menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

Ronald D. Moore Approves J.J. Abrams as New Trek XI Producer

Features

By GustavoLeao / 10:34, 24 October 2006 / General Star Trek

"I think it's an interesting move, and probably a good one for the franchise," Battlestar Galactica producer Ronald D. Moore told Star Trek Magazine when asked about the choice of J.J. Abrams as the new producer of the upcoming Star Trek XI.



"Abrams' lack of involvement in Star Trek is hopefully a positive thing, just as it was for Harve Bennett and Nick Meyer when they came in on Wrath of Khan. In that case, it let people take a clean look at The Original Series and wipe away a lot of sentimentality in an effort to get at the roots of what the show was and the results speak for themselves."

"I'm looking foward to seeing what Abrams comes up with."



More Top StoriesComments
Jul 03Orci and Kurtzman on Dealing with Fanboys, Say They Listen to the Online Fans4
Jul 03The Evolution of Generations : Part II Don't Miss the Conclusion to this In-Depth Analysis of the Film's Controversial Multiple Endings and the Death of James T. Kirk!5
Jul 03Cover and Info for William Shatner Presents TekWar Chronicles Issue 50
Jul 03First Photo of Chris Pine in New Post-Apocalyptic Horror Movie Carriers0
Jul 02The Evolution of Generations: a Scene-by-Scene Look at Three Different Prints Reveals Most Complete Analysis EVER of the Lost Footage, and the Editing Decisions!9
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

5 comments Post New | Help
View:

Remember the roles | Report this post to moderator
By: falcon (Odo's file, contact) @ 05:30:09 on Oct 25, 2006

Before everybody jumps on the JJ Bandwagon, let's remember a couple of definitions:

From Dictionary.com:

"Producer: a person responsible for the financial and administrative aspects of a stage, film, television, or radio production; the person who exercises general supervision of a production and is responsible chiefly for raising money, hiring technicians and artists, etc., required to stage a play, make a motion picture, or the like."

Now, realizing that producers lately also exercise great power over the general theme or direction of a film or TV series, let's also remember that the success or failure of any film rests on three things: (1) the script, (2) the director, and (3) the cast. While a producer supervises all aspects of the film, it's up to the other involved talent to pull it off. Of course, if they do, the producer looks like a hero. If they don't, usually it's the director who looks like the goat.

And let's remember, too, that even though JJ will be responsible for spending the money, Paramount Pictures will be responsible for giving it to him...and only they can say how much they're willing to spend. If JJ really wants to produce a blockbuster, don't be surprised if he begins bringing in other investors or production companies to help foot the bill. If the credits at the beginning read "A Paramount Picture - A J. J. Abrams Production", then you can bet Paramount's purse strings have him around the throat. If, however, the credits read "A J. J. Abrams - XYZ Films - Norway Company Production" (I threw the Norway name in there as a nod to the Great Bird) then there's money being spent from other sources and JJ is more free to pursue his own creative vision.

So, basically, everybody don't hold your breath until the film comes out, and ignore any rumors or unsubstantiated news items you may see -- let's just let this one percolate and see what comes out of the pot, m'kay?

--------

"I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by." - Douglas Adams



"Remind me to write an article on the compulsive reading of news. The theme will be that most neuroses can be traced to the unhealthy habit of wallowing in the troubles of five billion strangers." -- Robert Heinlein




falcon


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Remember the roles by EStillwell @ 14:49:47 on Oct 25
    RE: Remember the roles by falcon @ 16:03:16 on Oct 26

Ron Moore is GOD. | Report this post to moderator
By: MotherFraker (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 12:02:49 on Oct 24, 2006

Am I an admitted BATTLESTAR and Moore fanboy? Yes. So save your flames.

Is could he be more right on this point? No. His analysis of WRATH OF KHAN is so dead on. It's a reflection of what we've all been saying since VOYAGER drifed into irrelevance. (By the way, when was the last time your reflected on any VOYAGER episode? Exactly). New eyes, non-TREK eyes aren't only helpful sometimes, they're essential.

Did that work for Logan and NEMESIS? No, but he was beholden to Berman and Spiner.On reflection, Abrams is looking more and more like the best TREK news since... TNG's announcement?

So say we all, baby.



--------

'Risk IS our business' - Kirk.

Don't trust a snowman as far as you can throw it. Instead, shoot it in the face with a shotgun.

See new episodes of the ridiculous online comedy series

SNOWMEN HUNTERS every Wednesday at Zanzibar19.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Ron Moore is GOD. by Sxottlan @ 18:21:29 on Oct 24
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.