also in "Eyes Wide Shut," the worst movie I DIDN'T see (thank God for spoilers).

Here's a guy who's been married to three hot babes -- one older, one his age, and one younger -- yet his "lavender" reputation persists. Nuff said.

If you get Cruise for Trek XI, you have an uphill battle with 40-some guys like me, who remember him when and have hated the little wimp for a quarter century.

Notwithstanding, will I go see Trek XI if Cruise is in it? Yes, of course. They could cast Kermit the Frog as Captain Pike and I'd show. And TPTB know it.

--------

Image



GET A LIFE,
will you people? I mean, for crying out loud, it's just a TV show!.... You've turned an enjoyable little job, that I did as a lark for a few years, into a COLOSSAL WASTE OF TIME! -- William Shatner on Saturday Night Live (1986)


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Good | Report this post to moderator
By: Ro (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 13:33:52 on Aug 07, 2007

Cruise can act. That's all I need to know.

And if it's not true, then oh well.

--------

Image



The autumn days swung soft around me, like cotton on

my skin. But as the embers of the summer lost their

breath and disappeared, my heart went cold, and

only hollow rhythms resounded from within.




Image


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Actually not a bad idea ... | Report this post to moderator
By: timmer33 (Odo's file, contact) @ 12:57:44 on Aug 07, 2007

Hmm. There are a lot of people below complaining about this possibility. But really, it's not that bad. I love seeing star power associated with Trek. It's good for the franchise, believe it or not. Who cares what Cruise is like in the real world? He's a good actor, period. He'll bring something fresh to Trek, which is what JJ wants. What's wrong with that?

I have a sneaking suspicion after seeing that casting sheet that we won't see any big names in any of the TOS cast. They will all be relatively unknown ... or like Quinto, tv actors. Why do I think this ... BECAUSE, I believe Paramount will have this cast in a tv series following the film (if successful). Then they'll do a film every 2 years, just as before.

Hey, it's only logical. Paramount knows they need to keep TREK in the public eye. They need a new series, and what better way to do that than use this cast? THerefore, they will use unknowns in the big parts, and A-Listers in the minor roles.

Like Cruise.

Say what you will, but for me, there's no better Court Movie than A FEW GOOD MEN. Throw in MI3, and the objective people out there have to admit he's a good actor and would bring something special to the franchise.

Just my two cents.

Timmer33


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Actually not a bad idea ... by OV-101 @ 13:41:04 on Aug 08

Cruise? | Report this post to moderator
By: Hober Mallow (Odo's file, contact) @ 12:57:07 on Aug 07, 2007

Doesn't Cruise just barely fit the minimum height requirement to play a Ferengi?

--------

"It's fiction. It's not supposed to make sense." --a Trekweb poster defending Brannon Braga's scripts


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Forget Damon! Get Pitt! | Report this post to moderator
By: RenaissanceCritic (Odo's file, contact) @ 11:22:26 on Aug 07, 2007

Matt Damon is an excellent actor and writer but will not satisfy me for the role of James T. Kirk. Why Not? Kirk had special natural qualities that captured the audience which I do not see in Matt Damon. One of these is an effusive charm, an undeniable attraction to and for the ladies, an instant likeability, an impulsive quality that kept us guessing as to his next move and last but not least the requisite sparkle in his eyes and the readiness to break out into a smile or make some smart-alecky remark even in the direst of circumstance. Smiling, charming, sparkle in the eyes, brave and handsome. Is this not Brad Pitt at his finest? Damon has other gifts, and is much more cerebral, and while attractive - is not handsome in a dashing Kirk manner and more naturally inclined to react with reflection vs. action. I would have ZERO interest in standing in line to see Matt Damon as James T. Kirk. Kirk came before the days of Picard-like star fleet formality and I think Brad Pitt owns many of Kirk's qualities naturally and with good direction and some star fleet prepping, would nail the role.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Enterprise on Cruise control? | Report this post to moderator
By: OV-101 (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:45:01 on Aug 07, 2007 | Edit History (1)

Actually, Tom Cruise would not be a horrible choice. I really do not care about his politics as long as he could convincingly play Capt. Pike. If he can then he should be considered for the part. Would he be the best choice? I don't know. Folks have named Tom Hanks as a better option. Well, he seems like someone who likes Trek and he is a big time fan of spaceflight. I doubt you would have to twist his arm off to get him to do a cameo in a trek movie as long as his schedule permits.

Someone want to add a snap poll to include who should cameo as Pike? I'm getting ready for a trip or I would post one myself.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Enterprise on Cruise control? by Miroslav @ 11:11:45 on Aug 07

Could Be Worse | Report this post to moderator
By: Kirk Archer (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:26:39 on Aug 07, 2007

I think we all need to separate the man's personal life from his acting life. Travolta practices Scientology too; so what? A person has a right to belive and practice whatever faith he or she chooses. That's why the US provides freedom of religion. As Trek fans, we need to be more tolerant and accepting- especially as Trek fans! I am a Christian myself, my faith or yours or anyone's shouldn't come into play. What matters is whether Cruise is the right actor for the role.

I believe he can act. I liked his intensity in MI3. That being said, I agree with other posters here that Ray Liotta actually looks a lot like Pike, although the two photos shown together of Cruise and Pike look amazingly similar. And Tom Hanks has always been a huge fan of Trek. Why not at least approach him to see what he has to say? If he were willing he's make a good Pike too. Of the three, Liotta has the most intensity to bring to the role - IMHO.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Cruise? Could be worse. | Report this post to moderator
By: cdydatzigs (Odo's file, contact) @ 08:37:04 on Aug 07, 2007

Image

Quote:
...this is more a question of ethics, but Star Trek encourages free-thinking while Tom Cruise is doing his best to brainwash America to believe in Scientology (or whatever) and reject any other way of thinking.

Hmm, you mean exactly what Christians have been trying to do for YEARS? Please.. the guy is an actor. Just because he is in a film doesn't mean he is trying to convert the masses a la a Christian missionary. Hell, I love Top Gun but you don't see me begging girls on my street to have silent births do you? C'mon now, grow up.

Image

THE REAL TRUTH.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Cruise? Could be worse. by Chimera06 @ 09:19:25 on Aug 07
    RE: Cruise? Could be worse. by Chaotic Asimov @ 09:35:43 on Aug 07
       RE: Cruise? Could be worse. by Gary77 @ 21:26:04 on Aug 07
       RE: Cruise? Could be worse. by cdydatzigs @ 10:07:51 on Aug 07

Hold on there YODAOLDBOY..and co! | Report this post to moderator
By: Chaotic Asimov (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 08:13:49 on Aug 07, 2007 | Edit History (2)

This isn't so much as a response to YODA as a pre-emptive strike against all others who 'go' there about CRUISE and his beliefs...

Look, the guy is a bit out there. But if he is 'forcing' us to believe in Scientology then what is the rest of Hollywood doing with Global Warming?? Aren't we being forced to believe in something that some scientist question? I can't go anywhere with out some millionare jetsetter (like LEO and Al Gore and Sheryl Crow) telling me to cut back on driving my car while they do far more damage in one day leasing a leer-jet as I do in five years of driving my 4-cylinder Honda...And whether or not GLOBAL WARMING is true isn't the point. What is the point is that we are forced, much more so than Cruise, to believe in it for political reasons. (And since CHINA-INDIA will never go along with Global Warming solutions its all a bit moot anyway...but I digress)

As for Tom Cruise being in the movie? I have no problem with it. I have actually liked some of his movies. Not all, but some. The guy can act. His only problem is that he is 'kind' of out there. Kind of like Gene Roddenberry's IDIC crap that he was 'forcing' on us early convention goers. Yeah...IDIC crap. Oh, I believe in the concept..but not the mega-buck crap Roddenberry was hocking on us...

Sorry YODAOLDBOY, but I won't censor a person from STAR TREK because of his beliefs...What's next? Ban TOS from our children because SULU is gay????

Live and let live brother.

Chaotic


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Hold on there YODAOLDBOY..and co! by c.p. @ 14:54:22 on Aug 08
RE: Hold on there YODAOLDBOY..and co! by God @ 08:43:19 on Aug 07

Hanks | Report this post to moderator
By: Jodeo (Odo's file, contact) @ 08:07:38 on Aug 07, 2007

Hanks looks the part more than Cruise.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Star Trek and Austin Powers | Report this post to moderator
By: YodaOldBoy (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 07:51:24 on Aug 07, 2007

God help us, no! I just can't imagine any other reaction from the crowd watching the movie than the same one when it was revealed at the beginning of Austin Powers III: Goldmember that Austin was actually Tom Cruise. He just doesn't fit in Star Trek IMHO. And, this is more a question of ethics, but Star Trek encourages free-thinking while Tom Cruise is doing his best to brainwash America to believe in Scientology (or whatever) and reject any other way of thinking... not in my book a very Trekkian behavior and with the number of big stars in Hollywood, we can afford to reject this lunatic and get someone who actually likes the franchise and probably respects its ideals a little more (Tom Hanks anyone?).

--------

Lincoln Six-Echo: Who is 'God'?

McCord: You know when you really want something, you close your eyes and wish for it really hard? God is the guy that ignores you!



- The Island


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Star Trek and Austin Powers by prometheus 59650 @ 08:22:25 on Aug 07
    RE: Star Trek and Austin Powers by GustavoLeao @ 10:33:25 on Aug 07
    RE: Star Trek and Austin Powers by kc @ 08:29:28 on Aug 07
       RE: Star Trek and Austin Powers by prometheus 59650 @ 08:39:51 on Aug 07
          RE: Star Trek and Austin Powers by kc @ 17:52:21 on Aug 07
             RE: Star Trek and Austin Powers by prometheus 59650 @ 18:02:07 on Aug 07
                RE: Star Trek and Austin Powers by kc @ 09:35:32 on Aug 08
          RE: Star Trek and Austin Powers by Sam Cogley @ 10:34:04 on Aug 07
          RE: Star Trek and Austin Powers by Bean @ 09:03:24 on Aug 07
RE: Star Trek and Austin Powers by GustavoLeao @ 08:13:46 on Aug 07
    RE: Star Trek and Austin Powers by spockster @ 15:23:09 on Aug 07
    RE: Star Trek and Austin Powers by Chaotic Asimov @ 08:17:29 on Aug 07
       RE: Star Trek and Austin Powers by spockster @ 16:22:34 on Aug 07
Promenade
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.