Brent Spiner is a very funny guy with a very dry sense of humour. HE'S JOKING for God's sake!
Brent Spiner has plenty to do what with the bombing of Threshold after 14 episodes. Whoops! Sorry Mr Spiner, hope I didn't hit a sore spot.
Didn't Mr. Spiner want to quit trek? Why is he crying about the new movie? Maybe he dosen't like not having anything to do...
--------
Spock: That unit is a woman.
Nomad: A mass of conflicting impulses.
Didn't Mr. Spiner want to quit trek? Why is he crying about the new movie? Maybe he dosen't like not having anything to do...
--------
Spock: That unit is a woman.
Nomad: A mass of conflicting impulses.
Why is Spiner bashing Enterprise anyway? I read in article not so long ago that said he was impressed with where it was headed before it was cancelled.
Data and Picard's Excellent Adventure
Spiner says Star Trek is supposed to be about "going forward". So whats his kickass idea? Bring back all the big villains from the franchise and face them off against all the good guys? How exactly is that moving forward?
--------

A Government in the position to know everything that you do
is in the position to control everything that you do.
RE: So...
by mustangman289 @ 17:35:59 on Sep 30
Just take a look at the numbers.
All six of the Original series movies made increadable profit(ok except for 5, but it still made pretty good money). TNG has only had one exceptionaly profitable movie, First Contact. If you were the head of a studio, which way would you go! Also I think the biggest problem with Nemisis was the fact that Spiner helped come up with the story line.
Just take a look at the numbers.
All six of the Original series movies made increadable profit(ok except for 5, but it still made pretty good money). TNG has only had one exceptionaly profitable movie, First Contact. If you were the head of a studio, which way would you go! Also I think the biggest problem with Nemisis was the fact that Spiner helped come up with the story line.
Quote:
Lets move forward already shall we? Bring on the 25th century...
What did Gene do after pumping out 6 TOS movies? Move ahead about 65 years into the future. Maybe we should now too.
Start a new movie or series in 2450 with a new cast on a new ship in a new area of space with new villians and new friends (like how Klingons were the main enemy in TOS but then allies in TNG, make say, the Romulans the new allies which would work, seeing as how Nemesis kinda laid the foundation for that).
But learn from the failures of TNG and the sucesses from DS9 and make the series a little darker, dealing with our imperfections or, like Roddenberry's original concept of social commentary. I'm sure someone can make a story arc about an enemy with completely opposite ideologies than the Federation.
Wanna talk about a "reboot?" Just start the franchise over in the future.
Its funny how TNG cast don’t like Abrams ideas. Its pretty obvious they want another pay day.
I never really thought I'd ever say this, especially considering how much I loved his character, but this guy whined for years and years about wanting out and killing his character. Finally he gets a buddy to write his character a pointless death. What do we care what he thinks anymore? These publications have nothing better to do than to keep tracking down these actors and asking them for the same sound bite over and over again?
By the way, that idea for Trek XI is awful.
This idea is just silly. The problem with recent Star Trek is it just wasn't relevant. Producers and excutives tried too hard not to rock the boat and lose either some of the fan base or mainstream appeal (what they determine is mainstream). When you create something based on demographics and allegiance to a fan base, it becomes impersonal, cold, irrelevant and meaningless. When Star Trek is at its best it is either dealing with 1) issues that folks care about deeply or, 2) characters that folks care about deeply in legitimate difficulty. Look to the original series to see how cutting edge it was socially. Look at the run from STII-IV for characters people care about a lot in basically the worst long-term situation of their lives. Look at the character arc of Spock, from enlightened/warm, to literally dead, to a shell of himself, then slowly finding himself again. The battles aren't the centerpiece of the action...simply dramatic elements through which the characters travel to get from one place to another. There has been virtually no consistent character development since DS9...my point is, if the prequel movies are about how Kirk got from some other place to becoming the mature Kirk that we know, and the same for Spock, that will be interesting. And not just a boring hero...we know Kirk is a womanizer, overly emotional...he makes mistakes...he's not perfect...that's interesting. And different...that will bet butts in seats. But it's also a risk. We'll see..
I think the biggest challenge facing Trek these days is to come up with something fresh and inventative. I think Spiner is right in that with a prequel movie they are doing nothing more than the ‘Go Back to Where They Once Were That We Never Saw' ideology. But conversely the TNG movies did the same thing, especially with the whole Data "personfication of this and that" we got dragged though.
Although I never favored the whole prequel notions (never watched Enterprise because of it) I am reluctantly optimistic about the Kirk/Spock thing. Esepcially given the choice of that over a Justice League of Star Trek BS. Thats just a stupidly insane idea, and once again shows they aren't looking forward. Just resurrecting old characters instead of making new ones.
Lets move forward already shall we? Bring on the 25th century...
I think the biggest challenge facing Trek these days is to come up with something fresh and inventative. I think Spiner is right in that with a prequel movie they are doing nothing more than the ‘Go Back to Where They Once Were That We Never Saw' ideology. But conversely the TNG movies did the same thing, especially with the whole Data "personfication of this and that" we got dragged though.
Although I never favored the whole prequel notions (never watched Enterprise because of it) I am reluctantly optimistic about the Kirk/Spock thing. Esepcially given the choice of that over a Justice League of Star Trek BS. Thats just a stupidly insane idea, and once again shows they aren't looking forward. Just resurrecting old characters instead of making new ones.
Lets move forward already shall we? Bring on the 25th century...
Well... I'm not sold on this idea... Bringing all the villians together sounds like a hard one to "top"...
And its action for the sake of action. Its not much of a story.
His comment about prequels, I will have to think about.
...I guess the cool thing for Trek actors now is to bash their series/movies.
Brent Spiner is infected with the Threshold Virus....You have to be insane or sick to the head to think that was a good idea for STXI. That absolutely sucks! Hey, I liked Nemesis, i thought it was ok...but compared to this idea, Nemesis would've been Oscar bound! Come on!
....Spiner gives the best justification for Trek XI yet.
Why is it that Spiner even thought that the phrase "the idea that John Logan and I had" should be said again? I liked Nemesis, but it is clear that lots of people here and everywhere despised it.
And the problem with Enterprise was not the prequel idea... it was Berman and Braga making it a prequel to the Berman and Braga Trekuniverse. Once Coto and the Stevenses got in there and they respected and liked TOS, the 4th season really was good.
Lastly-- anyone think like me that having a Data story as part of 3 of the 4 TNG movies was a bad idea? It was one of the weaker aspects of Generations, then we did it again in Insurrection, and then we did a neo-Lore story with B4 in Nemesis. Why did they take what was weak for one movie and make it the weakest aspect of 3 of them?
Killing Data was a relief to me, but in the scene where it is appearant that B4 would be back and the B story for the next 3-4 movies, I am so happy we are bailing on the TNG universe. If you want to talk about "where we have been before"-- it is the TNG movies and all the Data stuff.
--------
Oops. Double post.
--------
'Risk IS our business' - Kirk.
Don't trust a snowman as far as you can throw it. Instead, shoot it in the face with a shotgun.
See new episodes of the ridiculous online comedy series
SNOWMEN HUNTERS every Wednesday at Zanzibar19.
Umm... triple post?
--------
'Risk IS our business' - Kirk.
Don't trust a snowman as far as you can throw it. Instead, shoot it in the face with a shotgun.
See new episodes of the ridiculous online comedy series
SNOWMEN HUNTERS every Wednesday at Zanzibar19.
Oh, this is just ridiculous. It's like I've never used a computer at all. Folks, I'm sorry.
--------
'Risk IS our business' - Kirk.
Don't trust a snowman as far as you can throw it. Instead, shoot it in the face with a shotgun.
See new episodes of the ridiculous online comedy series
SNOWMEN HUNTERS every Wednesday at Zanzibar19.
So it turns out years of gold make-up leads to insanity.
I can't remember the last time I've heard an idea this bad. What makes this worse for me (an avowed rebooter) is he's so wrong about his idea being cool, and so right right about the inherent lameness of the prequel idea. Now that we know it's cannon and in the past, there's a certain edge that's gone to TREK 11. I'm sure Abrams can make it as well as it can be made, but since the announcement I'm surpised about how much I'm not interested.
The more I think about Spiner's idea, the more I wonder if the mediocrity of B&B was tolorated because the other powers that were close bye were known my Paramount to be much, much worse. Sorry Data.
--------
'Risk IS our business' - Kirk.
Don't trust a snowman as far as you can throw it. Instead, shoot it in the face with a shotgun.
See new episodes of the ridiculous online comedy series
SNOWMEN HUNTERS every Wednesday at Zanzibar19.
you have to imagine it (have imagination), plus like he said (the cost) if it had the money im sure it would work amazingly, but then i have a problem how do you get ricardo moltalban back! is he even still alive?, maybe not a good idea after all.
I haven't read anything that fanboy since "Prodigal's Return"
Brent, if you think THAT would have appealed to people I sincerely question your sanity.
--------
"We've been attacked by the intelligent, educated segment of our culture." ---Pastor Ray Mummert speaking of those who favor Darwinian Evolution over Intelligent Design.
"We, in this country, do not want for stupid people. Go outside, touch every third person, and you're gonna find an idiot."--- Judge Judith Sheindlin
"I’m tired of it year after year after year, having to chose between the lesser of who cares? Of trying to get myself excited about a candidate who can speak in complete sentences. Of setting the bar so low I can hardly look at it."--- Leo McGarry, The West Wing
Spiner and Logan's Trek XI = fanwank.
--------

The autumn days swung soft around me, like cotton on
my skin. But as the embers of the summer lost their
breath and disappeared, my heart went cold, and
only hollow rhythms resounded from within.
What a horrible idea. Talk about reducing Star Trek to comic book level. Much as I dislike the prequel idea, this crappy one makes it look like the spark of genius.
Thank God these two clowns were jettisoned unceremoniously from the Trek universe. Every fan should be breathing a sigh of relief.
--------
psp1
You have got to be shitting me. That's the stupidest idea I've ever heard.
RE: ...
by zirami @ 17:08:25 on Sep 29