menuBarBack
blogging the final frontier since 1996        Beam Up News | Join | Your Account
Home
Schedule
boxBottom
Advanced Search
boxBottom
News Tribblets
boxBottom
Stardates Calendar
Feature Story

Features

Reviews Ex Deus Return to Examine 2005's First New Installment: "Daedalus"

Features

By O. Deus / 22:24, 16 January 2005 / ENTERPRISE Reviews

Reviews Ex Deus

Title: "Daedalus"

Overall: Overall
Performances: Performances
Writing: Writing
Direction: Directing
FX & Prod Value: FX etc


Synopsis: When an old friend of Archer's family, who also happens to be the inventor of the Transporter, comes on board, Archer endangers his ship and crew to try and help him save his son.

Review: "Daedalus" is in some ways an inverted version of STAR TREK: DEEP SPACE NINE's classic and beloved episode "The Visitor." Where "The Visitor" was the struggle of Jake Sisko to recover his father at great sacrifice, to end in reunion and relief, "Daedalus" inverts this story in more ways than one by portraying it as the struggle of a father to save his son and a struggle that is ultimately misguided and hopeless.

The episode also contains elements from such classic STAR TREK episodes as "The Conscience of the King" and TNG's "Too Short A Season", though in quality it is closer to the latter than any of the forementioned. While "Daedaleus" is a competent episode, it is ultimately not a great one, which it could have been. Still, in this and a number of ways "Daedalus" reflects ENTERPRISE's closeness to the original series.

Through Archer's conversations with Emory we have a better picture of the men who helped pioneer the early rough and tumble days of Starfleet and the sacrifices they made. The transporter takes on a different tinge when we begin to consider that men and women had to die to create it. As with many great inventions, there are great sacrifices to be made and Emory represents the Promothean fate of those who try to bring the fire of science to man.

STAR TREK has not had good luck with geniuses who come on board to test new experiments. Consider Daystrom of the Original Series' "The Ultimate Computer", which this episode also draws from in some ways. Then we have "Where No One Has Gone Before", in which the Enterprise-D ends up discovering all sorts of distant galaxies full of pretty lights. And already this season ENTERPRISE's three-episode encounter with Dr. Soong does not end on a particularly high note. All in all, it seems as if the next time a scientific genius tries to come onboard Enterprise they should strongly consider blasting him out of space before it's too late.

Science and scientific invention are often abstract qualities. An inventor, a central inventor, as increasingly outmoded as such things may be, helps personalize the invention as a human product rather than an abstract mechanical one. The machine, the computer, the technology is given certain human qualities or at least made more personal by attaching a human story to it. And while STAR TREK is science fiction, it is often light science fiction that can slip into the conventional luddite demonizations of science. "Daedalus" is fortunately not such an episode and while Emory is not particularly moral, he is human rather than villanous. Like many great Original Series episodes, the character of Emory is worked out and defined and made human and his failings make him all the more fallible when playing god. Indeed "Daedalus"' greatest failing as an episode may be the miscasting of Emory in a role that required a greater and far more capable actor in it.

To have been truly great, "Daedalus" needed its own Tony Todd, who played the adult Jake Sisko on "The Visitor." Sadly it had Bill Cobbs, an actor better known for sitcom roles and playing cranky old men cliches in tv and film than in serious acting. Here, he is simply not up to the part which required an actor with a strong theatrical background.

Additionally the episode suffers from occasional abrupt editing that may be caused by reduction in allowed episode running time. The entire device of Emory's son appearing as a ghost is a potentially interesting one and was used to great effect in "The Visitor." However having him appear as a dangerous formless being who kills and in poltergist style destroys equipment and walls was a far more dubious choice. It provided the element of danger and suspense but it's not altogether certain that these elements were needed or had to be created in this way. While it made both Emory and Archer's choices more difficult and controversial, in some ways the danger distracted from the core of the story by turning Quinn into a roving danger prowling the ship. Had the danger come from the Barrens themselves and Enterprise's exposure to a dangerous area of space, that might have made the moral dillema less cartoonish and put the focus back on Emory.

Ultimately, like the Augments three-part episode, "Daedalus" is about the tragedy of a genius falling through his own conscience and the decisions he makes.

Next week: Crew members are experimented on and PETA never leaps to object.



More Top StoriesComments
Oct 13Babylon 5 Producer J. Michael Straczynski on His Unproduced Star Trek Reboot0
Oct 13Zachary Quinto Says New Trek Movie Will Present TOS Characters in a Different Way7
Oct 12Roberto Orci and Alex Kurtzman to Write Star Trek Countdown Prequel Comic Book ?3
Oct 11J.J. Abrams Says New Star Trek Movie Does Not Feel Like a Reboot or Prequel5
Oct 11Comics Review : Star Trek Mirror Images Issue 40
Story Archives...Browse:   
Recent Reviews
Jan 24Observer Effect18
Dec 7Kir'Shara73
Nov 29Awakening46
Nov 22The Forge44
Nov 15The Augments58
More Reviews...
ENTERPRISE Mission Schedule | Logs by Season: 1 2 3 4
Episode Number Title Airdate

Talkback

23 comments Post New | Help
View:

DS9 | Report this post to moderator
By: OB (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:23:11 on Jan 20, 2005

This is my first post. I've always found it interesting that so many people on this website seem to really like DS9. I've probably only seen maybe half of the DS9 episodes, whereas I've seen every episode of TOS, TNG, and Enterprise, and probably 80% of Voyager episodes. I lost interest early on with DS9, but came back to it in the later seasons, when it held my interest more consistently. I'd like to give the show a second chance, and am considering buying a season or two on DVD. I am curious to know what season(s) of DS9 you fans of DS9 would recommend.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: DS9 by Cap'n Calhoun @ 01:53:24 on Jan 25
RE: DS9 by NAFF @ 11:57:47 on Jan 20

Daystrom Revisited | Report this post to moderator
By: zak (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:51:39 on Jan 18, 2005

I'm usually one who really loves most of the Enterprise episodes. Daedalus,however, was a disappointment. It seemed largely a kind of remake of the DAYSTROM TOS story only with a slight twist. (Noting also the DS9 THE VISITOR). Both the TOS Daystrom and Daedalus stories were about someone who gained great fame at an early age, who found he could never match that again. True, here we also had his son Quinn who had disappeared years before and still somehow existed in some subspatial anomoly or bubble. (But, Quinn really just took the place of Daestroms computer in the TOS episode which, if you recall, had been programmed with Daestroms engrams and so was, (I hate to say it) kind of like Daystrom's son in that story), In Daedalus, the story seemed to be about attempts to get the inventors son back. While in the DAYSTROM chronicle, it was to prove the superiority of the computer. Not all that different. I saw an obvious parallel between the two stories. And,as such, the ending wasn't at all surprisng.

Unfortunately, the inventors ultimate plight, as it was also for Daystrom, seemed kind of dreary, desperate and totally hopeless from the start.

There were other problems in the way the story unfolded as well, or, at least, things that grated on me as I watched. First, there were the almost inexplicable tirades that Archer made in response to very justified crew concerns that he was acting out of personal concern and not being objective. Archer's behavior seemed unexpectedly dictatorial and totally out of character.

It seemed further out of character for Archer later to tell Trip he was on the edge of insubordination if he dared to question his (Archer's) decision again. Worse, on top of that, Archer never showed even one single moment of self-reflection about his behavior, or his decisions. Not once did he look at his angry responses to those concerns, not when they happened, not right after they happened, not later. And, all of that seemed totally out of character.

I've really enjoyed ENTERPRISE this season. And,
after a series of, what I found to be, largely stellar (no pun intended) episodes up till now, one after the other (with of course there always being some things that could've been better, but all vastly entertaining, and nicely presented consecutively), this dreary drama was a disappointment
Perhaps it hit me in the wrong way or at the wrong time,as even DEUS saw many more redeeming qualities in it than I did.(Even the conversations between Trip and T'pal seemed forced, awkward and unlikely.

Nevertheless, it hasn't daunted my overall enthusiasm for the series, but when Daedalus rolls around again as a repeat, it's likely I'll be somewhere else.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Daystrom Revisited | Report this post to moderator
By: zak (Odo's file, contact) @ 10:51:03 on Jan 18, 2005

I'm usually one who really loves most of the Enterprise episodes. Daedalus,however, was a disappointment. It seemed largely a kind of remake of the DAYSTROM TOS story only with a slight twist. (Noting also the DS9 THE VISITOR). Both the TOS Daystrom and Daedalus stories were about someone who gained great fame at an early age, who found he could never match that again. True, here we also had his son Quinn who had disappeared years before and still somehow existed in some subspatial anomoly or bubble. (But, Quinn really just took the place of Daestroms computer in the TOS episode which, if you recall, had been programmed with Daestroms engrams and so was, (I hate to say it) kind of like Daystrom's son in that story), In Daedalus, the story seemed to be about attempts to get the inventors son back. While in the DAYSTROM chronicle, it was to prove the superiority of the computer. Not all that different. I saw an obvious parallel between the two stories. And,as such, the ending wasn't at all surprisng.

Unfortunately, the inventors ultimate plight, as it was also for Daystrom, seemed kind of dreary, desperate and totally hopeless from the start.

There were other problems in the way the story unfolded as well, or, at least, things that grated on me as I watched. First, there were the almost inexplicable tirades that Archer made in response to very justified crew concerns that he was acting out of personal concern and not being objective. Archer's behavior seemed unexpectedly dictatorial and totally out of character.

It seemed further out of character for Archer later to tell Trip he was on the edge of insubordination if he dared to question his (Archer's) decision again. Worse, on top of that, Archer never showed even one single moment of self-reflection about his behavior, or his decisions. Not once did he look at his angry responses to those concerns, not when they happened, not right after they happened, not later. And, all of that seemed totally out of character.

I've really enjoyed ENTERPRISE this season. And,
after a series of, what I found to be, largely stellar (no pun intended) episodes up till now, one after the other (with of course there always being some things that could've been better, but all vastly entertaining, and nicely presented consecutively), this dreary drama was a disappointment
Perhaps it hit me in the wrong way or at the wrong time,as even DEUS saw many more redeeming qualities in it than I did.(Even the conversations between Trip and T'pal seemed forced, awkward and unlikely.

Nevertheless, it hasn't daunted my overall enthusiasm for the series, but when Daedalus rolls around again as a repeat, it's likely I'll be somewhere else.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Well, I liked it... | Report this post to moderator
By: Cap'n Calhoun (Odo's file, contact) @ 01:55:30 on Jan 18, 2005

I thought this was a really strong stand-alone episode. I'm surprised that there haven't been more positive comments so far. The twist was a little obvious, but I liked the subtlety of the title (as SkyGuy pointed out), the strong guest star (in my opinion), the truly human (if a bit confusing) plot, the mention of all of the concerns with early transporters that fleshed out the universe a little more (although I'm still hoping Enterprise will show a case of transporter psychosis ["Realm of Fear", TNG] someday), and the wonderful resolution to some of the T'Pol subplots that they managed to sneak in (as deltaflyer mentioned). It's not the best episode of all time, but it was a good, strong stand-alone ep.

Incidentally, Deus, are you still giving numeric ratings? Last few epsiodes, all I've seen is:

Quote:
Title: "Daedalus" [or whatever]

Overall: Overall
Performances: Performances
Writing: Writing
Direction: Directing
FX & Prod Value: FX etc



--------

"You know what six movies average out to be really good? The first six Star Trek movies!" -- Fry, Futurama


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Well, I liked it... by timclim @ 04:12:37 on Jan 18

B-plot?? | Report this post to moderator
By: deltaflyer (Odo's file, contact) @ 22:17:30 on Jan 17, 2005

I liked the review but there's no mention of the T'pol B-plot which in my opinion was excellent...quite an oversight. After all T'pol is becoming more rational, more Vulcan and this was a defining episode for her character.

--------

Yes I am Australian...AND NO I DO NOT OWN A KANGAROO! And it's typical that we were made the last ones to join the federation....


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

A more concise review of Daedalus | Report this post to moderator
By: kzoodata (Odo's file, contact) @ 22:09:06 on Jan 17, 2005

sssnnnnnnnxxxxxxx........


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Enough with the wretched comparisons to Deep Sleep 9. | Report this post to moderator
By: motionblur (Odo's file, contact) @ 21:29:46 on Jan 17, 2005

Newsflash: DS9 was terrible. It suffered from worse acting than YOV and was boring as hell. Give it up already!


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Enough with the wretched comparisons to Deep Sleep 9. by Steve Krutzler @ 10:09:35 on Jan 18
    Actually, it's the reverse. by motionblur @ 20:49:50 on Jan 18
       RE: Actually, it's the reverse. by EdoGod @ 00:10:53 on Jan 20
       RE: Actually, it's the reverse. by EdoGod @ 00:10:29 on Jan 20
RE: Enough with the wretched comparisons to Deep Sleep 9. by kzoodata @ 22:04:07 on Jan 17

ep title | Report this post to moderator
By: SkyGuy (Odo's file, contact) @ 15:26:28 on Jan 17, 2005

Deus wrote
"... the tragedy of a genius falling through his own conscience and the decisions he makes."

Deus, I'm surprised you didn't bring home the ep title to support this point. Part way through watching it, I realized that the "anomaly" was Emory's lost son -- that Emory was "Daedalus" and his son was "Icarus" who disregarded his father's warnings and figuratively "flew too close to the Sun." Though the ep wasn't all that great, Coto & Co. should be commended for bringing in this TOS-like play on words.


--------

Image



GET A LIFE, will you people? I mean, for crying out loud, it's just a TV show!.... You've turned an enjoyable little job, that I did as a lark for a few years, into a COLOSSAL WASTE OF TIME! -- William Shatner on Saturday Night Live (1986)


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Deus you're far too kind | Report this post to moderator
By: Sphire (Odo's file, contact) @ 14:38:17 on Jan 17, 2005

After the mostly negative reviews you gave to other S4 episodes that were far superior to this one, I'm surprised you weren't harder on Daedalus. The things you cited as the episode's failings (i.e. Bill Cobbs, the destructive ghost) were actually the strongest points in my opinion. Everything else was badly conceived and executed.

They really dropped the ball by only briefly addressing the practical and philosophical consequences of transporter technology. There's a great episode to be made on that subject alone, and this wasn't it. Coto has been mostly hitting the right notes this season, so it's disappointing that he missed such an obvious opportunity.

Overall, this was a tedious, ponderous, poorly-written episode that would not have been out of place in the first two seasons. I almost fell asleep more than once. The episode basically kneecapped itself by revealing Erickson's true intentions so early. It would have had far more dramatic resonance if the true nature of the ghost, and Erickson's knowledge of it, would have been revealed closer to the end.

The scenes between Trip and T'Pol were horribly written. Trineer was probably trying his best under the circumstances, but Blalock is obviously losing interest fast. There's a difference between acting reserved and not acting at all, and Blalock phoned in that performance. Bakula fared no better. When he was barking orders at Trip, he just didn't have the air of authority that Stewart or Brooks would have.

And once again, there were negligible roles for Travis and Hoshi. This would make a good running joke, if not for the fact that it stopped being funny about two seasons ago. Either use them or drop them, because this is getting ridiculous.

After some impressive episodes this season, this was a real letdown. The fact that ENT's worst episode of the season aired the same night as BSG's premiere will make ENT look even more inferior than it already is.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Odyssey 5 Girl | Report this post to moderator
By: sbender (Odo's file, contact) @ 12:14:23 on Jan 17, 2005 | Edit History (1)

sorry, double post


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote

Odyssey 5 Girl | Report this post to moderator
By: sbender (Odo's file, contact) @ 12:14:07 on Jan 17, 2005

Did anyone besides me recognize the girl from Odyssey 5 in this episode? I bet Manny Coto had something to do with that.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: Odyssey 5 Girl by Jadzia-Dax @ 15:58:27 on Jan 18

A cheap episode... | Report this post to moderator
By: NAFF (Odo's file, contact) @ 09:13:49 on Jan 17, 2005

...and not a good one.

At least the high-jinks of previous Season 4 episodes have gone.

And so, it seems, has the budget.

This was like a Next Gen 'B' story.

And that is all the discussion this episode deserves.


Reply
Reply
Quote
Quote
RE: A cheap episode... by EdoGod @ 13:31:54 on Jan 17
RE: A cheap episode... by neshama @ 11:35:47 on Jan 17
Promenade










TrekWeb Merchants
Amazon.com
Amazon.co.uk
Amazon.ca
Amazon.de
Barnes & Noble

Get Firefox!
Privacy Policy | About Us | Legal Notice | Contact Us | | Get Firefox!
© 1996-2007 TrekWeb.com and Steve Krutzler. All rights reserved.