menuBarBack
blogging the final frontier since 1996        Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Schedule
boxBottom
Advanced Search
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
Feature Story

Features

Deus: "Divergence" Wraps Up STAR TREK "Valentine" Amiably, Phlox Shines

Features

By O. Deus / 07:27, 28 February 2005 / ENTERPRISE Reviews

Reviews Ex Deus

Title: "Divergence"

Overall: 8
Performances: 7.5
Writing: 7.5
Direction: 8
FX & Prod Value: 8.5


Synopsis: Columbia and Enterprise team up to rescue Phlox.

Review: In retrospect, it seems as if "Divergence" and "Affliction" would have made stronger episodes if they were aired together as one large two-parter, the way some TNG and VOYAGER episodes have been in the past. While it's an entertaining episode, "Divergence" is following up on far too much of the plot "Affliction" set into place to be as strong on its own.

Columbia's rescue of Enterprise is probably ENT's best use of ship and character-based special effects since "Minefield" and arguably surpasses it. It also has the sense of adventure and excitement that ENT has been sorely lacking for some time. Indeed the scene is spectacular enough that even on its own it's likely to be remembered for some time.

Phlox, arguably the show's best character and who has been all too often neglected, has gotten a much needed focus in "Affliction" and "Divergence" and it seems fitting that he is the one offering the ultimatum to the Admiral, rather than Archer. Not just because using biological weapons seems a bit of a stretch for Starfleet (though not so much of one considering "For The Uniform") but because it lets Phlox shine in a completely unexpected scene that would have been a cliche had it featured Archer.

Trip's sulking is, however, still tedious but at least it's understated now and for once we actually get to see why he's considered a great chief engineer in one of the more exciting engineering crisis scenes since Scotty was drinking and powering up warp engines on the old Enterprise (no bloody A,B,C,D or E). This is all the more of an accomplishment considering ENT's rather boring warp engine, which unlike the spectacular lava lamp engines of TNG and VOY is really nothing to look at. The Director of the episode also appears to be experimenting with smash zooms that are somewhat cliched as a technique but bring a little life to the action scenes.

The sense of galactic politics and scale isn't nearly as strong in "Divergence" with a lot of the material losing steam along the way and becoming reduced to individual character conflicts. Still, Reed's moral dilemma is well played even if it's not quite as gripping as it should be. The plot involving the Klingon general and his son is as hopeless as Archer's brow ridges. Archer, meanwhile, once again in two months risks his life to expose himself to a virus for the greater good. There simply have been a few too many stories in which Archer is ready to give his life in suicidal actions and it's almost as if he has a death wish by now.

Archer's role in the episode is really nothing too spectacular, especially considering that his best moment of the episode involves talking to his dog. Bakula himself may look back proudly on his ENT acting days if he chooses to, but the scene of him writhing with the virus won't be one of them. Instead it's one of the unintentionally funniest bits of the series. His brow ridges though seem like a nice TOS reference to James Kirk's romulan ears, left over from "The Enterprise Incident."

And it is scenes and references like that, which tell you that even if Manny Coto's season four doesn't always get it right, its heart is in the right place and so is "Divergence"'s sprit. While the episode falters in places it is ultimately a work of love and a valentine to STAR TREK. It should be remembered as one.

Next week: Temporal incursions better known as reruns.



More Top StoriesComments
May 23William Shatner to Host Screenings of Wrath of Khan, Discuss His Opinion on Into Darkness and the Star Trek Franchise 0
May 23Into Darkness Star Zoe Saldana on Upcoming 1883 Magazine Cover0
May 23Damon Lindelof Opens Up on His Work on Into Darkness, Talks About the Future of Star Trek Franchise Post-J.J. Abrams14
May 23Cover for Upcoming Novel Star Trek The Fall Revelation and Dust0
May 20Pre-Order Star Trek Into Darkness on DVD and Blu-Ray on Amazon2
Story Archives...Browse:   
Recent Reviews
Feb 21Affliction22
Feb 14The Aenar37
Feb 7"United"28
Jan 31Babel One36
Jan 24Observer Effect27
More Reviews...
ENTERPRISE Mission Schedule | Logs by Season: 1 2 3 4
Episode Number Title Airdate

Talkback

15 comments Post New | Help
View:

SEE!! | Report this post to moderator
By: alexkidd (Odo's file, contact) @ 23:58:07 on Feb 28, 2005 | Edit History (1)

All I can hope is that the fanboys on this page who think every Enterprise ep is a 10 out of 10 can now see what a good episode is really suppose to be like.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: SEE!! by Kiwi6009 @ 11:24:06 on Mar 03

SEE!! | Report this post to moderator
By: alexkidd (Odo's file, contact) @ 23:58:03 on Feb 28, 2005

All I can hope is that the fanboys on this page who think every Enterprise ep is a 10 out of 10 can now see what a good episode is really suppose to be like.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

What the?! | Report this post to moderator
By: deltaflyer (Odo's file, contact) @ 15:46:46 on Feb 28, 2005

No mention of Section 31 plot...

--------

Yes I am Australian...AND NO I DO NOT OWN A KANGAROO! And it's typical that we were made the last ones to join the federation....


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Well, well, well.... | Report this post to moderator
By: Hepkat (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:01:17 on Feb 28, 2005 | Edit History (1)

I have to say, despite the shady physics and a storytelling hiccup here and there, both Diversion and Affliction stand out as some of the best episodes of Enterprise to date. B&B, are you listening? THIS IS WHAT YOU SHOULD HAVE BEEN WRITING in season 1 instead of showing us a crew of arrogant, incompetent, self-righteous characters poking their noses in the affairs of species and being bossed around by evil Vulcans. Although Coto is not perfect, he seems to know a thing or two about how to write a prequel that fits in with established canon. No one's interested in seeing Enterprise spread American style freedom around the galaxy, no one's interested in a condescending Vulcan science officer barking at the crew, no one's interested in some drawn out, senseless time-travel crapperoo lasting one entire season that was never intelligently resolved.

We want to see issues that tie in and relate to the TOS/TNG world, we want to see a captain capable of making competent decisions, not putting the welfare of his dog before that of his crew. We have been craving this for over three years now, and now that the writers finally have someone that understands these things, it's unfortunately TOO LATE!

Way to go B&B...I should sue your asses for incompetence.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

A good engineer, not Tucker, would know... | Report this post to moderator
By: TRexx (Odo's file, contact) @ 08:24:31 on Feb 28, 2005

Quote from O. Deus:
Columbia's rescue of Enterprise is probably ENT's best use of ship and character-based special effects since "Minefield" and arguably surpasses it.


Good grief, that SPEED rip-off was awful. The ships had to be within 50 meters of each other, so Reed used a fixed tether of only 60 meters length?! Idiot. And once the NX-01 warp system was shut down, they could've immediately dropped out of warp to purge the Klingon algorithms at their leisure.

The writers are creating nonsense in their rush to prove that Tucker isn't a Huckleberry, including his grade-school remark to T'Pol last week: "A good engineer can see the differences". True to B&B's storytelling style, everyone around Tucker, including his replacement, is made to look dull so that Huckleberry can look sharp.


--------------
Star Trek vets surmise the franchise
Image


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Good Review | Report this post to moderator
By: EntFan! (Odo's file, contact) @ 08:18:10 on Feb 28, 2005

I enjoyed these two episodes. Yet, part of me wishes that Starfleet had "lost the day"...that Phlox realizes the only way the Klingon people would survive was to make them all Augments.

It would make for an interesting connection between Kor, Koloth and Kang and there long life spans, it just becomes harder and harder to believe any creature can push 150+ years.

On a side note, this ties in well to the Romulan head ridges as well. Think about it, the Klingons and Romulans go into an alliance, the Romulans give the Klingons cloaking technology, the Klingons give them augment genetics. In the end the Romulans lose their head ridges during TOS as well....

--------

"Being A Jackass Is Not A Talent, It's A Science"

...Quoted By Me While Passed Out Drunk



"Live Hard, Die Young, And Leave A Good Looking Corpse!"

--Kindred: The Embraced



"I didn't want to be drunk in pub-lic, these assholes through me out into pub-lic, I want to be drunk in a bar...arrest them!"

-Ron White



ULTIMATE PROOF WHY NO FAN SHOULD BE IN CHARGE OF STAR TREK



Image


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Good Review by Cylykon @ 13:57:34 on Feb 28
RE: Good Review by Cap'n Calhoun @ 10:05:44 on Feb 28
    RE: Good Review by EntFan! @ 10:10:34 on Feb 28

archer in agony | Report this post to moderator
By: dropdeadnelixx (Odo's file, contact) @ 07:54:47 on Feb 28, 2005

agree with deus on that one...i had to nearly look away it was so bad


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
Bakula Sucks Big Time by NAFF @ 08:05:28 on Mar 04
RE: archer in agony by Kiwi6009 @ 11:26:13 on Mar 03
I Liked The Feet by Jean-Luc @ 12:52:34 on Mar 01
RE: archer in agony by Locutus @ 12:19:38 on Mar 01
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us |
This website is not endorsed, sponsored or affiliated with CBS Studios Inc. or the "Star Trek" franchise.
The STAR TREK trademarks and logos are owned by CBS Studios Inc.
© 1996-2012 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.