menuBarBack
Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
News Story

Features

Abrams Cohorts Emphasize Respect for Mythology in Trek XI, Say Script Will Contain Old and New

Features

By Steve Krutzler / 17:07, 7 June 2006 / Feature Films

TrekWeb reader Christopher Allan Smith (MotherFraker) sent in the following report about Star Trek XI:

Recently, Jeff Goldsmith, Senior Editor for Creative Screenwriting Magazine, interviewed Alex Kurtzman and Roberto Orci about MISSION: IMPOSSIBLE 3 after a screening of the movie in May sponsored by the magazine. In the magazine's podcast, dated May 26, the duo gave the clearest indication yet of their plans for Star Trek XI.

Below is a word for word transcription of everything they said when asked about their pending Star Trek work. To this listener, it's the clearest indication yet they are not re-imagining (as this listener had hoped) but building on the current canon. Enjoy.

Question: I know you can't say much, but is there anything you could even tell us to interrelate you pick a starting point so vast and so rich as Star Trek?

A: There are pockets within the universe, and we know the mythology well, and we are fans of the novels that happen between the movies and all that kind of stuff, which aren't even counted as part of the mythology sometimes and we do know that there is a space to begin to see a lot of the origins of a lot of the things we know and we're going to start there. We're very mindful of being totally true to the mythology and totally true to what's come there, and in a way try to embrace the fact there's such a rich history to it that this is not a case of trying to come in and be so clever that you're going to reinvent everything. It's a case of coming in and using the stuff you know is great and you know really works and not violating anything that's come before it.

Question: So, are we able to say that this is going to be with characters we know or new characters which preceed the characters we know?

A: It will be a bit of both, I think. It will be both.

Link to magazine: http://www.creativescreenwriting.com/current.html

iTunes info: Go to Podcasts, Search for Creative Screenwriting, Episode
Dated May 26, 2006.
Podcast Timestamp 38 min. 33 seconds.



More Top StoriesComments
Nov 06Rumor Mill : Bryan Singer Battlestar Galactica Movie is Underway ?18
Nov 06Star Trek Online MMORPG Game Gameplay Trailer Released Online 2
Nov 06First Images from the Upcoming Star Trek The Art of the Film Book4
Nov 05Brent Spiner Criticizes Insurrection and Defends Nemesis, Stuart Baird and Rick Berman25
Nov 05J.J. Abrams in Talks to Produce Micronauts Movie7
Story Archives...Browse:   

Talkback

35 comments Post New | Help
View:

Trek XI is set between end of TOS & 1st film | Report this post to moderator
By: ShtuntBorg (Odo's file, contact) @ 01:27:01 on Jun 10, 2006

From their description it sounds like we'll get to see what happend in the 10 years between TOS and TMP.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Trek XI is set between end of TOS & 1st film by Cmdr. Riker @ 14:32:03 on Jun 10
    RE: Trek XI is set between end of TOS & 1st film by Capricorn Two @ 20:36:07 on Jun 10
       RE: Trek XI is set between end of TOS & 1st film by Mardus @ 09:19:46 on Jun 19
       RE: Trek XI is set between end of TOS & 1st film by Cmdr. Riker @ 20:05:26 on Jun 15
RE: Trek XI is set between end of TOS & 1st film by Capricorn Two @ 09:24:40 on Jun 10

I'm On Board | Report this post to moderator
By: c.p. (Odo's file, contact) @ 07:15:59 on Jun 08, 2006

A reimaging or not, I'm on board with any group that respects Star Trek and approaches it with excitement, talent and humility. I'm on board with anyone who sees it not as a dead franchise, but a rich mythology whose best movies could be ahead of it.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Fans of the novel, eh? | Report this post to moderator
By: MikeNinNH (Odo's file, contact) @ 06:50:58 on Jun 08, 2006

They talk about being fans of the novels though they're not counted as canon, and being able to see some origins. They also talk about a mix of old and new characters. I can't help but think of the ST Novel "Final Frontier" when they talk about that. It shows young Kirk, his father, Robert April and the launching of NCC-1701, some Romulan mythos, and old Kirk at the farm reminiscing. I've always thought it'd make a good movie...

--------

-----

"Who are you, and how did you get in here??"

"I'm a locksmith, and... I'm a locksmith".

- "Police Squad"


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Fans of the novel, eh? by OV-101 @ 21:04:22 on Jun 09
    RE: Fans of the novel, eh? by Capricorn Two @ 03:57:50 on Jun 10
       RE: Fans of the novel, eh? by GustavoLeao @ 09:24:54 on Jun 11
RE: Fans of the novel, eh? by falcon @ 05:15:22 on Jun 09
    RE: Fans of the novel, eh? by MikeNinNH @ 11:04:25 on Jun 09

Nice to get that load off my back | Report this post to moderator
By: Anarchos (Odo's file, contact) @ 06:23:10 on Jun 08, 2006

Count me in as someone who is relieved it's not a reboot. I'd rather a movie set around... I dunno, Janice Lester, than a reboot.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

YAY! | Report this post to moderator
By: Hbasm (Odo's file, contact) @ 00:57:39 on Jun 08, 2006

NOT a reimagining! I'm so releaved! :-) That's the best news I've heard in a long time. Thanks!


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

TNG | Report this post to moderator
By: zak (Odo's file, contact) @ 21:53:52 on Jun 07, 2006

Whatever else, I would be exponentially more excited about a film that involved - even tangentially - the ST crew of TNG, than one that went way back to TOS.
I love TOS, but I love TNG more. I didn't see anything incompatible in the question and answers in the writing being framed around the time TNG took place versus TOS; and I hope that's the way it turns out to be.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: TNG by the quickening @ 05:48:18 on Jun 08
    RE: TNG by zak @ 08:12:36 on Jun 08
       RE: TNG by the quickening @ 15:13:56 on Jun 09
          RE: TNG by Mardus @ 09:41:16 on Jun 19
          RE: TNG again by zak @ 22:58:52 on Jun 09
             RE: TNG again by the quickening @ 04:59:43 on Jun 12

My mind is at ease | Report this post to moderator
By: MotherFraker (Odo's file, contact, web site) @ 20:48:42 on Jun 07, 2006

While I have been a vocal, though hopefully not shrill, proponant of rebooting, a few things seem pretty clear to me from the words of Kurtzman and Orci.

1. They are real fans. Rather than just yap about how TREK is part of American mythology and be done with a sop to the fans, they really know the difference between how novels fit (or don't) into cannon and what really 'counts' as TREK. That tells me they aren't BSing about knowing and loving this lore. They love this like we do. And that if they are BSing, they've done so much research they know the minefileds, and I'm comfortable with them giving this a whack. (Could they do worse than Logan?)

2. Also, they talk about not violating what's come before, which again could be a sop to hair-trigger internet bashers, but I don't think it is. What most of this interview was about was MI3, and how they slipped into a universe they did not create and were able to integrate their ideas about character and drama and have it fit into what had come before. They gave Ethan Hunt a personal side never seen, but it worked. The result: what many (including this writer) think is by far the best MI movie yet.

3. They reference origins. There are only two main patches of undiscovered country in TREK today: the span between ENTERPRISE and TOS and between TOS era movies and TNG. I really doubt they're eager to lay their dramatic microscope on the orgins of Captain Picard. This might not be a STARFLEET ACADEMY story, but it's definately a TOS origin story. Speaking as someone who tells stories for a living, studies how they're constructed, listens to writers a lot, something in the way they answered suggests they might have Kirk and Spock, but in smaller roles than we all now suspect. I wouldn't be surprised if they turned out to be supporting players in service of main characters wholly created by Abrams, Kurtzman and Orci. That's just a hunch.

4. This one is most important, and hopeful, to me: They respect but are not bound by what is often misunderstood as cannon. Quite a bit of the bashing ENTERPRISE got was because it didn't comport with the origins of the Federation/Starfleet as laid down by non-cannonal sources, i.e. novels and reference books. The Encyclopedia nor Chronology count as cannon. Only what was on screen, or can reasonably inferred from being on screen, count (an item agreed upon by both the authors of the Chronology and Encyclopedia). If the inferrence as put down in those sources is later contradicted by something onscreen, out the written sources go. I'm glad to see they seem to be taking this track.

I, for one, am now very interested in coming TREK like I haven't been for a long time.

Now, if they only hadn't seemed so proud of their work on ZORRO 2...

--------

'Risk IS our business' - Kirk


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: My mind is at ease by TheJedi @ 07:46:23 on Jun 10
    RE: My mind is at ease by Mardus @ 00:32:22 on Jun 20

Sounds okay to me... | Report this post to moderator
By: AX (Odo's file, contact) @ 18:09:19 on Jun 07, 2006

I was never against the reimagining idea like some people, but I've never seen any reason for it either. There's nothing wrong with the universe we have. Huge movies like LoTR and Star Wars have proven that a complex history and mythology can be a great asset for a movie. It seems silly to get rid of one of Trek's assets.

The franchises problems rest not in the universe, but in the writing. Good writing set in a reimagined Star Trek universe will still be good writing, but good writing set against a complex backdrop makes suspension of disbelief easier. Obviously the writers could CREATE a new backdrop based on our current universe, but there's something about a universe created through five TV shows that feels more organic I think.

The disadvantage is what I like to call the Enterprise Season Four problem. Most of us agree that season four was the best season of Enterprise, but it had one major flaw that I think (as though I know anything) made sure those falling ratings continued to fall which is that it packed every episode with throw backs and references to the other shows. Obviously having something in the background is cool, but when it feels like the show is breaking the fourth wall (you know, they mention some inane piece of triva and you can almost feel the writers winking at you).

We need this movie to not be a triva movie, but that is very possible in the current universe--IMHO.

--------

"Time is a face on the water."



-Stephen King, The Dark Tower Series-


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Sounds okay to me... by MotherFraker @ 20:54:43 on Jun 07
RE: Sounds okay to me... by BellaOxmyx @ 19:35:02 on Jun 07

I only care about this film if Shatner and Nimoy are involved | Report this post to moderator
By: NEXUS (Odo's file, contact) @ 17:17:07 on Jun 07, 2006

I really don't have any intrest in a prequel unless Shatner and Nimoy are involved (as Kirk and Spock) in some way or another.

If they did framing scenes at the start and end of the film that somehow suggest Kirk is alive I (and most people I know who think ST died w/Kirk)will be there.

Otherwise, I have no desire to see Star Trek 90210.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2009 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.